Using video technology to enable student voice in assessment feedback

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 1092-1105

  Van der Kleij, Fabienne ^a   Adie, Lenore ^a   Cumming, Joy ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; TEACHING;

FEEDBACK MESSAGES; FEEDBACK PROCESS; FEEDBACK RESEARCHES; PILOT PROJECTS; SELF REFLECTION; SENDER AND RECEIVERS; STUDENT PERSPECTIVES; VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85008253021     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12536     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2013). The shape of the Australian curriculum. V4.0. Sydney, NSW: ACARA.
2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74.
3. Cann, A. (2014). Engaging students with audio feedback. Bioscience Education, 22, 31–41.
4. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205–249.
5. Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Maw, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K., et al., (2012). The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students?. Computers and Education, 58, 386–396.
6. Debuse, J. C. W., & Lawley, M. (2016). Benefits and drawbacks of computer-based assessment and feedback systems: student and educator perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 294–301.
7. Elwood, J., & Murphy, P. (2015). Assessment systems as cultural scripts: a sociocultural theoretical lens on assessment practice and products. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22, 182–192.
8. Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In P. Alexander & R. E. Mayer (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 249–271). New York: Routledge.
9. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
10. Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38, 21–27. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
11. Hawe, E., & Parr, J. (2013). Assessment for Learning in the writing classroom: an incomplete realisation. The Curriculum Journal, 25, 210–237.
12. Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 861–878.
13. Nicol, D., & McFarlane-Dick, D. (2007). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.
14. OECD. (2010). Singapore: rapid improvement followed by strong performance. Retrieved 21 November, 2016, from https://www.oecd.org/countries/singapore/46581101.pdf
15. Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2014). Guideline for individual learning. Evaluation report. Retrieved 21 November, 2016, from https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/senior/qcia_guideline_evaluation.pdf
16. Rodgers, C. R. (2006). Attending to student voice: the impact of descriptive feedback on learning and teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 209–237.
17. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.
18. Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). Understanding feedback: a learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review, 9, 1–15.
19. Tripp, T., & Rich, P. (2012). Using video to analyze one's own teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 678–704.
20. Van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2014). Improving teacher feedback during active learning: effects of a professional development program. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 772–809.
21. Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85, 475–511.