Learning to See New Things: Using Criteria to Support Pre-service Teachers' Discernment in the Context of Teachers' Relational Work

Frontiers in Education

Volumn 3, Issue , 2018, Pages

  Holmstedt, Pernilla ^a   Jönsson, Anders ^a   Aspelin, Jonas ^a  

^a KRISTIANSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

assessment; criteria; pre service teachers; relational competency; transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 85067075330     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2504284X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00054     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ajjawi R., Bearman M., (2018). Problematising “standards”: representation or performance?, in Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher education: Assessment for Knowing and Producing Quality Work, eds Boud D., Ajjawi R., Dawson P., Tai J., (Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge), 41–50.
2. Anderson J. B., Freiberg H. J., (1995). Using self-assessment as a reflective tool to enhance the student teaching experience. Teacher Educ. Q. 22, 77–91.
3. Aspelin J., (2006). Beneath the surface of classroom interaction: reflections on the microworld of education. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 9, 227–244. 10.1007/s11218-006-0008-2
4. Aspelin J., (2010). Sociala relationer och pedagogiskt ansvar [Social Relationships and Educational Responsibility]. Malmö: Gleerups.
5. Aspelin J., (2012). How do relationships influence student achievement? Understanding student performance from a general, social psychological standpoint. Int. Stud. Soc. Educ. 22, 41–56. 10.1080/09620214.2012.680327
6. Beaulieu R., (2016). A critical discourse analysis of teacher-student relationships in a third-grade literacy lesson: dynamics of microaggression. Cogent Educ. 3, 1–20. 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1244028
7. Braun V., Clarke V., (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
8. Brookhart S. M., (2018). Appropriate criteria: key to effective rubrics. Front. Educ. 3:22. 10.3389/feduc.2018.00022
9. Brookhart S. M., Chen F., (2015). The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics. Educ. Rev. 67, 343–368. 10.1080/00131911.2014.929565
10. Cornelius-White J., (2007). Learner centered teacher-student relationships are effective: a meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 77, 113–143. 10.3102/003465430298563
11. Elliott J., (1991). A model of professionalism and its implications for teacher education. Br. Educ. Res. J. 17, 309–318. 10.1080/0141192910170402
12. Hattie J., (2009). Visible Learning. A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
13. Hughes J. N., (2012). Teacher-student relationships and school adjustment: progress and remaining challenges. Attach. Hum. Dev. 14, 319–327. 10.1080/14616734.2012.67228822537527
14. Johnson R. B., Onwuegbuzie A. J., (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ. Res. 33, 14–26. 10.3102/0013189X033007014
15. Jonsson A., (2014). Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 39, 840–852. 10.1080/02602938.2013.875117
16. Jönsson A., (2008). Educative Assessment for/of Teacher Competency. Doctoral dissertation, Malmö: Malmö University.
17. Jonsson A., Panadero E., (2017). The use and design of rubrics to support AfL, in Scaling Up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education, eds Carless D., Bridges S., Chan C., Glofcheski R., (Dordrecht: Springer), 99–111.
18. Jonsson A., Svingby G., (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educ. Res. Rev. 2, 130–144. 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
19. Klinge L., (2016). Laerarens relationskompetence. En empirisk undersøgelse af, hvordan lærerens relationskompetence viser sig i interaktioner med elever og klasser i almenundervisningen i folkeskolen [The Teacher's Relational Competence]. Doctoral dissertation, Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
20. Knight P., Tait J., Yorke M., (2006). The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Stud. High. Educat. 31, 319–339. 10.1080/03075070600680786
21. Lave J., Wenger E., (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Lucander H., Knutsson K., Salé H., Jonsson A., (2012). I'll never forget this”: evaluating a pilot workshop in effective communication. J. Dental Educ. 76, 1311–1316.
23. Matthiesen N., (2016). Relationskompetencebegrebet under lup: ansvar i forudsigeligheden [The concept of relational competence], in Relationskompetencer i laereruddannelse og skole, eds Skibsted E., Matthiesen N., (Fredrikshavn: Dafolo), 139–156.
24. Matthiesen N., Gottlieb L., (2016). Når man laerer at vaere relationskompetent – fra kursus til skolepraktik [When one is taught to be relational competent], in Relationskompetencer i laereruddannelse og skole, eds Skibsted E., Matthiesen N., (Fredrikshavn: Dafolo), 89–106.
25. Metcalf K. K., Ronen Hammer M. A., Kahlich P. A., (1996). Alternatives to field-based experiences: the comparative effects of on-campus laboratories. Teach. Teacher Educ. 12, 271–283. 10.1016/0742-051X(95)00037-K
26. Nielsen A. M., Fibaek Laursen P., (2016). Relationskompetence og klasseledelse i laereruddannelse [Relational competence and classroom management in teacher education], in Relationskompetencer i laereruddannelse og skole, eds Skibsted E., Matthiesen N., (Fredrikshavn: Dafolo), 43–70.
27. Nordenbo S. E., Søgaard Larsen M., Tiftikçi N., Wendt R. E., Østergaard S., (2008). Lærerkompetanser og elevers læring i barnehage og skole [Teacher Competences and Student Learning in Preschool and School]. København: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsforlag & Dansk Clearinghouse for Uddannelsesforskning.
28. O'Donovan B., Price M., Rust C., (2004). Know what I mean? enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teach. High. Educ. 9, 325–335. 10.1080/1356251042000216642
29. Orsmond P., Merry S., (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 21, 239–250. 10.1080/0260293960210304
30. Panadero E., Jönsson A., (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: a review. Educ. Res. Rev. 9, 129–144. 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
31. Polanyi M., (1967/1983). The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester: Peter Smith.
32. Reddy Y. M., Andrade H., (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 35, 435–448. 10.1080/02602930902862859
33. Rimm-Kaufman S. E., Voorhees M. D., Snell M. E., La Paro K. M., (2003). Improving the sensitivity and responsivity of preservice teachers toward young children with disabilities. Topics Early Childhood Spec. Educ. 23, 151–163. 10.1177/02711214030230030501
34. Roorda D. L., Koomen H. M., Spilt J. L., Oort F. J., (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students' school engagement and achievement: a meta analytic approach. Rev. Educ. Res. 81, 493–529. 10.3102/0034654311421793
35. Sabol T. J., Pianta R. C., (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher-child relationships. Attach. Hum. Dev. 14, 213–231. 10.1080/14616734.2012.67226222537521
36. Sadler D. R., (2009). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 34, 159–179. 10.1080/02602930801956059
37. Sadler D. R., (2014). The futility of attempting to codify academic achievement standards. High. Educ. 67, 273–288. 10.1007/s10734-013-9649-1
38. Scheff T. J., (1990). Microsociology. Discourse, Emotion and Social Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
39. Schön D. A., (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Aldershot: Ashgate.
40. Skibsted E., Matthiesen N., (2016). Relationskompetencer i laereruddannelse og skole [Relational Competence in Teacher Education and School]. Fredrikshavn: Dafolo.
41. Vaismoradi M., Turunen H., Bondas T., (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs. Health Sci. 15, 398–405. 10.1111/nhs.1204823480423
42. Wenger E., (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Wubbels T., Brekelmans M., (2005). Two decades of research on teacher-student relationships in class. Int. J. Edu. Res. 43, 6–24. 10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003
44. Wubbels T., den Brok P., van Tartwijk J., Levy J., (2012). Interpersonal Relationships in Education: An overview of Contemporary Research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
45. Yeh Y.-C., (2004). Nurturing reflective teaching during critical-thinking instruction in a computer simulation program. Comput. Educ. 42, 181–194. 10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00071-X
46. Yerrick R., Ross D., Molebash P., (2005). Too close for comfort: real-time science teaching reflections via digital video editing. J. Sci. Teacher Educ. 16, 351–375. 10.1007/s10972-005-1105-3