Problematising standards: Representation or performance?

Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education: Assessment for Knowing and Producing Quality Work

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 41-50

  Ajjawi, Rola ^a   Bearman, Margaret ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027565225     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315109251     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Andrade, H., and A. Valtcheva. 2009. “Promoting learning and achievement through selfassessment.” Theory Into Practice 48 (1): 12-19. doi:10.1080/00405840802577544.
2. Barad, K. 2003. “Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801-831.
3. Bearman, M., and R. Ajjawi. 2017. “Actor-network theory and the OSCE: formulating a new research agenda for a post-psychometric era.” Advances in Health Sciences Education. doi:10.1007/s10459-017-9797-7.
4. Biggs, J., and C. Tang. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 3rd edn. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research in Higher Education and the Open University Press.
5. Bloxham, S., and P. Boyd. 2012. “Accountability in grading student work: securing academic standards in a twenty-first century accountability context.” British Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 615-634.
6. Bloxham, S., B. den-Outer, J. Hudson, and M. Price. 2016. “Let’s stop the pretence of consistent marking: exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (3): 466-481. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1024607.
7. Boud, D. 2017. “Standards-based assessment for an era of increasing transparency.” In Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education, edited by David Carless, Susan M. Bridges, Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan and Rick Glofcheski, 19-31. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
8. Bowker, G. C., and S. L. Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Dawson, P. 2015. “Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3): 347-360. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294.
10. Elmholdt, K., C. Elmholdt, L. Tanggaard, and L. H. Mersh. 2016. “Learning good leadership:a matter of assessment?" Human Resource Development International 19 (5): 406-428. doi:10.1080/13678868.2016.1206362.
11. Fenwick, T. 2010. "(un)Doing standards in education with actor-network theory.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (2): 117-133. doi:10.1080/02680930903314277.
12. Fenwick, T. J., and R. Edwards. 2013. “Performative ontologies: sociomaterial approaches to researching adult education and lifelong learning.” European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults 4 (1): 49-63.
13. Fraile, J., E. Panadero, and R. Pardo. 2017. “Co-creating rubrics: the effects on self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and performance of establishing assessment criteria with students.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 53: 69-76. doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.03.003
14. Hanna, M., and J. Fins. 2006. “Power and communication: why simulation training ought to be complemented by experiential and humanist learning.” Academic Medicine 81 (3):265-270.
15. Hudson, J., S. Bloxham, B. den Outer, and M. Price. 2017. “Conceptual acrobatics: talking about assessment standards in the transparency era.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (7):1309-1323. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1092130.
16. McConlogue, T. 2012. “But is it fair? Developing students’ understanding of grading complex written work through peer assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (1): 113-123. doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.515010.
17. Mol, A. 2009. “Living with diabetes: care beyond choice and control.” The Lancet 373 (9677):1756-1757. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60971-5.
18. Mulcahy, D. 1999. "(Actor-net) working bodies and representations: tales from a training field.” Science, Technology and Human Values 24 (1): 80-104.
19. Mulcahy, D. 2011. “Assembling the ‘accomplished’ teacher: the performativity and politics of professional teaching standards.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (sup1): 94-113. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00617.x.
20. Mulcahy, D. 2012. “Thinking teacher professional learning performatively: a socio-material account.” Journal of Education and Work 25 (1): 121-139. doi:10.1080/13639080.2012. 644910.
21. Mulcahy, D. 2014. “Re-thinking teacher professional learning: a more than representational account.” In Reconceptualising Professional Learning: Sociomaterial Knowledges, Practices and Responsibilities, edited by T. Fenwick and M. Nerland, 52-66. Abingdon, UK:Routledge.
22. O’Donovan, B., M. Price, and C. Rust. 2004. “Know what I mean? Enhancing student under - standing of assessment standards and criteria.” Teaching in Higher Education 9 (3):325-335. doi:10.1080/1356251042000216642.
23. Panadero, E., and A. Jonsson. 2013. “The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: a review.” Educational Research Review 9: 129-144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.
24. Price, M., B. O’Donovan, C. Rust, and J. Carroll. 2017. Assessment Standards: A Manifesto for Change. www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/assessment-standards-manifesto-change.
25. Reich, A., D. Rooney, and D. Boud. 2015. “Dilemmas in continuing professional learning:learning inscribed in frameworks or elicited from practice?" Studies in Continuing Education 37 (2): 131-141. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2015.1022717.
26. Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119-144.
27. Sadler, D. R. 2009. “Grade integrity and the representation of academic achievement.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (7): 807-826. doi:10.1080/03075070802706553.
28. Timmermans, S., and M. Berg. 2003. The Gold Standard: The Challenge of Evidence-based Medicine and Standardization in Health Care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
29. Timmermans, S., and S. Epstein. 2010. “A world of standards but not a standard world:toward a sociology of standards and standardization.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1):69-89. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629.
30. Torrance, H. 2007. “Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 14 (3): 281-294. doi:10.1080/09695940701591867.
31. Tummons, J. 2014a. “Professional standards in teacher education: tracing discourses of professionalism through the analysis of textbooks.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education19 (4): 417-432. doi:10.1080/13596748.2014.955634.
32. Tummons, J. 2014b. “The textual representation of professionalism: problematising professional standards for teachers in the UK lifelong learning sector.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 19 (1): 33-44. doi:10.1080/13596748.2014.872918.
33. Wear, D., and J. D. Varley. 2008. “Rituals of verification: the role of simulation in developing and evaluating empathic communication.” Patient Education and Counseling 71 (2):153-156. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.005.