What would happen to education if we take education evidence seriously?

Perspectives on Medical Education

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 222-232

  van der Vleuten, C P M ^a   Driessen, E W ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Education evidence; Education practice; Education research

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065133448     PISSN: 22122761     EISSN: 2212277X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40037-014-0129-9     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Koh GC-H, Khoo HE, Wong ML, Koh D. The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: a systematic review. Can Med Assoc J. 2008;178(1):34–41.
2. Schmidt HG, Van der Molen HT, Te Winkel WWR, Wijnen WHFW. Constructivist, problem-based learning does work: a meta-analysis of curricular comparisons involving a single medical school. Educ Psychol. 2009;44(4):227–49.
3. Norman G. Problem-based learning makes a difference. But why? Can Med Assoc J. 2008;178(1):61–2.
4. Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42(2):128–33.
5. van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Scheele F, Driessen EW, Hodges B. The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;24(6):703–19.
6. Gardner H. The mind’s new science: a history of the cognitive revolution. NewYork: Basic Books; 2008.
7. Levin JR. Elaboration-based learning strategies: powerful theory = powerful application. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1988;13(3):191–205.
8. Van Blankenstein FM. Elaboration during problem-based, small group discussion., A new approach to study collaborative learning Maastricht: Maastricht University; 2011.
9. Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith K. The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educ Psychol Rev. 2007;19:15–29.
10. Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2008;78(1):153–89.
11. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77:81–112.
12. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):101–8.
13. Watling C, Driessen E, Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ. 2013;47(6):585–94.
14. Govaerts MJB, Van der Vleuten CPM. Validity in work-based assessment: expanding our horizons. Med Educ. 2013;47(12):1164–74.
15. Daelmans HE, van der Hem-Stokroos HH, Hoogenboom RJ, Scherpbier AJ, Stehouwer CD, van der Vleuten CP. Feasibility and reliability of an in-training assessment programme in an undergraduate clerkship. Med Educ. 2004;38(12):1270–7.
16. Van den Eertwegh V, Van Dalen J, Van Dulmen S, Van der Vleuten CPM. Residents’ perceived barriers to communication skills learning: comparing two medical working contexts in postgraduate training. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95:91–7.
17. Driessen EW, Overeem K. Mentoring. In: Walsh K, editor. Oxford textbook of medical education. London: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 265–84.
18. Watling C, Driessen E, Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Music lessons: revealing medicine’s learning culture through a comparison with that of music. Med Educ. 2013;47(8):842–50.
19. Deci EL, Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Ryan RM. Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective. Educ Psychol. 1991;26(3–4):325–46.
20. Ten Cate OTJ, Kusurkar RA, Williams GC. How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE Guide No. 59. Med Teach. 2011;33(12):961–73.
21. Holmboe E, Ginsburg S, Bernabeo E. The rotational approach to medical education: time to confront our assumptions? Med Educ. 2011;45(1):69–80.
22. Bernabeo EC, Holtman MC, Ginsburg S, Rosenbaum JR, Holmboe ES. Lost in transition: the experience and impact of frequent changes in the inpatient learning environment. Acad Med. 2011;86(5):591–8.
23. Wagenaar A, Scherpbier AJ, Boshuizen HP, Van der Vleuten CP. The importance of active involvement in learning: a qualitative study on learning results and learning processes in different traineeships. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2003;8(3):201–12.
24. Ramanan RA, Taylor WC, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Mentoring matters. Mentoring and career preparation in internal medicine residency training. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(4):340–5.
25. Straus SE, Chatur F, Taylor M. Issues in the mentor–mentee relationship in academic medicine: a qualitative study. Acad Med. 2009;84(1):135–9.
26. Williams LL, Levine JB, Malhotra S, Holtzheimer P. The good-enough mentoring relationship. Acad Psychiatr. 2004;28(2):111–5.
27. Sambunjak D, Straus S, Marusic A. A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(1):72–8.
28. Overeem K, Lombarts M, Arah OA, Klazinga NS, Grol RP, Wollersheim HC. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers’ perspectives. Med Teach. 2010;32(2):141–7.
29. Zerzan JT, Hess R, Schur E, Phillips RS, Rigotti N. Making the most of mentors: a guide for mentees. Acad Med. 2009;84(1):140–4.
30. Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, Dornan T. The self critical doctor: helping students become more reflective. Br Med J. 2008;336(7648):827–30.
31. Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. Positive organizational behavior: engaged employees in flourishing organizations. J Organ Behav. 2008;29(2):147–54.
32. Seligman ME, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol Assoc. 2000;55(1):5–14.
33. Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Taris TW. Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work Stress. 2008;22(3):187–200.
34. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Towards a model of work engagement. Career Dev Int. 2008;13(3):209–23.
35. Hakanen JJ, Schaufeli WB, Ahola K. The job demands-resources model: a three-year cross-lagged study of burnout, depression, commitment, and work engagement. Work Stress. 2008;22(3):224–41.
36. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68.
37. Al-Faris EA, Irfan F, Van der Vleuten CP, et al. The prevalence and correlates of depressive symptoms from an arabian setting: a wake up call. Med Teach. 2012;34(Suppl 1):S32–6.
38. Teunissen PW, Westerman M. Junior doctors caught in the clash: the transition from learning to working explored. Med Educ. 2011;45(10):968–70.
39. Teunissen P, Scheele F, Scherpbier A, et al. How residents learn: qualitative evidence for the pivotal role of clinical activities. Med Educ. 2007;41(8):763–70.
40. Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A. Experience-based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):84–91.
41. Diemers A, Dolmans D, Santen M, Luijk S, Janssen-Noordman A, Scherpbier AJ. Students’ perceptions of early patient encounters in a PBL curriculum: a first evaluation of the Maastricht experience. Med Teach. 2007;29(2–3):135–42.
42. Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 2011;45(1):60–8.
43. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
44. Ogur B, Hirsh D, Krupat E, Bor D. The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge integrated clerkship: an innovative model of clinical education. Acad Med. 2007;82(4):397–404.
45. Couper I, Worley P, Strasser R, Strasser I. Rural longitudinal integrated clerkships: lessons from two programs on different continents. Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(2):1665.
46. Hauer KE, O’Brien B, Poncelet AN. Longitudinal, integrated clerkship education: better for learners and patients. Acad Med. 2009;84(7):821.
47. Strasser R, Hirsh D. Longitudinal integrated clerkships: transforming medical education worldwide? Med Educ. 2011;45(5):436–7.
48. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 2007;29(9):855–71.
49. Vleuten C, Verhoeven B. In-training assessment developments in postgraduate education in Europe. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83(6):454–9.
50. Norman GR, Van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI, editors. International handbook of research in medical education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
51. Daniel J. Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. J Interactive Media Educ. 2012.
52. Vardi MY. Will MOOCs destroy academia? Commun ACM. 2012;55(11):5.
53. Prober CG, Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures—a proposal for medical education. New Engl J Med. 2012;366(18):1657–9.
54. Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education; 2012.
55. McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, et al. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):236–43.
56. Van Merriënboer JJG, Kirschner PA. Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.
57. Bland CJ, Starnaman S, Wersal L, Moorhead-Rosenberg L, Zonia S, Henry R. Curricular change in medical schools: how to succeed. Acad Med. 2000;75(6):575–94.
58. Frambach J. The cultural complexity of PBL across the world. Doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University; 2014.
59. Prosser M, Trigwell K. Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. Br J Educ Psychol. 1997;67(1):25–35.
60. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.
61. Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 1996;11(2):87–98.
62. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700–5.
63. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–30.