In-training assessment developments in postgraduate education in Europe

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 454-459

  van der Vleuten, Cees ^a,b   Verhoeven, Bas ^c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assessment; Clinical performance; Direct observation; Portfolio; Postgraduate training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; EUROPE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; SURGERY; WORKPLACE;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EUROPE; HUMANS; SPECIALTIES, SURGICAL; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84878803288     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ans.12190     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Patricio M, den Engelsen C, Tseng D etal. Implementation of the Bologna two-cycle system in medical education: where do we stand in 2007? - results of an AMEE-MEDINE survey. Med. Teach. 2008; 30: 597-605.
2. Dornan T, Ashcroft D, Heathfield H etal. An in Depth Investigation into Causes of Prescribing Errors by Foundation Trainees in Relation to Their Medical Education. EQUIP Study. Manchester: Hope Hospital (University of Manchester Medical School Teaching Hospital), 2009.
3. Tully MP, Ashcroft DM, Dornan T etal. The causes of and factors associated with prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2009; 32: 819-836.
4. Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B etal. The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model. Acad. Med. 2010; 85: 1212-1220.
5. Teunissen PW, Boor K, Scherpbier AJ etal. Attending doctors' perspectives on how residents learn. Med. Educ. 2007; 41: 1050-1058.
6. Holmboe ES. Faculty and the observation of trainees' clinical skills: problems and opportunities. Acad. Med. 2004; 79: 16-22.
7. Boor K, Scheele F, van der Vleuten CP etal. How undergraduate clinical learning climates differ: a multi-method case study. Med. Educ. 2008; 42: 1029-1036.
8. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA etal. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005; 353: 2673-2682.
9. Frank JR, Danoff D. The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med. Teach. 2007; 29: 642-647.
10. ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad. Med. 2007; 82: 542-547.
11. Van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Scheele F etal. The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010; 24: 703-719
12. Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessment of professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med. Educ. 2005; 39: 309-317.
13. van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Driessen EW etal. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med. Teach. 2012; 34: 205-214.
14. Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL 3rd. Test-enhanced learning in medical education. Med. Educ. 2008; 42: 959-966.
15. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK etal. The mini-CEX (Clinical Evaluation Exercise): a preliminary investigation. Ann. Intern. Med. 1995; 123: 795-799.
16. Wilkinson JR, Crossley JG, Wragg A etal. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Med. Educ. 2008; 42: 364-373.
17. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H etal. Testing technical skill via an innovative 'bench station' examination. Am. J. Surg. 1997; 173: 226-230.
18. Cruess R, McIlroy JH, Cruess S etal. The Professionalism Mini-evaluation Exercise: a preliminary investigation. Acad. Med. 2006; 81 (10 Suppl): S74-78.
19. Hawkins RE, Margolis MJ, Durning SJ etal. Constructing a validity argument for the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise: a review of the research. Acad. Med. 2010; 85: 1453-1461.
20. Pelgrim EA, Kramer AW, Mokkink HG etal. In-training assessment using direct observation of single-patient encounters: a literature review. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. Theory Pract. 2011; 16: 131-142.
21. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med. Educ. 2010; 44: 101-108.
22. Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 2008; 78: 153-189.
23. Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 2003; 23: 2-10.
24. Williams RG, Klamen DA, McGaghie WC. Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teach. Learn. Med. 2003; 15: 270-292.
25. Van Tartwijk J, Driessen EW. Portfolios for assessment and learning: AMEE Guide no. 45. Med. Teach. 2009; 31: 790-801.
26. Butler P. A Review of the Literature on Portfolios and Electronic Portfolios. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University College of Education, 2006.
27. Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C etal. Portfolios in medical education: why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Med. Educ. 2007; 41: 1224-1233.
28. Tochel C, Haig A, Hesketh A etal. The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12. Med. Teach. 2009; 31: 299-318.
29. Driessen EW, Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT etal. The use of qualitative research criteria for portfolio assessment as an alternative to reliability evaluation: a case study. Med. Educ. 2005; 39: 214-220.
30. Lombarts MJ, Arah OA, Busch OR etal. [Using the SETQ system to evaluate and improve teaching qualities of clinical teachers]. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd 2010; 154: A1222.