Effects of feedback on learning strategies in learning journals: Learner-expertise matters

International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 16-30

  Roelle, Julian ^a   Berthold, Kirsten ^a   Fries, Stefan ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies; Expertise Reversal Effect; Feedback; Instructional Design; Learning Journals; Learning Strategies; Prompts; Self Regulated Learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882423109     PISSN: 21557136     EISSN: 21557144     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/ijcbpl.2011040102     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Workingmemory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564-577. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
3. Cantrell, R. J., Fusaro, J. A., & Dougherty, E. A. (2000). Exploring the effectiveness of journal writing on learning social studies: A com parative study. Reading Psychology, 21, 1-11. doi:10.1080/027027100278310
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading writing, and mathematics. In Resnick, L. B. (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453-494). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
7. Flavell, J. H. (1978). Metacognitive development. In Scandura, J. M., & Brainerd, C. J. (Eds.), Structural/process theories of complex human behavior (pp. 213-245). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Sijthoff and Noordhoff
8. Friedrich, H. F., & Mandl, H. (1997). Analyse und Förderung selbstgesteuerten Lernens. [Analyzing and fostering self-regulated learning] In Weinert, F. E., & Mandl, H. (Eds.), Psychologie der Erwa-chsenenbildung [Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Pädagogische Psychologie]. (pp. 237-293). Göt-tingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
9. Glogger, I., Holzäpfel, L., Schwonke, R., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2009). Activation of learning strategies in writing learning journals: The specificity of prompts matters. Zeitschrift fur Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 95-104. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.95
10. Graesser, A. C, Mc Namara, D., & Van Lehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Auto Tutor and i START. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225-234. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4004-4
11. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
12. Hübner, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2010). Writing learning journals: Instructional support to overcome learning-strategy deficits. Learning and Instruction, 20, 18-29. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.12.001
13. Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educa-tional Psychology Review, 19, 509-539. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
14. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). Expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23-31. doi:10.1207/ S15326985EP3801-4
15. Kalyuga, S., & Renkl, A. (2010). Expertise reversal effect and its instructional implications: Introduction to the special issue. Instructional Science, 38, 209-215. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9102-0
16. Mc Crindle, A., & Christensen, C. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performances. Learning and Instruction, 5, 167-185. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(95)00010-Z
17. Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32, 99-113. doi:10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021811.66966.1d
18. Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In Jonassen, D. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 745-783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2006). Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction. Learning and Instruction, 16, 310-322. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc. 2006.07.003
20. Nückles, M., Hübner, S., Dümer, S., & Renkl, A. (2010). Expertise reversal effects in writing-to-learn. Instructional Science, 38, 237-258. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9106-9
21. Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19, 259-271. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.002
22. Nückles, M., Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2004). The use of public learning diaries in blended learning. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 49-66. doi:10.1080/1358165042000186271
23. Reigeluth, C. M., & Stein, F. S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 335-382). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Schnotz, W. (2010). Reanalyzing the expertise reversal effect. Instructional Science, 38, 315-323. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9104-y
25. Schwonke, R., Hauser, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2006). Enhancing computer-supported writing of learning protocols by adaptive prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 77-92. doi:10.1016/j. chb.2005.01.002
26. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designsforgeneralized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
27. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795
28. Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20, 291-303. doi:10.1016/j.learn-instruc.2009.08.008
29. Stud.IP. (2009). Computer software. Retrieved from http://www.studip.de/
30. Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 29-47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. G., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205
32. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In Wittrock, C. M. (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (pp. 315-327). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
33. Wirtz, M., & Caspar, F (2002). Beurteilerübere-instimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität [Rater Agreement and Interrater Reliability]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.