Effects of non-driving-related tasks on takeover performance in different takeover situations in conditionally automated driving

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 62, Issue , 2019, Pages 494-504

  Dogan, Ebru ^a   Honnêt, Vincent ^b   Masfrand, Stéphan ^b   Guillaume, Anne ^c  

^a Institute VEDECOM   (France)

^b Groupe PSA   (France)

^c RENAULT   (France)

Author keywords

Automated vehicle; Driver performance; Level 3 automation; Non driving related tasks; Takeover

Indexed keywords

LONGITUDINAL CONTROL; ROAD AND STREET MARKINGS;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; DRIVER PERFORMANCE; DYNAMIC SIMULATORS; MENTAL WORKLOAD; NON-DRIVING RELATED TASKS; TAKEOVER; TRAFFIC ENVIRONMENT;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85061966654     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. AIDE (2005). Driving performance assessment – methods and metrics. Report IST-1-507674-IP. Retrieved from < http://www.aide-eu.org/pdf/sp2_deliv_new/aide_d2_2_5.pdf>.
2. Bao, S., Guo, Z., Flannagan, C., Sullivan, J., Sayer, J.R., LeBlanc, D., Distracted driving performance measures: A spectral power analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2518 (2015), 68–72.
3. Bueno, M., Dogan, E., Hadj Selem, F., Monacelli, E., Boverie, S., & Guillaume, A. (2016). How different mental workload levels affect the take-over control after automated driving. In IEEE 19th Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2016 (pp. 2040–2045). < https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2016.7795886>.
4. Bueno, M., Dogan, E., Hadj Selem, F., Monacelli, E., Boverie, S., & Guillaume, A. (2017). The effects of non-driving-task as a function of duration of automated driving. In 8th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE), July 17-21, California, USA.
5. Carsten, O., Lai, F.C., Barnard, Y., Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Control task substitution in semi-automated driving. Does it matter what aspects are automated?. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54 (2012), 747–761.
6. Damböck, D., Farid, M., Tönert, L., & Bengler K. (2012). Übernahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Autofahren. In 5. Tagung Fahrerassistenz 2012, München. Germany. Retrieved from: < https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1142102/1142102.pdf>.
7. De Waard, D., The measurement of drivers’ mental workload. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, 1996, University of Groningen, Traffic Research Centre, Haren, The Netherlands.
8. De Winter, J.C.F., Happee, R., Martens, M.H., Stanton, N.A., Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27 (Part B) (2014), 196–217.
9. Dogan, E., Cherif-Rahal, M., Deborne, R., Delhomme, P., Kemeny, A., Perrin, J., Transition of control in a partially automated vehicle: Effects of anticipation and non-driving-related task involvement. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 46 (2017), 205–215, 10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.012.
10. Embrey, D., Blackett, C., Marsden, P., & Peachey, J. (2006). Development of a human cognitive workload assessment tool: MCA final report. Retrieved from: < http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.138.4767&rep=rep1&type=pdf>.
11. Endsley, M.R., Toward a theory of situation awareness. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37 (1995), 32–64.
12. ERTRAC (2017). Automated driving roadmap. Retrieved from: < https://www.ertrac.org/uploads/documentsearch/id47/ERTRAC_Automated-Driving_Public%20Consultation%20April%202017.pdf>.
13. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2013). ‘‘Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting. San Diego, CA (pp. 1938–1942).
14. Gold, C., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2014). Influence of automated brake application on take- over situations in highly automated driving scenarios. In Proceedings of the FISITA 2014 World Automotive Congress.
15. Gouraud, J., Delorme, A., Berberian, B., Autopilot, Mind Wandering, and the Out of the Loop Performance Problem. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 2018, 541, 10.3389/fnins.2017.00541.
16. Gouy, M., Wiedemann, K., Stevens, A., Brunett, G., Reed, N., Driving next to automated vehicle platoons: How do short time headways influence non-platoon drivers’ longitudinal control?. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27 (2014), 264–273.
17. HAVEit (2011). D33.6 Validation of concept on optimum task repartition. Retrieved from: < http://www.haveit-eu.org/LH2Uploads/ItemsContent/24/HAVEit_212154_D33.6_Public.pdf>.
18. König, M., Neumayr, L., Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 44 (2017), 42–52.
19. Large, D.R., Banks, V.A., Burnett, G., Baverstock, S., & Skrypchuk, L. (2017). Exploring the behaviour of distracted drivers during different levels of automated driving. In Proceedings of International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention (DDI2017). Retrieved from: < https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314087980_Exploring_the_Behaviour_of_Distracted_Drivers_during_Different_Levels_of_Automation_in_Driving>.
20. Louw, T., Markkula, G., Boer, E., Madigan, R., Carsten, O., Merat, N., Coming back into the loop drivers’ perceptual-motor performance in critical events after automated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 108 (2017), 9–18.
21. Louw, T., Merat, N., Are you in the loop? Using gaze dispersion to understand driver visual attention during vehicle automation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 76 (2017), 35–50.
22. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C., Carsten, O., Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54 (2012), 762–771.
23. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F., Daly, M., Carsten, O.M., Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 26 (2014), 1–9.
24. Naujoks, F., Befelein, D., Wiedemann, K., Neukum, A., A review of non-driving-related tasks used in studies on automated driving. Stanton, N., (eds.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 597, 2018, Springer, Cham.
25. Neubaer, C., Matthews, G., Langheim, L., Saxby, D., Fatigue and voluntary utilization of automation in simulated driving. Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54 (2012), 734–746.
26. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D., A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans 30 (2000), 286–297.
27. Parker, D., Reason, J., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement. Ergonomics 38 (1995), 1036–1048.
28. Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., & Bengler, K. (2014). How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting, vol. 58 (pp. 2063–2067).
29. Radlmayr, J., Fischer, F.M., Bengler, K., The influence of non-driving related tasks on driver availability in the context of conditionally automated driving. Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y., (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2019, Springer, New York.
30. Society of Automotive Engineers (2014). J3016: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems (pp. 1–12).
31. Society of Automotive Engineers (2016). J3016: (R) Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (pp. 1–30).
32. Stratulat, A.M., Roussarie, V., Vercher, J.L., Bourdin, C., Does tilt/ translation ratio affect perception of deceleration in driving simulators?. Journal of Vestibular Research 21 (2011), 127–139.
33. Vogelpohl, T., Kühn, M., Hummel, T., Gehlert, T., Vollrath, M., Transitioning to manual driving requires additional time after automation deactivation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 55 (2018), 464–482.
34. Wandtner, B., Schömig, N., Schmidt, G., Effects of non-driving related task modalities on takeover performance in highly automated driving. Human Factors 60 (2018), 870–881, 10.1177/0018720818768199.
35. Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A., Attention and automation: New perspectives on mental underload and performance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2 (2002), 178–194.
36. Yousfi, E., Dogan, E., Bellet, T., Tijus, C., & Guillaume, A. (2018). The effect of time budget and driving assistance on manual takeover performance in a highly automated vehicle. In The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2018 Annual Meeting, 8–10 Oct, Berlin, Germany.
37. Zeeb, K.M., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M., Is take-over time all that matters: The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 92 (2016), 230–239.
38. Zeeb, K., Härtel, M., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M., Why is steering not the same as braking: The impact of non-driving related tasks on lateral and longitudinal driver interventions during conditionally automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 50 (2017), 65–69.
39. Zhang. B., de Winter, J., Varotto, S., Happee, R., & Martens, M. (2018). Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: a meta-analysis of 93 studies. < https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33648.56326>.
40. Zijlstra, F., van Doorn, L., The construction of a scale to measure subjective effort. Technical Report, 1985, Delft University of Technology.