Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving

Human Factors

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 870-881

  Wandtner, Bernhard ^a   Schömig, Nadja ^b   Schmidt, Gerald ^a  

^a Fuel Cell Activities IPC MK 01   (Germany)

^b WIVW GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

autonomous driving; distraction; driver behavior; human automation interaction; multiple resource models; vehicle automation

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; LOCKS (FASTENERS);

AUTONOMOUS DRIVING; DISTRACTION; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTIONS; MULTIPLE RESOURCES; VEHICLE AUTOMATIONS;

AUTOMATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; CAR DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85045059434     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720818768199     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Caird J. K., Willness C. R., Steel P., Scialfa C., (2008). A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(4), 1282–1293
2. Carsten O., Lai F. C., Barnard Y., Jamson A. H., Merat N., (2012). Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: Does it matter what aspects are automated? Human Factors, 54, 747–761
3. de Winter J. C., Happee R., Martens M. H., Stanton N. A. (2014). Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27(Part B), 196–217
4. Dingus T. A., Guo F., Lee S., Antin J. F., Perez M., Buchanan-King M., Hankey J., (2016). Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(10), 2636–2641
5. Dingus T. A., Hanowski R. J., Klauer S. G., (2011). Estimating crash risk. Ergonomics in Design, 19(4), 8–12
6. Donmez B., Boyle L. N., Lee J. D., (2006). The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance. Human Factors, 48, 785–804
7. Drews F. A., Yazdani H., Godfrey C. N., Cooper J. M., Strayer D. L., (2009). Text messaging during simulated driving. Human Factors, 51, 762–770
8. Endsley M. R., (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64
9. Engström J. A., Johansson E., Östlund J., (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(2), 97–120
10. Fitch G., (2015). The HMI for the automated vehicle. London: TU Automotive
11. Fox S., Hoffman M., (2002). Escalation behavior as a specific case of goal-directed activity: A persistence paradigm. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(4), 273–285
12. Gasser T. M., Arzt C., Ayoubi M., Bartels A., Eier J., Flemisch F... Vogt W. (2012). Rechtsfolgen zunehmender Fahrzeugautomatisierung [Legal consequences of an increase in vehicle automation]. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Wirtschaftsverlag NW, Bremerhaven
13. Gold C., Berisha I., Bengler K., (2015). Utilization of drivetime—Performing non-driving related tasks while driving highly automated. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting (pp. 1666–1670). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
14. Gold C., Damböck D., Lorenz L., Bengler K., (2013). “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting (pp. 1938–1942). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
15. Hart S. G., (2006). NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 904–908). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
16. Hart S. G., Staveland L. E., (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139–183
17. Horrey W. J., Lesch M. F., (2009). Driver-initiated distractions: Examining strategic adaptation for in-vehicle task initiation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(1), 115–122
18. Horrey W. J., Wickens C. D., (2004). Driving and side task performance: The effects of display clutter, separation, and modality. Human Factors, 46, 611–624
19. Jamson A. H., Merat N., (2005). Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: Effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(2), 79–96
20. Jung T., Kaß C., Schramm T., Zapf D., (2017). So what really is user experience? An experimental study of user needs and emotional responses as underlying constructs. Ergonomics, 60(12), 1601–1620
21. Lee J. D., (2014). Dynamics of driver distraction: The process of engaging and disengaging. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, 58, 24–32
22. Liang Y., Horrey W. J., Hoffman J. D., (2015). Reading text while driving: Understanding drivers’ strategic and tactical adaptation to distraction. Human Factors, 57, 347–359
23. Llaneras R. E., Salinger J., Green C. A., (2013). Human factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving systems: Drivers’ allocation of visual attention to the forward roadway. Proceedings of the 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 92–98). Iowa City, IA: Universityof Iowa
24. Louw T. L., Zschernack S., Gobel M., (2013). The effect of distraction modality on driver performance. Ergonomics SA: Journal of the Ergonomics Society of South Africa, 25(1), 13–25
25. Marberger C., Mielenz H., Naujoks F., Radlmayr J., Bengler K., Wandtner B., (2017). Understanding and applying the concept of “driver availability” in automated driving. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp. 595–605). New York, NY: Springer
26. Melcher V., Rauh S., Diederichs F., Widlroither H., Bauer W., (2015). Takeover requests for automated driving. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2867–2873
27. Miron A. M., Brehm J. W., (2006). Reactance theory—40 years later. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37(1), 9–18
28. O’Brien F., Cousineau D., (2014). Representing error bars in within-subject designs in typical software packages. Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 10(1), 56–67
29. Ovsiankina M., (1928). Die Wiederaufnahme von unterbrochenen Handlungen [Resumption of interrupted actions]. Psychologische Forschung, 11, 302–379
30. Owens J. M., McLaughlin S. B., Sudweeks J., (2011). Driver performance while text messaging using handheld and in-vehicle systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(3), 939–947
31. Petermann-Stock I., Hackenberg L., Muhr T., Mergl C., (2013, November). Wie lange braucht der Fahrer? Eine Analyse zu Übernahmezeiten aus verschiedenen Nebentätigkeiten während einer hochautomatisierten Staufahrt [How long does it take for the driver? Analysis of takeover times with different secondary tasks in a highly automated traffic jam assist]. Paper presented at 6th Tagung Fahrerassistenz [6th Conference on Driving Assistance], München, Germany
32. Radlmayr J., Gold C., Lorenz L., Farid M., Bengler K., (2014). How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the takeover quality in highly automated driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting (pp. 2063–2067). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
33. SAE International. (2014). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems (J3016). Warrendale, PA: Author
34. Strayer D. L., Turrill J., Cooper J. M., Coleman J. R., Medeiros-Ward N., Biondi F., (2015). Assessing cognitive distraction in the automobile. Human Factors, 57, 1300–1324
35. UDRIVE. (2017). European drivers spend 10% of the ride on secondary tasks. Retrieved from http://www.udrive.eu/index.php/news/145-european-drivers-spend-10-of-the-ride-on-secondary-tasks
36. Wandtner B., Schömig N., Schmidt G., Kunde W., (2018, March). Non-driving related tasks in highly automated driving – Effects of task modalities and cognitive workload on take-over performance. Paper presented at Automotive meets Electronics (AmE) Conference, Dortmund, Germany
37. Wandtner B., Schumacher M., Schmidt E. A., (2016). The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study. Traffic Injury Prevention, 17(5), 472–479
38. Wickens C. D., (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177
39. Wickens C. D., (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50, 449–455
40. Young K. L., Regan M. A., Lee J. D., (Eds.). (2008). Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
41. Zeeb K., Buchner A., Schrauf M., (2015). What determines the takeover time? An integrated model approach of driver takeover after automated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 78, 212–221