Why is steering not the same as braking? The impact of non-driving related tasks on lateral and longitudinal driver interventions during conditionally automated driving

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 50, Issue , 2017, Pages 65-79

  Zeeb, Kathrin ^a,c   Härtel, Manuela ^b   Buchner, Axel ^c   Schrauf, Michael ^b,c  

^a ROBERT BOSCH GMBH   (Germany)

^b DAIMLER AG   (Germany)

^c HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated driving; Conditional automation; Driver distraction; Driver take over; Driving simulator; Non driving related tasks

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; BRAKING; BUDGET CONTROL; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; STEERING; VEHICLES;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; DRIVER DISTRACTIONS; DRIVER TAKE-OVER; DRIVING SIMULATOR; NON-DRIVING RELATED TASKS;

AUTOMOBILE STEERING EQUIPMENT;

EID: 85029415000     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Carsten, O., Lai, F., Barnard, A., Merat, N., Jamson, A., Control task substitution in semi-automated driving: Does it matter what aspects are automated?. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54:5 (2012), 747–761.
2. Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1988, Routledge Academic, New York, NY.
3. Daneman, M., Reingold, E., Davidson, M., Time course of phonological activation during reading: Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21:4 (1995), 884–898.
4. De Winter, J., Happee, R., Martens, M., Stanton, N.A., Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 24 (2014), 196–217.
5. Dingus, T., Klauer, S., Neale, V., Petersen, A., Lee, S.E., Sudweeks, J., Knipling, R.R., The 100-car naturalistic driving study, phase II – results of the 100-car field experiment. 2006, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.
6. Engström, J.A., Johansson, E., Östlund, J., Effects of viusal and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 8 (2005), 97–120.
7. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., Buchner, A., G∗Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods 39 (2007), 175–191.
8. Flemisch, F., Heesen, M., Hesse, T., Kelsch, J., Schieben, A., Beller, J., Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: Authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations. Cognition, Technology & Work 14 (2012), 3–18.
9. Gold, C., Bengler, K., Taking over control from highly automated vehicles. Stanton, N.A., Landry, S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A., (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics, 2014, 64–69.
10. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K., “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 2013.
11. Greenberg, J., Tijerina, L., Curry, R., Artz, B., Cathey, L., Grant, P., Blommer, M., Evaluation of driver distraction using an event detection paradigm. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1843:1 (2003), 1–9.
12. Holm, S., A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 (1979), 65–70.
13. Horrey, W., Wickens, C., In-vehicle glance duration: Distributions, tails, and model of crash risk. Transportation Research Record 2018:1 (2007), 22–28.
14. Iqbal, S.T., Bailey, B.P., Leveraging characteristics of task structure to predict the cost of interruption. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, 2006, ACM, 741–750.
15. Kaakinen, J., Hyönä, J., Task effects of eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36:6 (2010), 1561–1566.
16. Llaneras, R., Salinger, J., & Green, C. (2013). Human factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving systems: drivers' allocation of visual attention to the forward roadway. In Proceedings of the seventh international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training, and vehicle design (pp. 92–98).
17. Lorenz, L., Kerschbaum, P., Hergeth, S., Gold, C., & Radlmayr, J. (2015). Vom Dual-Task zum Sequential-Task Paradigma: Ein Rückblick über Fahrsimulatorstudien. 7. Tagung Fahrerassistenz: Hochautomatisiertes Fahren – Hype oder mehr?, Munich, Germany.
18. Louw, T., Merat, N., Jamson, A., Engaging with highly automated driving: To be or not to be in the loop?. 8th International driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA., 2015.
19. Merat, N., Jamson, A., Lai, F., Carsten, O., Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Human Factors 54:5 (2012), 762–771.
20. Merat, N., Jamson, A., Lai, F., Daly, M., Carsten, O., Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27 (2014), 274–282.
21. Monsell, S., Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7:3 (2003), 134–140.
22. Monsell, S., Sumner, P., Waters, H., Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition 31:3 (2003), 327–342.
23. Naujoks, F., Mai, C., Neukum, A., The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Marek, T., (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics (AHFE), Krakow, Poland., 2014.
24. Neubauer, C., Matthews, G., & Saxby, D. (2012). The effects of cell phone use and automation on driver performance and subjective state in simulated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th annual meeting (Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 1987–1991). Sage Publications.
25. Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., Bengler, K., How traffic situations and non-driving related ktasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 2014, 2063–2067.
26. Rogers, R., Monsell, S., Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124:2 (1995), 207–231.
27. SAE International (2016). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicle (J3016).
28. Salvucci, D., Taatgen, N., Borst, J., Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: From concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2009, 1819–1828.
29. Schömig, N., Hargutt, V., Neukum, A., Petermann-Stock, I., & Othersen, I. (2015). The interaction between highly automated driving and the development of drowsiness. In 6th International conference on applied human factors and ergonomics (AHFE), Las Vegas, USA.
30. Trafton, J., Altmann, E., Brock, D., Mintz, F., Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58 (2003), 583–603.
31. Walch, M., Lange, K., Baumann, M., Weber, M., Autonomous driving: Investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, 2015, ACM, New York, USA, 11–18.
32. Wickens, C., Processing resources in attention. Parasuraman, R., Davies, D.R., (eds.) Varieties of attention, 1984, Academic Press, New York, 63–102.
33. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M., What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 78 (2015), 212–221.
34. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M., Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 92 (2016), 230–239.