Transitioning to manual driving requires additional time after automation deactivation

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 55, Issue , 2018, Pages 464-482

  Vogelpohl, Tobias ^a   Kühn, Matthias ^b   Hummel, Thomas ^b   Gehlert, Tina ^b   Vollrath, Mark ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b Unfallforschung der Versicherer   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated driving; Distraction; Driver assistance; Situation awareness; Take over request; Transition to manual

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; STREET TRAFFIC CONTROL; VEHICLES;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; DISTRACTION; DRIVER ASSISTANCE; SITUATION AWARENESS; TAKE-OVER REQUEST; TRANSITION TO MANUAL;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85045289928     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aeberhard, M., Rauch, S., Bahram, M., Tanzmeister, G., Thomas, J., Pilat, Y., Kaempchen, N., Experience, results and lessons learned from automated driving on Germany's highways. Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, IEEE 7:1 (2015), 42–57.
2. Brandenburg, S., & Skottke, E. M. (2014). Switching from manual to automated driving and reverse: Are drivers behaving more risky after highly automated driving?. In Intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), 2014 IEEE 17th international conference on (pp. 2978–2983). IEEE.
3. Carsten, O., Lai, F., Barnard, Y., Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Control task substitution in semiautomated driving does it matter what aspects are automated?. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54 (2012), 747–761.
4. Damböck, D., Farid, M., Tönert, L., Bengler, K., Übernahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Fahren. Tagung Fahrerassistenz. München, 15, 2012, 16.
5. Damböck, D. (2013). Automationseffekte im Fahrzeug–von der Reaktion zur Übernahme (Doctoral dissertation, München, Technische Universität München, Diss., 2013.).
6. De Waard, D., van der Hulst, M., Hoedemaeker, M., Brookhuis, K.A., Driver behavior in an emergency situation in the automated highway system. Transportation Human Factors 1:1 (1999), 67–82.
7. Endsley, M.R., Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society annual meeting, 32, 1988, Sage Publications, Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 97–101 No. 2.
8. Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O., The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37:2 (1995), 381–394.
9. Gasser, T. M., Arzt, C., Ayoubi, M., Bartels, A., Bürkle, L., Eier, J., Ellipsis & Vogt, W. (2012). Rechtsfolgen zunehmender Fahrzeugautomatisierung. Berichte der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen. Unterreihe Fahrzeugtechnik, 83.
10. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2013). “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 1938–1942). SAGE Publications.
11. Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Damböck, D., & Bengler, K. (2013). Partially automated driving as a fallback level of high automation. 6. Tagung Fahrerassistenzsysteme. Der Weg zum automatischen Fahren.
12. Gold, C., Körber, M., Hohenberger, C., Lechner, D., Bengler, K., Trust in automation–before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. Procedia Manufacturing 3 (2015), 3025–3032.
13. Krüger, H. P., Grein, M., Kaussner, A., & Mark, C. (2005). SILAB-A task-oriented driving simulation. In Driving Simulation Conference.
14. Gold, C., Körber, M., Lechner, D., Bengler, K., Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: the role of traffic density. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2016 0018720816634226.
15. Helldin, T., Falkman, G., Riveiro, M., & Davidsson, S. (2013). Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 210–217). ACM.
16. Henning, M. J., Georgeon, O., Wynn, T., & Krems, J. F. (2008, April). Modelling driver behaviour in order to infer the intention to change lanes. In Proceedings of European conference on human centred design for intelligent transport systems (Vol. 113).
17. Hillel, A.B., Lerner, R., Levi, D., Raz, G., Recent progress in road and lane detection: A survey. Machine Vision and Applications 25:3 (2014), 727–745.
18. Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Carsten, O.M., Lai, F.C., Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 30 (2013), 116–125.
19. Jennett, C., Cox, A.L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., Walton, A., Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66:9 (2008), 641–661.
20. Lange, C. (2005). The development and usage of Dikablis (digital wireless gaze tracking system). Abstracts of the 13th European Conference on Eye Movements ECEM13, Bern (2005), p. 50.
21. Lorenz, L., Kerschbaum, P., & Schumann, J. (2014). Designing take over scenarios for automated driving How does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop?. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 1681–1685). SAGE Publications.
22. Louw, T., Merat, N. & Jamson, H. (2015). Engaging with automation: To be or not to be in the loop? In Proceedings of the 8th international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design.
23. Maurer, M., Gerdes, J. C., Lenz, B., & Winner, H. (Eds.). (2015). Autonomes Fahren: Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte. Springer-Verlag.
24. Melcher, V., Rauh, S., Diederichs, F., Widlroither, H., Bauer, W., Take-over requests for automated driving. Procedia Manufacturing 3 (2015), 2867–2873.
25. Merat, N., & Jamson, A. H. (2009). How do drivers behave in a highly automated car. In Proceedings of the 5th international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design (pp. 514–521).
26. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C., Carsten, O., Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54:5 (2012), 762–771.
27. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C., Daly, M., Carsten, O.M., Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27 (2014), 274–282.
28. Meyer, G. (2014). Road Vehicle Automation (p. 154). S. Beiker (Ed.). Springer.
29. Nakamura, J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., The concept of flow. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology, 2014, Springer, Netherlands, 239–263.
30. Naujoks, F., Mai, C., Neukum, A., The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Part I, 7, 2014, 431.
31. Neukum, A., Krüger, H.-P., Fahrerreaktionen bei Lenksystemstörungen – Untersuchungsmethoden und Bewertungskriterien. VDI-Berichte 1791 (2003), 297–318.
32. Petermann-Stock, I., Hackenberg, L., Muhr, T., & Mergl, C. (2013). Wie lange braucht der Fahrer–eine Analyse zu Übernahmezeiten aus verschiedenen Nebentätigkeiten während einer hochautomatisierten Staufahrt. 6. Tagung Fahrerassistenzsysteme. Der Weg zum automatischen Fahren.
33. Petermann-Stock, I., Hackenberg, L., Muhr, T., Josten, J., & Eckstein, L. (2015). “Bitte übernehmen Sie das Fahren!“: ein multimodaler Vergleich von Übernahmestrategien. Beiträge zum 16. Braunschweiger Symposium für Automatisierungssysteme, Assistenzsysteme und eingebettete Systeme für Transportmittel (AAET) Februar 2015 (pp. 346–369). Braunschweig: IST Niedersachsen e.V.
34. Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., Bengler, K., How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 58, 2014, SAGE Publications, 2063–2067 1.
35. Reschka, A., Maurer, M., Conditions for a safe state of automated road vehicles. It-Information Technology 57:4 (2015), 215–222.
36. Richard, C. M., Campbell, J. L., & Brown, J. L. (2006). Task analysis of intersection driving scenarios: Information processing bottlenecks (No. FHWA-HRT-06-033).
37. SAE, society of automotive engineers, Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on road motor vehicle automated driving systems. Surface Vehicle Information Report J3016 (2014), 1–12 http://standards.sae.org/j3016_201401/.
38. Saffarian, M., De Winter, J.C.F., Happee, R., Automated driving: Human-factors issues and design solutions. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 56, 2012, Sage Publications, 2296–2300 1.
39. Salvucci, D.D., Liu, A., The time course of a lane change: Driver control and eye-movement behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 5:2 (2002), 123–132.
40. Salvucci, D.D., Taatgen, N.A., Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review 115 (2008), 101–130.
41. Shen, S., Neyens, D.M., Assessing drivers’ performance when automated driver support systems fail with different levels of automation. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 58, 2014, SAGE Publications, 2068–2072 1.
42. Skitka, L.J., Mosier, K., Burdick, M.D., Accountability and automation bias. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52:4 (2000), 701–717.
43. Schlag, B., Elderly drivers in Germany—fitness and driving behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention 25:1 (1993), 47–55.
44. Stanton, N.A., Young, M.S., Vehicle automation and driving performance. Ergonomics 41:7 (1998), 1014–1028.
45. Strand, N., Nilsson, J., Karlsson, I.M., Nilsson, L., Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27 (2014), 218–228.
46. Varotto, S. F., Hoogendoorn, R. G., Van Arem, B., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2015, January). Empirical longitudinal driving behaviour in case of authority transitions between adaptive cruise control and manual driving. In 94th annual meeting transportation research board, Washington, USA, 11–15 January 2015. TRB.
47. Vlakveld, W. (2015). Transition of control in highly automated vehicles. A literature review (Report No. R-2015-22). SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research.
48. Vollrath, M., Schleicher, S., Gelau, C., The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour–A driving simulator study. Accident Analysis & Prevention 43:3 (2011), 1134–1139.
49. Wierwille, W.W., Casali, J.G., A validated rating scale for global mental workload measurement applications. Proceedings of the human factors society annual meeting, 27, 1983, Sage Publications, Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 129–133 2.
50. Wulf, F., Rimini-Döring, M., Arnon, M., Gauterin, F., Recommendations supporting situation awareness in partially automated driver assistance systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems PP:99 (2014), 1–7.
51. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M., What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention 78 (2015), 212–221.
52. Ziegler, J., Bender, P., Schreiber, M., Lategahn, H., Strauss, T., Stiller, C., Zeeb, E., Making bertha drive? An autonomous journey on a historic route. Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, IEEE 6:2 (2014), 8–20.