NMDA receptors and brain development

Biology of the NMDA Receptor

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-15

  Ewald, Rebecca C ^a   Cline, Hollis T ^a  

^a Simons Center for Quantitative Biology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85057912670     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (134)

1. Kleinschmidt, A., Bear, M.F., and Singer, W., Blockade of “NMDA” receptors disrupts experience-dependent plasticity of kitten striate cortex, Science, 238, 355, 1987.
2. Cline, H.T., Debski, E.A., and Constantine-Paton, M., N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist desegregates eye-specific stripes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 4342, 1987.
3. Cull-Candy, S.G. and Leszkiewicz, D.N., Role of distinct NMDAR subtypes at central synapses, Sci STKE, 2004, re. 16, 2004.
4. Cull-Candy, S., Brickley, S., and Farrant, M., NMDAR subunits: diversity, development and disease, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 11, 327, 2001.
5. Wenthold, R.J. et al., Trafficking of NMDARs, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 43, 335, 2003.
6. Laurie, D.J. and Seeburg, P.H., Regional and developmental heterogeneity in splicing of the rat brain NMDAR1 mRNA, J. Neurosci., 14, 318e, 1994.
7. Paupard, M.C., Friedman, L.K., and Zukin, R.S., Developmental regulation and cell-specific expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor splice variants in rat hippocampus, Neuroscience, 79, 399, 1997.
8. Lee-Rivera, I., Zarain-Herzberg, A., and Lopez-Colome, A.M., Developmental expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor 1 splice variants in the chick retina, J. Neurosci. Res., 73, 369, 2003.
9. Magnusson, K.R., Bai, L., and Zhao, X., The effects of aging on different C-terminal splice forms of the zeta 1 (NR1) subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in mice, Brain. Res. Mol. Brain Res., 135, 141, 2005.
10. Soloviev, M.M. et al., Functional expression of a recombinant unitary glutamate receptor from Xenopus, which contains N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDAR subunits, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 32572, 1996.
11. Cox, J.A., Kucenas, S., and Voigt, M.M., Molecular characterization and embryonic expression of the family of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit genes in the zebrafish, Dev. Dyn., 234, 756, 2005.
12. Dunn, R.J., Bottai, D., and Maler, L., Molecular biology of the apteronotus NMDAR NR1 subunit, J. Exp. Biol, 202, 1319, 1999.
13. Ewald, R.C. et al., Roles of NR2A and NR2B in the development of dendritic arbor morphology in vivo, J. Neurosci., 23, 850, 2008.
14. Monyer, H. et al., Developmental and regional expression in the rat brain and functional properties of four NMDARs, Neuron., 12, 529, 1994.
15. Vicini, S. et al., Functional and pharmacological differences between recombinant N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, J. Neurophysiol., 79, 555, 1998.
16. Carmignoto, G. and Vicini, S., Activity-dependent decrease in NMDAR responses during development of the visual cortex, Science, 258, 1007, 1992.
17. Roberts, E.B. and Ramoa, A.S., Enhanced NR2A subunit expression and decreased NMDAR decay time at the onset of ocular dominance plasticity in the ferret, J. Neurophysiol., 81, 2587, 1999.
18. Shi, J., Aamodt, S.M., and Constantine-Paton, M., Temporal correlations between functional and molecular changes in NMDARs and GABA neurotransmission in the superior colliculus, J. Neurosci., 17, 6264, 1997.
19. Hestrin, S., Developmental regulation of NMDAR-mediated synaptic currents at a central synapse, Nature, 357, 686, 1992.
20. Cline, H.T., Wu, G.Y., and Malinow, R., In vivo development of neuronal structure and function, Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol., 61, 95, 1996.
21. Aizenman, C.D. and Cline, H.T., Enhanced visual activity in vivo forms nascent synapses in the developing retinotectal projection, J. Neurophysiol., 97, 2949, 2007.
22. Tovar, K.R. and Westbrook, G.L., The incorporation of NMDARs with a distinct subunit composition at nascent hippocampal synapses in vitro, J. Neurosci., 19, 4180, 1999.
23. Stocca, G. and Vicini, S., Increased contribution of NR2A subunit to synaptic NMDARs in developing rat cortical neurons, J. Physiol., 507 (Pt 1), 13, 1998.
24. Kew, J.N. et al., Developmental changes in NMDAR glycine affinity and ifenprodil sensitivity reveal three distinct populations of NMDARs in individual rat cortical neurons, J. Neurosci., 18, 1935, 1998.
25. Cathala, L., Misra, C., and Cull-Candy, S., Developmental profile of the changing properties of NMDARs at cerebellar mossy fiber-granule cell synapses, J. Neurosci., 20, 5899, 2000.
26. 2+] signaling in individual hippocampal dendritic spines, J. Neurosci., 25, 6037, 2005.
27. Ghosh, A. and Greenberg, M.E., Calcium signaling in neurons: molecular mechanisms and cellular consequences, Science, 268, 239, 1995.
28. Kennedy, M.B. et al., Integration of biochemical signalling in spines, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 6, 423, 2005.
29. Strack, S., McNeill, R.B., and Colbran, R.J., Mechanism and regulation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II targeting to the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 23798, 2000.
30. Mayadevi, M. et al., Sequence determinants on the NR2A and NR2B subunits of NMDAR responsible for specificity of phosphorylation by CaMKII, Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1598, 40, 2002.
31. Bayer, K.U. et al., Interaction with the NMDAR locks CaMKII in an active conformation, Nature, 411, 801, 2001.
32. Leonard, A.S. et al., Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is associated with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 3239, 1999.
33. Barria, A. and Malinow, R., NMDAR subunit composition controls synaptic plasticity by regulating binding to CaMKII, Neuron., 48, 289, 2005.
34. Kim, M.J. et al., Differential roles of NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDARs in Ras-ERK signaling and AMPA receptor trafficking, Neuron, 46, 745, 2005.
35. Krapivinsky, G. et al., The NMDAR is coupled to the ERK pathway by a direct interaction between NR2B and RasGRF1, Neuron, 40, 775, 2003.
36. Schubert, V., Da Silva, J.S., and Dotti, C.G., Localized recruitment and activation of RhoA underlies dendritic spine morphology in a glutamate receptor-dependent manner, J. Cell. Biol., 172, 453, 2006.
37. Al-Hallaq, R.A. et al., NMDA di-heteromeric receptor populations and associated proteins in rat hippocampus, J. Neurosci., 27, 8334, 2007.
38. Flint, A.C. et al., NR2A subunit expression shortens NMDAR synaptic currents in developing neocortex, J. Neurosci., 17, 2469, 1997.
39. Lu, H.C., Gonzalez, E., and Crair, M.C., Barrel cortex critical period plasticity is independent of changes in NMDAR subunit composition, Neuron, 32, 619, 2001.
40. Liu, L. et al., Role of NMDAR subtypes in governing the direction of hippocampal synaptic plasticity, Science, 304, 1021, 2004.
41. Massey, P.V. et al., Differential roles of NR2A and NR2B-containing NMDARs in cortical long-term potentiation and long-term depression, J. Neurosci., 24, 7821, 2004.
42. Neyton, J. and Paoletti, P., Relating NMDAR function to receptor subunit composition: limitations of the pharmacological approach, J. Neurosci., 26, 1331, 2006.
43. Morishita, W. et al., Activation of NR2B-containing NMDARs is not required for NMDAR-dependent long-term depression, Neuropharmacology, 52, 71, 2007.
44. Bartlett, T.E. et al., Differential roles of NR2A and NR2B-containing NMDARs in LTP and LTD in the CA1 region of two-week old rat hippocampus, Neuropharmacology, 52, 60, 2007.
45. Kiyama, Y. et al., Increased thresholds for long-term potentiation and contextual learning in mice lacking the NMDA-type glutamate receptor epsilon1 subunit, J. Neurosci., 18, 6704, 1998.
46. Tang, Y.P. et al., Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice, Nature, 401, 63, 1999.
47. Kohr, G. et al., Intracellular domains of NMDAR subtypes are determinants for longterm potentiation induction, J. Neurosci., 23, 10791, 2003.
48. Toyoda, H., Zhao, M.G., and Zhuo, M., Roles of NMDAR NR2A and NR2B subtypes for long-term depression in the anterior cingulate cortex, Eur. J. Neurosci., 22, 485, 2005.
49. Weitlauf, C. et al., Activation of NR2A-containing NMDARs is not obligatory for NMDAR-dependent long-term potentiation, J. Neurosci., 25, 8386, 2005.
50. Berberich, S. et al., Lack of NMDAR subtype selectivity for hippocampal long-term potentiation, J. Neurosci., 25, 6907, 2005.
51. Quinlan, E.M. et al., Rapid, experience-dependent expression of synaptic NMDARs in visual cortex in vivo, Nat. Neurosci., 2, 352, 1999.
52. Quinlan, E.M., Olstein, D.H., and Bear, M.F., Bidirectional, experience-dependent regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit composition in the rat visual cortex during postnatal development, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 12876, 1999.
53. Bear, M.F., Bidirectional synaptic plasticity: from theory to reality, Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 358, 649, 2003.
54. Philpot, B.D. et al., Visual experience and deprivation bidirectionally modify the composition and function of NMDARs in visual cortex, Neuron, 29, 157, 2001.
55. Philpot, B.D., Cho, K.K., and Bear, M.F., Obligatory role of NR2A for metaplasticity in visual cortex, Neuron, 53, 495, 2007.
56. Bienenstock, E.L., Cooper, L.N., and Munro, P.W., Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex, J. Neurosci., 2, 32, 1982.
57. Washbourne, P. et al., Cycling of NMDARs during trafficking in neurons before synapse formation, J. Neurosci., 24, 8253, 2004.
58. Tovar, K.R. and Westbrook, G.L., Mobile NMDARs at hippocampal synapses, Neuron, 34, 255-64, 2002.
59. Rumbaugh, G. and Vicini, S., Distinct synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDARs in developing cerebellar granule neurons, J. Neurosci., 19, 10603, 1999.
60. Thomas, C.G., Miller, A.J., and Westbrook, G.L., Synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDAR NR2 subunits in cultured hippocampal neurons, J. Neurophysiol., 95, 1727, 2006.
61. Vanhoutte, P. and Bading, H., Opposing roles of synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDARs in neuronal calcium signalling and BDNF gene regulation, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 13, 366-71, 2003.
62. Hardingham, G.E., Fukunaga, Y., and Bading, H., Extrasynaptic NMDARs oppose synaptic NMDARs by triggering CREB shut-off and cell death pathways, Nat. Neurosci., 5, 405, 2002.
63. Chatterton, J.E. et al., Excitatory glycine receptors containing the NR3 family of NMDAR subunits, Nature, 415, 793, 2002.
64. Ciabarra, A.M. et al., Cloning and characterization of chi-1: a developmentally regulated member of a novel class of the ionotropic glutamate receptor family, J. Neurosci, 15, 6498, 1995.
65. Sucher, N.J. et al., Developmental and regional expression pattern of a novel NMDAR-like subunit (NMDAR-L) in the rodent brain, J. Neurosci., 15, 6509, 1995.
66. Perez-Otano, I. et al., Assembly with the NR1 subunit is required for surface expression of NR3A-containing NMDARs, J. Neurosci., 21, 1228, 2001.
67. Das, S. et al., Increased NMDA current and spine density in mice lacking the NMDAR subunit NR3A, Nature, 393, 377, 1998.
68. Wong, H.K. et al., Temporal and regional expression of NMDAR subunit NR3A in the mammalian brain, J. Comp. Neurol., 450, 303, 2002.
69. Nishi, M. et al., Motoneuron-specific expression of NR3B, a novel NMDA-type glutamate receptor subunit that works in a dominant-negative manner, J. Neurosci., 21, RC185, 2001.
70. Matsuda, K. et al., Cloning and characterization of a novel NMDAR subunit NR3B: a dominant subunit that reduces calcium permeability, Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 100, 43, 2002.
71. Sakimura, K. et al., Reduced hippocampal LTP and spatial learning in mice lacking NMDAR epsilon 1 subunit, Nature, 373, 151, 1995.
72. Forrest, D. et al., Targeted disruption of NMDAR 1 gene abolishes NMDA response and results in neonatal death, Neuron, 13, 325, 1994.
73. Kutsuwada, T. et al., Impairment of suckling response, trigeminal neuronal pattern formation, and hippocampal LTD in NMDAR epsilon 2 subunit mutant mice, Neuron, 16, 333, 1996.
74. Ikeda, K. et al., Reduced spontaneous activity of mice defective in the epsilon 4 subunit of the NMDAR channel, Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 33, 61, 1995.
75. Kadotani, H. et al., Motor discoordination results from combined gene disruption of the NMDAR NR2A and NR2C subunits, but not from single disruption of the NR2A or NR2C subunit, J. Neurosci., 16, 7859, 1996.
76. Tashiro, A. et al., NMDA-receptor-mediated, cell-specific integration of new neurons in adult dentate gyrus, Nature, 442, 929, 2006.
77. Cline, H.T. and Constantine-Paton, M., NMDAR antagonists disrupt the retinotectal topographic map, Neuron, 3, 413, 1989.
78. Simon, D.K. et al., N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists disrupt the formation of a mammalian neural map, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 10593, 1992.
79. Ruthazer, E.S., Akerman, C.J., and Cline, H.T., Control of axon branch dynamics by correlated activity in vivo, Science, 301, 66, 2003.
80. Ramoa, A.S. et al., Suppression of cortical NMDAR function prevents development of orientation selectivity in the primary visual cortex, J. Neurosci, 21, 4299, 2001.
81. Li, Y. et al., Whisker-related neuronal patterns fail to develop in the trigeminal brainstem nuclei of NMDAR1 knockout mice, Cell, 76, 427, 1994.
82. Lee, L.J., Lo, F.S., and Erzurumlu, R.S., NMDAR-dependent regulation of axonal and dendritic branching, J. Neurosci., 25, 2304, 2005.
83. Iwasato, T. et al., NMDAR-dependent refinement of somatotopic maps, Neuron, 19, 1201, 1997.
84. Iwasato, T. et al., Cortex-restricted disruption of NMDAR1 impairs neuronal patterns in the barrel cortex, Nature, 406, 726, 2000.
85. Rebsam, A., Seif, I., and Gaspar, P., Refinement of thalamocortical arbors and emergence of barrel domains in the primary somatosensory cortex: a study of normal and monoamine oxidase a knock-out mice, J. Neurosci., 22, 8541, 2002.
86. Rajan, I., Witte, S., and Cline, H.T., NMDAR activity stabilizes presynaptic retino-tectal axons and postsynaptic optic tectal cell dendrites in vivo, J. Neurobiol., 38, 357, 1999.
87. Schmidt, J.T., Activity-driven sharpening of the retinotectal projection: the search for retrograde synaptic signaling pathways, J. Neurobiol., 59, 114, 2004.
88. Wu, G.Y. et al., Dendritic dynamics in vivo change during neuronal maturation, J. Neurosci., 19, 4472, 1999.
89. Hua, J.Y. and Smith, S.J., Neural activity and the dynamics of central nervous system development, Nat. Neurosci., 7, 327, 2004.
90. Scott, E.K. and Luo, L., How do dendrites take their shape? Nat. Neurosci., 4, 2001.
91. Cline, H.T., Dendritic arbor development and synaptogenesis, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 11, 118, 2001.
92. Rajan, I. and Cline, H.T., Glutamate receptor activity is required for normal development of tectal cell dendrites in vivo, J. Neurosci., 18, 7836, 1998.
93. Sin, W.C. et al., Dendrite growth increased by visual activity requires NMDAR and Rho GTPases, Nature, 419, 475, 2002.
94. Rocha, M. and Sur, M., Rapid acquisition of dendritic spines by visual thalamic neurons after blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 8026, 1995.
95. McAllister, A.K., Katz, L.C., and Lo, D.C., Neurotrophin regulation of cortical dendritic growth requires activity, Neuron, 17, 1057, 1996.
96. Wu, G.Y. and Cline, H.T., Stabilization of dendritic arbor structure in vivo by CaMKII, Science, 279, 1998.
97. Li, Z., Aizenman, C.D., and Cline, H.T., Regulation of rho GTPases by crosstalk and neuronal activity in vivo, Neuron, 33, 741, 2002.
98. Li, Z., Van Aelst, L., and Cline, H.T., Rho GTPases regulate distinct aspects of dendritic arbor growth in Xenopus central neurons in vivo, Nat. Neurosci., 3, 217, 2000.
99. Chiaia, N.L., Bennett-Clarke, C.A., and Rhoades, R.W., Effects of cortical and thalamic lesions upon primary afferent terminations, distributions of projection neurons, and the cytochrome oxidase pattern in the trigeminal brainstem complex, J. Comp. Neurol, 303, 600, 1991.
100. Niell, C.M., Meyer, M.P., and Smith, S.J., In vivo imaging of synapse formation on a growing dendritic arbor, Nat. Neurosci., 7, 254, 2004.
101. Maletic-Savatic, M., Malinow, R., and Svoboda, K., Rapid dendritic morphogenesis in CA1 hippocampal dendrites induced by synaptic activity, Science, 283, 1923, 1999.
102. Dailey, M.E. and Smith, S.J., The dynamics of dendritic structure in developing hippocampal slices, J. Neurosci., 16, 2983, 1996.
103. Portera-Cailliau, C., Pan, D.T., and Yuste, R., Activity-regulated dynamic behavior of early dendritic protrusions: evidence for different types of dendritic filopodia, J. Neurosci., 23, 7129, 2003.
104. Fifkova, E. and Delay, R.J., Cytoplasmic actin in neuronal processes as a possible mediator of synaptic plasticity, J. Cell. Biol., 95, 345, 1982.
105. Matus, A. et al., High actin concentrations in brain dendritic spines and postsynaptic densities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79, 7590, 1982.
106. Gray, E.G. et al., Synaptic organisation and neuron microtubule distribution, Cell Tissue Res., 226, 579, 1982.
107. Westrum, L.E. et al., Synaptic development and microtubule organization, Cell Tissue Res., 231, 93, 1983.
108. Vaughn, J.E., Barber, R.P., and Sims, T.J., Dendritic development and preferential growth into synaptogenic fields: a quantitative study of Golgi-impregnated spinal motor neurons, Synapse, 2, 69, 1988.
109. Vaughn, J.E., Fine structure of synaptogenesis in the vertebrate central nervous system, Synapse, 3, 255, 1989.
110. Star, E.N., Kwiatkowski, D.J., and Murthy, V.N., Rapid turnover of actin in dendritic spines and its regulation by activity, Nat. Neurosci., 5, 239, 2002.
111. Fukazawa, Y. et al., Hippocampal LTP is accompanied by enhanced F-actin content within the dendritic spine that is essential for late LTP maintenance in vivo, Neuron, 38, 447, 2003.
112. Fischer, M. et al., Glutamate receptors regulate actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines, Nat. Neurosci., 3, 887, 2000.
113. Malinow, R. and Malenka, R.C., AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 25, 103, 2002.
114. Huang, Y.S. et al., N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor signaling results in Aurora kinase-catalyzed CPEB phosphorylation and alpha CaMKII mRNA polyadenylation at synapses, EMBO J, 21, 2139, 2002.
115. Bestman, J.E. and Cline, H.T., The RNA binding protein CPEB controls dendrite growth and neural circuit assembly in vivo, J. Neurosci., 28, 850, 2008.
116. Garner, C.C., Waites, C.L., and Ziv, N.E., Synapse development: still looking for the forest, still lost in the trees, Cell Tissue Res., 326, 249, 2006.
117. Zhu, J.J. et al., Postnatal synaptic potentiation: delivery of GluR4-containing AMPA receptors by spontaneous activity, Nat. Neurosci., 3, 1098, 2000.
118. Durand, G.M., Kovalchuk, Y., and Konnerth, A., Long-term potentiation and functional synapse induction in developing hippocampus, Nature, 381, 71, 1996.
119. Wu, G., Malinow, R., and Cline, H.T., Maturation of a central glutamatergic synapse, Science, 274, 972, 1996.
120. Liao, D. and Malinow, R., Deficiency in induction but not expression of LTP in hippocampal slices from young rats, Learn Mem., 3, 138, 1996.
121. Isaac, J.T. et al., Silent synapses during development of thalamocortical inputs, Neuron, 18, 269, 1997.
122. Liao, D., Hessler, N.A., and Malinow, R., Activation of postsynaptically silent synapses during pairing-induced LTP in CA1 region of hippocampal slice, Nature, 375, 400, 1995.
123. Akerman, C.J. and Cline, H.T., Refining the roles of GABAergic signaling during neural circuit formation, Trends Neurosci., 30, 382, 2007.
124. Ben-Ari, Y. et al., GABAA, NMDA and AMPA receptors: a developmentally regulated “menage a trois,” Trends Neurosci., 20, 523, 1997.
125. Leinekugel, X. et al., Ca2+ oscillations mediated by the synergistic excitatory actions of GABA(A) and NMDARs in the neonatal hippocampus, Neuron, 18, 243, 1997.
126. Akerman, C.J. and Cline, H.T., Depolarizing GABAergic conductances regulate the balance of excitation to inhibition in the developing retinotectal circuit in vivo, J. Neurosci., 26, 5117, 2006.
127. Barria, A. and Malinow, R., Subunit-specific NMDAR trafficking to synapses, Neuron, 35, 345, 2002.
128. Hayashi, Y. et al., Driving AMPA receptors into synapses by LTP and CaMKII: requirement for GluR1 and PDZ domain interaction, Science, 287, 2262, 2000.
129. Shi, S.H. et al., Rapid spine delivery and redistribution of AMPA receptors after synaptic NMDAR activation, Science, 284, 1811, 1999.
130. Shi, S. et al., Subunit-specific rules governing AMPA receptor trafficking to synapses in hippocampal pyramidal neurons, Cell, 105, 331, 2001.
131. Beattie, E.C. et al., Regulation of AMPA receptor endocytosis by a signaling mechanism shared with LTD, Nat. Neurosci., 3, 1291, 2000.
132. Carroll, R.C. et al., Dynamin-dependent endocytosis of ionotropic glutamate receptors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 14112, 1999.
133. Carroll, R.C. et al., Rapid redistribution of glutamate receptors contributes to longterm depression in hippocampal cultures, Nat. Neurosci., 2, 454, 1999.
134. Lee, S.H. et al., Clathrin adaptor AP2 and NSF interact with overlapping sites of GluR2 and play distinct roles in AMPA receptor trafficking and hippocampal LTD, Neuron, 36, 661, 2002.