Multiple Rounds of Artificial Selection Promote Microbe Secondary Domestication- The Case of Cachaça Yeasts

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2018, Pages 1939-1955

  Barbosa, Raquel ^a   Pontes, Ana ^a   Santos, Renata O ^b   Montandon, Gabriela G ^b   De Ponzzes Gomes, Camila M ^b   Morais, Paula B ^c   Gonçalves, Paula ^a   Rosa, Carlos A ^b   Sampaio, Joscrossed D Sign Paulo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO TOCANTINS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

cachaca fermentation; comparative and population genomics; domestication traits; microbe domestication; microbe population genomics; yeast evolutionary biology

Indexed keywords

AQUAPORIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

AQUAPORINS; BASE SEQUENCE; FERMENTATION; GENES, FUNGAL; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 85055280560     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evy132     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Almeida P, Barbosa R, Bensasson D, Gonçalves P, Sampaio JP. 2017. Adaptive divergence in wine yeasts and their wild relatives suggests a prominent role for introgressions and rapid evolution at noncoding sites. Mol Ecol. 26(7):2167-2182.
2. Almeida P, et al. 2015. A population genomics insight into the Mediterranean origins of wine yeast domestication. Mol Ecol. 24(21):5412-5427.
3. Almeida P, et al. 2014. A Gondwanan imprint on global diversity and domestication of wine and cider yeast Saccharomyces uvarum. Nat Commun. 5:4044.
4. Avram D, Leid M, Bakalinsky AT. 1999. Fzf1p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a positive regulator of SSU1 transcription and its first zinc finger region is required for DNA binding. Yeast 15(6):473-480.
5. Badotti F, Gomes FCO, Rosa CA. 2012. 38 Brazilian cachaça: fermentation and production. In: Hui Y, editor. Handbook of plant-based fermented food and beverage technology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press. p. 639-648.
6. Badotti F, Vilaça ST, Arias A, Rosa CA, Barrio E. 2014. Two interbreeding populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains coexist in cachaça fermentations from Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res. 14(2):289-301.
7. Bankevich A, et al. 2012. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 19(5):455-477.
8. Barbosa R, et al. 2016. Evidence of natural hybridization in Brazilian wild lineages of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol Evol. 8(2):317-329.
9. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(15):2114-2120.
10. Borneman AR, et al. 2011. Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 7(2):e1001287.
11. Borneman AR, et al. 2012. The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins. FEMS Yeast Res. 12(1):88-96.
12. Borneman AR, Forgan AH, Kolouchova R, Fraser JA, Schmidt SA. 2016. Whole genome comparison reveals high levels of inbreeding and strain redundancy across the spectrum of commercial wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda) 6(4):957-971.
13. Borneman AR, Pretorius IS. 2015. Genomic insights into the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Genetics 199(2):281-291.
14. Campos CR, et al. 2010. Features of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a culture starter for the production of the distilled sugar cane beverage, cachaça in Brazil. J Appl Microbiol. 108(6):1871-1879.
15. Cardoso DR, et al. 2004. Comparison between cachaça and rum using pattern recognition methods. J Agric Food Chem. 52:3429-3433.
16. Coi AL, et al. 2017. Genomic signatures of adaptation to wine biological ageing conditions in biofilm-forming flor yeasts. Mol Ecol. 26(7):2150-2166.
17. Engle EK, Fay JC. 2012. Divergence of the yeast transcription factor FZF1 affects sulfite resistance. PLoS Genet. 8(6):e1002763.
18. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. 2003. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164(4):1567-1587.
19. Fay JC, Benavides JA. 2005. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 1(1):e5.
20. Galeote V, et al. 2011. Amplification of a Zygosaccharomyces bailii DNA segment in wine yeast genomes by extrachromosomal circular DNA formation. PLoS One 6(3):e17872.
21. Gallone B, et al. 2016. Domestication and divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae beer yeasts. Cell 166(6):1397-1410.
22. Gonçalves M, et al. 2016. Distinct domestication trajectories in top-fermenting beer yeasts and wine yeasts. Curr Biol. 26(20): 2750-2761.
23. Guerra JB, et al. 2001. Genetic diversity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains during the 24 h fermentative cycle for the production of the artisanal Brazilian cachaça. Lett Appl Microbiol. 33(2): 106-111.
24. Hall C, Dietrich FS. 2007. The reacquisition of biotin prototrophy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved horizontal gene transfer, gene duplication and gene clustering. Genetics 177(4):2293-2307.
25. Hutter S, Vilella AJ, Rozas J. 2006. Genome-wide DNA polymorphism analyses using VariScan. BMC Bioinformatics 7:409.
26. Legras J-L, Galeote V, Camarasa C, Blondin B, Dequin S. 2017. Ecology, diversity and applications of Saccharomyces yeasts in food and beverages. In: Satyanarayana T, Kunze G, editors. Yeast diversity in human welfare. Singapore: Springer Singapore. p. 283-321.
27. Legras JL, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet JM, Karst F. 2007. Bread, beer andwine: saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol Ecol. 16(10):2091-2102.
28. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14):1754-1760.
29. Li H, et al. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078-2079.
30. Liti G, et al. 2009. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458(7236):337-341.
31. Marsit S, et al. 2015. Evolutionary advantage conferred by an eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer event in wine yeasts. Mol Biol Evol. 32(7):1695-1707.
32. Mukai N, Masaki K, Fujii T, Iefuji H. 2014. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of PAD1 and FDC1 show a positive relationship with ferulic acid decarboxylation ability among industrial yeasts used in alcoholic beverage production. J Biosci Bioeng. 118(1):50-55.
33. Ness F, Aigle M. 1995. RTM1: A member of a new family of telomeric repeated genes in yeast. Genetics 140(3):945-956.
34. Nijkamp JF, et al. 2012. De novo sequencing, assembly and analysis of the genome of the laboratory strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D, a model for modern industrial biotechnology. Microb Cell Fact. 11(1):36.
35. Novo M, et al. 2009. Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106(38):16333-16338.
36. Park H, Bakalinsky AT. 2000. SSU1 mediates sulphite efflux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16(10):881-888.
37. Perez-Ortin JE, Querol A, Puig S, Barrio E. 2002. Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains. Genome Res. 12(10):1533-1539.
38. Romano P, Capece A, Jespersen L. 2006. Taxonomic and ecological diversity of food and beverage yeasts. In: Querol A, Fleet G, editors. The Yeast Handbook, volume 2, Yeasts in food and beverages. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. p. 13-53.
39. Rosa C, AM S, Faria J. 2009. Cachaça production. In: Ingledew WM, Kersall DR, Austin G., Kluhsipies C, editors. The alcohol textbook. 5th ed. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press. p. 481-490.
40. Sampaio JP, Pontes A, Libkind D, Hutzler M. 2017. Taxonomy, diversity, and typing of brewing yeasts. In: Bokulich NA, Bamforth CW, editors. Brewing microbiology: current research, omics and microbial ecology. UK: Caister Academic Press. p. 86-117.
41. Scott AL, Richmond PA, Dowell RD, Selmecki AM. 2017. The Influence of polyploidy on the evolution of yeast grown in a sub-optimal carbon source. Mol Biol Evol. 34(10):2690-2703.
42. Tilakaratna V, Bensasson D. 2017. Habitat predicts levels of genetic admixture in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda) 7(9):2919-2929.
43. Vianna CR, Silva CLC, Neves MJ, Rosa CA. 2008. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from traditional fermentations of Brazilian cachaça: Trehalose metabolism, heat and ethanol resistance. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 93(1-2):205-217.
44. Will JL, et al. 2010. Incipient balancing selection through adaptive loss of aquaporins in natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations. PLoS Genet. 6(4):e1000893.
45. Zimmer A, et al. 2014. QTL dissection of lag phase in wine fermentation reveals a new translocation responsible for Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptation to sulfite. PLoS One 9(1):e86298.