Divergence of the yeast transcription factor FZF1 affects sulfite resistance

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Engle, Elizabeth K ^a   Fay, Justin C ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRIER PROTEIN; PROTEIN SSU1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR FZF1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ANION TRANSPORT PROTEIN; FZF1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SSU1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SULFITE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PHYSICAL RESISTANCE; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SACCHAROMYCES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SULFITE RESISTANCE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; ALLELE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG RESISTANCE; FUNGAL GENOME; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; OPEN READING FRAME; REGULATORY SEQUENCE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES;

ALLELES; ANION TRANSPORT PROTEINS; DRUG RESISTANCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENOME, FUNGAL; OPEN READING FRAMES; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; REGULATORY SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SULFITES; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84864029159     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002763     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Bergmann S, Ihmels J, Barkai N, (2004) Similarities and differences in genome-wide expression data of six organisms. PLoS Biol 2: e9 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020009.
2. Lelandais G, Tanty V, Geneix C, Etchebest C, Jacq C, et al. (2008) Genome adaptation to chemical stress: clues from comparative transcriptomics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida glabrata. Genome Biol 9: R164.
3. Chan ET, Quon GT, Chua G, Babak T, Trochesset M, et al. (2009) Conservation of core gene expression in vertebrate tissues. J Biol 8: 33.
4. Whitehead A, Crawford D, (2006) Variation within and among species in gene expression: raw material for evolution. Mol Ecol 15: 1197-1211.
5. Fay JC, McCullough HL, Sniegowski PD, Eisen MB, (2004) Population genetic variation in gene expression is associated with phenotypic variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol 5: R26.
6. Khaitovich P, Weiss G, Lachmann M, Hellmann I, Enard W, et al. (2004) A neutral model of transcriptome evolution. PLoS Biol 2: e132 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020132.
7. Lemos B, Meiklejohn C, Caceres M, Hartl D, (2005) Rates of divergence in gene expression profiles of primates, mice, and flies: stabilizing selection and variability among functional categories. Evolution 59: 126-137.
8. Fay JC, Wittkopp PJ, (2008) Evaluating the role of natural selection in the evolution of gene regulation. Heredity 100: 191-199.
9. Wittkopp PJ, Haerum BK, Clark AG, (2008) Regulatory changes underlying expression differences within and between Drosophila species. Nat Genet 40: 346-350.
10. Emerson JJ, Hsieh L, Sung H, Wang T, Huang C, et al. (2010) Natural selection on cis and trans regulation in yeasts. Genome Res 20: 826-836.
11. Ihmels J, Bergmann S, Gerami-Nejad M, Yanai I, McClellan M, et al. (2005) Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science 309: 938-940.
12. Doniger SW, Fay JC, (2007) Frequent gain and loss of functional transcription factor binding sites. PLoS Comput Biol 3: e99 doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030099.
13. Tsankov AM, Thompson DA, Socha A, Regev A, Rando OJ, (2010) The role of nucleosome positioning in the evolution of gene regulation. PLoS Biol 8: e1000414 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000414.
14. Stern DL, Orgogozo V, (2008) The loci of evolution: how predictable is genetic evolution? Evolution 62: 2155-2177.
15. Yvert G, Brem R, Whittle J, Akey J, Foss E, et al. (2003) Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nat Genet 35: 57-64.
16. Brown KM, Landry CR, Hartl DL, Cavalieri D, (2008) Cascading transcriptional effects of a naturally occurring frameshift mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Ecol 17: 2985-2997.
17. Kim HS, Huh J, Fay JC, (2009) Dissecting the pleiotropic consequences of a quantitative trait nucleotide. FEMS Yeast Res 9: 713-722.
18. Rockman MV, (2012) The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter. Evolution 66: 1-17.
19. Bullard JH, Mostovoy Y, Dudoit S, Brem RB, (2010) Polygenic and directional regulatory evolution across pathways in Saccharomyces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 5058-5063.
20. Fraser HB, Moses AM, Schadt EE, (2010) Evidence for widespread adaptive evolution of gene expression in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 2977-2982.
21. Fraser HB, Babak T, Tsang J, Zhou Y, Zhang B, et al. (2011) Systematic detection of polygenic cis-regulatory evolution. PLoS Genet 7: e1002023 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002023.
22. Wang X, Chamberlin HM, (2002) Multiple regulatory changes contribute to the evolution of the Caenorhabditis lin-48 ovo gene. Genes Dev 16: 2345-2349.
23. McGregor AP, Orgogozo V, Delon I, Zanet J, Srinivasan DG, et al. (2007) Morphological evolution through multiple cis-regulatory mutations at a single gene. Nature 448: 587-590.
24. Jeong S, Rebeiz M, Andolfatto P, Werner T, True J, et al. (2008) The evolution of gene regulation underlies a morphological difference between two Drosophila sister species. Cell 132: 783-793.
25. Rebeiz M, Pool JE, Kassner VA, Aquadro CF, Carroll SB, (2009) Stepwise modification of a modular enhancer underlies adaptation in a Drosophila population. Science 326: 1663-1667.
26. Frankel N, Erezyilmaz DF, McGregor AP, Wang S, Payre F, et al. (2011) Morphological evolution caused by many subtle-effect substitutions in regulatory DNA. Nature 474: 598-603.
27. Li Y, Liang H, Gu Z, Lin Z, Guan W, et al. (2009) Detecting positive selection in the budding yeast genome. J Evol Biol 22: 2430-2437.
28. Bird CP, Stranger BE, Liu M, Thomas DJ, Ingle CE, et al. (2007) Fast-evolving noncoding sequences in the human genome. Genome Biol 8: R118.
29. Pollard KS, Salama SR, King B, Kern AD, Dreszer T, et al. (2006) Forces shaping the fastest evolving regions in the human genome. PLoS Genet 2: e168 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020168.
30. Prabhakar S, Noonan JP, Pääbo S, Rubin EM, (2006) Accelerated evolution of conserved noncoding sequences in humans. Science 314: 786.
31. Prabhakar S, Visel A, Akiyama JA, Shoukry M, Lewis KD, et al. (2008) Human-specific gain of function in a developmental enhancer. Science 321: 1346-1350.
32. Pollard KS, Salama SR, Lambert N, Lambot M, Coppens S, et al. (2006) An RNA gene expressed during cortical development evolved rapidly in humans. Nature 443: 167-172.
33. Stern DL, Orgogozo V, (2009) Is genetic evolution predictable? Science 323: 746-751.
34. Carroll SB, (2008) Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134: 25-36.
35. Sawyer SL, Malik HS, (2006) Positive selection of yeast nonhomologous end-joining genes and a retrotransposon conflict hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 17614-17619.
36. Casalone E, Colella CM, Daly S, Fontana S, Torricelli I, et al. (1994) Cloning and characterization of a sulphite-resistance gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10: 1101-1110.
37. Avram D, Leid M, Bakalinsky AT, (1999) Fzf1p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a positive regulator of SSU1 transcription and its first zinc finger region is required for DNA binding. Yeast 15: 473-480.
38. Park H, Bakalinsky AT, (2000) SSU1 mediates sulphite efflux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16: 881-888.
39. Pérez-Ortín JE, Querol A, Puig S, Barrio E, (2002) Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains. Genome Res 12: 1533-1539.
40. Markova-Raina P, Petrov D, (2011) High sensitivity to aligner and high rate of false positives in the estimates of positive selection in the 12 Drosophila genomes. Genome Res 21: 863-874.
41. Wong KM, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP, (2008) Alignment uncertainty and genomic analysis. Science 319: 473-476.
42. Schmid K, Yang Z, (2008) The trouble with sliding windows and the selective pressure in BRCA1. PLoS ONE 3: e3746 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003746.
43. Ronald J, Brem R, Whittle J, Kruglyak L, (2005) Local regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 1: e25 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0010025.
44. Gasch A, Spellman P, Kao C, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen M, et al. (2000) Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11: 4241-4257.
45. Gasch A, Werner-Washburne M, (2002) The genomics of yeast responses to environmental stress and starvation. Funct Integr Genomics 2: 181-192.
46. Ponting CP, (2011) What are the genomic drivers of the rapid evolution of PRDM9? Trends Genet 27: 165-171.
47. Wray G, Hahn M, Abouheif E, Balhoff J, Pizer M, et al. (2003) The evolution of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes. Mol Biol Evol 20: 1377-1419.
48. Venkataram S, Fay JC, (2010) Is transcription factor binding site turnover a sufficient explanation for cis-regulatory sequence divergence? Genome Biol Evol 2: 851-858.
49. Lynch VJ, May G, Wagner GP, (2011) Regulatory evolution through divergence of a phosphoswitch in the transcription factor CEBPB. Nature 480: 383-386.
50. Sarver A, DeRisi J, (2005) Fzf1p regulates an inducible response to nitrosative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 16: 4781-4791.
51. Odom DT, Dowell RD, Jacobsen ES, Gordon W, Danford TW, et al. (2007) Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation has diverged significantly between human and mouse. Nat Genet 39: 730-732.
52. Borneman AR, Gianoulis TA, Zhang ZD, Yu H, Rozowsky J, et al. (2007) Divergence of transcription factor binding sites across related yeast species. Science 317: 815-819.
53. Schmidt D, Wilson MD, Ballester B, Schwalie PC, Brown GD, et al. (2010) Five-vertebrate ChIP-seq reveals the evolutionary dynamics of transcription factor binding. Science 328: 1036-1040.
54. Zhou L, Ma X, Arbeitman MN, Sun F, (2009) Chromatin regulation and gene centrality are essential for controlling fitness pleiotropy in yeast. PLoS ONE 4: e8086 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008086.
55. Park H, Hwang Y, (2008) Genome-wide transcriptional responses to sulfite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Microbiol 46: 542-548.
56. Badis G, Chan ET, van Bakel H, Pena-Castillo L, Tillo D, et al. (2008) A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Mol Cell 32: 878-887.
57. Yuasa N, Nakagawa Y, Hayakawa M, Iimura Y, (2004) Distribution of the sulfite resistance gene SSU1-R and the variation in its promoter region in wine yeasts. J Biosci Bioeng 98: 394-397.
58. Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander E, (2003) Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423: 241-254.
59. Pond S, Frost S, Muse S, (2005) HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 21: 676-679.
60. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG, (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 4876-4882.
61. Edgar RC, (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792-1797.
62. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J, (2000) T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 302: 205-217.
63. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T, (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 511-518.
64. Löytynoja A, Goldman N, (2010) webPRANK: a phylogeny-aware multiple sequence aligner with interactive alignment browser. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 579.
65. Stoye J, (1998) Multiple sequence alignment with the Divide-and-Conquer method. Gene 211: GC45-56.
66. Comeron J, (1999) K-Estimator: calculation of the number of nucleotide substitutions per site and the confidence intervals. Bioinformatics 15: 763-764.
67. Wach A, Brachat A, Pöhlmann R, Philippsen P, (1994) New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10: 1793-1808.
68. Sikorski RS, Hieter P, (1989) A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122: 19-27.
69. Park H, Lopez NI, Bakalinsky AT, (1999) Use of sulfite resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a dominant selectable marker. Curr Genet 36: 339-344.
70. Kim HS, Fay JC, (2007) Genetic variation in the cysteine biosynthesis pathway causes sensitivity to pharmacological compounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 19387-19391.
71. Magee L, (1990) R2 measures based on Wald and likelihood ratio joint significance tests. American Statistician 44: 250-253.
72. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA, (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44-57.
73. Bussereau F, Lafay J, Bolotin-Fukuhara M, (2004) Zinc finger transcriptional activators of yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 4: 445-458.
74. Goto-Yamamoto N, Kitano K, Shiki K, Yoshida Y, Suzuki T, et al. (1998) SSU1-R, a sulfite resistance gene of wine yeast, is an allele of SSU1 with a different upstream sequence. J Ferment Bioeng 86: 427-433.