The Influence of Polyploidy on the Evolution of Yeast Grown in a Sub-Optimal Carbon Source

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2017, Pages 2690-2703

  Scott, Amber L ^a   Richmond, Phillip A ^a   Dowell, Robin D ^a   Selmecki, Anna M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

adaptive evolution; experimental evolution; expression data; genomics; polyploidy; yeast

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; CARBON; FUNGAL RNA; GLUCOSE; PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE TRANSPORT; CARBON SOURCE; CARBON UTILIZATION; CLONE; DIPLOIDY; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENOME; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; GENOTYPE; GLUCOSE TRANSPORT; HAPLOIDY; HXT6 GENE; HXT7 GENE; IPT1 GENE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOT3 GENE; MTH1 GENE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POLYPLOIDY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; RGT1 GENE; RGT2 GENE; RNA SEQUENCE; SNF3 GENE; SPECIES; TETRAPLOIDY; UPREGULATION; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING; YEAST; ADAPTATION; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CARBON; DIPLOIDY; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; HAPLOIDY; MUTATION; POLYPLOIDY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TETRAPLOIDY;

EID: 85030680905     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msx205     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Adams J, Hansche PE. 1974. Population studies in microorganisms. Genetics 76:327-335.
2. Anders S, Huber W. 2010. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11:R106.
3. Anderson JB, Sirjusingh C, Parsons AB, Boone C, Wickens C, Cowen LE, Kohn LM. 2003. Mode of selection and experimental evolution of antifungal drug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 163:1287-1298.
4. Anderson JB, Sirjusingh C, Ricker N. 2004. Haploidy, diploidy and evolution of antifungal drug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 168:1915-1923.
5. Bennett RJ, Johnson AD. 2003. Completion of a parasexual cycle in Candida albicans by induced chromosome loss in tetraploid strains. EMBO J. 22:2505-2515.
6. Berman J. 2016. Ploidy plasticity: A rapid and reversible strategy for adaptation to stress. FEMS Yeast Res. 16:1-5.
7. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114-2120
8. Brown CJ, Todd KM, Rosenzweig RF. 1998.Multiple duplications of yeast hexose transport genes in response to selection in a glucose-limited environment. Mol Biol Evol. 15:931-942.
9. Cherry JM, Hong EL, Amundsen C, Balakrishnan R, Binkley G, Chan ET, Christie KR, Costanzo MC, Dwight SS, Engel SR, et al. 2012. Saccharomyces Genome Database: The genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D700-D705.
10. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. 2012. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, Snp Eff. Fly (Austin) 6:80-92.
11. Dickson RC, Nagiec EE, Wells GB, Nagiec MM, Lester RL. 1997. Synthesis of mannose-(inositol-P) 2-ceramide, the major sphingolipid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, requires the IPT1 (YDR072c) gene. Biochemistry 272:29620-29625.
12. Dietzel KL, Ramakrishnan V, Murphy EE, Bisson LF. 2012. MTH1 and RGT1 demonstrate combined haploinsufficiency in regulation of the hexose transporter genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genet. 13:107.
13. Dunham MJ, Badrane H, Ferea T, Adams J, Brown PO, Rosenzweig F, Botstein D. 2002. Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:16144-16149.
14. Engel SR, Dietrich FS, Fisk DG, Binkley G, Balakrishnan R, Costanzo MC, Dwight SS, Hitz BC, Karra K, Nash RS, et al. 2014. The reference genome sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Then and now. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 4:389-398.
15. Frenkel EM, Good BH, Desai MM. 2014. The fates of mutant lineages and the distribution of fitness effects of beneficial mutations in laboratory budding yeast populations. Genetics 196:1217-1226.
16. Fujiwara T, Bandi M, Nitta M, Ivanova EV, Bronson RT, Pellman D. 2005. Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells. Nature 437:1043-1047.
17. Gerstein A, Fu M, Mukaremera L, Li Z, Ormerod K, Fraser J, Berman J, Nielsen K. 2015. Polyploid titan cells produce haploid and aneuploid progeny to promote stress adaptation. MBio 6:1-14.
18. Gerstein AC. 2012. Mutational effects depend on ploidy level: All else is not equal. Biol Lett. 9:20120614.
19. Gerstein AC, Chun HJE, Grant A, Otto SP. 2006. Genomic convergence toward diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLo S Genet. 2:1396-1401.
20. Gerstein AC, Cleathero LA, Mandegar MA, Otto SP. 2011. Haploids adapt faster than diploids across a range of environments. J Evol Biol. 24:531-540.
21. Gerstein AC, Mcbride RM, Otto SP. 2008. Ploidy reduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biol Lett. 4:91-94.
22. Gerstein AC, Otto SP. 2009. Ploidy and the causes of genomic evolution. J Hered. 100:571-581.
23. de Godoy LMF, Olsen JV, Cox J, Nielsen ML, Hubner NC, Fröhlich F, Walther TC, Mann M. 2008. Comprehensive mass-spectrometrybased proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature 455:1251-1254.
24. Gresham D, Desai MM, Tucker CM, Jenq HT, Pai D. a, Ward A, De Sevo CG, Botstein D, Dunham MJ. 2008. The repertoire and dynamics of evolutionary adaptations to controlled nutrient-limited environments in yeast. PLo S Genet. 4:e1000303.
25. Grishin AV, Rothenberg M, Downs MA, Blumer KJ. 1998. Mot3, a Zn finger transcription factor that modulates gene expression and attenuates mating pheromone signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 149:879-892.
26. Halfmann R, Jarosz DF, Jones SK, Chang A, Lancaster AK, Lindquist S. 2012. Prions are a common mechanism for phenotypic inheritance in wild yeasts. Nature 482:363-368.
27. Hallstrom TC, Lambert L, Schorling S, Balzi E, Goffeau A, Moye-Rowley WS. 2001. Coordinate control of sphingolipid biosynthesis and multidrug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 276:23674-23680.
28. Harrison BD, Hashemi J, Bibi M, Pulver R, Bavli D, Nahmias Y, Wellington M, Sapiro G, Berman J. 2014. A tetraploid intermediate precedes aneuploid formation in yeasts exposed to fluconazole. PLo S Biol. 12:e1001815.
29. Holmes DL, Lancaster AK, Lindquist S, Halfmann R. 2013. Heritable remodeling of yeast multicellularity by an environmentally responsive prion. Cell 153:153-165.
30. Hong J, Gresham D. 2014. Molecular specificity, convergence and constraint shape adaptive evolution in nutrient-poor environments. PLo S Genet. 10:e1004041.
31. Hongay C, Jia N, Bard M, Winston F. 2002. Mot3 is a transcriptional repressor of ergosterol biosynthesis genes and is required for normal vacuolar function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 21:4114-4124.
32. Hufton AL, Panopoulou G. 2009. Polyploidy and genome restructuring: A variety of outcomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 19:600-606.
33. Kao KC, Sherlock G. 2008. Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet. 40:1499-1504.
34. King KC, Seppala O, Neiman M. 2012. Is more better Polyploidy and parasite resistance. Biol Lett. 8:598-600.
35. Korona R. 1999. Unpredictable fitness transitions between haploid and diploid strains of the genetically loaded yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 151:77-85.
36. Koschwanez JH, Foster KR, Murray AW. 2013. Improved use of a public good selects for the evolution of undifferentiated multicellularity. Elife 2013:1-27.
37. Krogh a, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer E. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: Application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 305:567-580.
38. Kvitek DJ, Sherlock G. 2011. Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape. PLo S Genet. 7:e1002056.
39. Kvitek DJ, Sherlock G. 2013. Whole genome, whole population sequencing reveals that loss of signaling networks is the major adaptive strategy in a constant environment. PLo S Genet. 9:e1003972.
40. Lang GI, Rice DP, Hickman MJ, Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Botstein D, Desai MM. 2013. Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations. Nature 500:571-574.
41. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357-359.
42. Levin JZ, Yassour M, Adiconis X, Nusbaum C, Thompson DA, Friedman N, Gnirke A, Regev A. 2010. Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods. Nat Methods 7:709-715.
43. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078-2079.
44. Marshall-Carlson L, Neigeborn L, Coons D, Bisson L, Carlson M. 1991. Dominant and recessive suppressors that restore glucose transport in a yeast snf3 mutant. Genetics 128:505-512.
45. Mayer VW, Aguilera A. 1990. High levels of chromosome instability in polyploids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 231:177-186.
46. Mishra S, Whetstine JR. 2016. Different facets of copy number changes: Permanent, transient, and adaptive.Mol Cell Biol. 36:1050-1063.
47. Møller HD, Parsons L, Jørgensen TS, Botstein D, Regenberg B. 2015. Extrachromosomal circular DNA is common in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 112:E3114-E3122.
48. Muller LAH, Mc Cusker JH. 2009. Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity among clinical and nonclinical Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates suggests heterozygote advantage in clinical environments. Mol Ecol. 18:2779-2786.
49. Orr HA, Otto SP. 1994. Does diploidy increase the rate of adaptation Genetics 136:1475-1480.
50. Otto SP. 2007. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131:452-462.
51. Otto SP, Whitton J. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu Rev Genet. 34:401-437.
52. Ozcan S, Dover J, Rosenwald AG, Wölfl S, Johnston M. 1996. Two glucose transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are glucose sensors that generate a signal for induction of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:12428-12432.
53. Ozcan S, Johnston M. 1995. Three different regulatory mechanisms enable yeast hexose transporter (HXT) genes to be induced by different levels of glucose.Mol Cell Biol. 15:1564-1572.
54. Ozcan S, Johnston M. 1999. Function and regulation of yeast hexose transporters. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 63:554-569.
55. Pandit MK, Pocock MJO, Kunin WE. 2011. Ploidy influences rarity and invasiveness in plants. J Ecol. 99:1108-1115.
56. Paquin C, Adams J. 1983. Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations. Nature 302:495-500.
57. Payen C, Sunshine AB, Ong GT, Pogachar JL, Zhao W, Dunham MJ. 2016. High-throughput identification of adaptivemutations in experimentally evolved yeast populations. PLOS Genet. 12:e1006339.
58. Van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A. 2009. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet. 10:725-732.
59. Polish J. a, Kim J-H, Johnston M. 2005. How the Rgt1 transcription factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is regulated by glucose. Genetics 169:583-594.
60. Rancati G, Pavelka N, Fleharty B, Noll A, Trimble R, Walton K, Perera A, Staehling-Hampton K, Seidel CW, Li R. 2008. Aneuploidy underlies rapid adaptive evolution of yeast cells deprived of a conserved cytokinesis motor. Cell 135:879-893.
61. Raser JM, Shea EKO. 2006. Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science 304:1811-1814.
62. Sabina J, Johnston M. 2009. Asymmetric signal transduction through paralogs that comprise a genetic switch for sugar sensing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 284:29635-29643.
63. Schulte F, Wieczorke R, Hollenberg CP, Boles E. 2000. The HTR1 gene is a dominant negative mutant allele of MTH1 and blocks Snf3-A nd Rgt2-dependent glucose signaling in yeast. J Bacteriol. 182:540-542.
64. Sellis D, Kvitek DJ, Dunn B, Sherlock G, Petrov DA. 2016. Heterozygote advantage is a common outcome of adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 203:1401-1413.
65. Selmecki AM, Maruvka YE, Richmond PA, Guillet M, Shoresh N, Sorenson AL, De S, Kishony R, Michor F, Dowell R, et al. 2015. Polyploidy can drive rapid adaptation in yeast. Nature 519:349-352.
66. Sémon M, Wolfe KH. 2007. Consequences of genome duplication. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 17:505-512.
67. Soltis DE, Visger CJ, Soltis PS. 2014. The polyploidy revolution then and now: Stebbins revisited. Am J Bot. 101:1057-1078.
68. Stebbins GL. 1940. The significance of polyploidy in plant evolution. Am Nat. 74:54-66.
69. Storchova Z. 2014. Ploidy changes and genome stability in yeast. Yeast 31:421-430.
70. Storchov-a Z, Breneman A, Cande J, Dunn J, Burbank K, O'toole E, Pellman D. 2006. Genome-wide genetic analysis of polyploidy in yeast. Nature 443:541-547.
71. Storici F, Lewis LK, Resnick MA. 2001. In vivo site-directed mutagenesis using oligonucleotides. Nat Biotechnol. 19:773-776.
72. Tamari Z, Yona AH, Pilpel Y, Barkai N, Airoldi E, Huttenhower C, Gresham D, Lu C, Caudy A, Dunham M, et al. 2016. Rapid evolutionary adaptation to growth on an "unfamiliar" carbon source. BMC Genomics 17:674.
73. Thompson DA, Desai MM, Murray AW. 2006. Ploidy controls the success of mutators and nature of mutations during budding yeast evolution. Curr Biol. 16:1581-1590.
74. Torres EM, Sokolsky T, Tucker CM, Chan LY, Boselli M, Dunham MJ, Amon A. 2007. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317:916-924.
75. Venkataram S, Dunn B, Li Y, Agarwala A, Chang J, Ebel ER, Geiler-Samerotte K, Hérissant L, Blundell JR, Levy SF, et al. 2016. Development of a comprehensive genotype-to-fitness map of adaptation-driving mutations in yeast. Cell 166:1585-1596.
76. Voordeckers K, Kominek J, Das A, Espinosa-Cant-u A, De Maeyer D, Arslan A, Van Pee M, van der Zande E, Meert W, Yang Y, et al. 2015. Adaptation to high ethanol reveals complex evolutionary pathways. PLOS Genet. 11:e1005635.
77. Wenger JW, Piotrowski J, Nagarajan S, Chiotti K, Sherlock G, Rosenzweig F. 2011. Hunger artists: Yeast adapted to carbon limitation show trade-offs under carbon sufficiency. PLo S Genet. 7:e1002202.
78. Wu C, Rolfe P, Gifford D, Fink G. 2010. Control of transcription by cell size. PLo S Biol. 8:e1000523.
79. Yona AH, Manor YS, Herbst RH, Romano GH, Mitchell A, Kupiec M, Pilpel Y, Dahan O. 2012. Chromosomal duplication is a transient evolutionary solution to stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109:21010-21015.
80. Zack TI, Schumacher SE, Carter SL, Cherniack AD, Saksena G, Tabak B, Lawrence MS, Zhang C-Z, Wala J, Mermel CH, et al. 2013. Pan-cancer patterns of somatic copy number alteration. Nat Genet. 45:1134-1140.
81. Zaragoza O, Nielsen K. 2013. Titan cells in Cryptococcus neoformans: Cells with a giant impact. Curr Opin Microbiol. 16:409-413.
82. Zeyl C. 2004. Experimental studies of ploidy evolution in yeast. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 233:187-192.
83. Zeyl C, Vanderford T, Carter M. 2003. An evolutionary advantage of haploidy in large yeast populations. Science 299:555-558.
84. Zhu YO, Sherlock G, Petrov DA. 2016. Whole genome analysis of 132 clinical Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains reveals extensive ploidy variation. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 6:2421-2434.
85. Zörgö E, Chwialkowska K, Gjuvsland AB, Garré E, Sunnerhagen P, Liti G, Blomberg A, Omholt SW, Warringer J. 2013. Ancient evolutionary trade-offs between yeast ploidy states. PLo S Genet. 9:e1003388.