QTL dissection of lag phase in wine fermentation reveals a new translocation responsible for Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptation to sulfite

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Zimmer, Adrien ^a,b   Durand, Cécile ^a,b   Loira, Nicolás ^c   Durrens, Pascal ^b   Sherman, David James ^b   Marullo, Philippe ^a,b  

^a LAFFORT   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SULFITE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ADH1 GENE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION 16; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION 8; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE EXPRESSION; GRAPE JUICE; HEMIZYGOSITY; NONHUMAN; PROMOTER REGION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; RECIPROCAL CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SSU1 GENE; WINE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

FERMENTATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; WINE;

EID: 84900305093     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086298     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Elena SF, Lenski RE (2003) Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 4: 457-469. (Pubitemid 36648145)
2. Dunham MJ, Badrane H, Ferea T, Adams J, Brown PO, et al. (2002) Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 16144-16149. (Pubitemid 35462763)
3. Romano GH, Gurvich Y, Lavi O, Ulitsky I, Shamir R, et al. (2010) Different sets of QTLs influence fitness variation in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 6.
4. Liti G, Louis EJ (2012) Advances in quantitative trait analysis in yeast. PLoS Genet 8: e1002912.
5. Yang Y, Foulquie-Moreno MR, Clement L, Erdei E, Tanghe A, et al. (2013) QTL Analysis of High Thermotolerance with Superior and Downgraded Parental Yeast Strains Reveals New Minor QTLs and Converges on Novel Causative Alleles Involved in RNA Processing. PLoS Genet 9: e1003693.
6. Steinmetz LM, Sinha H, Richards DR, Spiegelman JI, Oefner PJ, et al. (2002) Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Nature 416: 326-330. (Pubitemid 34260247)
7. Salinas F, Cubillos FA, Soto D, Garcia V, Bergstrom A, et al. (2012) The genetic basis of natural variation in oenological traits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 7: e49640.
8. Ehrenreich IM, Torabi N, Jia Y, Kent J, Martis S, et al. (2010) Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants. Nature 464: 1039-1042.
9. Marullo P, Aigle M, Bely M, Masneuf-Pomarede I, Durrens P, et al. (2007) Single QTL mapping and nucleotide-level resolution of a physiologic trait in wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. FEMS Yeast Res 7: 941-952. (Pubitemid 47256362)
10. Brem RB, Yvert G, Clinton R, Kruglyak L (2002) Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 296: 752-755. (Pubitemid 34442007)
11. Araya C, Payen C, Dunham M, Fields S (2010) Whole-genome sequencing of a laboratory-evolved yeast strain. BMC Genomics 11: 88.
12. Zhang Q, Lambert G, Liao D, Kim H, Robin K, et al. (2011) Acceleration of Emergence of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance in Connected Microenvironments. Science 333: 1764-1767.
13. Doniger SW, Kim HS, Swain D, Corcuera D, Williams M, et al. (2008) A Catalog of Neutral and Deleterious Polymorphism in Yeast. PLoS Genet 4: e1000183.
14. King T, Seeto S, Ferenci T (2006) Genotype-by-Environment Interactions Influencing the Emergence of rpoS Mutations in Escherichia coli Populations. Genetics 172: 2071-2079.
15. Liti G, Louis EJ (2005) Yeast evolution and comparative genomics. Annu Rev Microbiol 59: 135-153. (Pubitemid 41507427)
16. Dunham MJ, Badrane H, Ferea T, Adams J, Brown PO, et al. (2002) Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 16144-16149. (Pubitemid 35462763)
17. Koszul R, Caburet S, Dujon B, Fischer G (2004) Eucaryotic genome evolution through the spontaneous duplication of large chromosomal segments. Embo J 23: 234-243. (Pubitemid 38165763)
18. Welch JW, Fogel S, Cathala G, Karin M (1983) Industrial yeasts display tandem gene iteration at the CUP1 region. Molecular and Cellular Biology 3: 1353-1361.
19. Chang SL, Lai HY, Tung SY, Leu JY (2013) Dynamic large-scale chromosomal rearrangements fuel rapid adaptation in yeast populations. PLoS Genet 9: e1003232.
20. Novo M, Bigey F, Beyne E, Galeote V, Gavory F, et al. (2009) Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 16333-16338.
21. Galeote V, Bigey F, Beyne E, Novo M, Legras JL, et al. (2011) Amplification of a Zygosaccharomyces bailii DNA segment in wine yeast genomes by extrachromosomal circular DNA formation. PLoS One 6: e17872.
22. Hall C, Brachat S, Dietrich FS (2005) Contribution of Horizontal Gene Transfer to the Evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 4: 1102-1115. (Pubitemid 40817469)
23. Galeote V, Novo M, Salema-Oom M, Brion C, Valerio E, et al. (2010) FSY1, a horizontally transferred gene in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118 wine yeast strain, encodes a high-affinity fructose/H+ symporter. Microbiology 156: 3754-3761.
24. Ness F, Aigle M (1995) RTM1: a member of a new family of telomeric repeated genes in yeast. Genetics 140: 945-956.
25. Chen G, Bradford WD, Seidel CW, Li R (2012) Hsp90 stress potentiates rapid cellular adaptation through induction of aneuploidy. Nature 482: 246-250.
26. Infante JJ, Dombek KM, Rebordinos L, Cantoral JM, Young ET (2003) Genome-Wide Amplifications Caused by Chromosomal Rearrangements Play a Major Role in the Adaptive Evolution of Natural Yeast. Genetics 165: 1745-1759. (Pubitemid 38040267)
27. Yu X, Gabriel A (2004) Reciprocal Translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Formed by Nonhomologous End Joining. Genetics 166: 741-751. (Pubitemid 38391739)
28. Pennaneach V, Kolodner RD (2009) Stabilization of Dicentric Translocations through Secondary Rearrangements Mediated by Multiple Mechanisms in S. cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 4: e6389.
29. Jackson SP (2002) Sensing and repairing DNA double-strand breaks. Carcinogenesis 23: 687-696.
30. Agarwal S, Tafel AA, Kanaar R (2006) DNA double-strand break repair and chromosome translocations. DNA Repair (Amst) 5: 1075-1081. (Pubitemid 44291620)
31. Fischer G, James SA, Roberts IN, Oliver SG, Louis EJ (2000) Chromosomal evolution in Saccharomyces. Nature 405: 451-454. (Pubitemid 30367420)
32. Greig D (2008) Reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces. Heredity 102: 39-44.
33. Rachidi N, Barre P, Blondin B (1999) Multiple Ty-mediated chromosomal translocations lead to karyotype changes in a wine strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 261: 841-850. (Pubitemid 29286764)
34. Umezu K, Hiraoka M, Mori M, Maki H (2002) Structural Analysis of Aberrant Chromosomes That Occur Spontaneously in Diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Retrotransposon Ty1 Plays a Crucial Role in Chromosomal Rearrangements. Genetics 160: 97-110. (Pubitemid 34118274)
35. Bidenne C, Blondin B, Dequin S, Vezinhet F (1992) Analysis of the chromosomal DNA polymorphism of wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 22: 1-7.
36. Liti G, Peruffo A, James SA, Roberts IN, Louis EJ (2005) Inferences of evolutionary relationships from a population survey of LTR-retrotransposons and telomeric-associated sequences in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Yeast 22: 177-192. (Pubitemid 40298148)
37. Nardi T, Corich V, Giacomini A, Blondin B (2010) A sulphite-inducible form of the sulphite efflux gene SSU1 in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast. Microbiology 156: 1686-1696.
38. Tosato V, Nicolini C, Bruschi CV (2009) DNA bridging of yeast chromosomes VIII leads to near-reciprocal translocation and loss of heterozygosity with minor cellular defects. Chromosoma 118: 179-191.
39. Yuasa N, Nakagawa Y, Hayakawa M, Iimura Y (2005) Two alleles of the sulfite resistance genes are differentially regulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69: 1584-1588. (Pubitemid 41207350)
40. Rossi B, Noel P, Bruschi CV (2010) Different aneuploidies arise from the same bridge-induced chromosomal translocation event in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 186: 775-790.
41. Perez-Ortin JE, Querol A, Puig S, Barrio E (2002) Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains. Genome Res 12: 1533-1539. (Pubitemid 35175091)
42. Park H, Bakalinsky AT (2000) SSU1 mediates sulphite efflux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16: 881-888. (Pubitemid 30466094)
43. Shibata Y, Malhotra A, Bekiranov S, Dutta A (2009) Yeast genome analysis identifies chromosomal translocation, gene conversion events and several sites of Ty element insertion. Nucleic Acids Research 37: 6454-6465.
44. Marullo P, Yvert G, Bely M, Aigle M, Dubourdieu D (2007) Efficient use of DNA molecular markers to construct industrial yeast strains. FEMS Yeast Res Vol7: 1295.
45. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, et al. (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078-2079.
46. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, et al. (2011) The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27: 2156-2158.
47. Chevreux B, Pfisterer T, Drescher B, Driesel AJ, Müller WE, et al. (2004) Using the miraEST assembler for reliable and automated mRNA transcript assembly and SNP detection in sequenced ESTs. Genome research 14: 1147-1159. (Pubitemid 38811551)
48. Albertin W, Da Silva T, Rigoulet M, Salins B, Masneuf-Pomarède I, et al. (in press) The mitochondrial DNA impacts respiration but not fermentation in inter specific Saccharomyces hybrids. Plos one.
49. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH (1991) Applications of high efficiency lithium acetate transformation of intact yeast cells using single-stranded nucleic acids as carrier. Yeast 7: 253-263.
50. Teste MA, Duquenne M, Francois JM, Parrou JL (2009) Validation of reference genes for quantitative expression analysis by real-time RT-PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Mol Biol 10: 99.
51. Marullo P, Bely M, Masneuf-Pomarede I, Pons M, Aigle M, et al. (2006) Breeding strategies for combining fermentative qualities and reducing off-flavor production in a wine yeast model. FEMS Yeast Res 6: 268-279.
52. Pate JB, Lodge JP, Wartburg AF (1962) Effect of Pararosaniline in the Trace Determination of Sulfur Dioxide. Analytical Chemistry 34: 1660-1662.
53. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
54. Engle EK, Fay JC (2012) Divergence of the yeast transcription factor FZF1 affects sulfite resistance. PLoS Genet 8: e1002763.
55. Tachibana C, Yoo JY, Tagne JB, Kacherovsky N, Lee TI, et al. (2005) Combined global localization analysis and transcriptome data identify genes that are directly coregulated by Adr1 and Cat8. Mol Cell Biol 25: 2138-2146. (Pubitemid 40354614)
56. Ng PC, Henikoff S (2001) Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Res 11: 863-874. (Pubitemid 32447869)
57. Goto-Yamamoto N, Kitano K, Shiki K, Yoshida Y, Suzuki T, et al. (1998) SSU1-R, a sulfite resistance gene of wine yeast, is an allele of SSU1 with a different upstream sequence. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering 86: 427-433. (Pubitemid 29008727)
58. Yuasa N, Nakagawa Y, Hayakawa M, Iimura Y (2004) Distribution of the sulfite resistance gene SSU1-R and the variation in its promoter region in wine yeasts. J Biosci Bioeng 98: 394-397. (Pubitemid 40013209)
59. Ribéreau-Gayon P, Dubourdieu D, Donèche B, Lonvaud A (2000) Alcoholic fermentation and metabolic pathways. Handbook of Enology Vol1. London: John Wiley & Sons.
60. Henick K, Edinger, Daniel, Monk(1998) Selective effects of sulfur dioxide and yeast starter culture addition on indigenous yeast populations and sensory characteristics of wine. Journal Of Applied Microbiology 84: 865-876.
61. Egli CM, Edinger WD, Mitrakul CM, Henick-Kling T (1998) Dynamics of indigenous and inoculated yeast populations and their effect on the sensory character of Riesling and Chardonnay wines. Journal Of Applied Microbiology 85: 779-789. (Pubitemid 28517009)
62. Winzeler EA, Richards DR, Conway AR, Goldstein AL, Kalman S, et al. (1998) Direct allelic variation scanning of the yeast genome. Science 281: 1194-1197. (Pubitemid 28406295)
63. Gresham D, Ruderfer DM, Pratt SC, Schacherer J, Dunham MJ, et al. (2006) Genome-wide detection of polymorphisms at nucleotide resolution with a single DNA microarray. Science 311: 1932-1936.
64. Deutschbauer AM, Davis RW (2005) Quantitative trait loci mapped to single-nucleotide resolution in yeast. Nat Genet 37: 1333-1340. (Pubitemid 41722188)
65. Ambroset C, Petit M, Brion C, Sanchez I, Delobel P, et al. (2011) Deciphering the molecular basis of wine yeast fermentation traits using a combined genetic and genomic approach. G3 (Bethesda) 1: 263-281.
66. Cubillos FA, Billi E, Zorgo E, Parts L, Fargier P, et al. (2011) Assessing the complex architecture of polygenic traits in diverged yeast populations. Mol Ecol 20: 1401-1413.
67. Bloom JS, Ehrenreich IM, Loo WT, Lite TLV, Kruglyak L (2013) Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross. Nature 494: 234-237.
68. Ehrenreich IM, Bloom J, Torabi N, Wang X, Jia Y, et al. (2012) Genetic Architecture of Highly Complex Chemical Resistance Traits across Four Yeast Strains. Plos Genetics 8.
69. Katou T, Namise M, Kitagaki H, Akao T, Shimoi H (2009) QTL mapping of sake brewing characteristics of yeast. J Biosci Bioeng 107: 383-393.
70. Divol B, du Toit M, Duckitt E (2012) Surviving in the presence of sulphur dioxide: strategies developed by wine yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95: 601-613.
71. Stratford M, Morgan P, Rose A (1987) Sulphur dioxide resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomycodes ludwigii. Journal of general microbiology 133: 2173-2179.
72. Hinze H, Holzer H (1986) Analysis of the energy metabolism after incubation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with sulfite or nitrite. Archives of microbiology 145: 27-31. (Pubitemid 16065407)
73. Park H, Hwang YS (2008) Genome-wide transcriptional responses to sulfite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Microbiol 46: 542-548.
74. Thornton RJ (1982) Selective hybridisation of pure culture wine yeasts. European journal of applied microbiology and biotechnology 14: 159-164.
75. Casalone E, Colella CM, Daly S, Gallori E, Moriani L, et al. (1992) Mechanism of resistance to sulphite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 22: 435-440.
76. Thomas D, Surdin-Kerjan Y (1997) Metabolism of sulfur amino acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 503-532. (Pubitemid 28006958)
77. Xu X, Wightman JD, Geller BL, Avram D, Bakalinsky AT (1994) Isolation and characterization of sulfite mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Current Genetics 25: 488-496. (Pubitemid 24134183)
78. Badis G, Chan ET, van Bakel H, Pena-Castillo L, Tillo D, et al. (2008) A Library of Yeast Transcription Factor Motifs Reveals a Widespread Function for Rsc3 in Targeting Nucleosome Exclusion at Promoters. Molecular Cell 32: 878-887.
79. Favier M, Bilhère E, Lonvaud-Funel A, Moine V, Lucas PM (2012) Identification of pOENI-1 and Related Plasmids in Oenococcus oeni Strains Performing the Malolactic Fermentation in Wine. PLoS ONE 7: e49082.
80. Fraser JA, Huang JC, Pukkila-Worley R, Alspaugh JA, Mitchell TG, et al. (2005) Chromosomal translocation and segmental duplication in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryotic cell 4: 401-406. (Pubitemid 40257139)
81. Chuma I, Isobe C, Hotta Y, Ibaragi K, Futamata N, et al. (2011) Multiple Translocation of the AVR-Pita Effector Gene among Chromosomes of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe oryzae and Related Species. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002147.
82. Koszul R, Dujon B, Fischer G (2006) Stability of Large Segmental Duplications in the Yeast Genome. Genetics 172: 2211-2222.
83. Adams J, Puskas-Rozsa S, Simlar J, Wilke C (1992) Adaptation and major chromosomal changes in populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Current Genetics 22: 13-19.
84. Dhar R, Sagesser R, Weikert C, Yuan J, Wagner A (2011) Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to saline stress through laboratory evolution. J Evol Biol 24: 1135-1153.