Genomic signatures of adaptation to wine biological ageing conditions in biofilm-forming flor yeasts

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 2150-2166

  Coi, A L ^a   Bigey, F ^b   Mallet, S ^b   Marsit, S ^b   Zara, G ^a   Gladieux, P ^c   Galeote, V ^b   Budroni, M ^a   Dequin, S ^b   Legras, J L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASSARI   (Italy)

^b UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Biofilm; Biological ageing; Domestication; FLO11; Flor yeast; Genome; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; ZRT1

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIOFILM; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MICROBIOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; WINE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BIOFILMS; FERMENTATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SELECTION, GENETIC; WINE;

EID: 85018059768     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mec.14053     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Adhikari H, Cullen PJ (2015) Role of phosphatidylinositol phosphate signaling in the regulation of the filamentousgrowth mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Eukaryotic Cell, 14, 427-440.
2. Akao T, Yashiro I, Hosoyama A et al. (2011) Whole-genome sequencing of sake yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kyokai no. 7. DNA Research: An International Journal for Rapid Publication of Reports on Genes and Genomes, 18, 423-434.
3. Akey JM, Zhang G, Zhang K, Jin L, Shriver MD (2002) Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome Research, 12, 1805-1814.
4. Akey JM, Ruhe AL, Akey DT et al. (2010) Tracking footprints of artificial selection in the dog genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 1160-1165.
5. Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K (2009) Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals Fast modelbased estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Research, 19, 1655-1664.
6. Almeida P, Barbosa R, Zalar P et al. (2015) A population genomics insight into the Mediterranean origins of wine yeast domestication. Molecular Ecology, 24, 5412-5427.
7. Amato R, Pinelli M, Monticelli A et al. (2009) Genome-wide scan for signatures of human population differentiation and their relationship with natural selection, functional pathways and diseases. PLoS ONE, 4, e7927.
8. Argueso JL, Carazzolle MF, Mieczkowski PA et al. (2009) Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome Research, 19, 2258-2270.
9. Auton A, McVean G (2007) Recombination rate estimation in the presence of hotspots. Genome Research, 17, 1219-1227.
10. Baker AE, Wang B, Bellora N et al. (2015) The genome sequence of Saccharomyces eubayanus and the domestication of lager-brewing yeasts. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 11, 2018-2031.
11. Barth G, Gaillardin C (1996) Yarrowia lipolytica. In: Non-Conventional Yeasts in Biotechnology: A Handbook (ed. Wolf K), pp. 313-388. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
12. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57, 289-300.
13. Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D et al. (2011) Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (G Sherlock, Ed.). PLoS Genetics, 7, e1001287.
14. Borneman AR, Forgan AH, Kolouchova R, Fraser JA, Schmidt SA (2016) Whole genome comparison reveals high levels of inbreeding and strain redundancy across the spectrum of commercial wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics, 6, 957-971.
15. Browning SR, Browning BL (2007) Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for wholegenome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. American Journal of Human Genetics, 81, 1084-1097.
16. Brückner S, Mösch H-U (2011) Choosing the right lifestyle: adhesion and development in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 36, 25-58.
17. Budroni M, Giordano G, Pinna G, Farris GA (2000) A genetic study of natural flor strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolated during biological ageing from Sardinian wines. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 89, 657-662.
18. Bumgarner SL, Dowell RD, Grisafi P, Gifford DK, Fink GR (2009) Toggle involving cis-interfering noncoding RNAs controls variegated gene expression in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 18321-18326.
19. Chen H, Patterson N, Reich D (2010) Population differentiation as a test for selective sweeps. Genome Research, 20, 393-402.
20. Citiulo F, Jacobsen ID, Miramón P et al. (2012) Candida albicans scavenges host zinc via Pra1 during endothelial invasion. PLoS Pathogens, 8, e1002777.
21. Coi AL, Legras J-L, Zara G, Dequin S, Budroni M (2016) A set of haploid strains available for genetic studies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae flor yeasts. FEMS Yeast Research, 6, 1-26.
22. Cromie GA, Hyma KE, Ludlow CL et al. (2013) Genomic sequence diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae assessed by RAD-seq. G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 3, 2163-2171.
23. Cruickshank TE, Hahn MW (2014) Reanalysis suggests that genomic islands of speciation are due to reduced diversity, not reduced gene flow. Molecular Ecology, 23, 3133-3157.
24. Cullen PJ, Sprague GF (2012) The regulation of filamentous growth in yeast. Genetics, 190, 23-49.
25. Engel SR, Cherry JM (2013) The new modern era of yeast genomics: community sequencing and the resulting annotation of multiple Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains at the Saccharomyces Genome Database. Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2013, bat012.
26. Engle EK, Fay JC (2013) ZRT1 harbors an excess of nonsynonymous polymorphism and shows evidence of balancing selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 3, 665-673.
27. Estreicher SK (2006) Wine from Neolithic Times to the 21st Century. Algora Publishing, New York.
28. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131, 479-491.
29. Fay JC, Benavides JA (2005) Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genetics, 1, 66-71.
30. Fidalgo M, Barrales RR, Ibeas JI, Jimenez J (2006) Adaptive evolution by mutations in the FLO11 gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 11228-11233.
31. Fujita A, Hiroko T, Hiroko F, Oka C (2005) Enhancement of superficial pseudohyphal growth by overexpression of the SFG1 gene in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene, 363, 97-104.
32. Furukawa K, Sidoux-Walter F, Hohmann S (2009) Expression of the yeast aquaporin Aqy2 affects cell surface properties under the control of osmoregulatory and morphogenic signalling pathways. Molecular Microbiology, 74, 1272-1286.
33. Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Borkovich KA et al. (2003) The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Nature, 422, 859-868.
34. Galeote V, Novo M, Salema-Oom M et al. (2010) FSY1, a horizontally transferred gene in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118 wine yeast strain, encodes a high-affinity fructose/H+ symporter. Microbiology (Reading, England), 156, 3754-3761.
35. Gallone B, Steensels J, Prahl T et al. (2016) Domestication and divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Beer Yeasts. Cell, 166, 1397-1410.e16.
36. Gibbons JG, Rinker DC (2015) The genomics of microbial domestication in the fermented food environment. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 35, 1-8.
37. Gitan RS, Luo H, Rodgers J, Broderius M, Eide D (1998) Zincinduced inactivation of the yeast ZRT1 zinc transporter occurs through endocytosis and vacuolar degradation. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 273, 28617-28624.
38. Gladieux P, Ropars J, Badouin H et al. (2014) Fungal evolutionary genomics provides insight into the mechanisms of adaptive divergence in eukaryotes. Molecular Ecology, 23, 753-773.
39. Guillaume C, Delobel P, Sablayrolles J-M, Blondin B (2007) Molecular basis of fructose utilization by the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a mutated HXT3 allele enhances fructose fermentation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73, 2432-2439.
40. Gutenkunst RN, Hernandez RD, Williamson SH, Bustamante CD (2009) Inferring the joint demographic history of multiple populations from multidimensional SNP frequency data. PLoS Genetics, 5, e1000695.
41. Ho WC, Zhang J (2014) The genotype-phenotype map of yeast complex traits: basic parameters and the role of natural selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31, 1568-1580.
42. Hudson RR (2002) Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics, 18, 337-338.
43. Ibeas JI, Jimenez J (1996) Genomic complexity and chromosomal rearrangements in wine-laboratory yeast hybrids. Current Genetics, 30, 410-416.
44. Ibeas JI, Jimenez J (1997) Mitochondrial DNA loss caused by ethanol in Saccharomyces Flor yeasts. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63, 7-12.
45. Jombart T, Ahmed I (2011) adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 27, 3070-3071.
46. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genetics, 11, 94.
47. Karunanithi S, Joshi J, Chavel C et al. (2012) Regulation of mat responses by a differentiation MAPK pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE, 7, e32294.
48. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30, 772-780.
49. Kryazhimskiy S, Plotkin JB (2008) The population genetics of dN/dS. PLoS Genetics, 4, e1000304.
50. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL et al. (2004) Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biology, 5, R12.
51. Kvitek DJ, Sherlock G (2013) Whole genome, whole population sequencing reveals that loss of signaling networks is the major adaptive strategy in a constant environment (J Zhang, Ed.). PLoS Genetics, 9, e1003972.
52. Lee T-H, Guo H, Wang X, Kim C, Paterson AH (2014) SNPhylo: a pipeline to construct a phylogenetic tree from huge SNP data. BMC Genomics, 15, 162.
53. Legras J-L, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet J-M, Karst F (2007) Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Molecular Ecology, 16, 2091-2102.
54. Legras J-L, Erny C, Charpentier C (2014) Population structure and comparative genome hybridization of european flor yeast reveal a unique group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with few gene duplications in their genome. PLoS ONE, 9, e108089.
55. Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 25, 1754-1760.
56. Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J et al. (2010) De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Research, 20, 265-272.
57. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM et al. (2009) Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature, 458, 337-341.
58. Lorenz MC, Heitman J (1998) The MEP2 ammonium permease regulates pseudohyphal differentiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO Journal, 17, 1236-1247.
59. Magwene PM, Kayıkcí Ö, Granek JA et al. (2011) Outcrossing, mitotic recombination, and life-history trade-offs shape genome evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 1987-1992.
60. Marsit S, Mena A, Bigey F et al. (2015) Evolutionary advantage conferred by an eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer event in wine yeasts. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32, 1695-1707.
61. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E et al. (2010) The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing nextgeneration DNA sequencing data. Genome Research, 20, 1297-1303.
62. McVean G (2009) A genealogical interpretation of principal components analysis. PLoS Genetics, 5, e1000686.
63. Moradi MH, Nejati-Javaremi A, Moradi-Shahrbabak M, Dodds KG, McEwan JC (2012) Genomic scan of selective sweeps in thin and fat tail sheep breeds for identifying of candidate regions associated with fat deposition. BMC Genetics, 13, 10.
64. Ng PC, Henikoff S (2001) Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Research, 11, 863-874.
65. Nobile CJ, Nett JE, Hernday AD et al. (2009) Biofilm matrix regulation by Candida albicans Zap1. PLoS Biology, 7, e1000133.
66. Novo M, Bigey F, Beyne E et al. (2009) Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesv, 106, 16333-16338.
67. Oleksyk TK, Smith MW, O’Brien SJ (2010) Genome-wide scans for footprints of natural selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 365, 185-205.
68. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D (2006) Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genetics, 2, e190.
69. Pérez-Ortín JE, Querol A, Puig S, Barrio E (2002) Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains. Genome Research, 12, 1533-1539.
70. Petersson A, Almeida JRM, Modig T et al. (2006) A 5-hydroxymethyl furfural reducing enzyme encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH6 gene conveys HMF tolerance. Yeast (Chichester, England), 23, 455-464.
71. Pfeifer B, Wittelsbürger U, Ramos-Onsins SE, Lercher MJ (2014) PopGenome: an efficient swiss army knife for population genomic analyses in R. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31, 1929-1936.
72. Rausch T, Zichner T, Schlattl A et al. (2012) DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 28, i333-i339.
73. Reynolds TB, Fink GR (2001) Bakers’ yeast, a model for fungal biofilm formation. Science (New York, N.Y.), 291, 878-881.
74. Romano P, Suzzi G (1993) Sulfur dioxide and wine microorganisms. In: Wine Microbiology and Biotechnology (ed. Fleet GH), pp. 373-393. Harwood Academic Publishers, London.
75. Ropars J, Rodríguez De La Vega RC, López-Villavicencio M et al. (2015) Adaptive horizontal gene transfers between multiple cheese-associated fungi. Current Biology, 25, 2562-2569.
76. Ross-Ibarra J, Morrell PL, Gaut BS (2007) Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(Suppl. 1), 8641-8648.
77. Ryan O, Shapiro RS, Kurat CF et al. (2012) Global gene deletion analysis exploring yeast filamentous growth. Science (New York, N.Y.), 337, 1353-1356.
78. Saito H, Posas F (2012) Response to hyperosmotic stress. Genetics, 192, 289-318.
79. Scannell DR, Zill OA, Rokas A et al. (2011) The awesome power of yeast evolutionary genetics: new genome sequences and strain resources for the Saccharomyces sensu stricto Genus. G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 1, 11-25.
80. Schacherer J, Shapiro JA, Ruderfer DM, Kruglyak L (2009) Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 458, 342-345.
81. Sopko R, Huang D, Smith JC, Figeys D, Andrews BJ (2007) Activation of the Cdc42p GTPase by cyclin-dependent protein kinases in budding yeast. The EMBO Journal, 26, 4487-4500.
82. Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics, 30, 1312-1313.
83. Thornton K (2003) libsequence: a C++ class library for evolutionary genetic analysis. Bioinformatics, 19, 2325-2327.
84. Ueno Y (1999) RGA2, a putative Rho-type GTPase-activating protein, is regulated by the transcription factor Tec1 during filamentous growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
85. Vallee BL, Auld DS (1990) Zinc coordination, function, and structure of zinc enzymes and other proteins. Biochemistry, 29, 5647-5659.
86. Vatsiou AI, Bazin E, Gaggiotti OE (2016) Detection of selective sweeps in structured populations: a comparison of recent methods. Molecular Ecology, 25, 89-103.
87. Wei W, McCusker JH, Hyman RW et al. (2007) Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJM789. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 12825-12830.
88. Will JL, Kim HS, Clarke J et al. (2010) Incipient balancing selection through adaptive loss of aquaporins in natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations. PLoS Genetics, 6, e1000893.
89. Yang Z (2007) PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 1586-1591.
90. Yang Z, Dos Reis M (2011) Statistical properties of the branchsite test of positive selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28, 1217-1228.
91. Zara S, Bakalinsky AT, Zara G et al. (2005) FLO11-based model for air-liquid interfacial biofilm formation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71, 2934-2939.