Quality Talk: Developing Students’ Discourse to Promote High-level Comprehension

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 1113-1160

  Murphy, P Karen ^a   Greene, Jeffrey A ^b   Firetto, Carla M ^c   Hendrick, Brendan D ^b   Li, Mengyi ^d   Montalbano, Cristin ^b   Wei, Liwei ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

argumentation; classroom discussion; critical thinking; Quality Talk; reading comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 85053669639     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: 19351011     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0002831218771303     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Adams M. J., (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, & Newman
2. Alexander P. A., Murphy P. K., Guan J., Murphy P. A., (1998). How students and teachers in Singapore and the United States conceptualize knowledge and beliefs: Positioning learning within epistemological frameworks. Learning and Instruction, 8, 97–116. doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(97)00004-2
3. Almasi J. F., (1995). The nature of fourth graders’ sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 314–351. doi:10.2307/747620
4. Alvermann D. E., Hayes D. A., (1989). Classroom discussion of content area reading assignments: An intervention study. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(3), 305–335. doi:10.2307/747772
5. Alvermann D. E., O’Brien D. G., Dillon D. R., (1990). What teachers do when they say they’re having discussions of content area reading assignments: A qualitative analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(4), 296–322. doi:10.2307/747693
6. Anderson R. C., Chinn C., Waggoner M., Nguyen K., (1998). Intellectually stimulating story discussions. In Osborn J., Lehr F., (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 170–186). New York: Guilford Press
7. Anderson R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel K., McNurlen B., Archodidou A., Kim S., Reznitskaya A., Tillmanns M., Gilbert L., (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 1–46. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1901_1
8. Applebee A., Langer J., Nystrand M., Gamoran A., (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Education Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730. doi:10.3102/00028312040003685
9. Beck I. L., McKeown M. G., (2006). Improving comprehension with Questioning the Author: A fresh and expanded view of a powerful approach. New York: Scholastic
10. Bennett S., Maton K., Kervin L., (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
11. Berland L. K., Reiser B. J., (2011). Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216. doi:10.1002/sce.20420
12. Billings L., Fitzgerald J., (2002). Dialogic discussion and the Paideia Seminar. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 907–941. doi:10.3102/00028312039004905
13. Bråten I., Anmarkrud Ø., Brandmo C., Strømsø H. I., (2014). Developing and testing a model of direct and indirect relationships between individual differences, processing, and multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 30, 9–24. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.11.002
14. Bråten I., Britt M. A., Strømsø H. I., Rouet J. F., (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48–70. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538647
15. Bråten I., Ferguson L. E., Strømsø H. I., Anmarkrud Ø. (2014). Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 58–85. doi:10.1111/bjep.12005
16. Chinn C. A., Buckland L. A., Samarapungavan A., (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
17. Chinn C. A., O’Donnell A. M., Jinks T. S., (2000). The structure of discourse in collaborative learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 77–97. doi:10.1080/00220970009600650
18. Chinn C. A., Rinehart R. W., Buckland L. A., (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the AIR model of epistemic cognition. In Rapp D. N., Braasch J. L. G., (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 425–453). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
19. Chiu M. M., McBride-Chang C., (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 41 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 331–362. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_1
20. Cohen E. G., (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35. doi:10.2307/1170744
21. Curran P. J., Lee T., Howard A. L., Lane S., MacCullum R., (2012). Disaggregating within-person and between person effects in multilevel and structural equation growth models. In Harring J. R., Hancock G. R., (Eds.), Advances in longitudinal methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 217–253). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing
22. Daniel M. H., (2010). Reliability of AIMSweb Reading Curriculum-Based Measurement (R-CBM) (Oral Reading Fluency). NCS Pearson, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.aimsweb.com/wp-content/uploads/Summary-of-Reliability-Information-for-AIMSweb-R-CBM.pdf
23. Edwards D., Mercer N., (1987). Common knowledge: The development of joint understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen
24. Elizabeth T., Ross Anderson T., Snow E., Selman R. (2012). Academic discussions: An analysis of instructional discourse and an argument for an integrative assessment framework. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1214–1250. doi:10.3102/0002831212456066
25. Elley W. B., (1994). The IEA study of reading literacy: Achievement and instruction in thirty-two school systems. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press
26. Fuchs L., Fuchs D., Hosp M., Jenkins J., (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0503_3
27. Goffreda C., DiPerna J., (2010). An empirical review of psychometric evidence for the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 30(3), 463–483
28. Goldenberg C., (1993). Instructional conversations: Promoting comprehension through discussion. The Reading Teacher, 46, 316–326
29. Goldman S. R., Lawless K. A., Gomez K. W., Braasch J., McLeod S., Manning F., (2010). Literacy in the digital world: Comprehending and learning from multiple sources. In McKeown M. G., Kucan L., (Eds.), Bringing reading research to life (pp. 257–284). New York, NY: Guilford
30. Graham J. W., (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
31. Graham S., Harris K. R., (2014). Conducting high quality writing intervention research: Twelve recommendations. Journal of Writing Research, 6, 89–123. doi:10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.1
32. Great Books Foundation. (1987). An introduction to shared inquiry. Chicago: Author
33. Greene J. A., (2015). Serious challenges require serious scholarship: Integrating implementation science into the scholarly discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.007
34. Greene J. A., Azevedo R., Torney-Purta J., (2008). Modeling epistemic and ontological cognition: Philosophical perspectives and methodological directions. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 142–160. doi:10.1080/00461520802178458
35. Greene J. A., Sandoval W. A., Bråten I., (2016). Introduction to epistemic cognition. In Greene J. A., Sandoval W. A., Bråten I., (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 495–510). New York: Routledge
36. Greene J. A., Yu S. B., (2016). Educating critical thinkers: The role of epistemic cognition. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 45–53. doi:10.1177/2372732215622223
37. Herrenkohl L. R., Cornelius L., (2013). Investigating elementary students’ scientific and historical argumentation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 413–461. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.799475
38. Iordanou K., Constantinou C., (2015). Supporting use of evidence in argumentation through practice in argumentation and reflection in the context of Socrates learning environment. Science Education, 99(2), 282–311. doi:10.1002/sce.21152
39. Iordanou K., Kendeou P., Beker K., (2016). Argumentative reasoning. In Greene J. A., Sandoval W. A., Bråten I., (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 39–53). New York: Routledge
40. Janssen F. J. J. M., Westbroek H. B., van Driel J. H., (2014). How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers. Instructional Science, 42, 67–90. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9296-z
41. Johnson E., Jenkins J., Petscher Y., Catts H., (2009). How can we improve the accuracy of screening instruments? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(4), 174–185. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00291.x
42. King A., (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In O’Donnell A. M., King A., (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87–116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
43. Kucan L., (2009). Engaging teachers in investigating their teaching as a linguistic enterprise: The case of comprehension instruction in the context of discussion. Reading Psychology, 30, 51–87. doi:10.1080/02702710802274770
44. Kuhn D., Cheney R., Weinstock M., (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309–328. doi:10.1016/s0885-2014(00)00030-7
45. Kuhn D., Zillmer N., Crowell A., Zavala J., (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456–496. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.830618
46. Lee C. D., Goldman S. R., Levine S., Magliano J., (2016). Epistemic cognition in literary reasoning. In Greene J. A., Sandoval W. A., Bråten I., (Eds.), Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 165–183). New York: Routledge
47. Li M., Murphy P. K., Wang J., Mason L. H., Firetto C. M., Wei L., Chung K. S., (2016). Promoting reading comprehension and critical–analytic thinking: A comparison of three approaches with fourth and fifth graders. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 101–115. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.002
48. Logan S., Johnston R. S., (2009). Gender differences in reading: Examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 199–214. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01389.x
49. Loyens S. M. M., Kirschner P. A., Paas F., (2012). Problem-based learning. In Harris K. R., Graham S., Urdan T., Bus A. G., Major S., Swanson H. L., (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 3. Application to learning and teaching (pp. 403–425). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
50. Mason L., Boscolo P., (2004). Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 103–128. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.001
51. Mason L., Scirica F., (2006). Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16, 492–509. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.007
52. McKeown M. G., Beck I. L., Blake R. G. K., (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218–253. doi:10.1598/rrq.44.3.1
53. Mehan H., (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
54. Mercer N., (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters
55. Mercer N., (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge
56. Michaels S., O’Connor C., (2015). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussion. In Resnick L. B., Asterhan C. S. C., Clarke S. N., (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 347–362). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association
57. Michaels S., O’Connor C., Resnick L. B., (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297. doi:10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
58. Murphy P. K., (2015). Marking the way: School-based interventions that “work.” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.003
59. Murphy P. K., Alexander P. A., (2016). Interrogating the relation between conceptual change and epistemic beliefs. In Greene J. A., Sandoval W. A., Bråten I., (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 439–459). New York: Routledge
60. Murphy P. K., Alexander P. A., Muis K. R., (2012). Knowledge and knowing: The journey from philosophy and psychology to human learning. In Harris K. R., Graham S., Urdan T., (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook: Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 189–226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
61. Murphy P. K., Firetto C. M., (2017). Quality Talk: A blueprint for productive talk. In Murphy P. K., (Ed.), Classroom discussions in education (pp. 101–133). New York: Routledge
62. Murphy P. K., Firetto C. M., Greene J. A., Butler A. M., (2017). Analyzing the talk in Quality Talk discussions: A coding manual. Unpublished manuscript, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. doi.org/10.18113/S1XW64
63. Murphy P. K., Greene J. A., Firetto C. M., Li M., Lobczowski N. G., Duke R. F., … Croninger R. M. V., (2017). Exploring the influence of homogeneous versus heterogeneous grouping on students’ text-based discussions and comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 336–355. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.003
64. Murphy P. K., Rowe M. L., Ramani G., Silverman R., (2014). Promoting critical-analytic thinking in children and adolescents at home and in school. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 561–578. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9281-3
65. Murphy P. K., Wilkinson I. A. G., Soter A. O., (2010). Instruction based on discussion. In Mayer R., Alexander P. A., (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 382–407). New York: Taylor & Francis
66. Murphy P. K., Wilkinson I. A. G., Soter A. O., Hennessey M. N., Alexander J. F., (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ high-level comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 740–764. doi:10.1037/a0015576
67. National Assessment Governing Board. (2013). Reading framework for the 2013 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from www.edpubs.gov/document/ed005373p.pdf
68. National Education Association. (2014). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educators guide to the “Four Cs.” Washington, DC: Author
69. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers
70. Nystrand M., (2006). Research on the role of discussion as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), 392–412
71. Nystrand M., (with Gamoran A., Kachur R., Prendergast C.,). (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press
72. Nystrand M., Wu L., Gamoran A., Zeiser S., Long D., (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35(2), 135–198. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3502_3
73. O’Donnell C. L., (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33–84. doi:10.3102/0034654307313793
74. Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Trends shaping education 2013. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/trends_edu-2013-en
75. Pearson P. D., Gallagher M. C., (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 20–22
76. Piaget J., (1932). The language and thought of the child (2nd ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
77. Popham W. J., (2006). Assessment for educational leaders. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc
78. Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S., (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
79. Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S., Congdon R., (2010). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International
80. Reninger K. B., Wilkinson I. A. G., (2010). Using discussion to promote striving readers’ higher level comprehension of literary texts. In Collins J. L., Gunning T. G., (Eds.), Building struggling students’ higher level literacy: Practical ideas, powerful solutions (pp. 57–83). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
81. Reznitskaya A., Anderson R. C., Dong T., Li Y., Kim I. H., Kim S. Y., (2008). Learning to think well: Application of argument schema theory. In Block C. C., Parris S., (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 196–213). New York, NY: Guilford Press
82. Reznitskaya A., Glina M., Carolan B., Michaud O., Rogers J., Sequeira L., (2012). Examining transfer effects from dialogic discussions to new tasks and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 288–306. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.003
83. Ryu S., Sandoval W. A., (2012). Improvements to elementary children’s epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488–526. doi:10.1002/sce.21006
84. Sandoval W. A., (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656. doi:10.1002/sce.20065
85. Scammacca N. K., Fall A.- M., Roberts G., (2014). Benchmarks for expected annual academic growth for students in the bottom quartile of the normative distribution. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(3), 366–379. doi:10.1080/19345747.2014.952464
86. Schwarz B. B., De Groot R., (2007). Argumentation in a changing world. The International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2–3), 297–313. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9020-6
87. Shinn M. R., Good R., Knutson N., Tilly W., Collins V., (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459–479
88. Shinn M. R., Shinn M. M., (2002). AIMSweb training workbook: Administration and scoring of reading Maze for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation
89. Slavin R. E., (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 293–336. doi:10.2307/1170460
90. Soter A. O., Wilkinson I. A. G., Murphy P. K., Rudge L., Reninger K., Edwards M., (2008). What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal Educational Research, 47, 372–391. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001
91. Taylor B. M., Pearson P. D., Peterson D. S., Rodriguez M. C., (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 3–28. doi:10.1086/499740
92. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The nation’s report card: 2015 reading state snapshot report. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/stt2015/pdf/2016008NP4.pdf
93. Van den Bergh L., Ros A., Beijaard D. (2014). Improving teacher feedback during active learning: Effects of a professional development program. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 772–809. doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531322
94. Vygotsky L. S., (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
95. Vygotsky L. S., (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
96. Vygotsky L. S., (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In Wertsch J. V., (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe
97. Wagemaker H., (Ed.). (1996). Are girls better readers? Gender differences in reading literacy in 32 countries. The Hague, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement
98. Warren H. K., Domitrovich C. E., Greenberg M. T., (2009). Implementation quality in school-based research: Roles for the prevention researcher. In Dinella L. M., (Ed.), Conducting science-based psychology research in schools (pp. 129–151). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
99. Webb N. M., (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1
100. Webb N. M., (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366–389. doi:10.2307/749186
101. Webb N. M., Nemer K. M., Chizhik A. W., Sugrue B., (1998). Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 607–651. doi:10.2307/1163461
102. Wei L., Murphy P. K., (2017). Teacher and student roles: Walking the gradually changing line of responsibility. In Murphy P. K., (Ed.), Classroom discussions in education (pp. 30–53). New York: Routledge
103. Wei L., Murphy P. K., Firetto C. M., (in press). How can teachers facilitate productive small-group talk? An integrated taxonomy of teacher discourse moves. The Elementary School Journal
104. Weinstock M. P., Neuman Y., Glassner A., (2006). Identification of informal reasoning fallacies as a function of epistemological level, grade level, and cognitive ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 327–341. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.327
105. Wells G., (2007). Semiotic mediation, dialogue, and the construction of knowledge. Human Development, 50, 244–274. doi:10.1159/000106414
106. Wilkinson I. A. G., Soter A. O., Murphy P. K., (2010). Developing a model of Quality Talk about literary text. In McKeown M. G., Kucan L., (Eds.), Bringing reading research to life (pp. 142–169). New York: Guilford Press
107. Wilkinson I. A. G., Soter A. O., Murphy P. K., Li J., (2008, March). Promoting high-level comprehension of text through quality talk: A quasi-experimental study. Paper session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY
108. Wu X., Anderson R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel K., Miller B., (2013). Enhancing motivation and engagement through collaborative discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 622–632. doi:10.1037/a0032792