Investigating Elementary Students' Scientific and Historical Argumentation

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 413-461

  Herrenkohl, Leslie Rupert ^a   Cornelius, Lindsay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880933133     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2013.799475     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bell, P. 1997. " Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups ". In Proceedings of CSCL 1997: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Edited by: Hall, R., Miyake, N. and Enyedy, N. 10 - 19. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
2. Bell, P. and Linn, M. C. 2000. Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the Web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22: 797 - 817.
3. Bell, P. and Linn, M. C. 2002. " Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute? ". In Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, Edited by: Hofer, B. K. and Pintrich, P. R. 321 - 346. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bendixen, L. D. and Rule, D. C. 2004. An integrative approach to personal epistemology: A guiding model. Educational Psychologist, 39 (1): 69 - 80.
5. Braaten, M. L. 2011. Developing inquiry-as-stance and repertoires of practice: Teacher learning across two settings (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
6. Brown, A. L. and Campione, J. C. 1994. " Guided discovery in a community of learners ". In Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice, Edited by: McGilly, K. 229 - 270. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Cazden, C. B. 1988. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8. Chin, C. and Osborne, J. 2010. Supporting argumentation through students' questions: Case studies in science classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19: 230 - 284.
9. Chinn, C. and Malhotra, B. A. 2002. Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86 (2): 175 - 218.
10. Chinn, C. A. and Brewer, W. F. 1993. The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implication for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63: 1 - 49.
11. Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A. and Samarapungavan, A. 2011. Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46 (3): 141 - 167.
12. Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P. 1996. Making sense of qualitative data, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Collingwood, R. G. 1965. Essays in the philosophy of history, Austin: University of Texas Press.
14. Cornelius, L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2013). Teacher epistemology and student learning in science and history. Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. Cornelius, L., Herrenkohl, L. R. and Wolfstone-Hay, J. 2013. " Organizing collaborative learning experiences around subject matter domains: The importance of aligning social and intellectual structures in instruction ". In The international handbook of collaborative learning, Edited by: Hmelo-Silver, C. E., 'Donnell, A. M. O, Chan, C. and Chinn, C. A. 333 - 350. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
16. Cornelius, L. L. 2008. Student participation in classroom discourse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
17. diSessa, A. 2004. Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22: 293 - 331.
18. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. and Scott, P. 1994. Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23: 5 - 12.
19. Driver, R., Newton, P. and Osborne, J. 2000. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84: 287 - 312.
20. Duschl, R. A. 1990. Restructuring science education, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21. Duschl, R. A. and Osborne, J. 2002. Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse. Studies in Science Education, 38: 39 - 72.
22. Engle, R. A. and Conant, F. R. 2002. Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20: 399 - 483.
23. Frederiksen, J. R., Sipusic, M., Sherin, M. and Wolfe, E. W. 1998. Video portfolio assessment: Creating a framework for viewing the functions of teaching. Educational Assessment, 5 (4): 225 - 297.
24. Hennessey, M. G. 2002. " Metacognitive aspects of students' reflective discourse: Implications for intentional conceptual change teaching and learning ". In Intentional conceptual change, Edited by: Sinatra, G. M. and Pintrich, P. R. 103 - 132. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Herrenkohl, L. R. and Guerra, M. R. 1998. Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16: 431 - 473.
26. Herrenkohl, L. R. and Mertl, V. 2011. How students come to be, know, and do: A case for a broad view of learning, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Herrenkohl, L. R., Palincsar, A., DeWater, L. and Kawasaki, K. 1999. Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8: 451 - 493.
28. Herrenkohl, L. R., Tasker, T. and White, B. Y. 2011. Developing classroom cultures of inquiry and reflection using web of inquiry. Cognition and Instruction, 29: 1 - 44.
29. Hexter, J. H. 1971. Doing history, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
30. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. 2004. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational Psychology Review, 16 (3): 235 - 266.
31. Kawasaki, K., Herrenkohl, L. R. and Yeary, S. 2004. Theory building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit: A case study of third and fourth grade students' developing epistemologies of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26: 1299 - 1324.
32. Krajcik, J. S. and Blumenfeld, P. C. 2006. " Project-based learning ". In The Cambridge handbook of the learning science, Edited by: Sawyer, R. K. 317 - 334. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33. Kuhn, D. 1993. Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77: 319 - 337.
34. Kyza, E. A. 2009. Middle-school students' reasoning about alternative hypotheses in a scaffolded, software-based inquiry investigation. Cognition and Instruction, 27: 277 - 311.
35. Lee, P. and Ashby, R. 2000. " Progression in historical understanding among students ages 7-14 ". In Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives, Edited by: Stearns, P. N., Seixas, P. and Wineburg, S. 199 - 222. New York, NY: New York University Press.
36. Lehrer, R. and Schauble, L. 2004. Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41: 635 - 680.
37. Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking science: Language, learning, and values, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
38. Levstik, L. S. and Barton, K. C. 2005. Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle school, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Martin, T., Pierson, J., Rivale, S. R., Vye, N. J., Bransford, J. D. and Diller, K. 2007. " The role of generating ideas in challenge-based instruction in promoting adaptivity ". In Innovations 2007: World innovations in engineering education and research, Edited by: Aung, W. 147 - 160. Arlington, VA: International Network for Engineering Education and Research.
40. Metz, K. 2004. Children's understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22: 219 - 290.
41. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. National Center for History in the Schools. (n.d.) Historical thinking standards. http://nchs.ucla.edu/standards/thinking5-12.html (http://nchs.ucla.edu/standards/thinking5-12.html)
43. National Research Council. 2007. Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in Grades K-8, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
44. National Research Council. 2012. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
45. Nystrand, M. 1997. Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
46. Reiser, B. J. 2004. Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13: 273 - 304.
47. Rosebery, A. S. and Warren, B., eds. 2008. Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students' strengths, Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
48. Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B. and Conant, F. R. 1992. Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2: 61 - 94.
49. Sandoval, W. A. 2005. Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89: 634 - 656.
50. Sandoval, W. A. and Millwood, K. A. 2005. The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23: 23 - 55.
51. Simmons, P. E., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnegan, B., Crockett, D and Labuda, K. 1999. Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36: 930 - 954.
52. Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L. R. and Bell, P. 2005. The comparative understanding of school subjects: Past, present, and future. Review of Educational Research, 75 (2): 125 - 157.
53. Tharp, R. G. and Gallimore, R. 1991. Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
54. VanSledright, B. 2002. Confronting history's interpretive paradox while teaching fifth graders to investigate the past. American Educational Research Journal, 39: 1089 - 1115.
55. Voss, J. F. and Wiley, J. 2000. " A case study of developing historical understanding via instruction: The importance of integrating text components and constructing arguments ". In Knowing, teaching and learning in history, Edited by: Stearns, P., Wineburg, S. and Seixas, P. 375 - 389. New York, NY: NYU Press.
56. Watts, D. G. 1972. The learning of history, London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
57. White, B. Y. and Frederiksen, J. R. 1998. Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16: 3 - 118.
58. Wineburg, S. 2001. Historical thinking and other unnatural acts, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.