Epistemic cognition in literary reasoning

Handbook of Epistemic Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 165-183

  Lee, Carol D ^a   Goldman, Susan R ^a   Levine, Sarah ^a   Magliano, Joseph ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967468295     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315795225     Document Type: Chapter

References (127)

1. Altieri, C. (1981). Act & quality: A theory of literary meaning and humanistic understanding. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
2. Anderson, R. (2004). Role of the reader's schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th Ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3. Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (Vol. 1955). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. M. Holquist (Ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
6. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
7. Barthes, R. (1988). Introduction to the structural analysis of the narrative. University of Birmingham, Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
8. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bloom, H., DeMan, P., Derrida, J., & Hartman, G., Miller, J. Hillis. (1987). Deconstructionism and criticism. New York: Continuum.
10. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Butler, J. (2011). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.
12. Cacioppo, J. T. (2002). Social neuroscience: Understanding the pieces fosters understanding the whole and vice versa. American Psychologist, 57, 819-831.
13. Cacioppo, J. T., Visser, P. S., & Pickett, C. L. (Eds.). (2005). Social neuroscience: People thinking about thinking people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Champion, T., Seymour, H., & Camarata, S. (1995). Narrative discourse among African American children. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5(4), 333-352.
15. Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141-167.
16. Claassen, E. (2012). Author representation in literary reading. Utrecht, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
17. Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics, and the study of literature. New York: Cornell University Press.
18. Dijkstra, K., Zwaan, R. A., Graesser, A. C., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Character and reader emotions in literary texts. Poetics, 23(1), 139-157.
19. Donovan, J. (1975). Feminist literary criticism. Lexington, Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky.
20. Dorfman, M. H. (1996). Evaluating the interpretive community: Evidence from expert and novice readers. Poetics, 23(6), 453-470.
21. Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary theory: An introduction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
22. Fabb, N. (1997). Linguistics and literature. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23. Fasold, R. W. & Connor-Linton, J. (2006). An introduction to language and linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Flavell, J. H., & Miller, P. H. (1998). Social cognition. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), W. Damon (Series Editor), Handbook of child psychology (Fifth ed., Vol. 2, pp. 851-898). New York: Wiley.
26. Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. Galda, L. & Liang, L. A. (2003). Literature as experience or looking for facts: Stance in the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(2), 268-275.
28. Gates, H. L., & Anozie, S. O. (1984). Black literature and literary theory (Vol. 860). New York: Routledge.
29. Gee, J. P. (1989). The narrativization of experience in the oral style. Journal of Education, 171(1), 75-96.
30. Goetz, E. T., Sadoski, M., Olivarez Jr., A., Calero-Breckheimer, A., Garner, P., & Fatemi, Z. (1992). The structure of emotional response in reading a literary text: Quantitative and qualitative analyses. Reading Research Quarterly, 361-372.
31. Goldman, S. R. (1997). Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 357-398.
32. Goldman, S. R. & Lee, C. D. (2014). Text complexity: State of the art and the conundrums it raises. Elementary School Journal, 115(2), 290-300.
33. Goldman, S. R., Reyes, R., & Varnhagen, C. K. (1984). Understanding fables in first and second languages. Journal of National Association for Bilingual Education, 3, 35-66.
34. Graves, B. & Frederiksen, C. H. (1991). Literary expertise in the description of a fictional narrative. Poetics, 20(1), 1-26.
35. Graves, B. & Frederiksen, C.H. (1996). A cognitive study of literary expertise. In R. J. Kruez & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 397-418). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
36. Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt.
37. Gutierrez, K., Baquedana-Lopez, P., & Alvarez, H. (1999). A cultural-historical approach to collaboration: Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 87-93.
38. Gutierrez, K. & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25.
39. Hakemulder, J. F. (2004). Foregrounding and its effect on readers' perception. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 193-218.
40. Hart, F. E. (2001). The epistemology of cognitive literary studies. Philosophy and Literature, 25(2), 314-334.
41. Hillocks, G. & Ludlow, L. (1984). A taxonomy of skills in reading and interpreting fiction. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 7-24.
42. Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 378-405.
43. Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.
44. Hogan, P. C. (1997). Literary universals. Poetics Today, 18(2), 223-249. doi: 10.2307/1773433.
45. Hughes, L. (1926). The negro artist and the racial mountain. The Nation.
46. Jacquenod, C. (1987). Concerning the interpretation of fictional literary texts. Proceedings of the international conference for the empirical study of literature. Siegen, West Germany: Siegen University.
47. Jakobson, R. (1968). Poetry of grammar and grammar of poetry. Lingua, 21, 597-609.
48. Johnson, D. F. & Goldman, S. R. (1987). Children's recognition and use of rules of moral conduct in stories. The American Journal of Psychology, 100, 205-224.
49. Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49(4), 294-303.
50. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
51. Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (2009). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Lee, C. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students' skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 608-631.
55. Lee, C. D. (2005). Double voiced discourse: African American vernacular English as resource in cultural modeling classrooms. In A. F. Ball & S. W. Freedman (Eds.), New literacies for new times: Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning for the 21st century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Lee, C. D. (2006). The educability of intellective competence. In E. W. Gordon & B. L. Bridglall (Eds.), The affirmative development of academic abilities. (pp. 155-188). Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
57. Lee, C. D. (2007). Culture, literacy and learning: Taking bloom in the midst of the whirlwind. New York: Teachers College Press.
58. Lee, C. D. (2009). Historical evolution of risk and equity: Interdisciplinary issues and critiques. Review of Research in Education, 33, 63-100.
59. Lee, C. D. (2010). Soaring above the clouds, delving the ocean's depths: Understanding the ecologies of human learning and the challenge for education science. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 643-655.
60. Lee, C. D. (2011). Education and the study of literature. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 49-58.
61. Lee, C. D. & Spratley, A. (2009). Reading in the disciplines and the challenges of adolescent literacy New York: Carnegie Foundation of New York.
62. Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction (Vol. 13). Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press.
63. Louwerse, M. M. (2008). Embodied representations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 838-844.
64. Louwerse, M. M. & Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Languages encodes geographical information. Cognitive Science, 33, 51-73.
65. Mandler, J. (1978). A code in the mode: The use of a story schema in retrieval. Discourse Processes, 1, 14-35.
66. Mandler, J. M. & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
67. McNamara, D. S. & Magliano, J. P. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of learning and motivation, 51, 297-384.
68. Meltzoff, A. N. & Decety, J. (2003). What imitation tells us about social cognition: A rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences, 358, 491-500.
69. Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. (1994a). Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response. Discourse Processes, 17(3), 337-352.
70. Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. (1994b). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389-407.
71. Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 37-58.
72. Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. (1998). The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 25(6), 327-341.
73. Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. (2002). A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics, 30(4), 221-241.
74. Morrison, T. (1992). Playing in the dark: Whiteness and the literary imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75. Muis, K. R. & Duffy, M. C. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students' beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 213.
76. National Governors Association (2010). Common core state standards initiative. CCSSO Council of Chief State School Officers.
77. National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press.
78. Orellana, M. (2009). Translating immigrant childhoods: Children's work as culture and language brokers. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
79. Ortony, A. (1979). Metaphor and thought (Second Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
80. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
81. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
82. Peer, W. V. (1991). But what is literature? Toward a descriptive definition of literary texts. In R. D. Sell (Ed.), Literary pragmatics (pp. 127-141). London/New York: Routledge.
83. Peer, W. v., Hakemulder, J., & Zyngier, S. (2007). Lines on feeling: Foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning. Language and Literature, 16(2), 197-213.
84. Peskin, J. (1998). Constructing meaning when reading poetry: An expert-novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 16(3), 235-263.
85. Peskin, J. (2007). The genre of poetry: Secondary school students' conventional expectations and interpretive operations. English in Education, 41(3), 20-36.
86. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: The new science of language and mind (Vol. 7529). London: Penguin UK.
87. Pratt, M. L. (1977). Toward a speech act theory of literary discourse (Vol. 266). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
88. Rabinowitz, P. (1987). Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
89. RAND Reading Study Group (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
90. Ransom, J. C. (1941). The new criticism. Norfolk, CT: New Directions.
91. Rapp, D. N. & Taylor, H. A. (2004). Interactive dimensions in the construction of mental representtions for text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 988-1001.
92. Reynolds, R., Taylor, M., Steffensen, M., Shirey, L., & Anderson, R. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(3), 353-365.
93. Richards, I. A. (2003). Principles of literary criticism. London: Routledge.
94. Ricoeur, P. (1978). The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and feeling. Critical Inquiry, 143-159.
95. Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence and education (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
96. Sadoski, M. & Paivio, A. (2000). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
97. Said, E. W. (1983). The world, the text, and the critic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
98. Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Random House LLC.
99. Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
100. Schogt, H. G. (1988). Linguistics, literary analysis, and literary translation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
101. Schraw, G. (1997). Situational interest in literary text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(4), 436-456.
102. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol. 626). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
103. Searle, J. R., Kiefer, F., & Bierwisch, M. (1980). Speech act theory and pragmatics (Vol. 10). The Netherlands: Springer.
104. Simon, H. A. (1977). The structure of ill-structured problems. In H.A. Simon (Ed.), Models of discovery (pp. 304- 325). The Netherlands: Springer.
105. Smagorinsky, P., McCann, T., & Kern, S. (1987). Explorations: Introductory activities for literature and composition, 7-12. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
106. Soto, G. (2000). The jacket. In G. Soto, The effects of Knut Hamsun on a Fresno boy: Recollections and short essays (pp. 6-9). New York: Persea Books.
107. Spencer, M. B., Dupree, D., & Hartmann, T. (1997). A phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory (pvest): A self-organization perspective in context. Development and Psychopathology, 9(4), 317-833.
108. Spiro, R. (1980). Constructive processes in prose comprehension and recall. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 245-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
109. Stanfield, R. A. & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Sciences, 12, 153-156.
110. Steffensen, M., Joag-Dev, C., & Anderson, R. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 10-29.
111. Stein, N. L. & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
112. Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteurs quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
113. Sugiyama, M. S. (2001). Narrative theory and function: Why evolution matters. Philosophy and Literature, 25(2), 233-250.
114. Sweetser, E. (1995). Metaphor, mythology, and everyday language. Journal of pragmatics, 24(6), 585-593.
115. Thompson, E. M. (1971). Russian formalism and Anglo-American new criticism: A comparative study (Vol. 8). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
116. Todorov, T. (1977). The poetics of prose. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
117. Tompkins, J. (1980). Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post structuralism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
118. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
119. Trabasso, T. & Sperry, L. L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595-611.
120. Trabasso, T. & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612-630.
121. Valencia, S. W., Wixson, K., & Pearson, P. D. (2014). Putting text complexity in context: Refocusing on comprehension of complex text. Elementary School Journal.
122. Vipond, D. & Hunt, R. (1984). Point-driven understanding: Pragmatic and cognitive dimensions of literary reading. Poetics, 13, 261-277.
123. Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in evaluating documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73-87.
124. Yukhymenko-Lescroart, M., Briner, S., Burkett, C., McCarthy, K. S., Levine, S., Magliano, J. P., Lee, C. D., & Goldman, S. R. (in preparation). Believing in fiction: Development and initial validation of the literature epistemology scale.
125. Zeitz, C. M. (1994). Expert-novice differences in memory, abstraction, and reasoning in the domain of literature. Cognition and Instruction, 12(4), 277-312.
126. Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920-933.
127. Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18, 229-234.