Serious challenges require serious scholarship: Integrating implementation science into the scholarly discourse

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue , 2015, Pages 112-120

  Greene, Jeffrey Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Causality; Educational psychology; Implementation fidelity; Mixed methods; Translational research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920279526     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: 10902384     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Angrist J.D., Guido W.I., Rubin D.B. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1996, 91:444-472.
2. Bai H. Using propensity score analysis for making causal claims in research articles. Educational Psychology Review 2011, 23(2):273-278.
3. Bembenutty H., Cleary T.J., Kitsantas A. Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines: A tribute to Barry J. Zimmerman 2013, Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC.
4. Brown A.L. Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1992, 2(2):141-178.
5. Capella E., Massetti G.M., Yampolsky S. Rigorous, responsive, and responsible: Experimental designs in school intervention research. Conducting science-based psychology research in schools 2009, 51-78. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. L.M. Dinella (Ed.).
6. Century J., Rudnick M., Freeman C. A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation: A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge. American Journal of Evaluation 2010, 31(2):199-218.
7. De Lisi R. Reflection, reconstruction, and transformation of the EdD: A dean's perspective. Planning & Changing 2013, 44.
8. Dinella L.M. Introduction. Conducting science-based psychology research in schools 2009, 3-8. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. L.M. Dinella (Ed.).
9. Dinella L.M., Ladd G. Building and maintaining relationships with school stakeholders. Conducting science-based psychology research in schools 2009, 9-31. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. L.M. Dinella (Ed.).
10. Eisenhart M. Representing qualitative data. Handbook of complementary methods in education research 2006, 567-581. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. J.L. Green, G. Camili, P.B. Elmore (Eds.).
11. International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs 2015, Routledge, New York, NY. H.R. Fives, M.G. Gill (Eds.).
12. Fixsen D.L., Blase K., Duda M., Naoom S., Van Dyke M. Implementation of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: Research findings and their implications for the future. Implementation and dissemination: Extending treatments to new populations and new settings 2010, 435-450. Guilford Press, New York. 2nd ed. J. Weisz, A. Kazdin (Eds.).
13. Graham S., McKeown D., Kiuhara S., Harris K. A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology 2012, 104:879-896.
14. Hattie J. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement 2009, Routledge, New York, NY.
15. International guide to student achievement 2013, Routledge, New York, NY. J. Hattie, E.M. Anderman (Eds.).
16. Jackson T., Burrus J., Bassett K., Roberts R.D. Teacher leadership: An assessment framework for an emerging area of professional practice 2010, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
17. Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching 2008, Routledge, New York. A.E. Kelly, R.A. Lesh, J.Y. Baek (Eds.).
18. King R.B., McInerney D.M. Culture's consequences on student motivation: Capturing cross-cultural universality and variability through personal investment theory. Educational Psychology 2014, 49(3):175-198.
19. Kline R.B. Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research 2004, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
20. Kulikowich J.M., Sperling R.A. Prescriptive statements: Philosophical, theoretical, and methodological considerations. Educational Psychology Review 2011, 23:189-195.
21. Lemons C.J., Fuchs D., Gilbert J.K., Fuchs L.S. Evidence-based practices in a changing world: Reconsidering the counterfactual in education research. Educational Researcher 2014, 43(5):242-252.
22. Mayer R.E. What good is educational psychology? The case of cognition and instruction. Educational Psychologist 2001, 36(2):83-88.
23. Mayer R.E. E. L. Thorndike's enduring contributions to educational psychology. Educational psychology: A century of contributions 2003, 113-154. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah, NJ. B.J. Zimmerman, D.H. Schunk (Eds.).
24. McKeown D. Examining the effects of practice-based professional development and coaching on the differentiation of SRSD writing instruction 2012, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
25. Mertens D.M. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods 2010, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
26. Murnane R.J., Willet J.B. Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research 2010, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
27. Murphy P.K., Cromley J. Call for papers for special issue: Examining innovations-navigating the dynamic complexities of school-based intervention research. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2013, 38:107.
28. Nelson M.C., Cordray D.S., Hulleman C.S., Sommer E.C. A procedure for assessing intervention fidelity in experiments testing educational and behavioral interventions. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 2012, 39(4):374-396.
29. O'Connell A.A., Gray D.L. Cause and event: Supporting casual claims through logistic models. Educational Psychology Review 2011, 23:245-261.
30. O'Donnell C.L. Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research 2008, 78(1):33-84.
31. Patton M. Qualitative research & evaluation methods 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
32. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 2000, 55(1):68-78.
33. Schochet, P. et al. (2010). Standards for regression discontinuity designs. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_rd.pdf.
34. Shadish W.R., Cook T.D., Campbell D.T. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference 2002, Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, NY.
35. Stanovich K.E. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 1986, 21(4):360-407.
36. Stokes D. Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation 1997, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
37. Thistlethwaite D.L., Campbell D.T. Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology 1960, 51(6):309-317.
38. Thorndike E.L. Educational psychology 1903, The Science Press, New York, NY.
39. Warren H.K., Domitrovich C.E., Greenberg M.T. Implementation quality in school-based research: Roles for the prevention researcher. Conducting science-based psychology research in schools 2009, 129-151. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. L.M. Dinella (Ed.).