Design-based research (DBR)

International Handbook of the Learning Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 383-392

  Puntambekar, Sadhana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85049279832     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315617572     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523-535.
2. Bedersen, B. B., & Hollan, J. (1995). Pad++: A zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, New York.
3. Bielaczyc, K. (2013). Informing design research: Learning from teachers’ designs of social infrastructure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(2), 258-311.
4. Bopardikar, A., Gnesdilow, D., & Puntambekar, S. (2011). Effects of using multiple forms of support to enhance students’ collaboration during concept mapping. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.) Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (pp. 104-111), Hong Kong: ISLS.
5. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
6. Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 49-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1987). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. In J. D. Day & J. G. Borkowski (Eds.), Intelligence and exceptionality: New directions for theory, assessment, and instructional practice (pp. 81-132). Westport, CN: Ablex.
8. Chan, C., & van Aalst, J. (2018). Knowledge building: Theory, design, and analysis. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 295-307). New York: Routledge.
9. Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 105-114.
10. Design-Based Research Collective (DBRC). (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educa-tional inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 4-8.
11. Furnas, G. W. (1986). Generalized fisheye views. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York.
12. Gnesdilow, D., Bopardikar, A., Sullivan, S., Puntambekar, S. (2010). Exploring Convergence of Science Ideas through Collaborative Concept Mapping. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 698-705), Chicago, IL.
13. Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H.-K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of middle school learners’ science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 323-346.
14. Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11-34.
15. Kelly, A. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115-128.
16. Kolodner, J. L. (2006). The learning sciences and the future of education: What we know and what we need to be doing better. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
17. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., (2003). Problem-based learn-ing meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design(tm) into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547.
18. Kozma, R. (2000). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chem-istry. In M. Jacobson & R. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 11-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. S. (2011). Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowl-edge integration. New York: Routledge.
20. Lumpe, A. T., & Butler, K. (2002). The information seeking strategies of high school science students. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 549-566.
21. McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2006). Design research from a curriculum perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research, (pp. 67-90). New York: Routledge.
22. Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2000). Do teachers support causal understanding through their discourse when teaching primary science? British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 599-613.
23. Ormel, B. J., Roblin, N. N. P., McKenney, S. E., Voogt, J. M., & Pieters, J. M. (2012). Research-practice interactions as reported in recent design studies: Still promising, still hazy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 967-986.
24. McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2006). Design research from a curriculum perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research, (pp. 67-90). New York: Routledge.
25. Palincsar, A. S. (2003). Ann L. Brown: Advancing a theoretical model of learning and instruction. In D. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk, (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 459-475). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Palincsar, A. S. & Magnusson, S. J. (2001). The interplay of first-hand and second-hand investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 151-194). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Phillips, D. C., & Dolle, J. R. (2006). From Plato to Brown and beyond: Theory, practice, and the promise of design experiments. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Bockaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psy-chology: Past, present and future trends. Sixteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte (pp. 277-292). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
28. Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Goldstein, J. (2007). Comparing classroom enactments of an inquiry cur-riculum: Lessons learned from two teachers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 81-130.
29. Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Hübscher, R. (2003). Improving navigation and learning in hypertext envi-ronments with navigable concept maps. Human-Computer Interaction, 18(4), 395-426.
30. Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18-36.
31. Sandoval, W. A., & Daniszewski, K. (2004). Mapping trade-offs in teachers’ integration of technology-supported inquiry in high school science classes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 161-178.
32. Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25-28.
33. Stylianou, A., & Puntambekar, S. (2003). Does metacognitive awareness of reading strategies relate to the way middle school students navigate and learn from hypertext. Annual Conference of the Northeast Educational Research Association. Copenhagen, Denmark.
34. Stylianou, A., & Puntambekar, S. (2004). Understanding the role of metacognition while reading from nonlin-ear resources. Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS). Los Angeles, CA.
35. Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305-335.
36. Tabak, I., & Reiser, B. J. (1997). Complementary roles of software-based scaffolding and teacher-student inter-actions in inquiry learning. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.) Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning '97 (pp. 289-298). Toronto, Canada.
37. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7-44.