Elevated proportions of deleterious genetic variation in domestic animals and plants

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 276-290

  Makino, Takashi ^a   Rubin, Carl Johan ^b   Carneiro, Miguel ^c,d   Axelsson, Erik ^b   Andersson, Leif ^b   Webster, Matthew T ^b  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Artificial selection; Domestication; Effective population size; Mutational load; Natural selection; Population bottleneck

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BOMBYX; CHICKEN; CROP; DOG; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; DOMESTICATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; LEPORIDAE; ORYZA; PIG; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOYBEAN;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; BOMBYX; CHICKENS; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; DOGS; DOMESTICATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIATION; ORYZA; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; RABBITS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SOYBEANS; SWINE;

EID: 85046144334     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evy004     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Auton A, et al. 2013. Genetic recombination is targeted towards gene promoter regions in dogs. PLoS Genet. 9(12):e1003984.
2. Axelsson E, et al. 2013. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 495(7441):360–364.
3. Björnerfeldt S, Webster MT, Vila C. 2006. Relaxation of selective constraint on dog mitochondrial DNA following domestication. Genome Res. 16(8):990–994.
4. Boyko AR, et al. 2008. Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 4(5): e1000083.
5. Brandvain Y, Wright SI. 2016. The limits of natural selection in a non-equilibrium world. Trends Genet. 32(4):201–210.
6. Carneiro M, et al. 2014. Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication. Science 345(6200):1074–1079.
7. Carneiro M, Ferrand N, Nachman MW. 2009. Recombination and speci-ation: loci near centromeres are more differentiated than loci near telomeres between subspecies of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Genetics 181(2):593–606.
8. Charlesworth B. 2009. Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat Rev Genet. 10(3):195–205.
9. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet Res. 74(3):329–340.
10. Choi Y, Chan AP. 2015. PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics 31(16):2745–2747.
11. Chun S, Fay JC. 2011. Evidence for hitchhiking of deleterious mutations within the human genome. PLoS Genet. 7(8):e1002240.
12. Clutton-Brock J. 1999. A natural history of domesticated mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Crow JF, Kimura M. 2009. An introduction to population genetics theory. Repr. of 1970 Ed. Caldwell (NJ): Blackburn.
14. Cruz F, Vila C, Webster MT. 2008. The legacy of domestication: accumulation of deleterious mutations in the dog genome. Mol Biol Evol. 25(11):2331–2336.
15. Darwin C. 1876. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. New York: Appleton.
16. Dietrich HM, Cole RK, Wick G. 1999. The natural history of the obese strain of chickens–an animal model for spontaneous autoimmune thy-roiditis. Poult Sci. 78(10):1359–1371.
17. Dimitrieva S, Bucher P. 2013. UCNEbase—a database of ultraconserved non-coding elements and genomic regulatory blocks. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(Database issue):D101–D109.
18. Do R, et al. 2015. No evidence that selection has been less effective at removing deleterious mutations in Europeans than in Africans. Nat Genet. 47(2):126–131.
19. Eriksson J, et al. 2008. Identification of the yellow skin gene reveals a hybrid origin of the domestic chicken. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000010.
20. Eyre-Walker A, Gaut RL, Hilton H, Feldman DL, Gaut BS. 1998. Investigation of the bottleneck leading to the domestication of maize. Proc. Natl Acad Sci U S A. 95(8):4441–4446.
21. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD. 2007. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat Rev Genet. 8(8):610–618.
22. Frantz LAF, et al. 2015. Evidence of long-term gene flow and selection during domestication from analyses of Eurasian wild and domestic pig genomes. Nat Genet. 47:1141–1148.
23. Frantz LAF, et al. 2016. Genomic and archaeological evidence suggest a dual origin of domestic dogs. Science 352(6290):1228–1231.
24. Freedman AH, et al. 2014. Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs. PLoS Genet. 10(1):e1004016.
25. Fu W, Gittelman RM, Bamshad MJ, Akey JM. 2014. Characteristics of neutral and deleterious protein-coding variation among individuals and populations. Am J Hum Genet. 95(4):421–436.
26. Giuffra E, et al. 2000. The origin of the domestic pig: independent domestication and subsequent introgression. Genetics 154(4):1785–1791.
27. Goldsmith MR, Shimada T, Abe H. 2005. The genetics and genomics of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Annu Rev Entomol. 50:71–100.
28. Groenen MAM, et al. 2012. Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature 491(7424):393–398.
29. Hartfield M, Otto SP. 2011. Recombination and hitchhiking of deleterious alleles. Evol Int J Org Evol. 65(9):2421–2434.
30. Henn BM, Botigué LR, Bustamante CD, Clark AG, Gravel S. 2015. Estimating the mutation load in human genomes. Nat Rev Genet. 16(6):333–343.
31. Henn BM, et al. 2016. Distance from sub-Saharan Africa predicts mutational load in diverse human genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113(4):E440–E449.
32. Hill WG, Robertson A. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 8(3):269–294.
33. Huang X, et al. 2012. A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice. Nature 490(7421):497–501.
34. Hymowitz T. 1970. On the domestication of the soybean. Econ Bot. 24(4):408–421.
35. Inada DC, et al. 2003. Conserved noncoding sequences in the grasses. Genome Res. 13(9):2030–2041.
36. Kanginakudru S, Metta M, Jakati R, Nagaraju J. 2008. Genetic evidence from Indian red jungle fowl corroborates multiple domestication of modern day chicken. BMC Evol. Biol 8:174.
37. Karlsson EK, Lindblad-Toh K. 2008. Leader of the pack: gene mapping in dogs and other model organisms. Nat Rev Genet. 9(9):713–725.
38. Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A. 2007. Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies. Genetics 177(4):2251–2261.
39. Kimura M, Maruyama T, Crow JF. 1963. The mutation load in small populations. Genetics 48:1303–1312.
40. Koenig D, et al. 2013. Comparative transcriptomics reveals patterns of selection in domesticated and wild tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110(28):E2655–E2662.
41. Kofler R, et al. 2011. PoPoolation: a toolbox for population genetic analysis of next generation sequencing data from pooled individuals. PLoS One 6(1):e15925.
42. Kono TJY, et al. 2016. The role of deleterious substitutions in crop genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 33(9):2307–2317.
43. Lam H-M, et al. 2010. Resequencing of 31 wild and cultivated soybean genomes identifies patterns of genetic diversity and selection. Nat Genet. 42(12):1053–1059.
44. Larson G, Burger J. 2013. A population genetics view of animal domestication. Trends Genet. 29(4):197–205.
45. Larson G, Fuller DQ. 2014. The evolution of animal domestication. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 45(1):115–136.
46. Li H, et al.; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 25(16):2078–2079.
47. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14): 1754–1760.
48. Lindblad-Toh K, et al. 2005. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438(7069): 803–819.
49. Liu Q, Zhou Y, Morrell PL, Gaut BS. 2017. Deleterious variants in Asian rice and the potential cost of domestication. Mol Biol Evol. 34(4):908–924.
50. Lohmueller KE, et al. 2008. Proportionally more deleterious genetic variation in European than in African populations. Nature 451(7181):994–997.
51. Lu J, et al. 2006. The accumulation of deleterious mutations in rice genomes: a hypothesis on the cost of domestication. Trends Genet. 22(3):126–131.
52. Lynch M. 2010. Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet. 26(8):345–352.
53. Marsden CD, et al. 2016. Bottlenecks and selective sweeps during domestication have increased deleterious genetic variation in dogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113(1):152–157.
54. Maynard Smith JM, Haigh J. 1974. The hitchhiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 23(01):23–35.
55. Meyer RS, Purugganan MD. 2013. Evolution of crop species: genetics of domestication and diversification. Nat Rev Genet. 14(12): 840–852.
56. Mulvihill JJ. 1972. Congenital and genetic disease in domestic animals. Science 176(4031):132–137.
57. Nabholz B, et al. 2014. Transcriptome population genomics reveals severe bottleneck and domestication cost in the African rice (Oryza glaber-rima). Mol Ecol. 23(9):2210–2227.
58. Ohta T. 1973. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature 246(5428):96–98.
59. Ohta T. 1992. The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 23(1):263–286.
60. Ostrander EA, Kruglyak L. 2000. Unleashing the canine genome. Genome Res. 10(9):1271–1274.
61. Peischl S, Dupanloup I, Kirkpatrick M, Excoffier L. 2013. On the accumulation of deleterious mutations during range expansions. Mol Ecol. 22(24):5972–5982.
62. Renaut S, Rieseberg LH. 2015. The accumulation of deleterious mutations as a consequence of domestication and improvement in sunflowers and other compositae crops. Mol Biol Evol. 32(9):2273–2283.
63. Rubin C-J, et al. 2012. Strong signatures of selection in the domestic pig genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109(48):19529–19536.
64. Rubin CJ, et al. 2010. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 464(7288): 587–591.
65. Schubert M, et al. 2014. Prehistoric genomes reveal the genetic foundation and cost of horse domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111(52):E5661–E5669.
66. Shannon LM, et al. 2015. Genetic structure in village dogs reveals a Central Asian domestication origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 112(44):13639–13644.
67. Simons YB, Turchin MC, Pritchard JK, Sella G. 2014. The deleterious mutation load is insensitive to recent population history. Nat Genet. 46(3):220–224.
68. Stevens L. 2005. Genetics and evolution of the domestic fowl. Cambridge/ New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. Thalmann O, et al. 2013. Complete mitochondrial genomes of ancient canids suggest a European origin of domestic dogs. Science 342(6160):871–874.
70. Vaysse A, et al. 2011. Identification of genomic regions associated with phenotypic variation between dog breeds using selection mapping. PLoS Genet. 7(10):e1002316.
71. Wang G-D, et al. 2016. Out of southern East Asia: the natural history of domestic dogs across the world. Cell Res. 26(1):21–33.
72. Watterson GA. 1975. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 7(2):256–276.
73. Xia Q, et al. 2009. Complete resequencing of 40 genomes reveals domestication events and genes in silkworm (Bombyx). Science 326(5951):433–436.
74. Xiang H, et al. 2014. Early Holocene chicken domestication in northern China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111(49):17564–17569.
75. Xu X, et al. 2011. Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes. Nat Biotechnol. 30(1):105–111.
76. Zeder MA. 2012. The domestication of animals. J Anthropol Res. 68(2):161–190.
77. Zhang M, Zhou L, Bawa R, Suren H, Holliday JA. 2016. Recombination rate variation, hitchhiking, and demographic history shape deleterious load in poplar. Mol Biol Evol. 33(11):2899–2910.
78. Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E. 2012. Domestication of plants in the Old World: the origin and spread of domesticated plants in Southwest Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin. 4th ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.