Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication

Nature

Volumn 464, Issue 7288, 2010, Pages 587-591

  Rubin, Carl Johan ^a   Zody, Michael C ^a,b   Eriksson, Jonas ^a   Meadows, Jennifer R S ^a   Sherwood, Ellen ^c   Webster, Matthew T ^a   Jiang, Lin ^a   Ingman, Max ^d   Sharpe, Ted ^b   Ka, Sojeong ^a   Hallböök, Finn ^a   Besnier, Francois ^e   Carlborg, Rjan ^e   Bedhom, Bertrand ^f   Tixier Boichard, Michèle ^f   Jensen, Per ^g   Siegel, Paul ^h   Lindblad Toh, Kerstin ^a,b   Andersson, Leif ^a,e  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^f UMR1313 GÉNÉTIQUE ANIMALE ET BIOLOGIE INTÉGRATIVE   (France)

^g LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^h VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA; THYROTROPIN RECEPTOR;

CAPTIVE BREEDING; DNA; DOMESTICATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; HORMONE; MEAT; MORPHOLOGY; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM; POULTRY; VERTEBRATE;

ARTICLE; BREEDING; CHICKEN; DOMESTICATION; GENE DELETION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HETEROZYGOSITY; LOSS OF FUNCTION MUTATION; METABOLIC REGULATION; MISSENSE MUTATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHOTOPERIODICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC LOCI; GENOME; MALE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEQUENCE DELETION;

ANIMALIA; GALLUS GALLUS; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 77950080740     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature08832     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Darwin, C. On the Origins of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (Murray, 1859).
2. Darwin, C. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication (Murray, 1868).
3. Andersson, L. Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 130-138 (2001).
4. Eriksson, J. et al. Identification of the yellow skin gene reveals a hybrid origin of the domestic chicken. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000010 (2008)
5. Crawford, R. D. Poultry Breeding and Genetics (Elsevier Science, 1990).
6. International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium. A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 432, 717-722 (2004).
7. Havenstein, G. B., Ferket, P. R. & Qureshi, M. A. Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 82, 1500-1508 (2003).
8. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432, 695-716 (2004).
9. Tran, T. S., Kolodkin, A. L. & Bharadwaj, R. Semaphorin regulation of cellular morphology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 263-292 (2007).
10. Dobney, K. & Larson, G. Genetics and animal domestication: new windows on an elusive process. J. Zool. 269, 261-271 (2006).
11. 3 regulates photoperiodic response of gonads in birds. Nature 426, 178-181 (2003).
12. Nakao, N. et al. Thyrotrophin in the pars tuberalis triggers photoperiodic response. Nature 452, 317-322 (2008).
13. Hanon, E. A. et al. Ancestral TSH mechanism signals summer in a photoperiodic mammal. Curr. Biol. 18, 1147-1152 (2008).
14. Messina,D. N. & Sonnhammer, E. L. L.DA Sher: a stand-alone protein sequence client for DAS, the Distributed Annotation System. Bioinformatics 25, 1333-1334 (2009).
15. Kerje, S. et al. The twofold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and white leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs. Anim. Genet. 34, 264-274 (2003)
16. Price, E. O. Animal Domestication and Behavior (CABI, 2002).
17. Shimada, M. et al. Mice lacking melanin-concentrating hormone are hypophagic and lean. Nature 396, 670-674 (1998).
18. Sewalem, A. et al. Mapping of quantitative trait loci for body weight at three, six, and nine weeks of age in a broiler layer cross. Poult. Sci. 81, 1775-1781 (2002).
19. Zhou, H. et al. Genome-wide linkage analysis to identify chromosomal regions affecting phenotypic traits in the chicken. I. Growth and average daily gain. Poult. Sci. 85, 1700-1711 (2006).
20. Ambo, M. et al. Quantitative trait loci for performance traits in a broiler 3 layer cross. Anim. Genet. 40, 200-208 (2009)
21. Stone S,et al. TBC1D1isa candidate forasevere obesity geneandevidence foragene/ gene interactionin obesity predisposition. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15, 2709-2720 (2006).
22. Chadt, A. et al. Tbc1d1 mutation in lean mouse strain confers leanness and protects from diet-induced obesity. Nature Genet. 40, 1354-1359 (2008).
23. Peck, G. R. et al. Insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of the Rab GTPase-activating protein TBC1D1 regulates GLUT4 translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 30016-30023 (2009).
24. Olson, M. V. When less is more: gene loss as an engine of evolutionary change. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64, 18-23 (1999).
25. Lu, J. et al. The accumulation of deleterious mutations in rice genomes: a hypothesis on the cost of domestication. Trends Genet. 22, 126-131 (2006).
26. Agarwal, S. K., Cogburn, L. A. & Burnside, J. Dysfunctional growth hormone receptor in a strain of sex-linked dwarf chicken: evidence for a mutation in the intracellular domain. J. Endocrinol. 142, 427-434 (1994).
27. Jacobsson, L. et al. Many QTLs with minor additive effects are associated with a large difference in growth between two selection lines in chickens. Genet. Res. 86, 115-125 (2005).
28. Darvasi, A. Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models. Nature Genet. 18, 19-24 (1998).
29. Dunnington, E. A. & Siegel, P. B. Long-term divergent selection for eight-week body weight in white Plymouth rock chickens. Poult. Sci. 75, 1168-1179 (1996).
30. Liljedahl, L.-E., Kolstad, N., Sørensen, P. & Maijala, K. Scandinavian selection and crossbreeding experiment with laying hens. I. Background and general outline. Acta Agric. Scand. 29, 273-286 (1979).
31. Cole, R. K. Hereditary hypothyroidism in the domestic fowl. Genetics 53, 1021-1033 (1966).
32. Hillel, J. et al. Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet. Sel. Evol. 35, 533-557 (2003).
33. Carlborg, O. et al. Epistasis and the release of genetic variation during long-term selection. Nature Genet. 38, 418-420 (2006).
34. Karlsson, E. K. et al. Efficient mapping of mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association. Nature Genet. 39, 1321-1328 (2007).
35. Felsenstein, J. PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5, 164-166 (1989).
36. Alvarez-Castro, J. M. & Carlborg, O. A unified model for functional and statistical epistasis and its application in quantitative trait loci analysis. Genetics 176, 1151-1167 (2007).
37. Le Rouzic, A. & Alvarez-Castro, J. M. Estimation of genetic effects and genotype-phenotype maps. Evol. Bioinform. Online 4, 225-235 (2008).
38. 2 intercross designs. Genetics 178, 2315-2326 (2008).
39. Rozen, S. & Skaletsky, H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol. Biol. 132, 365-386 (2000).
40. Ka, S. et al. Proviral integrations and expression of endogenous Avian leucosis virus during long term selection for high and low body weight in two chicken lines. Retrovirology 6, 68 (2009).
41. {DDCT method. Methods 25, 402-408 (2001).