A survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickens

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Derks, Martijn F L ^a   Megens, Hendrik Jan ^a   Bosse, Mirte ^a   Visscher, Jeroen ^b   Peeters, Katrijn ^b   Bink, Marco C A M ^b   Vereijken, Addie ^b   Gross, Christian ^a,c   De Ridder, Dick ^a   Reinders, Marcel J T ^c   Groenen, Martien A M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Hendrix Genetics   (Netherlands)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; EGG; FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GENOTYPE; POULTRY; RECOMBINATION; SELECTION;

ANIMALIA; GALLUS GALLUS;

ANIMAL; BREEDING; CHICKEN; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; GENE DELETION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; VETERINARY MEDICINE; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; BREEDING; CHICKENS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE DELETION; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING;

EID: 85045516552     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-018-0390-1     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Charlesworth D, Willis JH. Fundamental concepts in genetics. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:783-96.
2. Zhang M, Zhou L, Bawa R, Suren H, Holliday JA. Recombination rate variation, hitchhiking, and demographic history shape deleterious load in poplar. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:2899-910.
3. Chun S, Fay JC. Evidence for hitchhiking of deleterious mutations within the human genome. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002240.
4. VanRaden PM, Olson KM, Null DJ, Hutchison JL. Harmful recessive effects on fertility detected by absence of homozygous haplotypes. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:6153-61.
5. Derks MFL, Megens HJ, Bosse M, Lopes MS, Harlizius B, Groenen MAM. A systematic survey to identify lethal recessive variation in highly managed pig populations. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:858.
6. Sitzenstock F, Ytournel F, Sharifi AR, Cavero D, Taubert H, Preisinger R, et al. Efficiency of genomic selection in an established commercial layer breeding program. Genet Sel Evol. 2013;45:29.
7. Kearney JF, Navarro P, Haley CS, Villanueva B. Consequences of selection for improving production traits on the frequency of deleterious alleles for fitness. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:850-9.
8. Rakonjac S, Bogosavljevic-Boskovic S, Pavlovski Z, Skrbic Z, Doskovic V, Petrovic MD, et al. Laying hen rearing systems: a review of major production results and egg quality traits. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2014;70:93-104.
9. Ellen ED, Visscher J, van Arendonk JA, Bijma P. Survival of laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and associative effects in three purebred layer lines. Poult Sci. 2008;87:233-9.
10. Savory CJ. Feather pecking and cannibalism. Worlds Poult Sci J. 1995;51:215-9.
11. Johnson PA, Stephens CS, Giles JR. The domestic chicken: causes and consequences of an egg a day. Poult Sci. 2015;94:816-20.
12. Webster AB. Welfare implications of avian osteoporosis. Poult Sci. 2004;83:184-92.
13. Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ. Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction. Genetics. 2013;194:597-607.
14. Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819-29.
15. Charlier C, Li W, Harland C, Littlejohn M, Coppieters W, Creagh F, et al. NGS-based reverse genetic screen for common embryonic lethal mutations compromising fertility in livestock. Genome Res. 2016;26:1333-41.
16. Rubin CJ, Zody MC, Eriksson J, Meadows JR, Sherwood E, Webster MT, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature. 2010;464:587-91.
17. Gheyas AA, Boschiero C, Eory L, Ralph H, Kuo R, Woolliams JA, et al. Functional classification of 15 million SNPs detected from diverse chicken populations. DNA Res. 2015;22:205-17.
18. Schmid M, Smith J, Burt DW, Aken BL, Antin PB, Archibald AL, et al. Third report on chicken genes and chromosomes 2015. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2015;145:78-179.
19. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559-75.
20. Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LCAM, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4:7.
21. Browning SR, Browning BL. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:1084-97.
22. Fritz S, Capitan A, Djari A, Rodriguez SC, Barbat A, Baur A, et al. Detection of haplotypes associated with prenatal death in dairy cattle and identification of deleterious mutations in GART, SHBG and SLC37A2. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65550.
23. Sickle: A sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files. https://github.com/najoshi/sickle. Accessed 20 Feb 2018.
24. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754-60.
25. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078-9.
26. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297-303.
27. Garrison E, Marth G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXiv 2012:1207.3907 [q-bio.GN].
28. McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GR, Thormann A, et al. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 2016;17:122.
29. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1073-82.
30. Choi Y, Chan AP. PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2745-7.
31. Blake JA, Eppig JT, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Smith CL, Bult CJ, et al. Mouse genome database (MGD)-2017: community knowledge resource for the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D723-9.
32. Skinner ME, Uzilov AV, Stein LD, Mungall CJ, Holmes IH. JBrowse: a next-generation genome browser. Genome Res. 2009;19:1630-8.
33. Elferink MG, Megens HJ, Vereijken A, Hu X, Crooijmans RPMA, Groenen MAM. Signatures of selection in the genomes of commercial and non-commercial chicken breeds. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32720.
34. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44-57.
35. Elferink MG, van As P, Veenendaal T, Crooijmans RP, Groenen MA. Regional differences in recombination hotspots between two chicken populations. BMC Genet. 2010;11:11.
36. Megens HJ, Crooijmans RP, Bastiaansen JW, Kerstens HH, Coster A, Jalving R, et al. Comparison of linkage disequilibrium and haplotype diversity on macro- and microchromosomes in chicken. BMC Genet. 2009;10:86.
37. Amuzu-Aweh EN, Bovenhuis H, de Koning DJ, Bijma P. Predicting heterosis for egg production traits in crossbred offspring of individual White Leghorn sires using genome-wide SNP data. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47:27.
38. Jiang Y, Ding Q, Xie X, Libby RT, Lefebvre V, Gan L. Transcription factors SOX4 and SOX11 function redundantly to regulate the development of mouse retinal ganglion cells. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:18429-38.
39. Pinhasov A, Mandel S, Torchinsky A, Giladi E, Pittel Z, Goldsweig AM, et al. Activity-dependent neuroprotective protein: a novel gene essential for brain formation. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2003;144:83-90.
40. Aslam ML, Bastiaansen JW, Elferink MG, Megens HJ, Crooijmans RP, Blomberg A, et al. Whole genome SNP discovery and analysis of genetic diversity in Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). BMC Genomics. 2012;13:391.
41. Smeds L, Qvarnström A, Ellegren H. Direct estimate of the rate of germline mutation in a bird. Genome Res. 2016;26:1211-8.
42. Denholm L, Marron B, Parnell P, Teseling C, Beever J. Pleiotropic embryonic malformation associated with cranial and caudal neural tube defects from a single amino-acid substitution (V311A) at a conserved locus in the Nhlrc2 protein. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on neural tube defects: 26-29 October 2015; Austin. 2015.
43. Adams HA, Sonstegard TS, VanRaden PM, Null DJ, Van Tassell CP, Larkin DM, et al. Identification of a nonsense mutation in APAF1 that is likely causal for a decrease in reproductive efficiency in Holstein dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99:6693-701.
44. Lagrutta AA, McCarthy JG, Scherczinger CA, Heywood SM. Identification and developmental expression of a novel embryonic myosin heavy-chain gene in chicken. DNA. 1989;8:39-50.
45. Hu ZL, Park CA, Reecy JM. Developmental progress and current status of the animal QTLdb. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D827-33.
46. Grako KA, Ochiya T, Barritt D, Nishiyama A, Stallcup WB. PDGF (alpha)-receptor is unresponsive to PDGF-AA in aortic smooth muscle cells from the NG2 knockout mouse. J Cell Sci. 1999;112:905-15.
47. Ponting CP, Hardison RC. What fraction of the human genome is functional? Genome Res. 2011;21:1769-76.
48. Andersson L, Archibald AL, Bottema CD, Brauning R, Burgess SC, Burt DW, et al. Coordinated international action to accelerate genome-to-phenome with FAANG, the functional annotation of animal genomes project. Genome Biol. 2015;16:57.
49. Bosse M, Megens HJ, Madsen O, Crooijmans RPMA, Ryder OA, Austerlitz F, et al. Using genome-wide measures of coancestry to maintain diversity and fitness in endangered and domestic pig populations. Genome Res. 2015;257:970-81.
50. Sohail M, Vakhrusheva OA, Sul JH, Pulit SL, Francioli LC, Genome of the Netherlands Consortium, et al. Negative selection in humans and fruit flies involves synergistic epistasis. Science. 2017;356:539-42.
51. Ng PC, Levy S, Huang J, Stockwell TB, Walenz BP, Li K, et al. Genetic variation in an individual human exome. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000160.
52. Ramu P, Esuma W, Kawuki R, Rabbi IY, Egesi C, Bredeson JV, et al. Cassava haplotype map highlights fixation of deleterious mutations during clonal propagation. Nat Genet. 2017;48:959-63.
53. Backström N, Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mellenius H, Nam K, Bolund E, et al. The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome. Genome Res. 2010;20:485-95.
54. Perez-Enciso M, Rincon JC, Legarra A. Sequence - versus chip-assisted genomic selection: accurate biological information is advised. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47:43.
55. Perez-Enciso M, Forneris N, de los Campos G, Legarra A. Evaluating sequence-based genomic prediction with an efficient new simulator. Genetics. 2017;205:939-53.
56. MacLeod IM, Bowman PJ, Vander Jagt CJ, Haile-Mariam M, Kemper KE, Chamberlain AJ, et al. Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:144.