Genomic BLUP decoded: A look into the black box of genomic prediction

Genetics

Volumn 194, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 597-607

  Habier, David ^a,b   Fernando, Rohan L ^a   Garrick, Dorian J ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALLELE; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION; BREEDING; DAIRY CATTLE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MAIZE; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADDITIVE-GENETIC RELATIONSHIPS; COSEGREGATION; GENOMIC BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION (BLUP); GENOMIC SELECTION; GENPRED; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM (LD); SHARED DATA RESOURCES;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; GENOME; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SAMPLE SIZE; ZEA MAYS;

BOS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84879774670     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.152207     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Albrecht, T., V. Wimmer, H.-J. Auinger, M. Erbe, C. Knaak et al., 2011 Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123: 339-350.
2. Andreescu, C., S. Avendano, S. R. Brown, A. Hassen, S. J. Lamont et al., 2007 Linkage disequilibrium in related breeding lines of chickens. Genetics 177: 2161-2169.
3. Bastiaansen, J., A. Coster, M. Calus, J. van Arendonk, and H. Bovenhuis, 2012 Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures. Genet. Sel. Evol. 44: 3.
4. Bernardo, R., 2010 Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants, Ed. 2. Stemma Press, Woodbury, Minnesota.
5. Calus, M., and R. Veerkamp, 2007 Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breed-ing value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124: 362-368.
6. Calus, M., and R. Veerkamp, 2011 Accuracy of multi-trait geno-mic selection using different methods. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43: 26.
7. Calus, M. P. L., T. H. E. Meuwissen, A. P. W. de Roos, and R. F. Veerkamp, 2008 Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics 178: 553-561.
8. Daetwyler, H. D., B. Villanueva, and J. A. Woolliams, 2008 Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS ONE 3: e3395.
9. Daetwyler, H. D., R. Pong-Wong, B. Villanueva, and J. A. Woolliams, 2010 The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide eval-uation methods. Genetics 185: 1021-1031.
10. de Roos, A. P. W., B. J. Hayes, R. J. Spelman, and M. E. Goddard, 2008 Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics 179: 1503-1512.
11. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay, 1996 Introduction to Quan-titative Genetics, Ed. 4. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12. Fernando, R. L., 2003 Statistical issues in marker assisted selec-tion, pp. 101-108 in 8th Genetic Prediction Workshop of The Beef Improvement Federation. Edited by L. V. Cundiff.
13. Fernando, R. L., D. Habier, C. Stricker, J. C. M. Dekkers, and L. R. Totir, 2007 Genomic selection. Acta Agric. Scand. Anim. Sci. 57: 192-195.
14. Gianola, D., G. de los Campos, W. G. Hill, E. Manfredi, and R. Fernando, 2009 Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics 183: 347-363.
15. Goddard, M. E., 2009 Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136: 245-257.
16. Goddard, M. E., B. J. Hayes, and T. H. E. Meuwissen, 2011 Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the acuracy of geno-mic selection. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 128: 409-421.
17. Habier, D., R. L. Fernando, and J. C. M. Dekkers, 2007 The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177: 2389-2397.
18. Habier, D., R. L. Fernando, and J. C. M. Dekkers, 2009 Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics 182: 343-353.
19. Habier, D., J. Tetens, F.-R. Seefried, P. Lichtner, and G. Thaller, 2010a The impact of genetic relationship information on ge-nomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 42: 5.
20. Habier, D., L. R. Totir, and R. L. Fernando, 2010b A two-stage approximation for analysis of mixture genetic models in large pedigrees. Genetics 185: 655-670.
21. Habier, D., R. Fernando, K. Kizilkaya, and D. Garrick, 2011 Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 186.
22. Hayes, B., P. Bowman, A. Chamberlain, K. Verbyla, and M. God-dard, 2009a Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41: 51.
23. Hayes, B., M. Goddard, and P. Vissher, 2009b Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. 91: 47-60.
24. Henderson, C. R., 1973 Sire evaluation and genetic trends, pp. 10-41 in Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in Honor of Dr. Jay L. Lush. American Society of Animal Science and American Dairy Science Association, Champaign, IL.
25. Henderson, C. R., 1975 Best linear unbiased estimation and pre-diction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423-447.
26. Hill, W. G., 1976 Order statistics of correlated variables and im-plications in genetic selection programs. Biometrics 32: 889-902.
27. Hill, W., and B. Weir, 2011 Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage. Genet. Res. 93: 47-64.
28. Karlin, S., 1984, Theoretical aspects of genetic map functions in recombination processes, pp. 209-228 in Human Population Ge-netics: The Pittsburgh Symposium, edited by A. Chakravarti. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
29. Lee, S., M. Goddard, P. Visscher, and J. van der Werf, 2010 Using the realized relationship matrix to disentangle confounding fac-tors for the estimation of genetic variance components of com-plex traits. Genet. Sel. Evol. 42: 22.
30. Legarra, A., and R. Fernando, 2009 Linear models for joint asso-ciation and linkage QTL mapping. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41: 43.
31. Lund, M., A. de Roos, A. de Vries, T. Druet, V. Ducrocq et al., 2011 A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predic-tions. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43: 43.
32. Malécot, G., 1948 Les Mathématiques de l'Hérédité. Masson et Cie., Paris.
33. Meuwissen, T. H. E., B. J. Hayes, and M. E. Goddard, 2001 Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819-1829.
34. Meuwissen, T. H. E., A. Karlsen, S. Lien, I. Olsaker, and M. E. God-dard, 2002 Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus for twin-ning rate using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping. Genetics 161: 373-379.
35. Mrode, R. A., 2005 Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values, Ed. 2. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxford-shire, UK.
36. Ober, U., J. F. Ayroles, E. A. Stone, S. Richards, D. Zhu et al., 2012 Using whole-genome sequence data to predict quantita-tive trait phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 8: e1002685.
37. Ohta, T., and M. Kimura, 1969 Linkage disequilibrium at steady state determined by random genetic drift and recurrent muta-tion. Genetics 63: 229-238.
38. Pérez-Enciso, M., 2003 Fine mapping of complex trait genes com-bining pedigree and linkage disequilibrium information: a Bayes-ian unified framework. Genetics 163: 1497-1510.
39. Qanbari, S., E. C. G. Pimentel, J. Tetens, G. Thaller, P. Lichtner et al., 2010 The pattern of linkage disequilibrium in German Holstein cattle. Anim. Genet. 41: 346-356.
40. Reich, D. E., M. Cargill, S. Bolk, J. Ireland, P. C. Sabeti et al., 2001 Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Nature 411: 199-204.
41. Snedecor, G., and W. Cochran, 1967 Statistical Methods, Ed. 6. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
42. Van Raden, P. M., 2008 Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 91: 4414-4423.
43. Yang, J., B. Benyamin, B. Mc, H. A. Evoy, S. Gordon et al., 2010 Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the herita-bility for human height. Nat. Genet. 42: 565-569.
44. FERNANDO, R. L., and M. GROSSMAN, 1989 Marker assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction. Genet. Sel. Evol. 21: 467-477.
45. HABIER, D., L. R. TOTIR, and R. L. FERNANDO, 2010 A two-stage approximation for analysis of mixture genetic models in large pedigrees. Genetics 185: 655-670.