Direct estimate of the rate of germline mutation in a bird

Genome Research

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 1211-1218

  Smeds, Linnéa ^a   Qvarnström, Anna ^a   Ellegren, Hans ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL GENETICS; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CPG ISLAND; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; FICEDULA ALBICOLLIS; FLYCATCHER; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME SIZE; GERMLINE MUTATION; INHERITANCE; MALE; MAMMAL; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; PEDIGREE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; GENETICS; GENOME; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; SONGBIRD;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; GERM-LINE MUTATION; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MUTATION RATE; PEDIGREE; SONGBIRDS;

EID: 84984940557     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.204669.116     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Andolfatto P. 2001. Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol 18: 279-290.
2. Awadalla P, Gauthier J, Myers RA, Casals F, Hamdan FF, Griffing AR, Côté M, Henrion E, Spiegelman D, Tarabeux J, et al. 2010. Direct measure of the de novo mutation rate in autism and schizophrenia cohorts. Am J Hum Genet 87: 316-324.
3. Axelsson E, Smith NGC, Sundström H, Berlin S, Ellegren H. 2004. Male-biased mutation rate and divergence in autosomal, Z-linked and W-linked introns of chicken and turkey. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1538-1547.
4. Bateman AJ. 1959. The viability of near-normal irradiated chromosomes. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med 1: 170-180.
5. Beck NR, Double MC, Cockburn A. 2003. Microsatellite evolution at two hypervariable loci revealed by extensive avian pedigrees. Mol Biol Evol 20: 54-61.
6. Benson G. 1999. Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 573-580.
7. Brommer JE, Gustafsson L, Pietiäinen H, Merilä J. 2004. Single-generation estimates of individual fitness as proxies for long- Term genetic contribution. Am Nat 163: 505-517.
8. Burri R, Nater A, Kawakami T, Mugal CF, Olason PI, Smeds L, Suh A, Dutoit L, Bureš S, Garamszegi LZ, et al. 2015. Linked selection and recombination rate variation drive the evolution of the genomic landscape of differentiation across the speciation continuum of Ficedula flycatchers. Genome Res 25: 1656-1665.
9. Chamary JV, Parmley JL, Hurst LD. 2006. Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals. Nat Rev Genet 7: 98-108.
10. The Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium. 2005. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature 437: 69-87.
11. Conrad D, Keebler J, DePristo M, Lindsay S, Zhang Y, Casals F, Idaghdour Y, Hartl C, Torroja C, Garimella K, et al. 2011. Variation in genome-widemutation rates within and between human families. Nat Genet 43: 712-714.
12. Crow JF. 2000. The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation. Nat Rev Genet 1: 40-47.
13. Cutter AD, Dey A, Murray RL. 2009. Evolution of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Mol Biol Evol 26: 1199-1234.
14. De Magalhäes JP, Costa J. 2009. A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life-history traits. J Evol Biol 22: 1770-1774.
15. Denver DR, Wilhelm LJ, Howe DK, Gafner K, Dolan PC, Baer CF. 2012. Variation in base-substitution mutation in experimental and natural lineages of Caenorhabditis nematodes. Genome Biol Evol 4: 513-522.
16. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, et al. 2011. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 43: 491-498.
17. Drake JW, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Crow JF. 1998. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148: 1667-1686.
18. Ellegren H. 2007. Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274: 1-10.
19. Ellegren H, Smeds L, Burri R, Olason PI, Backstrom N, Kawakami T, Kunstner A, Makinen H, Nadachowska-Brzyska K, Qvarnstrom A, et al. 2012. The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers. Nature 491: 756-760.
20. Farlow A, Long H, Arnoux S, Sung W, Doak TG, Nordborg M, Lynch M. 2015. The spontaneous mutation rate in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 201: 737-744.
21. Flowers JM, Hazzouri KM, Pham GM, Rosas U, Bahmani T, Khraiwesh B, Nelson DR, Jijakli K, Abdrabu R, Harris EH, et al. 2015. Whole-genome resequencing reveals extensive natural variation in the model green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell 27: 2353-2369.
22. Francioli LC, Polak PP, Koren A, Menelaou A, Chun S, Renkens I; Genome of the Netherlands Consortium, van Duijn CM, Swertz M, Wijmenga C, et al. 2015. Genome-wide patterns and properties of de novo mutations in humans. Nat Genet 47: 822-826.
23. Galtier N, Blier PU, Nabholz B. 2009. Inverse relationship between longevity and evolutionary rate of mitochondrial proteins in mammals and birds. Mitochondrion 9: 51-57.
24. Gymrek M, Golan D, Rosset S, Erlich Y. 2012. lobSTR: A short tandem repeat profiler for personal genomes. Genome Res 22: 1154-1162.
25. Hershberg R, Petrov DA. 2010. Evidence that mutation is universally biased towards AT in bacteria. PLoS Genet 6: E1001115.
26. The International SNP Map Working Group. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 409: 928-933.
27. Kardos M, Husby A, McFarlane E, Qvarnstrom A, Ellegren H. 2016. Whole genome resequencing of extreme phenotypes in collared flycatchers highlights the difficulty of detecting quantitative trait loci in natural populations. Mol Ecol Resour 16: 727-741.
28. Kawakami T, Smeds L, Backström N, Husby A, Qvarnström A, Mugal CF, Olason P, Ellegren H. 2014. A high-density linkage map enables a second- generation collared flycatcher genome assembly and reveals the patterns of avian recombina tion rate variation and chromosomal evolution. Mol Ecol 23: 4035-4058.
29. Keightley PD. 2012. Rates and fitness consequences of new mutations in humans. Genetics 190: 295-304.
30. Keightley PD, Ness RW, Halligan DL, Haddrill PR. 2014. Estimation of the spontaneous mutation rate per nucleotide site in a Drosophila melanogaster full-sib family. Genetics 196: 313-320.
31. Keightley PD, Pinharanda A, NessRW, Simpson F, Dasmahapatra KK, Mallet J, Davey JW, Jiggins CD. 2015. Estimation of the spontaneous mutation rate in Heliconius melpomene. Mol Biol Evol 32: 239-243.
32. Kimura M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217: 624-626.
33. Kondrashov AS, Crow JF. 1993. A molecular approach to estimating the human deleterious mutation rate. Hum Mutat 2: 229-234.
34. Kong A, Frigge ML, Masson G, Besenbacher S, Sulem P, Magnusson G, Gudjonsson SA, Sigurdsson A, Jonasdottir A, Jonasdottir A, et al. 2012. Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father's age to disease risk. Nature 488: 471-475.
35. Künstner A, Nabholz B, Ellegren H. 2011. Significant selective constraint at fourfold degenerate sites in the avian genome and its consequence for detection of positive selection. Genome Biol Evol 3: 1381-1389.
36. Lanfear R, Ho SYW, Love D, Bromham L. 2010. Mutation rate is linked to diversification in birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 20423-20428.
37. Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows- Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754-1760.
38. Lindblad-Toh K, Winchester E, Daly MJ, Wang DG, Hirschhorn JN, Laviolette J-P, Ardlie K, Reich DE, Robinson E, Sklar P, et al. 2000. Large-scale discovery and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the mouse. Nat Genet 24: 381-386.
39. Lowe CB, Clarke JA, Baker AJ, Haussler D, Edwards SV. 2015. Feather development genes and associated regulatory innovation predate the origin of Dinosauria. Mol Biol Evol 32: 23-28.
40. Lynch M. 2010a. Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet 26: 345-352.
41. Lynch M. 2010b. Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 961-968.
42. Lynch M. 2011. The lower bound to the evolution of mutation rates. Genome Biol Evol 3: 1107-1118.
43. Lynch M, Sung W, Morris K, Coffey N, Landry CR, Dopman EB, Dickinson WJ, Okamoto K, Kulkarni S, Hartl DL, et al. 2008. A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105: 9272-9277.
44. Michaelson Jacob J, Shi Y, Gujral M, Zheng H, Malhotra D, Jin X, Jian M, Liu G, Greer D, Bhandari A, et al. 2012. Whole-genome sequencing in autism identifies hot spots for de novo germline mutation. Cell 151: 1431-1442.
45. Mugal CF, Arndt PF, Holm L, Ellegren H. 2015. Evolutionary consequences of DNA methylation on the GC content in vertebrate genomes. G3 (Bethesda) 5: 441-447.
46. Mukai T. 1964. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Spontaneous mutation rate of polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 50: 1-19.
47. Muller HJ. 1928. The measurement of gene mutation rate in Drosophila, its high variability, and its dependence upon temperature. Genetics 13: 279-357.
48. Nabholz B, Künstner A, Wang R, Jarvis ED, Ellegren H. 2011. Dynamic evolution of base composition: causes and consequences in avian phylogenomics. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2197-2210.
49. Nachman MW, Crowell SL. 2000. Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. Genetics 156: 297-304.
50. Nam K, Mugal C, Nabholz B, Schielzeth H, Wolf J, Backstrom N, Kunstner A, Balakrishnan C, Heger A, Ponting C, et al. 2010. Molecular evolution of genes in avian genomes. Genome Biol 11: R68.
51. Ness RW, Morgan AD, Vasanthakrishnan RB, Colegrave N, Keightley PD. 2015. Extensive de novo mutation rate variation between individuals and across the genome of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genome Res 25: 1739-1749.
52. Ossowski S, Schneeberger K, Lucas-Lledó JI, Warthmann N, Clark RM, Shaw RG, Weigel D, Lynch M. 2010. The rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 327: 92-94.
53. Primmer CR, Saino N, Moller AP, Ellegren H. 1998. Unraveling the processes of microsatellite evolution through analysis of germ line mutations in barn swallows Hirundo rustica. Mol Biol Evol 15: 1047-1054.
54. Roach JC, Glusman G, Smit AFA, Huff CD, Hubley R, Shannon PT, Rowen L, Pant KP, Goodman N, Bamshad M, et al. 2010. Analysis of genetic inheritance in a family quartet by whole-genome sequencing. Science 328: 636-639.
55. Russell LB, Russell WL. 1996. Spontaneous mutations recovered as mosaics in the mouse specific-locus test. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93: 13072- 13077.
56. Samocha KE, Robinson EB, Sanders SJ, Stevens C, Sabo A, McGrath LM, Kosmicki JA, Rehnstrom K, Mallick S, Kirby A, et al. 2014. A framework for the interpretation of de novo mutation in human disease. Nat Genet 46: 944-950.
57. Sandstedt S, Tucker P. 2005. Male-driven evolution in closely related species of the mouse genus Mus. J Mol Evol 61: 138-144.
58. Scally A, Durbin R. 2012. Revising the human mutation rate: implications for understanding human evolution. Nat Rev Genet 13: 745-753.
59. Schalet AP. 1960. "A study of spontaneous visible mutations in Drosophila melanogaster." PhD thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
60. Schrider DR, Houle D, Lynch M, Hahn MW. 2013. Rates and genomic consequences of spontaneous mutational events in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 194: 937-954.
61. Shendure J, Akey JM. 2015. The origins, determinants, and consequences of human mutations. Science 349: 1478-1483.
62. Smeds L, Warmuth V, Bolivar P, Uebbing S, Burri R, Suh A, Nater A, Bures S, Garamszegi LZ, Hogner S, et al. 2015. Evolutionary analysis of the female- specific avian W chromosome. Nat Commun 6: 7330.
63. Smit AFA, Hubley R, Green P. 1996-2010. RepeatMasker Open-3.0. http://www.repeatmasker.org/.
64. Stadler LJ. 1930. The frequency of mutation of specific genes in maize. Anat Rec 47: 381.
65. Sung W, Ackerman MS, Miller SF, Doak TG, Lynch M. 2012a. Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 18488-18492.
66. Sung W, Tucker AE, Doak TG, Choi E, Thomas WK, Lynch M. 2012b. Extraordinary genome stability in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 19339-19344.
67. Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. 2013. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform 14: 178-192.
68. Uchimura A, Higuchi M, Minakuchi Y, Ohno M, Toyoda A, Fujiyama A, Miura I, Wakana S, Nishino J, Yagi T. 2015. Germline mutation rates and the long- Term phenotypic effects of mutation accumulation in wild- Type laboratory mice and mutator mice. Genome Res 25: 1125-1134.
69. Venn O, Turner I, Mathieson I, de Groot N, Bontrop R, McVean G. 2014. Strong male bias drives germline mutation in chimpanzees. Science 344: 1272-1275.
70. Wallberg A, Han F, Wellhagen G, Dahle B, Kawata M, Haddad N, Simoes ZLP, Allsopp MH, Kandemir I, De la Rua P, et al. 2014. A worldwide survey of genome sequence variation provides insight into the evolutionary history of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nat Genet 46: 1081-1088.
71. S correlates positively with body mass in birds, raising implications for inferring lineage-specific selection. Genome Biol 15: 542.
72. Yang S, Wang L, Huang J, Zhang X, Yuan Y, Chen J-Q, Hurst LD, Tian D. 2015. Parent-progeny sequencing indicates higher mutation rates in heterozygotes. Nature 523: 463-467.
73. Zhang G, Li C, Li Q, Li B, Larkin DM, Lee C, Storz JF, Antunes A, Greenwold MJ, Meredith RW, et al. 2014. Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation. Science 346: 1311-1320.
74. Zhu YO, Siegal ML, HallDW, Petrov DA. 2014. Precise estimates of mutation rate and spectrum in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111: E2310-E2318.