Whole genome SNP discovery and analysis of genetic diversity in Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo)

BMC Genomics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Aslam, Muhammad L ^a   Bastiaansen, John W M ^a   Elferink, Martin G ^a   Megens, Hendrik Jan ^a   Crooijmans, Richard P M A ^a   Blomberg, Le A ^b   Fleischer, Robert C ^c   Van Tassell, Curtis P ^b   Sonstegard, Tad S ^b   Schroeder, Steven G ^b   Groenen, Martien A M ^a   Long, Julie A ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA EXTRACTION; DNA LIBRARY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; HAPLOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HOMOZYGOSITY; MALE; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; POPULATION GENETICS; PROMOTER REGION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TURKEY (BIRD);

ANIMALS; BREEDING; GENE LIBRARY; GENETIC VARIATION; MALE; MEXICO; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TURKEYS;

MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; SUIDAE;

EID: 84864910611     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-391     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Speller CF, Kemp BM, Wyatt SD, Monroe C, Lipe WD, Arndt UM, Yang DY. Ancient mitochondrial DNA analysis reveals complexity of indigenous North American turkey domestication. PNAS 2010, 107(7):2807-2812. 10.1073/pnas.0909724107, 2840336, 20133614.
2. Food and agriculture organization statistical division (FAOSTAT) of the United Nations Food and agriculture organization statistical division (FAOSTAT) of the United Nations http://faostat.fao.org/, Food and agriculture organization statistical division (FAOSTAT) of the United Nations.
3. Berri C, Wacrenier N, Millet N, Le Bihan-Duval E. Effect of selection for improved body composition on muscle and meat characteristics of broilers from experimental and commercial lines. Poult Sci 2001, 80:833-838.
4. Li H, Deeb N, Zhou H, Mitchell AD, Ashwell CM, Lamont SJ. Chicken quantitative trait loci for growth and body composition associated with transforming growth factor-β genes1. Poult Sci 2003, 82:347-356.
5. Le Bihan-Duval E, Debut M, Berri CM, Sellier N, Santé-Lhoutellier V, Jégo Y, Beaumont C. Chicken meat quality : genetic variability and relationship with growth and muscle characteristics. BMC Genetics 2008, 9:53. 2533670, 18706119.
6. Aslam ML, Bastiaansen JWM, Crooijmans RPMA, Ducro BJ, Vereijken A, Megens H-J, Groenen MAM. Genetic variances, heritabilities and maternal effects on body weight, breast meat yield, meat quality traits and the shape of the growth curve in turkey birds. BMC Genetics 2011, 12(1):14. 3039623, 21266032.
7. Montaldo HH, Meza-Herrera CA. Use of molecular markers and major genes in the genetic improvement of livestock. EJB 1998, 1(2).
8. Groeneveld LF, Lenstra JA, Eding H, Toro MA, Scherf B, Pilling D, Negrini R, Finlay EK, Jianlin H, Groeneveld E, et al. Genetic diversity in farm animals - a review. Animal Genetics 2010, 41:6-31.
9. Dekkers JCM, Hospital F. The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations. Nature Reviews Genetics 2002, 3:22-32. 10.1038/nrg701, 11823788.
10. Muir WM, Wong GK-S, Zhang Y, Wang J, Groenen MAM, Crooijmans RPMA, Megens H-J, Zhang H, Okimoto R, Vereijken A, et al. Genome-wide assessment of worldwide chicken SNP genetic diversity indicates significant absence of rare alleles in commercial breeds. PNAS 2008, 105(45):17312-17317. 10.1073/pnas.0806569105, 2582254, 18981413.
11. Suh Y, Vijg J. SNP discovery in associating genetic variation with human disease phenotypes. Mutat Res 2005, 573(1-2):41-53.
12. Gray IC, Campbell DA, Spurr NK. Single nucleotide polymorphisms as tools in human genetics. Human Molecular Genetics 2000, 9(16):2403-2408. 10.1093/hmg/9.16.2403, 11005795.
13. Duran C, Appleby N, Edwards D, Batley J. Molecular genetic markers: Discovery, applications, data storage and visualisation. Current Bioinformatics 2009, 4:16-27.
14. Altshuler D, Pollara VJ, Cowles CR, Van Etten WJ, Baldwin J, Linton L, Lander ES. An SNP map of the human genome generated by reduced representation shotgun sequencing. Nature 2000, 407(6803):513-516. 10.1038/35035083, 11029002.
15. Kerstens HHD, Crooijmans RPMA, Veenendaal A, Dibbits BW, Chin-A-Woeng TFC, Dunnen JT, Groenen MAM. Large scale single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in unsequenced genomes using second generation high throughput sequencing technology: applied to turkey. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:479. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-479, 2772860, 19835600.
16. Li G, Ma L, Song C, Yang Z, Wang X, Huang H, Li Y, Li R, Zhang X, Yang H, et al. The YH database: the first Asian diploid genome database. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:1025-1028.
17. Ramos AM, Crooijmans RPMA, Affara NA, Amaral AJ, Archibald AL, Beever JE, Bendixen C, Churcher C, Clark R, Dehais P, et al. Design of a High Density SNP Genotyping Assay in the Pig Using SNPs Identified and Characterized by Next Generation Sequencing Technology. PLoS One 2009, 4(8):e6524. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006524, 2716536, 19654876.
18. Stothard P, Choi J-W, Basu U, Sumner-Thomson J, Meng Y, Liao X, Moore S. Whole genome resequencing of black Angus and Holstein cattle for SNP and CNV discovery. BMC Genomics 2011, 12(1):559. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-559, 3229636, 22085807.
19. You F, Huo N, Deal K, Gu Y, Luo M-C, McGuire P, Dvorak J, Anderson O. Annotation-based genome-wide SNP discovery in the large and complex Aegilops tauschii genome using next-generation sequencing without a reference genome sequence. BMC Genomics 2011, 12(1):59. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-59, 3041743, 21266061.
20. Kilian B, Graner A. NGS technologies for analyzing germplasm diversity in genebanks. Briefings in Functional Genomics 2012, 11(1):38-50. 10.1093/bfgp/elr046, 3281264, 22257472.
21. Dalloul RA, Long JA, Zimin AV, Aslam L, Beal K, Ann Blomberg L, Bouffard P, Burt DW, Crasta O, Crooijmans RPMA, et al. Multi-Platform Next-Generation Sequencing of the Domestic Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): Genome Assembly and Analysis. PLoS Biol 2010, 8(9):e1000475. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000475, 2935454, 20838655.
22. Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Brent S, Carvalho-Silva D, Clapham P, Coates G, Fairley S, Fitzgerald S, et al. Ensembl 2012. Nucleic Acids Research 2012, 40(D1):D84-D90. 10.1093/nar/gkr991, 3245178, 22086963.
23. Ma L, Runesha HB, Dvorkin D, Garbe JR, Da Y. Parallel and serial computing tools for testing single-locus and epistatic SNP effects of quantitative traits in genome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:315. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-315, 2503991, 18644146.
24. Boschiero C, Rosario MF, Ledur MC, Campos RLR, Ambo M, Coutinho LL, Moura ASAMT. Associations between microsatellite markers and traits related to performance, carcass and organs in chickens. Int J Poult Sci 2009, 8(7):615-620.
25. Gu X, Feng C, Ma L, Song C, Wang Y, Da Y, Li H, Chen K, Ye S, Ge C, et al. Genome-wide association study of body weight in chicken F2 resource population. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(7):e21872. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021872, 3136483, 21779344.
26. Andersson L. Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals. Nature Rev Genet 2001, 2:130-138. 10.1038/35052563, 11253052.
27. American Poultry Association In. APA recognized breeds and varieties 2010, [http://www.amerpoultryassn.com], American Poultry Association.
28. International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 2004, 432:717-722. 10.1038/nature03156, 2263125, 15592405, International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium.
29. Rubin C-J, Zody MC, Eriksson J, Meadows JRS, Sherwood E, Webster MT, Jiang L, Ingman M, Sharpe T, Ka S, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 2010, 464(7288):587-591. 10.1038/nature08832, 20220755.
30. Notter DR. The importance of genetic diversity in livestock populations of the future. J Anim Sci 1999, 77:61-69.
31. Bijma P, Meuwissen THE, Woolliams JA. Design of sustainable breeding programs in developed countries. Proceedings 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, 19-23 August Vol 30: 2002; [S.l.]: [s.n.]; 2002, 2002: 133.
32. Ryman N, Utter F, Laikre L. Protection of intraspecific biodiversity of exploited fishes. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 5, 417-446. Rev Fish Biol Fish 1995, 5:417-446.
33. Ficetola GF, Garner TW, De Bernardi F. Genetic diversity, but not hatching success, is jointly affected by postglacial colonization and isolation in the threatened frog, Rana latastei. Mol Ecol 2007, 16(15):3285.
34. Kijowski J, Niewiarowicz A. Emulsifying properties of proteins and meat from broiler breast muscles as affected by their initial pH values. J Food Technol 1978, 13:451-459.
35. Hillel J, Granevitze Z, Twito T, Ben-Avraham D, Blum S, Lavi U, David L, Feldman MW, Cheng H, Weigend S. Molecular markers for the assessment of chicken biodiversity. World's Poultry Science Journal 2007, 63:33-45. 10.1017/S0043933907001250, 3486898, 23133693.
36. Megens HJ, Crooijmans RP, San Cristobal M, Hui X, Li N, Groenen MA. Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication. Genet Sel Evol 2008, 40(1):103-128. 2674914, 18096118.
37. Fulton JE. Genomic selection for poultry breeding. Animal Frontiers 2012, 2(1):30-36.
38. Kijas JM, Townley D, Dalrymple BP, Heaton MP, Maddox JF, McGrath A, Wilson P, Ingersoll RG, McCulloch R, McWilliam S, et al. A genome wide survey of SNP variation reveals the genetic structure of sheep breeds. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(3):e4668. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004668, 2652362, 19270757.
39. Gautier M, Laloë D, Moazami-Goudarzi K. Insights into the genetic history of French cattle from dense SNP data on 47 worldwide breeds. PLoS One 2010, 5(9). pii: e13038.
40. Lin BZ, SasazaKi S, Mannen H. Genetic diversity and structure in Bos taurus and Bos indicus populations analyzed by SNP markers. Ani Sci J 2010, 81(3):281-289.
41. Sawai H, Kim HL, Kuno K, Suzuki S, Gotoh H, Takada M, Takahata N, Satta Y, Akishinonomiya F. The Origin and Genetic Variation of Domestic Chickens with Special Reference to Junglefowls Gallus g. gallus and G. varius. PLoS One 2010, 5(5). e10639.
42. Mock KE, Theimer TC, Rhodes OE, Greenberg DL, Keim P. Genetic variation across the historical range of the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Molecular Ecology 2002, 11:643-657. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01467.x, 11972754.
43. Kamara D, Gyenai KB, Geng T, Hammade H, Smith EJ. Microsatellite marker-based genetic analysis of relatedness between commercial and heritage turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Poult Sci 2007, 86:46-49.
44. Smith EJ, Geng T, Long E, Pierson FW, Sponenberg DP, Larson C, Gogal R. Molecular analysis of the relatedness of five domesticated turkey strains. Biochemical Genetics 2005, 43:35-47. 10.1007/s10528-005-1065-5, 15859518.
45. The American Livestock Breeds Conservancy Turkeys: Narragansett North Carolina, USA, [http://www.albc-usa.org/cpl/narragansett.html], The American Livestock Breeds Conservancy.
46. Marsden SJ. The Beltsville small white turkey. World′s Poult Sci J 2007, 32-41. 3486898, 23133693.
47. The American Livestock Breeds Conservancy Turkeys: Royal Palm North Carolina, USA, [http://albc-usa.org/cpl/royalpalm.html], The American Livestock Breeds Conservancy.
48. Slikas B, Jones IB, Derrickson SR, Fleischer RC. Phylogenetic relationships of insular Micronesian white-eyes (Aves: Passeriformes: Zosteropidae), based on mitochondrial sequence data. Auk 2000, 117:355-365.
49. Fleischer RC, Kirchman JJ, Dumbacher JP, Bevier L, Dove C, Rotzel NC, Edwards SV, Lammertink M, Miglia K, Moore SW. Mid-Pleistocene divergence of Cuban and North American ivory-billed woodpeckers. Biology Letters 2006, 2:466-469. 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0490, 1686174, 17148432.
50. Stromberg M. Mosaik Assembler. 110014 2010, Boston College, Lee W-P.
51. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Subgroup GPDP. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(16):2078-2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352, 2723002, 19505943.
52. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38(16):e164. 10.1093/nar/gkq603, 2938201, 20601685.
53. Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Brent S, Chen Y, Clapham P, Coates G, Fairley S, Fitzgerald S, et al. Ensembl 2011. Nucleic Acids Research 2011, 39(suppl 1):D800-D806. 3013672, 21045057.
54. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) 2005, Washington: Department of genome sciences, university of Washington, Seattle, 369.
55. Nei M. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 1972, 106:283-292.
56. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2011, 10.1093.
57. Pereira SL, Baker AJ. A molecular timescale for galliform birds accounting for uncertainty in time estimates and heterogeneity of rates of DNA substitutions across lineages and sites. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2006, 38(2):499-509. 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.07.007, 16112881.
58. Hillier LW, Marth GT, Quinlan AR, Dooling D, Fewell G, Barnett D, Fox P, Glasscock JI, Hickenbotham M, Huang W, et al. Whole-genome sequencing and variant discovery in C. elegans. Nature Methods 2008, 5(2):183-188. 10.1038/nmeth.1179, 18204455.
59. Consortium TGP. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 2010, 467:1061. 10.1038/nature09534, 3042601, 20981092.
60. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nature Genetics 2011, 43(5):491-498. 10.1038/ng.806, 3083463, 21478889.
61. Rosenberg MS, Subramanian S, Kumar S. Patterns of transitional mutation biases within and among mammalian genomes. Mol Biol Evol 2003, 20(6):988-993. 10.1093/molbev/msg113, 12716982.
62. Bernardi G. Isochores and the evolutionary genomics of vertebrates. Gene 2000, 241(1):3-17. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00485-0, 10607893.
63. Strachan T, Read AP. Human Molecular Genetics. An overview of mutation, polymorphism, and DNA repair 1999, New York: Wiley-Liss, 2.
64. Van Laere A-S, Nguyen M, Braunschweig M, Nezer C, Collette C, Moreau L, Archibald AL, Haley CS, Buys N, Tally M, et al. A regulatory mutation in IGF2 causes a major QTL effect on muscle growth in the pig. Nature 2003, 425:832-836. 10.1038/nature02064, 14574411.
65. Wang ET, Sandberg R, Luo S, Khrebtukova I, Zhang L, Mayr C, Kingsmore SF, Schroth GP, Burge CB. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 2008, 456(7221):470-476. 10.1038/nature07509, 2593745, 18978772.
66. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, Smith HO, Yandell M, Evans CA, Holt RA, et al. The Sequence of the Human Genome. Science 2001, 291(5507):1304-1351. 10.1126/science.1058040, 11181995.
67. Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 2002, 420(6915):520-562. 10.1038/nature01262, 12466850, Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium.
68. Miller W, Makova KD, Nekrutenko A, Hardison RC. Comparative genomics. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 2004, 5:15-56. 10.1146/annurev.genom.5.061903.180057, 15485342.
69. Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, Kamal M, Clamp M, Chang JL, Kulbokas EJ, Zody MC, et al. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 2005, 438(7069):803-819. 10.1038/nature04338, 16341006.
70. Sponenberg DP, Hawes RO, Johnson P, Christman CJ. Turkey conservation in the United States. Animal Genetic Resources Information Bulletin (AGRI) 2000, 27:59-66.
71. Frank R, Reese J, Bender M, Sponenberg DP, Williamson D, Beranger J. Selecting your best turkeys for breeding The American Livestock Breeds Conservancy, [http://www.albc-usa.org/documents/MasterBreeder/turkeys_chapter1.pdf].
72. Hauser L, Adcock GJ, Smith PJ, Ramírez JHB, Carvalho GR. Loss of microsatellite diversity and low effective population size in an overexploited population of New Zealand snapper (Pagrus auratus). Proc Natl Acad Sci 2002, 99:11742-11747. 10.1073/pnas.172242899, 129339, 12185245.
73. Larson S, Jameson R, Bodkin J, Staedler M, Bentzen P. Microsatellite DNA and mitochondrial DNA variation in remnant and translocated sea otter (Enhydra lutris) populations. J Mammal 2002, 83:893-906.
74. Nabata D, Masuda R, Takahashi O, Nagata J. Bottleneck effects on the sika deer Cervus nippon population in Hokkaido, revealed by ancient DNA analysis. Zoolog Sci 2004, 21:473-481. 10.2108/zsj.21.473, 15118235.
75. Axelsson E, Webster MT, Smith NGC, Burt DW, Ellegren H. Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes. Genome Res 2005, 15(1):120-125. 10.1101/gr.3021305, 540272, 15590944.
76. Aslam ML, Bastiaansen JWM, Crooijmans RPMA, Vereijken A, Megens H-J, Groenen MAM. A SNP based linkage map of the turkey genome reveals multiple intrachromosomal rearrangements between the turkey and chicken genomes. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:647. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-647, 3091770, 21092123.
77. Megens HJ, Crooijmans RP, Bastiaansen JW, Kerstens HH, Coster A, Jalving R, Vereijken A, Silva P, Muir WM, Cheng HH, et al. Comparison of linkage disequilibrium and haplotype diversity on macro- and microchromosomes in chicken. BMC Genetics 2009, 10(86).
78. Ellegren H. Molecular evolutionary genomics of birds. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 2007, 117(1-4):120-130.
79. Price EO. Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1999, 65:245-271.
80. Moller M, Chaudhary R, Hellmén E, Höyheim B, Chowdhary B, Andersson L. Pigs with the dominant white coat color phenotype carry a duplication of the KIT gene encoding the mast/stem cell growth factor receptor. Mammalian Genome 1996, 7(11):822-830. 10.1007/s003359900244, 8875890.
81. Fang M, Larson G, Soares Ribeiro H, Li N, Andersson L. Contrasting Mode of Evolution at a Coat Color Locus in Wild and Domestic Pigs. PLoS Genet 2009, 5(1):e1000341. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000341, 2613536, 19148282.
82. Farnir F, Coppieters W, Arranz J-J, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Grisart B, Karim L, Marcq F, Moreau L, Mni M. Extensive genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in cattle. Genome Res 2000, 10:220-227. 10.1101/gr.10.2.220, 10673279.
83. McRae AF, McEwan JC, Dodds KJ, Wilson T, Crawford AM, Slate J. Linkage disequilibrium in domestic sheep. Genetics 2002, 160(3):1113-1122. 1462013, 11901127.
84. Amaral AJ, Megens H-J, Crooijmans RPMA, Heuven HCM, Groenen MAM. Linkage disequilibrium decay and haplotype block structure in the Pig. Genetics 2008, 179(1):569-579. 10.1534/genetics.107.084277, 2390633, 18493072.
85. Qanbari S, Pimentel ECG, Tetens J, Thaller G, Lichtner P, Sharifi AR, Simianer H. A genome-wide scan for signatures of recent selection in Holstein cattle. Animal Genetics 2010, 41:377-389.
86. Amaral AJ, Ferretti L, Megens H-J, Crooijmans RPMA, Nie H, Ramos-Onsins SE, Perez-Enciso M, Schook LB, Groenen MAM. Genome-Wide Footprints of Pig Domestication and Selection Revealed through Massive Parallel Sequencing of Pooled DNA. PLoS One 2011, 6(4):e14782. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014782, 3070695, 21483733.
87. Lundberg M, Kesson SA, Bensch S. Characterization of a divergent chromosome region in the willow warbler Phylloscopus trochilus using avian genomic resources. J Evol Biol 2011, 24:1241-1253. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02259.x, 21418120.
88. Aslam ML, Bastiaansen JWM, Crooijmans RPMA, Vereijken A, Groenen MAM. Whole genome QTL mapping for growth, meat quality and breast meat yield traits in turkey. BMC Genetics 2011, 12:61. 3142527, 21745371.
89. Hu Z-L, Reecy JM. Animal QTLdb: Beyond a Repository - A Public Platform for QTL Comparisons and Integration with Diverse Types of Structural Genomic Information. Mammalian Genome 2007, 18:1-4. 10.1007/s00335-006-0105-8, 17245610.