Coordinated international action to accelerate genome-to-phenome with FAANG, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes project

Genome Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Andersson, Leif ^a,b   Archibald, Alan L ^c   Bottema, Cynthia D ^d   Brauning, Rudiger ^e   Burgess, Shane C ^f   Burt, Dave W ^c   Casas, Eduardo ^g   Cheng, Hans H ^h   Clarke, Laura ⁱ   Couldrey, Christine ^j   Dalrymple, Brian P ^k   Elsik, Christine G ^l   Foissac, Sylvain ^m   Giuffra, Elisabetta ⁿ   Groenen, Martien A ^o   Hayes, Ben J ^p,q,r   Huang, LuSheng S ^s   Khatib, Hassan ^t   Kijas, James W ^k   Kim, Heebal ^u   Lunney, Joan K ^v   McCarthy, Fiona M ^w   McEwan, John C ^e   Moore, Stephen ^x   Nanduri, Bindu ^y   Notredame, Cedric ^z   Palti, Yniv ^aa   Plastow, Graham S ^ab   Reecy, James M ^ac   Rohrer, Gary A ^ad   Sarropoulou, Elena ^ae   Schmidt, Carl J ^af   Silverstein, Jeffrey ^v   Tellam, Ross L ^k   Tixier Boichard, Michele ⁿ   Tosser Klopp, Gwenola ^m   Tuggle, Christopher K ^ac   Vilkki, Johanna ^ag   White, Stephen N ^ah,ai   Zhao, Shuhong ^aj   Zhou, Huaijun ^ak   more..

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^e INVERMAY AGRICULTURAL CENTRE   (New Zealand)

^f Environmental Research Laboratory   (United States)

^g NATIONAL ANIMAL DISEASE CENTER   (United States)

^h AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

ⁱ EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^j LIVESTOCK IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION   (New Zealand)

^k CSIRO   (Australia)

^l UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^m UMR1388 GenPhySE   (France)

ⁿ UMR1313 GÉNÉTIQUE ANIMALE ET BIOLOGIE INTÉGRATIVE   (France)

^o WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^p Biosciences Research Division   (Australia)

^q Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering   (Australia)

^r LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^s JIANGXI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^t UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^u Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^v AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^w UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^x UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^y MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^z CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

^aa NATIONAL CENTER FOR COOL AND COLD WATER AQUACULTURE   (United States)

^ab UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^ac IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^ad U S MEAT ANIMAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^ae INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY   (Greece)

^af UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^ag FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^ah AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^ai WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^aj HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^ak UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FUNCTIONAL ANNOTATION OF ANIMAL GENOMES PROJECT; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOME; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; ANIMAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOME; GENOMICS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84935833067     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0622-4     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Encode Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57-74.
2. Andersson L. Molecular consequences of animal breeding. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2013;23:295-301.
3. Freking BA, Murphy SK, Wylie AA, Rhodes SJ, Keele JW, Leymaster KA, et al. Identification of the single base change causing the callipyge muscle hypertrophy phenotype, the only known example of polar overdominance in mammals. Genome Res. 2002;12:1496-506.
4. Clop A, Marcq F, Takeda H, Pirottin D, Tordoir X, Bibé B, et al. A mutation creating a potential illegitimate microRNA target site in the myostatin gene affects muscularity in sheep. Nat Genet. 2006;38:813-8.
5. Van Laere AS, Nguyen M, Braunschweig M, Nezer C, Collette C, Moreau L, et al. A regulatory mutation in IGF2 causes a major QTL effect on muscle growth in the pig. Nature. 2003;425:832-6.
6. Andersson LS, Larhammar M, Memic F, Wootz H, Schwochow D, Rubin CJ, et al. Mutations in DMRT3 affect locomotion in horses and spinal circuit function in mice. Nature. 2012;488:642-6.
7. Schaub MA, Boyle AP, Kundaje A, Batzoglou S, Snyder M. Linking disease associations with regulatory information in the human genome. Genome Res. 2012;22:1748-59.
8. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature. 2004;432:695-716.
9. Groenen MA, Archibald AL, Uenishi H, Tuggle CK, Takeuchi Y, Rothschild MF, et al. Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature. 2012;491:393-8.
10. Elsik CG, Tellam RL, Worley KC, Gibbs RA, Muzny DM, Weinstock GM, et al. The genome sequence of taurine cattle: a window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science. 2009;324:522-8.
11. Jiang Y, Xie M, Chen W, Talbot R, Maddox JF, Faraut T, et al. The sheep genome illuminates biology of the rumen and lipid metabolism. Science. 2014;344:1168-73.
12. Brawand D, Wagner CE, Li YI, Malinsky M, Keller I, Fan S, et al. The genomic substrate for adaptive radiation in African cichlid fish. Nature. 2014;513:375-81.
13. Rubin CJ, Zody MC, Eriksson J, Meadows JR, Sherwood E, Webster MT, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature. 2010;464:587-91.
14. Carneiro M, Rubin CJ, Di Palma F, Albert FW, Alfoldi J, Barrio AM, et al. Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication. Science. 2014;345:1074-9.
15. Freedman AH, Gronau I, Schweizer RM, Ortega-Del Vecchyo D, Han E, et al. Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004016.
16. Larkin DM, Daetwyler HD, Hernandez AG, Wright CL, Hetrick LA, Boucek L, et al. Whole-genome resequencing of two elite sires for the detection of haplotypes under selection in dairy cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:7693-8.
17. Rubin CJ, Megens HJ, Martinez Barrio A, Maqbool K, Sayyab S, Schwochow D, et al. Strong signatures of selection in the domestic pig genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:19529-36.
18. Schubert M, Jónsson H, Chang D, Der Sarkissian C, Ermini L, Ginolhac A, et al. Prehistoric genomes reveal the genetic foundation and cost of horse domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E5661-9.
19. Guilbault C, Saeed Z, Downey GP, Radzioch D. Cystic fibrosis mouse models. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2007;36:1-7.
20. Devoy A, Bunton-Stasyshyn RK, Tybulewicz VL, Smith AJ, Fisher EM. Genomically humanized mice: technologies and promises. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:14-20.
21. Walters EM, Wolf E, Whyte JJ, Mao J, Renner S, Nagashima H. Completion of the swine genome will simplify the production of swine as a large animal biomedical model. BMC Med Genomics. 2012;5:55.
22. Hill WG. Applications of population genetics to animal breeding, from Wright, Fisher and Lush to genomic prediction. Genetics. 2014;196:1-16.
23. Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819-29.
24. Meuwissen T, Goddard M. Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Genetics. 2010;185:623-31.
25. Daetwyler HD, Capitan A, Pausch H, Stothard P, van Binsbergen R, Brondum RF, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of monogenic and complex traits in cattle. Nat Genet. 2014;46:858-65.
26. MacLeod IM, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. The effects of demography and long-term selection on the accuracy of genomic prediction with sequence data. Genetics. 2014;198:1671-84.
27. Koufariotis L, Chen YP, Bolormaa S, Hayes BJ. Regulatory and coding genome regions are enriched for trait associated variants in dairy and beef cattle. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:436.
28. Shen Y, Yue F, McCleary DF, Ye Z, Edsall L, Kuan S, et al. A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature. 2012;488:116-20.
29. Yue F, Cheng Y, Breschi A, Vierstra J, Wu W, Ryba T, et al. A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome. Nature. 2014;515:355-64.
30. Roy S, Ernst J, Kharchenko PV, Kheradpour P, Negre N, Eaton ML, et al. Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science. 2010;330:1787-97.
31. Gerstein MB, Lu ZJ, Van Nostrand EL, Cheng C, Arshinoff BI, Liu T, et al. Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project. Science. 2010;330:1775-87.
32. Sivasubbu S, Sachidanandan C, Scaria V. Time for the zebrafish ENCODE. J Genet. 2013;92:695-701.
33. Barbosa-Morais NL, Irimia M, Pan Q, Xiong HY, Gueroussov S, Lee LJ, et al. The evolutionary landscape of alternative splicing in vertebrate species. Science. 2012;338:1587-93.
34. Schmidt D, Wilson MD, Ballester B, Schwalie PC, Brown GD, Marshall A, et al. Five-vertebrate ChIP-seq reveals the evolutionary dynamics of transcription factor binding. Science. 2010;328:1036-40.
35. Tagu D, Colbourne JK, Nègre N. Genomic data integration for ecological and evolutionary traits in non-model organisms. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:490.
36. Bae JB. Perspectives of international human epigenome consortium. Genomics Inform. 2013;11:7-14.
37. Birney E, Hudson TJ, Green ED, Gunter C, Eddy S, Rogers J, et al. Prepublication data sharing. Nature. 2009;461:168-70.
38. The FAANG Consortium. http://www.faang.org
39. Stamatoyannopoulos JA. What does our genome encode? Genome Res. 2012;22:1602-11.
40. Landt SG, Marinov GK, Kundaje A, Kheradpour P, Pauli F, Batzoglou S, et al. ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia. Genome Res. 2012;22:1813-31.
41. Birney E. The making of ENCODE: lessons for big-data projects. Nature. 2012;489:49-51.
42. Eddy SR. The ENCODE project: missteps overshadowing a success. Curr Biol. 2013;23:R259-61.
43. Parkhomchuk D, Borodina T, Amstislavskiy V, Banaru M, Hallen L, Krobitsch S, et al. Transcriptome analysis by strand-specific sequencing of complementary DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:e123.
44. Derrien T, Johnson R, Bussotti G, Tanzer A, Djebali S, Tilgner H, et al. The GENCODE v7 catalog of human long noncoding RNAs: analysis of their gene structure, evolution, and expression. Genome Res. 2012;22:1775-89.
45. Harrow J, Frankish A, Gonzalez JM, Tapanari E, Diekhans M, Kokocinski F, et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project. Genome Res. 2012;22:1760-74.
46. Mudge JM, Frankish A, Harrow J. Functional transcriptomics in the post-ENCODE era. Genome Res. 2013;23:1961-73.
47. Thurman RE, Rynes E, Humbert R, Vierstra J, Maurano MT, Haugen E, et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:75-82.
48. Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods. 2013;10:1213-8.
49. Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ. ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2015;109:21.29.1-9.
50. Ong CT, Corces VG. CTCF: an architectural protein bridging genome topology and function. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:234-46.
51. Ho JW, Jung YL, Liu T, Alver BH, Lee S, Ikegami K, et al. Comparative analysis of metazoan chromatin organization. Nature. 2014;512:449-52.
52. Meissner A, Gnirke A, Bell GW, Ramsahoye B, Lander ES, Jaenisch R. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:5868-77.
53. van Berkum NL, Lieberman-Aiden E, Williams L, Imakaev M, Gnirke A, Mirny LA, et al. Hi-C: a method to study the three-dimensional architecture of genomes. J Vis Exp 2010;39:pii:1869.
54. Rao SS, Huntley MH, Durand NC, Stamenova EK, Bochkov ID, Robinson JT, et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159:1665-80.