Web-based foreign language reading: Affective and productive outcomes

CALICO Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 305-325

  Lück, Kerstin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

German; Skimming and Scanning; Student Participation and Motivation; Web based Reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044882951     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/cj.v25i2.305-325     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alderman, K. (2004). Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. Boston: Faber & Faber.
3. Blanchard, J., McLain, J., & Bartshe, P. (2005). The web and Reading Instruction. Computers in the Schools, 21 (3-4), 5-14.
4. Brandl, K. (2002). Integrating internet-based reading materials into the foreign language curriculum: From teacher- to student-centered approaches. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (3), 87-107. Retrieved November 9, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/brandl
5. Bruce, B. (2003). (Ed.). Literacy in the information age: Inquiries into meaning making with new technologies. Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
6. Burke, J. (2000). Caught in the web: Reading the internet. Voices from the Middle, 7 (3), 12-23.
7. Burke, J. (2001). Illuminating texts: How to teach students to read the world. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8. Bush, V. (1945, July). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 176, 101-108.
9. Bush, V. (1967). Memex revisited. Science is not enough. New York: William Monow.
10. Bush, M., & Terry, R. (Eds.). (1997). Technology-enhanced language learning. Lincolnwood, IL: National Text Company.
11. Bussière, P. (2004). The impact of computer use on reading achievement of 15-year-olds: Final report. Gatineau, Québec: Learning Policy Directorate.
12. Calderon-Young, E. (1999). Technology for teaching foreign languages among community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 23 (2), 161-169.
13. Campbell, R. (1998, January-February). HyperMinds for hyperTimes. The demise of rational, logical thought? Educational Technology, Volume number?, 24-31.
14. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
15. Castells, M. (1998). End of millenium. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
16. Castells, M., & Catterall, B. (2001). The making of the network society. London: Institute of Contemporary Arts.
17. Cerf, V. (2003). The internet under surveillance. Paris: RSF.
18. Chen, P., & McGrath, D. (2003). Moments of joy: Student engagement and conceptual learning in the design of hypermedia documents. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35 (3), 402-421.
19. Cobb, T. (2000, February). Is the computer following the language lab into the dustbin of ed tech history? Keynote address given at the Concordia Ed Tech Symposium 2000, Montreal, Canada. Retrieved November 9, 2007, from 123.208.224.131/keynote.htm
20. Crossman, D. (1997). The evolution of the world wide web as an emerging instructional technological tool. In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 19-23). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publication, Inc.
21. Davis, J., & Lyman-Hager, M. A. (1997). Computers and L2 reading: Student performance, student attitudes. Foreign Language Annals, 30 (1), 58-72.
22. Elliot, J. (Ed.). (2005). Motivation, engagement and educational performance: International perspectives on the context for learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
23. Finnemann, M. (1996). The world wide web and foreign language teaching. ERIC CCL News Bulletin, 20, 1-7.
24. Forbes, L. (2004). Using web-based bookmarks in K-8 settings: Linking the internet to instruction. Reading Teacher, 58 (2), 148-153.
25. Gambrell, L. (2005). Reading literature, reading text, reading the internet: The times they are changing. Reading Teacher, 58 (6), 588-591.
26. Hancock, J. (Ed.). (1999). Teaching literacy using information technology: A collection of articles from the Australian Literacy Educator’s Association. Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
27. Herren, D. (1996). Guided reading: A hypermedia shell. Middleburg, VT: Green Mountain Mac.
28. Horning, A. (2002). Reading the world wide web: Critical literacy for the new century. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 2, 2.
29. Karchmer, R. (2004). Creating connections: Using the internet to support struggling readers’ background knowledge. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 20 (3), 331-335.
30. Keller, J. (1999). Motivation in cyber learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1 (1), 7-30.
31. Khan, B. (1997). Web-based instruction (WBI): What is it and why is it? In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 5-18). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, Inc.
32. Kramarski, B., & Feldman, Y. (2000). Internet in the classroom: Effects on reading comprehension, motivation and metacognitive awareness. Educational Media International, 37 (3), 49-55.
33. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Kramsch, C., A’Ness, F., & Lam, E. (2000). Authenticity and authorship in computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 4 (2), 78-104. Retrieved November 9, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num2/kramsch/default.html
35. Krymes, A. (2005). Teaching online comprehension strategies using think-alouds. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48 (6), 492-500.
36. Leino, K., Linnakylä, P., & Malin, A. (2004). Finnish students’ multiliteracy profiles. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48 (3), 251-270.
37. Lemke, J. (1998). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meaning and media. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformation in a post-typographic world (pp. 288-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Levine, A., Ferenz, O., & Reves, T. (2000). EFL academic reading and modern technology: How can we turn our students into independent critical readers? TESL-EJ, 4 (4), 1-9. Retrieved November 9, 2007, from http://tesl-ej.org/ej16/a1.html
39. Martin, L. (2003). Web reading: Linking text and technology. Reading Teacher, 56 (8), 735-737.
40. Morkes, J., & Nielsen, J. (1997). Concise, SCANNABLE, and objective: How to write for the web. Retrieved November 9, 2007, from http://www.useit.com/papers/webwriting
41. McNabb, M., Hassel, B., & Steiner, L. (2002). Literacy learning on the net: An exploratory study. Reading Online, 5, 10.
42. Mertens, D. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Nelson, T. (1974, rev. 1987). Computer lib/dream machines. Redmond, WA: Tempus Books; Microsoft Press.
44. Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
45. Osuna, M., & Meskill, C. (1998). Using the world wide web to integrate Spanish language and culture: A pilot study. Language Learning & Technology, 1 (2), 66-87. Retrieved November 7, 2007, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num2/article4/default.html
46. Owston, R. (1997). The world wide web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 26 (1), 27-33.
47. Owston, R., & Wideman, H. (2001). Computer access and student achievement in early school years. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 17 (4), 433-444.
48. Radden, G., & Panther, K.-U. (Eds.). (2004). Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
49. Relan, A., & Gilliani, B. (1995). Web-based information and the traditional classroom: Similarities and differences. In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 41-46). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publication, Inc.
50. Ricketts, C., & Zakrzewski, S. (2005). A risk-analysis approach to implementing web-based assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (6), 603-620.
51. Rosalia, S. (2002). Looking for lizard music: The internet as a reading motivation tool. Voice of Youth Advocates, 25 (3), 169-171.
52. Schmar-Dobler, E. (2003). Reading on the internet. The link between literacy and technology. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47 (1), 80-85.
53. Siegle, D. (2004). The merging of literacy and technology in the 21st century. A bonus for gifted education. Gifted Children Today, 27 (2), 32-35.
54. Song, S. H. (2000). Research issues of motivation in web-based instruction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 1 (3), 225-229.
55. Spiro, R., & Jehng, J.-C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the non-linear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Spiro, R., Feltovich, P., Jacobson, M., & Coulson, R. (1995). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access for instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 85-107). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Weaving the literacy web: Changes in reading from page to screen. Reading Teacher, 55 (7), 662-669.
58. Talbott, S. (1995). The future does not compute: Transcending the machines in our midst. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly & Associates.
59. Thompson, S. D., Martin, L., Richards, L., & Branson, D. (2003). Assessing critical thinking and problem solving using a web-based curriculum for students. The Internet and Higher Education, 6 (2), 185-191.
60. Trend, D. (2001). Reading digital culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
61. Trollope, J. (1995). A comparison of reading strategies in a computerised reading situation and in a non-computerised reading situation. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press.
62. Verhoeven, L., & Snow, C. (Eds.). (2001). Literacy and motivation: Reading engagement in individuals and groups. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Warschauer, M. (1996). Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. In Mark Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawai’i symposium (pp. 29-46). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
64. Warschauer, M. (1997a). The internet for English teaching: Guidelines for teachers. TESL Reporter, 30 (1), 27-33.
65. Warschauer, M. (1997b). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81 (4), 470-481.
66. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture and the power in online education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.