The Web and Reading Instruction

Computers in the Schools

Volumn 21, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 5-14

  Blanchard, Jay ^a   McLain, Jared ^a   Bartshe, Patrick ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Broadband; Internet; K 8 reading instruction; Web

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023901647     PISSN: 07380569     EISSN: 15287033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J025v21n03_02     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bennett, M., 2003. A broadband world, Washington, DC:Alliance for Public Technology. (with Benton Foundation)
2. Blanchard, J., ed. 1999. Educational computing in the schools:Technology, communication and literacy, New York:Haworth Press.
3. Blanchard, J., and Mason, G., eds. 1987. The computer in reading and language arts, New York:Haworth Press.
4. Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M., and Overmatt, M., 2002. Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction:A review. Review of Educational Research, 72:101–130.
5. Carroll, M., 2004. Cartwheels on the keyboard:Computer-based literacy instruction in an elementary classroom, Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
6. Cordes, C., and Miller, E., 2000. Fool’s gold:A critical look at computers in childhood, College Park, MD:Alliance for Childhood.
7. Cuban, L., 1986. Teachers and machines:The classroom use of technology since 1920, New York:Teachers College Press.
8. Cuban, L., 2001. Oversold and underused:Computers in the classroom, Cambridge, MA:Harvard Press.
9. Culp, K., Honey, M., and Mandinach, E., 2003. A retrospective on twenty years of educational technology policy, Washington, DC:U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology.
10. Dufflemeyer, F., 2002. Alphabet activities on the Internet. Reading Teacher, 55(7):631–635.
11. Estep, S., McInerney, W., Vockell, E., and Kosmoski, G., 1999. An investigation of the relationship between integrated learning systems and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28(1):5–19.
12. Grunwald Associates. 2003. Connected to the future:A report on children’s Internet use Retrieved April 16, 2004, from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting http://cpb.org/ed/resources/connected
13. Healy, J., 1998. Failure to connect:How computers affect our children’s minds for better or worse, New York:Simon & Schuster.
14. Johnson, L., 2003. The dream machine. Computers in the Schools, 20(1/2):1–10.
15. Keltner, B., and Ross, R., 1996. The cost of school-based educational technology programs, Santa Monica, CA:RAND.
16. Kulik, J., 1994. “Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction.”. In Technology assessment in education and training, Edited by:Baker, E., and O'Neil, H., 9–33. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
17. Labbo, L., 2000. Toward a vision of the future role of technology in literacy education. Forum on Technology in Education, Washington, DC:U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology.
18. Leander, K., 2003. Writing travelers' tales on new literacyscapes. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3):392–397.
19. Leu, D., Kinzer, C., Coiro, J., and Cammack, D., 2004. “Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies.”. In Theoretical models and processes of reading, Edited by:Ruddell, R., and Unrau, N., 1570–1613. Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
20. Lou, Y., Abrami, P., and Aploonia, S., 2001. Small group and individual learning with technology:A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3):449–521.
21. Maddux, C., 2003. Twenty years of research in information technology in education:Assessing our progress. Computers in the Schools, 20(1/2):35–48.
22. Mason, G., and Blanchard, J., 1979. Computer applications in reading, Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
23. Mason, G., Blanchard, J., and Daniel, D., 1982. Computer applications in reading, 2nd ed., Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
24. Mason, G., Blanchard, J., and Daniel, D., 1987. Computer applications in reading, 3rd ed., Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
25. McVee, M., and Dickson, B., 2002. Creating a rubric to examine literacy software for the primary grades. Reading Teacher, 55(7):635–639.
26. National Research Council. 2002. Improving learning with technology, Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
27. NetDay. 2003. Voices & views from today’s tech-savvy students Retrieved April 10, 2004, from www.netday.org
28. Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., and Soloway, E., 2003. No access, no use, no impact:Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1):21–30.
29. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. 2000. Computer-based technology and learning:Evolving uses and expectations, Naperville, IL:Author.
30. Oblinger, D., July/August 2003. Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials:Understanding the new students July/August, 37–47. EDUCAUSE
31. Oppenheimer, T., 2003. The flickering mind, New York:Random House.
32. Paterson, W., Henry, J., O'Quin, K., Ceprano, M., and Blue, E., 2003. Investigating the effectiveness of an integrated learning system on early emergent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(2):172–207.
33. Pew. 2001. The Internet and education, Washington, DC:Pew Charitable Trusts.
34. Pew. 2002. The digital disconnect:The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools, Washington, DC:Pew Charitable Trusts.
35. Pew. 2003. America’s online pursuits, Washington, DC:Pew Charitable Trusts.
36. Pew. 2004. Internet and American Life (Internet Tracking Data, April 13, 2004), Washington, DC:Pew Charitable Trusts.
37. Pflaum, W., 2004. The technology fix:The promise and reality of computers in our schools, Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
38. Roblyer, M., Castine, W., and King, F., 1988. Assessing the impact of computer-based instruction:A review of recent research. Computers in the Schools, 5(3–4):117–149.
39. Ross, J., Hogaboam-Gray, A., and Hanny, L., 2001. Collateral benefits of an interactive literacy program for grade 1 and 2 students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3):219–234.
40. Ryan, A., 1991. Meta-analysis of achievement effects of micro-computer applications in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2):161–184.
41. Ryan, P., Kloss, J., Chorost, M., and Fried, R., 2002. Developing powerful learning solutions, Menlo Park, CA:SRI International.
42. Schmitt, C., and Slonaker, L., 1996. Computers in school:Do students improve? High technology doesn't always equal high achievement. San Jose Mercury News, January 14:1A
43. Sivin-Kachela, J., and Bialo, E., 1996. Report on the effectiveness of technology in the schools, Washington, DC:Software Publishers Association.
44. Tapscott, D., 1998. Growing up digital:The rise of the Net generation, New York:McGraw-Hill.
45. Treadwell, M., 2002. 60 Great Internet sites for math, reading, and language arts, Arlington Heights, IL:Skylight Professional Development.
46. U. S. Department of Commerce. September 23 2002. Office of Technology policy report, September 23, Washington, DC:Author.
47. U. S. Department of Education. 2003. A retrospective on twenty years of education technology policy, Washington, DC:Office of Educational Technology.
48. U. S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences. 2003. Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence:A user friendly guide, Washington, DC:Author.
49. U. S. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2003. Internet access in public schools and classrooms:1994–2002, Washington, DC:Author.
50. Waxman, H., Connell, M., and Gray, J., 2002. A quantitative synthesis of recent research on the effects of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes, Naperville, IL:North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
51. Waxman, H., Lin, M., and Michko, G., 2003. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes, Naperville, IL:Learning Point Associates.
52. Web-Based Education Commission. 2000. The power of the Internet for learning; Moving from promise to practice, Washington, DC:U. S. Congress. (Legislative authority expired 3/19/2001)
53. Willis, J., 2003. Instructional technologies in schools:Are we there yet?. Computers in the Schools, 20(1/2):11–34.
54. Zhao, Y., and Frank, K., 2003. Factors affecting technology uses in schools:An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4):807–840.