Reading on the internet: The link between literacy and technology

Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 80-85

  Schmar Dobler, Elizabeth ^a  

^a EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542633278     PISSN: 10813004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Block, C.C., & Pressley, M. (2001). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford.
2. Cattagini, A., & Farris, E. (2001). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2000. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
3. Dole, J.A., Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.E., & Pearson, P.D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
4. Dowhower, S.L. (1999). Supporting a strategic stance in the classroom: A comprehension framework for helping teachers help students to be strategic. The Reading Teacher, 52, 672-683.
5. Duke, N.K., & Pearson, P.D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
6. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Kamil, M., & Lane, D. (1998). Researching the relation between technology and literacy: An agenda for the 21st century. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 323-341). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Leu, D.J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-770). Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Leu, D.J. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the Internet and other digital technologies. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 310-336). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
10. Leu, D.J., & Kinzer, C.K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
11. Paris, S.G., Cross, D.R., & Lipson, M.Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.
12. Pearson, P.D. (1985). Changing the face of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 38, 724-737.
13. Pearson, P.D., Roehler, L.R., Dole, J.A., & Duffy, G.G. (1992). Developing expertise in reading comprehension. In S.J. Samuels & A.E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp. 145-199). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
14. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Reinking, D. (1998). Introduction: Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographic world. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformation in a post-typographic world (pp. xi-xxx). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Home computers and Internet use in the United States: August 2000. Retrieved April 4, 2003, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p23-207.pdf