A hybrid model to govern the mitigation alliance

From the Paris Agreement to a Low-Carbon Bretton Woods: Rationale for the Establishment of a Mitigation Alliance

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 133-171

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

Governing authorities; Hybrid governance; Members Determined Contributions (MDC); Mitigation Alliance (MA) members; Plurilaterally Determined Contributions (PDC); Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

EID: 85034411863     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54699-5_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (88)

1. Aglietta, M., Hourcade, J.-C., Jaeger, C., & Peressin Fabert, B. (2015). Financing transition in an adverse context: Climate finance beyond carbon finance. International Environmental Agreements, 15, 403-420.
2. Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Transnational climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 9 (2), 52-73.
3. Andresen, S. (2015). International climate negotiations: Top-down, bottom-up or a combination of both? The International Spectator, 50 (1), 15-30.
4. Bayer, P., Marcoux, C., & Urpelainen, J. (2013). Leveraging private capital for climate mitigation: Evidence from the Clean Development Mechanism. Ecological Economics, 96, 14-24.
5. Bellassen, V., & Cochran, I. (2015). Introduction: Key notions and trade-offs involved in MRVing emissions. In V. Bellassen & N. Stephan (Eds.), Accounting for carbon: Monitoring, reporting and verifying emissions in the climate economy (pp. 1-17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9 (1), 14-25.
7. Bodansky, D. (2016). The legal character of the Paris agreement. RECIEL, 25 (2), 142-150.
8. Bodansky, D. M., Hoedl, S. A., Metcalf, G. E., & Stavins, R. N. (2016). Facilitating linkage of climate policies through the Paris outcome. Climate Policy, 16 (8), 956-972.
9. Böhm, S., Brei, V., & Dabhi, S. (2015). EDF Energy’s green CSR claims examined: The follies of global carbon commodity chains. Global Networks, 15, 87-S107.
10. Böhmelt, T. (2013). Civil society lobbying and countries’ climate change policies: A matching approach. Climate Policy, 13 (6), 698-717.
11. Bradshaw, P. (2014). The dynamics of nested governance: A system perspective. In P. Bradshaw & M. Toubiana (Eds.), Nonprofit governance: Innovative perspectives and approaches (pp. 231-248). London: Routledge.
12. Buhr, K., Roth, S., & Stigson, P. (2014). Climate change politics through a global pledge-and-review regime: Positions among negotiators and stakeholders. Sustainability, 6, 794-811.
13. Campiglio, E. (2016). Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 121, 220-230.
14. Caparrós, A. (2016). The Paris agreement as a step backward to gain momentum: Lessons from and for theory. Revue d’Economie Politique, 126 (3), 347-356.
15. Chang, J.-P., & Bellassen, V. (2015). Trendsetter for territorial schemes: National GHG inventories under the UNFCCC. In V. Bellassen & N. Stephan (Eds.), Accounting for carbon: Monitoring, reporting and verifying emissions in the climate economy (pp. 21-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Clémençon, R. (2016). The two sides of the Paris climate agreement: Dismal failure or historic breakthrough? Journal of Environment and Development, 25 (1), 3-24.
17. Dafermos Y., Nikolaidi, M., & Galanis, G. (2016, November 14-15). Climate change, financial stability and monetary policy. Paper presented at the Bank of England workshop on central banking, climate change and environmental sustainability.
18. Das, K. (2015). Climate clubs: Carrots, sticks and more. Economic & Political Weekly, 5 (34), 24-27.
19. De Coninck, H., Haake, F., & van der Linden, N. (2007). Technology transfer in the clean development mechanism. Climate Policy, 7, 444-456.
20. Deleuil, T. (2012). The common but differentiated responsibilities principle: Changes in continuity after the Durban conference of the parties. RECIEL, 21 (3), 271-281.
21. Den Elzen, M. G. J., Schaeffer, M., & Lucas, P. L. (2005). Differentiating future commitments on the basis of countries’ relative historical responsibility for climate change: Uncertainties in the “Brazilian proposal” in the context of a policy implementation. Climatic Change, 71 (3), 277-301.
22. Doelle, M. (2004). Climate change and the WTO: Opportunities to motivate state action on climate change through the World Trade Organization. RECIEL, 13 (1), 85-103.
23. Downie, C. (2014). Transnational actors in environmental politics: Strategies and influence in long negotiations. Environmental Politics, 23 (3), 376-394.
24. Droege, S. (2011). Using border measures to address carbon flows. Climate Policy, 11, 1191-1201.
25. Du Pont, Y. R., Jeffery, M. L., Gütschow, J., Christoff, P., & Meinshausen, M. (2016). National contributions for decarbonizing the world economy in line with the G7 agreement. Environmental Research Letters, 11, 054005.
26. Falkner, R. (2016). A minilateral solution for global climate change? On bargaining efficiency, club benefits and international legitimacy. Perspectives on Politics, 14 (1), 87-101.
27. Gallaraga, I., Gonzalez-Eguino, M., & Markandya, A. (2011). The role of regional governments in climate change policy. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21, 164-182.
28. Gandenberger, C., Bodenheimer, M., Schleich, J., Orzanna, R., & Macht, L. (2015). Factors driving international technology transfer: Empirical insights from a CDM project survey. Climate Policy, 16 (8), 1065-1084.
29. Garibaldi, J. A. (2014). The economics of boldness: Equity, action, and hope. Climate Policy, 14 (1), 82-101.
30. Geden, O. (2015, December 14). Paris climate deal: The trouble with targetism. The Guardian.
31. Global4C. (2016, May 2). Michael Metcalfe advocates Quantitative Easing (QE) for climate change mitigations. Complementary Currencies for Climate Change Article.
32. Goldemberg, J., & Guardabassi, P. (2015). Burden sharing in the implementation of the climate convention. Energy Policy, 81, 56-60.
33. Green, J. F., Sterner, T., & Wagner, G. (2014). A balance of bottom-up and top-down in linking climate policies. Nature Climate Change, 4, 1064-1067.
34. Haites, E., Duan, M., & Seres, S. (2006). Technology transfer by CDM projects. Climate Policy, 6, 327-344.
35. Hale, T. (2016). “All hands on deck”: The Paris agreement and nonstate climate action. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (3), 12-22.
36. Hare, W., Stockwell, C., Flachsland, C., & Oberthur, S. (2010). The architecture of the global climate regime: A top-down perspective. Climate Policy, 10, 600-614.
37. Helm, D., Hepburn, C., & Ruta, G. (2012). Trade climate change and the political game theory of border adjustments. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28, 368-394.
38. Hermwille, L. (2016). Climate change as a transformation challenge. A new climate policy paradigm? GAIA, 25 (1), 19-22.
39. Hourcade, J. C., Perrissin Fabert, B., & Rozenberg, J. (2012). Venturing into uncharted financial waters: An essay on climate-friendly finance. International Environment Agreements Politics, Law and Economics, 12 (2), 165-186.
40. Hourcade, J-C., Aglietta, M., & Perrissin Fabert, B. (2014). Transition to a low-carbon society and sustainable economic recovery, A monetary-based financial device. CIRED concept note.
41. Hourcade, J-C., Aglietta, M., & Perrissin Fabert, B. (2015). The low carbon transition between the animal spirits of finance and the fault lines of the world economy. In A. Sirkis (Ed.), Moving the trillions-A debate on positive pricing of mitigation actions (pp. 22-36). Rio de Janeiro: Brasil No Clima.
42. ICAO. (2016). On board a sustainable future. 2016 Environmental Report, ICAO.
43. Jacobs, M. (2016). High pressure for low emissions. How civil society created the Paris climate agreement. Juncture, 22 (4), 314-323.
44. Johnston, C., Milman, O., & Vidal, J. (2016, October 2016). Climate change: Global deal reached to limit use of hydrofluorocarbons. The Guardian.
45. Kashwan, P., & Holahan, R. (2014). Nested governance for effective REDD+: Institutional and political arguments. International Journal of the Commons, 8 (2), 554-575.
46. Knox, J. (2004). The judicial resolution of conflicts between trade and the environment. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 28 (1), 1-78.
47. Kuchler, M. (2015). Stakeholding as sorting of actors into categories: Implications for civil society participation in the CDM. International Environmental Agreements. doi: 10.1007/s10784-015-9314-5.
48. Levi, M. D. (1991). Bretton woods: Blueprint for a greenhouse gas agreement. Ecological Economics, 4, 253-267.
49. Lund, E. (2013). Environmental diplomacy: Comparing the influence of business and environmental NGOs in negotiations on reform of the clean development mechanism. Environmental Politics, 22 (5), 739-759.
50. Madden, N. J. (2014). Greenmeans stop: Veto players and their impact on climate-change policy outputs. Environmental Politics, 23 (4), 570-589.
51. Mannis, A. (2001). Indicators of sustainable development. GAIA Report.
52. Marcu, A. (2016, January). Carbon market provisions in the Paris agreement (article 6) (CEPS Special Report, 128).
53. Maruyama, W. H. (2011). Climate change and the WTO: Cap and trade versus carbon tax? Journal of World Trade, 45 (4), 679-726.
54. Mattoo, A., & Subramanian, A. (2012). Equity in climate change: An analytical review. World Development, 40 (6), 1083-1097.
55. Mavroidis, P. C., & de Melo, J. (2015). Climate change policies and the WTO: Greening the GATT, revisited. In S. Barret, C. Carracro, & J. de Melo (Eds.), Towards a workable and effective climate regime (pp. 225-236). London: CEPR Press.
56. Methmann, C. (2013). The sky is the limit: Global warming as global governmentality. European Journal of International Relations, 19 (1), 69-91.
57. Michaelowa, A. (2015). Opportunities for and alternatives to global climate regimes post-Kyoto. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40, 395-417.
58. Michaelowa, A., & Michaelowa, K. (2015). Do rapidly developing countries take up new responsibilities for climate change mitigation? Climatic Change, 133, 499-510.
59. Morgan, J. (2016). Paris COP 21: Power that speaks the truth? Globalizations. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2016.1163863.
60. Müller, B., Höhne, N., & Ellermann, C. (2010). Differentiating (historic) responsibilities for climate change. Climate Policy, 9, 593-611.
61. Murphy, R., & Hines, C. (2010). Green quantitative easing: Paying for the economy we need. Finance For the Future Report.
62. Nordhaus, W. (2015). Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. American Economic Review, 105 (4), 1339-1370.
63. Peters, G.P., Andrew, R.M., Solomon, S., & Friedlingstein, P. (2015). Measuring a fair and ambitious climate agreement using cumulative emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 10, 105004.
64. Pettenella, D., & Brotto, L. (2012). Governance features for successful REDD+ projects organization. Forest Policy and Economics, 18, 46-52.
65. Potoski, M. (2015). Green clubs in building block climate change regimes. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1517-9.
66. Rajamani, L. (2016). Ambition and differentiation in the 2015 Paris agreement: Interpretative possibilities and underlying politics. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 65, 493-514.
67. Raman, M. (2016, January 9). Climate change battle in Paris. Economic and Political Weekly, 51 (2), 35-40.
68. Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Scheffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., & Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature, 354, 631-639.
69. Rozenberg, J., Hallegatte, S., Perrissin-Fabert, B., & Hourcade, J.-C. (2013). Funding low-carbon investments in the absence of a carbon tax. Climate Policy, 13 (1), 134-141.
70. Sabel, C. F., & Victor, D. G. (2015). Governing global problems under uncertainty: Making bottom-up climate policy work. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1507-y.
71. Shiroyama, H., Yarime, M., Matsuo, M., Schoreder, H., Scholz, R., & Ulrich, A. E. (2012). Governance for sustainability: Knowledge integration and multi-actor dimensions in risk management. Sustainability Science, 7 (1), 45-55.
72. Stewart, R., Oppenheimer, M., & Rudyk, B. (2013). A new strategy for global climate protection. Climatic Change, 120, 1-12.
73. Streck, C. (2004). New partnerships in global environmental policy: The clean development mechanism. Journal of Environment and Development, 13 (3), 295-322.
74. Streck, C. (2012). Innovativeness and paralysis in international climate policy. Transnational Environmental Law, 1 (1), 137-152.
75. Thomson, M. C., Baruah, M., & Carr, E. R. (2011). Seeing REDD+ as a project of environmental governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 14, 100-110.
76. Van der Gaast, W., Begg, K., & Flamos, A. (2009). Promoting sustainable energy technology transfers to developing countries through the CDM. Applied Energy, 86, 230-236.
77. Vant, A., & Vedeld, P. O. (2013). National governance structures for REDD+. Global Environmental Change, 23, 422-432.
78. Victor, D. G. (2015, January). The case for climate clubs. E15 Initiative Thinking Piece.
79. Wara, M. (2008). Measuring the Clean Development Mechanism’s performance and potential. UCLA Law Review, 55, 1759-1803.
80. Watson, J., Ockwell, D., Byrne, R., & Stua, M. (2015). Lessons from China: Building technological capabilities for low carbon technology transfer and development. Climatic Change, 131 (3), 387-399.
81. Wei, Y.-M., Wang, L., Liao, H., Wang, K., Murty, T., & Yan, J. (2014). Responsibility accounting in carbon allocation: A global perspective. Applied Energy, 130, 122-133.
82. Weischer, L., Morgan, J., & Patel, M. (2012). Climate clubs: Can small groups of countries make a big difference in addressing climate change? RECIEL, 21 (3), 177-192.
83. Well, M., & Carrapatoso, A. (2016). REDD+ finance: Policy making in the context of fragmented institutions. Climate Policy. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1202096.
84. Winkler, H., & Rajamani, L. (2014). CBDR&RC in a regime applicable to all. Climate Policy, 14 (1), 102-121.
85. Wyborn, C., & Bixler, R. P. (2013). Collaboration and nested environmental governance: Scale dependency, scale framing, and cross-scale interactions in collaborative conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, 123, 58-67.
86. Zavodov, K. (2012). Renewable energy investment and the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy, 40, 81-89.
87. Zelli, F., & van Asselt, H. (2010). The overlap between the UN climate regime and the World Trade Organization: Lessons for climate governance beyond 2012. In F. Biermann, P. Pattberg, & F. Zelli (Eds.), Global climate governance beyond 2012: Architecture, agency and adaptation (pp. 79-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88. Zhao, J. (2013). Developed countries’ cap-and-trade border measures: China’s possible reactions. Chinese Journal of International Law, 12 (4), 809-842.