Do rapidly developing countries take up new responsibilities for climate change mitigation?

Climatic Change

Volumn 133, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 499-510

  Michaelowa, Axel ^a   Michaelowa, Katharina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ECONOMICS; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES;

BINDING COMMITMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; EMISSIONS MITIGATION; GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL; INDONESIA; SINGAPORE; SOUTH AFRICA;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DEVELOPING WORLD; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GAS; UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE;

CHINA; INDONESIA; SOUTH AFRICA;

EID: 84947867973     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: 15731480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1528-6     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baer P, Athanasiou T, Kartha S (2008) The Greenhouse development rights framework: The right to development in a climate constrained world. EcoEquity and Christian Aid, Berkeley
2. Beaton C, Lontoh L (2010) Lessons learned from Indonesia’s attempts to reform fossil-fuel subsidies. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Geneva
3. Bell D (2011) Global climate justice, historic emissions, and excusable ignorance. Monist 94:391–411
4. Boyd A, Coetzee K, Boulle M (2014) What does the current NAMA-space in South Africa look like? A TERI-NFA NAMA Country Report on South Africa. University of Cape Town, Energy Research Centre
5. Castro P, Hörnlein L, Michaelowa K (2014) Constructed peer groups and path dependence in international organizations: The case of the international climate change negotiations. Glob Environ Chang 25:109–120
6. Chandler W, Schaeffer R, Zhou D, Shukla PR, Tudela F, Davidson O, Alpan-Atamer S (2002) Climate change mitigation in developing countries: Brazil, China, India, Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington
7. Conrad B (2012) China in Copenhagen: Reconciling the “Beijing Climate Revolution” and the “Copenhagen Climate Obstinacy”. The China Q 210:435–455
8. Deleuil T (2012) The common but differentiated responsibilities principle: changes in continuity after the Durban Conference of the Parties. RECIEL 21:271–281
9. den Elzen M, Hof A, Mendoza Beltran A, van Ruijven B, van Vliet J (2013) Implications of long-term global and developed country reduction targets for developing countries. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 18:491–512
10. Government of Indonesia (2013) Submission by the Republic of Indonesia https://unfccc.int/files/documentation/submissions_from_parties/adp/application/pdf/adp_indonesia_workstream_1_20130308.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2015
11. Government of South Africa (2013) South African submission on mitigation https://unfccc.int/files/documentation/submissions_from_parties/adp/application/pdf/adp_south_africa_workstream_1__mitigation_20130930.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2015
12. Hamilton-Hart N (2006) Singapore’s Climate Change Policy: The Limits of Learning. Contemp South-East Asia 28:363–384
13. Han SS (2010) Managing motorization in sustainable transport planning: the Singapore experience. J Transp Geogr 18(2):314–331
14. Höhne N, den Elzen M, Escalante D (2014) Regional GHG reduction targets based on effort sharing: a comparison of studies. Clim Pol 14:122–147
15. Honkonen T (2009) The common but differentiated responsibility principle in multilateral environmental agreements: regulatory and policy aspects. Kluwer, New York
16. 2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion 1971–2011, Paris
17. IPCC WG III (2014) Technical Summary, Working Group III contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of climate change, Geneva
18. Kartha S, Erickson P (2011) Comparison of Annex 1 and non-Annex 1 pledges under the Cancun Agreements. SEI Working Paper WP-US-1107. Stockholm
19. King E (2014) Green Climate Fund wants developing country cash. Global Climate Change News and Analysis (ed 28 July). http://www.rtcc.org/2014/07/28/green-climate-fund-wants-developing-country-cash. Accessed 11 August 2014
20. Lam S, Toan T (2006) Land transport policy and public transport in Singapore. Transportation 33(2):171–188
21. Levine M, Aden NT (2008) Global carbon emissions in the coming decades: the case of China. Report LBNL-372E. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
22. Low M (2011) Singapore’s role in the UNFCCC Green Climate Fund Eco Business. http://wwweco-businesscom/opinion/singapores-role-in-the-unfccc-green-climate-fund-by-melissa-low/ Accessed 11 August 2014
23. Luomi M (2009) Bargaining in the Saudi Bazaar. Common ground for a post-2012 climate agreement?, Finnish Institute of Foreign Affairs Briefing Paper 48, Helsinki
24. Michaelowa A (2007) Graduation and deepening. In: Aldy J, Stavins R (eds) Architectures for agreement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 81–104
25. Michaelowa K, Michaelowa A (2012) India as an emerging power in international climate negotiations. Clim Pol 12:575–590
26. Michaelowa A, Honegger M, Eschmann M, Dransfeld B, Krey M (2014) The role of CDM and NAMAs to promote greenhouse gas reductions in the GCC. In: Ferroukhi R, Luciani G (eds) Political Economy of Energy Reform: the Clean Energy-Fossil Fuel Balance in the Gulf States. Gerlach Press, Berlin, pp. 143–182
27. Moellendorf D (2012) Climate change and global justice. WIREs Clim Chang 3:131–143
28. Müller B, Mahadeva M (2013) The Oxford Approach. Operationalizing the UNFCCC Principle of ‘Respective Capabilities’. EV 58. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford
29. Müth M, Minhans A (2014) A comparative review of the making of urban transport policies in metropolitan areas in Southeast Asia. Jurnal Teknologi 70(4): 83–90
30. Olszewski P (2007) Singapore motorisation restraint and its implications on travel behaviour and urban sustainability. Transportation 34:319–335
31. Pauw P, Bauer S, Richerzhagen C, Brandi C, Schmole H (2014) Different perspectives on differentiated responsibilities: a state-of-the-art review of the notion of common but differentiated responsibilities in international negotiations. DIE Discussion Paper 6/2014. German Development Institute, Bonn.
32. Purnomo A, Katili-Niode A, Melisa E, helmy F, Sukadri D, Sitorus S (2013) Evolution of Indonesia’s climate change policy. From Bali to Durban. National Council on Climate Change, Jakarta
33. Rajamani L (2013) Differentiation in the emerging climate regime. Theor Inquiries Law 14:151–171
34. Republic of South Africa (2011): Climate change awareness campaign. Department of Environmental Affairs. http://www.climateaction.org.za/cop17-cmp7/sa-government-position-on-climate-change. Accessed 11 August 2014
35. Tait L, Winkler H (2012) Estimating greenhouse gas emissions associated with achieving universal access to electricity in South Africa. University of Cape Town, Energy Research Centre
36. Tavoni M, Kriegler E, Aboumahboub T, Calvin K, de Maere G, Jewell J, Kober T, Lucas P, Luderer G, McCollum D, Marangoni G, Riahi K, van Vuuren D (2013) The distribution of the major economies’ effort in the Durban platform scenarios. Limits Special Issue, Milan
37. Tyler E (2013) South Africa: A case study on national and sub-national climate policy experiences. Discussion note prepared for workshop on “Building the hinge: Reinforcing national and global climate governance mechanisms”, 5–7 December 2013, Alwar
38. UNFCCC (2011) Compilation of information on nationally appropriate mitigation actions to be implemented by Parties not included in Annex I to the Convention: Note by the secretariat. FCCC/AWGLCA/2011/INF.1, Bonn
39. Vihma A (2011) India and the global climate governance: between principles and pragmatism. Environ Dev 20:1–26
40. Winkler H (2008) Climate change mitigation negotiations, with an emphasis on options for developing countries. University of Cape Town, Energy Research Centre
41. Winkler H, Rajamani L (2014) CBDR&RC in a regime applicable to all. Clim Pol 14:102–121
42. World Bank (2014) Country and lending groups. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups. Accessed 9 August 2014