CBDR&RC in a regime applicable to all

Climate Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 102-121

  Winkler, Harald ^a   Rajamani, Lavanya ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^b CENTRE FOR POLICY RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

capability; CBDR RC; differentiation; Durban Platform; equity; responsibility

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS; EQUITY; UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 84890566412     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2013.791184     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Africa Group (Algeria on behalf of the African Group). (2009). Ideas and proposals on the elements contained in paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan. Submissions from Parties (FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/MISC.4 (Part I)). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
2. Aslam, M. A. (2002). Equal per capita entitlements: A key to global participation on climate change?. In K. Baumert, O. Blanchard, S. Llosa, & J. F. Perkaus (Eds.), Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for protecting the climate (pp. 175-202). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
3. Australia (Government of Australia). (2008). Views and information on the means to achieve mitigation objectives of Annex I Parties. Submissions from Parties (FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/MISC.1/Add.2). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
4. Baer, P., Athanasiou, T., & Kartha, S. (2008). The Greenhouse development rights framework: The right to development in a climate constrained world. Berkeley, CA: EcoEquity and Christian Aid, November. Retrieved September 28, 2011, from http://www.ecoequity.org/docs/TheGDRsFramework.pdf.
5. BASIC (Brazil, South Africa, India, China). (2010). Joint Statement issued at the conclusion of the Third Meeting of BASIC Ministers. 25 April. Cape Town. Retrieved April 30, 2010, from http://www.environment.gov.za/NewsMedia/MedStat/2010Apr26/BASICMinisters.doc.
6. BASIC (Brazil, South Africa, India, China). (2012). Joint Statement issued at the conclusion of the Twelfth Meeting of BASIC Ministers on climate change, 20-21 September, Brasilia.
7. BASIC experts. (2011). Equitable access to sustainable development: Contribution to the body of scientific knowledge. Beijing, Brasilia, Cape Town and Mumbai: BASIC expert group. Retrieved December 6, 2011, from http://www.erc.uct.ac.za/Basic_Experts_Paper.pdf.
8. Baumert, K. A., Herzog, T., & Pershing, J. (2005). Navigating the numbers: Greenhouse gas data and international climate policy. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
9. Belarus (Government of Belarus). (2009). Proposals from Belarus for amendments to the Kyoto Protocol. Note by the Secretariat (FCCC/KP/CMP/2009/9). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
10. Biniaz, S. (2002). Common but differentiated responsibilities. Remarks by S. Biniaz, American Society of International Law Proceedings 96.
11. Blanchard, O. (2002). Scenarios for differentiating commitments: A quantitative analysis. In K. Baumert, O. Blanchard, S. Llosa, & J. F. Perkaus (Eds.), Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for protecting the climate (pp. 203-222). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
12. Bodansky, D. (1993). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A commentary. Yale Journal of International Law, 18, 451-558.
13. Bodansky, D., & Diringer, E. (2010). The evolution of multilateral regimes: Implications for climate change. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
14. Brazil. (1997). Proposed elements of a protocol to the UNFCCC. Presented by Brazil in response to the Berlin mandate (FCCC/AGBM/1997/MISC.1/Add.3). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
15. Brazil (Government of Brazil). (2009). Ideas and proposals on the elements contained in paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan. Submissions from Parties (FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/MISC.1). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
16. Brouns, B., & Ott, H. E. (2005). Taking the lead: Post-2012 climate targets for the North: Towards adequate and equitable future climate commitments for industrialised countries. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. November. Retrieved September 28, 2011, from http://www.wupperinst.org/uploads/tx_wibeitrag/WP155.pdf.
17. CASS/DRC joint project team. (2011). Equitable access to sustainable development: Carbon budget account proposal BASIC experts. Equitable access to sustainable development: Contribution to the body of scientific knowledge. Beijing, Brasilia, Cape Town and Mumbai: BASIC expert group.
18. China (Government of China). (2012). Views on a workplan for the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. Submissions from Parties (FCCC/ADP/2012/MISC.3). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
19. CIA (Central Intelligence Agency). (2012). World factbook. Washington, DC: Directorate of Intelligence. Retrieved February 17, 2013, from http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html.
20. Den Elzen, M., Lucas, P., Berk, M. M., Criqui, P., & Kitous, A. (2006). Multi-stage: A rule-based evolution of future commitments under the Climate Change Convention. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 6(1), 1-28. doi: 10.1007/s10784-004-5645-3
21. Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. EIG (Environmental Integrity Group - Liechtenstein, Mexico, Monaco, Republic of Korea, Switzerland). (2012). Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP) in 2012: Necessary achievements and organisation of work. Retrieved August 3, from http://unfccc.int/files/documentation/submissions_from_parties/adp/application/pdf/adp_eig_03082012.pdf.
23. Gupta, J. (1998). Encouraging developing country participation in the climate change regime. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University Amsterdam. Retrieved October 8, 2011, from http://scholar.google.co.za/scholarhl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=fDp&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=Encouraging+developing+country+participation+in+the+climate+change+regime&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=0l0l0l5115l0l0l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&biw=829&bih=895&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws.
24. Höhne, N., & Blok, K. (2005). Calculating historical contributions to climate change - Discussing the 'Brazilian Proposal'. Climatic Change, 71(1), 141-173. doi: 10.1007/s10584-005-5929-9
25. Höhne, N., den Elzen, M., & Weiss, M. (2006). Common but differentiated commitments (CDC): A new conceptual approach to long-term climate policy. Climate Policy, 6(2), 181-200.
26. India (Government of India). (2012). Views on a workplan for the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. Submissions from Parties (FCCC/ADP/2012/MISC.3). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
27. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2007a). Climate change 2007: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Bern, IPCC working Group I Technical Support Unit. Retrieved September 29, 2011, from http://www.ipcc.ch.
28. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2007b). Climate change 2007: Mitigation of climate change. Summary for policy makers. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.
29. Japan (Government of Japan). (2008). Ideas and proposals on the elements contained in paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan. Submissions from Parties (FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/MISC.5/Add.2 (Part II)). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
30. Kanitkar, T., Jayaraman, T., D'Souza, M., Sanwal, M., Purkayastha, P., & Talwar, R. (2010, June 28-29). Meeting equity in a finite carbon world: Global carbon budgets and burden sharing in mitigation actions. Global carbon budgets and equity in climate change. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.
31. Kazakhstan (Government of Kazakhstan). (2002). Amendment proposed by Kazakhstan to add its name to the list in Annex I to the Convention (FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.4). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
32. La Rovere, E. L., Valente de Macedo, L., & Baumert, K. (2002). The Brazilian proposal on relative responsibility for global warming. In K. Baumert, O. Blanchard, S. Llosa, & J. F. Perkaus (Eds.), Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for protecting the climate (pp. 157-174). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
33. Malta (Government of Malta). (2009). Proposal from Malta to amend Annex I to the Convention. Note by the Secretariat (FCCC/CP/2009/2). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
34. Michaelowa, A., Butzengeiger, S., & Jung, M. (2005). Graduation and deepening: An ambitious post-2012 climate policy scenario. International Environmental Agreements, 5(1), 25-46. doi: 10.1007/s10784-004-3674-6
35. Milanovic, B. (2011). The haves and the have-nots: A brief and idiosyncratic history of global inequality. New York: Basic Books.
36. New Zealand (Government of New Zealand). (2008). Ideas and proposals on the elements contained in paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan. Submissions from Parties (FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/MISC.5). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
37. Ott, H. E., Winkler, H., Brouns, B., Kartha, S., Mace, M. J., Huq, S.,Rahman, A. A. (2004). South-North dialogue on equity in the greenhouse: A proposal for an adequate and equitable global climate agreement. Eschborn: Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH in cooperation with Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Germany and Energy Research Centre (ERC), University of Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved October 29, 2011, from http://www.erc.uct.ac.za/Research/publications/04Ott-etal-SouthNorthDiaLogue.pdf.
38. Pew Center. (2005). International climate efforts beyond 2012: Report of the climate dialogue at Pocantico. Arlington: Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Retrieved February 17, 2013, from http://www.pewclimate.org.
39. Rajamani, L. (2006). The doctrinal basis for and boundaries of differential treatment in international environmental law. In L. Rajamani (Ed.), Differential treatment in international environmental law (pp. 129-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Rajamani, L. (2008). Differentiation in the post-2012 climate regime. Policy Quarterly, 4(4), 48-51November.
41. Rajamani, L. (2009). Addressing the'Post-Kyoto' stress disorder: Reflections on the emerging legal architecture of the climate regime. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 58(4), 803-834. doi: 10.1017/S0020589309001584
42. Rajamani, L. (2011). The reach and limits of the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities in the climate change regime. In N. Dubash (Ed.), Handbook on climate change in India: Development, governance and politics (pp. 118-129). Abingdon: Routledge.
43. Saran, S. (2010). Irresistible forces and immovable objects: A debate on contemporary climate politics. Climate Policy, 10(6), 678-683. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2010.0136
44. Schmalensee, R. (1998). Greenhouse policy architectures and institutions (Report no. 13, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change). Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://mit.edu/globalchange/www/abstracts.html-a13.
45. Shue, H. (2009). Historical responsibility: Accountability for the results of actions taken. Technical briefing at the sixth session of the Adhoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action under the Convention, 4 June. Retrieved June 29, 2010, from http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/ad_hoc_working_groups/lca/application/pdf/1_shue_rev.pdf.
46. UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development). (1992). The Rio declaration on environment and development. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations.
47. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (2010). The emissions gap report: Are the Copenhagen Accord pledges sufficient to limit global warming to 2°C and 1.5°C. A preliminary assessment. Nairobi: UNEP.
48. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). (2011). Bridging the emissions gap: A UNEP Synthesis Report. Nairobi, Paris, London: UNEP. Retrieved November 23, 2011, from http://www.unep.org/publications/ebooks/bridgingemissionsgap/.
49. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York, NY: United Nations. Retrieved October 8, 2011, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.
50. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). (2008). Decision 1/CP.13. Bali action plan (FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
51. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). (2010). Decision 2/CP.15: Copenhagen Accord. Noted in COP Report (FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1). New York: United Nations.
52. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). (2011). Decision 1/CP.16: The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1). New York: United Nations.
53. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). (2012). Decision 1/CP.17: Establishment of an ad hoc working group on the Durban Platform for enhanced action (FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1). Durban, South Africa: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat.
54. United States (Government of the United States of America). (2012a). Advancing the work of the ADP. 27 July. Retrieved October 8, 2011, from http://unfccc.int/files/documentation/submissions_from_parties/adp/application/pdf/adp_usa_27072012.pdf.
55. United States (Government of the United States of America). (2012b). Views on a workplan for the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. Submission from Parties (FCCC/ADP/2012/MISC.3). Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2012/adp1/eng/misc03.pdf.
56. Werksman, J. (2010). Legal symmetry and legal differentiation under a future deal on climate change. Climate Policy, 10(6), 672-677. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2010.0150
57. Winkler, H., Baumert, K., Blanchard, O., Burch, S., & Robinson, J. (2007). What factors influence mitigative capacity?. Energy Policy, 35(1), 692-703. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.009
58. Winkler, H., Brouns, B., & Kartha, S. (2006). Future mitigation commitments: Differentiating among non-Annex I countries. Climate Policy, 5(5), 469-486.
59. Winkler, H., & Vorster, S. (2007). Building bridges to 2020 and beyond: The road from Bali. Climate Policy, 7(3), 240-254. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685652
60. Winkler, H., Vorster, S., & Marquard, A. (2009). Who picks up the remainder? Mitigation in developed and developing countries. Climate Policy, 9(6), 634-651.