Facilitating linkage of climate policies through the Paris outcome

Climate Policy

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 956-972

  Bodansky, Daniel M ^a   Hoedl, Seth A ^b   Metcalf, Gilbert E ^c   Stavins, Robert N ^d  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

climate policy architecture; international climate policy; linkage; market mechanisms

Indexed keywords

BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; POLICY MAKING; REGIONAL POLICY; TOP-DOWN APPROACH; UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 84938531001     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1069175     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. D.Bodansky, & E.Diringer, (2014). Building flexibility and ambition into a 2015 climate agreement. Arlington, VA:Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. Retrieved from http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/int-flexibility-06-14.pdf
2. D.Bodansky, S.Hoedl, G.E.Metcalf, & R.N.Stavins, (2014). Facilitating linkage of heterogeneous regional, national, and sub-national climate policies through a future international agreement (Discussion Paper, Harvard Project on Climate Agreements). Cambridge, MA:Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. Retrieved from http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/harvard-ieta-linkage-paper-nov-2014.pdf
3. C.Brummer, (2011). Soft law and the global financial system:Rule making in the 21st century. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
4. D.Burtraw, K.L.Palmer, C.Munnings, P.Weber, & M.Woerman, (2013). Linking by degrees:Incremental alignment of cap-and-trade markets (Discussion Paper 13–04). Washington, DC:Resources for the Future. Retrieved from www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=22167
5. Clean Air Task Force. (2014). Power switch:An effective, affordable approach to reducing carbon pollution from existing fossil-fueled power plants. Boston, MA. Retrieved from www.catf.us/resources/publications/view/194
6. European Commission. (2011, June 7). Commission regulation (EU) no. 550/2011 of 7 June 2011 on determining, pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, certain restrictions applicable to the use of international credits from projects involving industrial gases. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:149:0001:0003:EN:PDF
7. European Commission. (2014). International carbon market. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/linking/index_en.htm
8. C.Flachsland, R.Marschinski, & O.Edenhofer, (2009). To link or not to link:Benefits and disadvantages of linking cap-and-trade systems. Climate Policy, 9, 358–372. doi:10.3763/cpol.2009.0626
9. C.Helm, (2003). International emissions trading with endogenous allowance choices. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2737–2747. doi:10.1016/S0047–2727(02)00138-X
10. B.Holtsmark, & D.E.Sommervoll, (2012). International emissions trading:Good or bad? Economics Letters, 117, 362–364. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.05.034
11. C.Hood, G.Briner, & M.Rocha, (2014, May). GHG or not GHG:Accounting for diverse mitigation contributions in the post-2020 climate framework (Climate Change Expert Group Paper no. 2014(2)). Paris:OECD. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/env/cc/GHG%20or%20not%20GHG_CCXGsentout_May2014_REV.pdf
12. IPCC. (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Hayama:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved from www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl
13. ISO. (2009a). ISO 14064–1:2006 Greenhouse gases – Part 1:Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved from www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=38381
14. ISO. (2009b). ISO 14064–2:2006 Greenhouse gases – Part 2:Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancements. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved from www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=38382
15. ISO. (2009c). ISO 14064–3:2006 Greenhouse gases – Part 3:Specification with guidance for the validation and verification of greenhouse gas assertions. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved from www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=38700
16. ISO. (2011). ISO 14066:2011 Greenhouse gases – Competence requirements for greenhouse gas validation teams and verification teams. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved from www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=43277
17. ISO. (2013a). ISO/TR 14069:2013 Greenhouse gases – Quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions for organizations – Guidance for the application of ISO 14064–1. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved from www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43280
18. ISO. (2013b). ISO 14065:2013 Greenhouse gases – Requirements for greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies for use in accreditation or other forms of recognition. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved from www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=60168
19. J.Jaffe, M.Ranson, & R.Stavins, (2009). Linking tradable permit systems:A key element of emerging international climate policy architecture. Ecology Law Quarterly, 36, 789–808. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1910&context=elq
20. S.Kröll, L.Mistelis, & P.P.Viscasillas, (2011). Introduction to the CISG. In S.Kröll, L.Mistelis, & P.P.Viscasillas (Eds.), The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods:Article by article commentary (pp. 19–20). Munich:CH Beck/Hart Publishing.
21. A.Marcu, (2014). The role of market mechanisms in a post-2020 climate change agreement (Special Report 87). Brussels:Centre for European Policy Studies. Retrieved from www.ceps.eu/book/role-market-mechanisms-post-2020-climate-change-agreement
22. G.Metcalf, & D.Weisbach, (2012). Linking policies when tastes differ:Global climate policy in a heterogeneous world. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6(1), 110–129. doi:10.1093/reep/rer021
23. A.Miller, & L.Oats, (2014). Principles of international taxation (4th ed.). Haywards Heath:Bloomsbury Professional.
24. R.Newell, W.Pizer, & D.Raimi, (2013). Carbon markets 15 years after Kyoto:Lessons learned, new challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 123–146. doi:10.1257/jep.27.1.123
25. A.Prag, C.Hood, & P.M.Barata, (2013). Made to measure:Options for emissions accounting under the UNFCCC (Climate Change Expert Group Paper no. 2013(1)). Paris:OECD. Retrieved from www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment-and-sustainable-development/made-to-measure-options-for-emissions-accounting-under-the-unfccc_5jzbb2tp8ptg-en
26. M.Ranson, & R.N.Stavins, (2013). Post-Durban climate policy architecture based on linkage of cap-and-trade systems. The Chicago Journal of International Law, 13, 403–438. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1290647348/13D59F9A202577E7152
27. M.Ranson, & R.N.Stavins, (2015). Linkage of greenhouse gas emissions trading systems:Learning from experience. Climate Policy. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.997658
28. D.Shelton, (2003). Commitment and compliance:The role of non-binding norms in the international legal system. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
29. E.Somanathan, (2010). What do we expect from an international climate agreement? A perspective from a low-income country. In J.E.Aldy, & R.N.Stavins (Eds.), Post-Kyoto international climate policy:Implementing architectures for agreement (pp. 599–617). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
30. A.Tuerk, M.Michael, F.Christian, & S.Wolfgang, (2009). Linking carbon markets:Concepts, case studies, and pathways. Climate Policy, 9, 341–357. doi:10.3763/cpol.2009.0621
31. UNFCCC. (1992). Text of the Convention. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/items/6036.php
32. UNFCCC. (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf
33. UNFCCC. (2012, March 15). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1, p. 2, Decision 1/CP.17, Establishment of an Ad Hoc working group on the Durban platform for enhanced action. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdf#page=2
34. World Bank. (2014). State and trends of carbon pricing 2014. Washington, DC:World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/05/19572833/state-trends-carbon-pricing-2014