Responsibility accounting in carbon allocation: A global perspective

Applied Energy

Volumn 130, Issue , 2014, Pages 122-133

  Wei, Yi Ming ^a   Wang, Lu ^a   Liao, Hua ^a   Wang, Ke ^a   Murty, Tad ^b   Yan, Jinyue ^c  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Allocation; Burden sharing; Historical responsibility; Per capita cumulative emissions; Proposals

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES;

ALLOCATION; BURDEN SHARING; CUMULATIVE EMISSIONS; HISTORICAL RESPONSIBILITY; PROPOSALS;

ECONOMICS;

BIOMASS ALLOCATION; CARBON EMISSION; DEVELOPING WORLD; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; EMISSION INVENTORY; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; KYOTO PROTOCOL; OECD;

BRAZIL; CANADA; CHINA; INDIA; JAPAN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84901980188     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.05.025     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Parry M.L. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: working group II contribution to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
2. Hasan K.N., Saha T.K., Chattopadhyay D., et al. Benefit-based expansion cost allocation for large scale remote renewable power integration into the Australian grid. Appl Energy 2014, 113:836-847.
3. Baumert KA, Herzog T, Pershing J. 2005. Navigating the numbers: greenhouse gas data and international climate policy, Washington, DC.
4. Beckerman W., Pasek J. The equitable international allocation of tradable carbon emission permits. Global Environ Change 1995, 5:405-413.
5. Rose A., Stevens B., Edmonds J., Wise M. International equity and differentiation in global warming policy. Environ Resource Econ 1998, 12:25-51.
6. Ringius L., Torvanger A., Underdal A. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 2002, 2:1-22.
7. Klinsky S., Dowlatabadi H. Conceptualizations of justice in climate policy. Climate Policy 2009, 9:88-108.
8. Caney S. Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden J Int Law 2005, 18:747-775.
9. den Elzen M., Fuglestvedt J., Höhne N., Trudinger C., Lowe J., Matthews B., et al. Analysing countries' contribution to climate change: scientific and policy-related choices. Environ Sci Policy 2005, 8:614-636.
10. 2 intensity reduction targets by 2020? A regional allocation based on equity and development. Energy Policy 2011, 5:2407-2415.
11. Su L.Y., Wang Y., Ru X.J., Chen Q. The equity of the indicators for assessing carbon emission. Ecol Environ Sci 2009, 18:1594-1598.
12. Hua Y.J., Teng F. Midway toward the 2 degree target: adequacy and fairness of the Cancún pledges. Appl Energy 2013, 112:856-865.
13. 2 emission reduction quota trading in China. Appl Energy 2013, 112:1518-1528.
14. Shue H. Global environment and international inequality. Int Affairs 1999, 75:531-545.
15. Grubb M. Seeking fair weather: ethics and the international debate on climate change. Int Affairs (R Inst Int Affairs 1944-) 1995, 71:463-496.
16. UNDP Human development report 2007/2008: fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world 2007, Oxford University Press for UNDP.
17. OECD OECD environmental outlook to 2030 2007, OECD Publishing.
18. Baer P., Athanasiou T., Kartha S., Kemp-Benedict E. The right to development in a climate constrained world: the greenhouse development rights framework 2008, Heinrich Böll Stiftung/Christian Aid/EcoEquity/Stockholm Environment Institute, Berlín. Revised 2dn ed.
19. 2 emission reductions among one billion high emitters. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2009, 106:11884-11888.
20. Sørensen B. Pathways to climate stabilisation. Energy Policy 2008, 36:3505-3509.
21. 2 concentrations by 2050: a calculation on the emission rights of different countries. Sci China Ser D: Earth Sci 2009, 52:1447-1469.
22. Borden TA, Marland G, Anders RJ. Global, regional, and national fossil fuel CO2 emissions. Trends: a compendium of data on global change. Carbon dioxide information analysis center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2012 ; 2009. http://www.cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/overview_2009.html.
23. Energy Information Administration. 2007. International Energy Outlook-IEO2007 (U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC); available at http: //www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/ ieo07 /ind ex.html.
24. Angus Maddison Database;. http://www.ggdc.net/MADDISON/oriindex.htm.
25. United Nations, Department of economic and social affairs, population division. 2011. World population prospects: the 2010 Revision, Highlights and Advance (United Nations).
26. Ding Z.L., Duan X.N., Ge Q.S., Zhang Z.Q. On the major proposals for carbon emission reduction and some related issues. Sci China Earth Sci 2010, 53:159-172.
27. Wei YM, Liu LC, Wu G, Zou LL. Energy economics: CO2 emissions in China (Beijing); 2011.
28. Maddison A. A comparison of levels of GDP per capita in developed and developing countries, 1700-1980. J Econ Hist 1983, 43:27-41.
29. Liao H., Wei Y.M. International comparison: mid- and long- term energy saving potential analysis in China. China Soft Sci Mag 2011, 3:23-32.
30. 2 emissions allowance over provinces in China by 2020. Energy Policy 2012, 54:214-229.
31. Stern NH, Britain G. Stern review: the economics of climate change. HM treasury London; 2006.
32. Nathan R., Asbjørn T., Jan S.F. Climate agreements based on responsibility for global warming: periodic updating, policy choices, and regional costs. Global Environ Change 2006, 16:182-194.
33. Müller B., Höhne N., Ellermann C. Differentiating (historic) responsibilities for climate change. Climate Policy 2009, 9:593-611.
34. Shue H. Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law Policy 2008, 1:39-60.
35. Allen M.R., Frame D.J., Huntingford C., Jones C.D., Lowe J.A., Meinshausen M., et al. Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature 2009, 458:1163-1166.