Transnational actors in environmental politics: Strategies and influence in long negotiations

Environmental Politics

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 376-394

  Downie, Christian ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

climate change; environmental politics; international negotiations; transnational actors

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

EID: 84899524938     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: 17438934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2013.875252     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Agrawala, S. and Andresen, S., 1999. Indispensability and indefensibility? The United States in the climate treaty negotiations. Global Governance, 5 (4), 457-482.
2. Atkinson, R., 1995. Climate debate ends on cool note greenhouse gas cutbacks stalled 2 years. The Washington Post, 8 April, p. 15.
3. Barnett, M. and Sikkink, K., 2008. From international relations to global society. In: C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, eds. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 62-83.
4. Berry, M., 2002. Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35 (4), 679-682.
5. Betsill, M., 2008. Environmental NGOs and the Kyoto Protocol negotiations: 1995 to 1997. In: M. Betsill and E. Corell, eds. NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 43-66.
6. Betsill, M. and Corell, E., 2008. Introduction to NGO diplomacy. In: M. Betsill and E. Corell, eds. NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1-18.
7. Bexell, M., Tallberg, J., and Uhlin, A., 2010. Democracy in global governance: the promises and pitfalls of transnational actors. Global Governance, 16 (1), 81-101.
8. Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P., 2000. Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Carpenter, C., 2001. Businesses, green groups and the media: the role of non-governmental organisations in the climate change debate. International Affairs, 77 (2), 313-328.
10. Downie, C., 2012. Toward an understanding of state behavior in prolonged international negotiations. International Negotiation, 17 (2), 295-320.
11. Downie, C., 2013. Transnational actors: Nongovernmental organizations, civil society and individuals. In: P. Harris, ed. Routledge handbook of global environmental politics. London: Routledge, 176-186.
12. Downie, C., 2014. The politics of climate change negotiations: strategies and variables in prolonged international negotiations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
13. Gough, C. and Shackley, S., 2001. The respectable politics of climate change: the epistemic communities and NGOs. International Affairs, 77 (2), 329-345.
14. Hilzenrath, D., 1993. Miscalculations, lobby effort doomed BTU tax plan. The Washington Post, 11 June, p. 1.
15. Joachim, J., 2003. Framing issues and seizing opportunities: the UN, NGOs, and women's rights. International Studies Quarterly, 47 (2), 247-274.
16. Keck, M. and Sikkink, K., 1998. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17. Khagram, S., 2006. Possible future architectures of global governance: a transnational perspective/prospective. Global Governance, 12 (1), 97-117.
18. Lake, D., 2008. The state and international relations. In: C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, eds. Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 41-61.
19. Lake, D., 2010. Rightful rules: authority, order, and the foundations of global governance. Studies Quarterly, 54 (3), 587-613.
20. Leggett, J., 1999. The carbon war: dispatches from the end of the oil century. London: Allen Lane.
21. Levy, D., 2005. Business and the evolution of the climate regime. In: D. Levy and P. Newell, eds. The business of global environmental governance. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 73-104.
22. Lund, E., 2013. Environmental diplomacy: comparing the influence of business and environmental NGOs in negotiations on reform of the clean development mechanism. Environmental Politics, 22 (5), 739-759.
23. Newell, P., 2000. Climate for change: non-state actors and the global politics of the greenhouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Odell, J. and Sell, S., 2006. Reframing the issue: The WTO coalition on intellectual property and public health, 2001. In: J. Odell, ed. Negotiating trade: developing countries in the WTO and NAFTA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85-114.
25. Pitzl, J. and Stewart, E. 2000. The US position on the Kyoto Protocol: Senate ratification or not? Washington, DC, Georgetown University. Available from: http://faculty.guisd.org/product.cfm?ProductID=193&MenuCategory=2 [Accessed 5 December 2013].
26. Porter, G. Brown, J. and Chasek, P., eds., 2000. Global environmental politics. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
27. Putnam, R., 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42 (3), 427-460.
28. Risse-Kappen, T., 1995. Bringing transnational relations back in: Introduction. In: T. Risse-Kappen, ed. Bringing transnational relations back in: non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-34.
29. Schattschneider, E.E., 1960. The semisovereign people: a realist's view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
30. Sell, S., 2003. Private power, public law: the globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Sewell, G., 1996. Conflicting beliefs: national implementation of the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16 (3), 137-150.
32. Tallberg, J. and Jönsson, C., 2010. Transnational actor participation in international institutions: where, why, and with what consequences? In: C. Jönsson and J. Tallberg, eds. Transnational actors in global governance: patterns, explanations, and implications. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-21.
33. United States Senate, 1997. Senate resolution 98. 105th Congress. 1st Session Available from: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d105:S.RES.98: [Accessed 5 December 2013].
34. Wapner, P., 1995. Politics beyond the state: environmental activism and world civic politics. World Politics, 47 (3), 311-340.
35. White, R., 1998. Kyoto and beyond. Issues in Science and Technology, 14 (3), 59-65.
36. Yin, R., 2009. Case study research design and methods. London: Sage Publications.