The economics of boldness: equity, action, and hope

Climate Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 82-101

  Garibaldi, José Alberto ^a  

^a Energeia Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

climate change negotiations; cooperation; equity; responsibility; UNFCCC

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; COLLECTIVE ACTION; DEVELOPING WORLD; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EQUITY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; NEGOTIATION PROCESS;

EID: 84890558664     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2013.831314     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ackerman, F., & Finlayson, I. (2006). The economics of inaction on climate change: A sensitivity analysis. Climate Policy, 6, 509-526.
2. Ackerman, F., Stanton, E., Hope, C., & Alberth, S. (2009). Did the Stern review underestimate US and global climate change damages?. Energy Policy, 37, 2717-2721. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.011
3. Alberth, S., & Hope, C. (2007). Climate modelling with endogenous technical change: Stochastic learning and optimal greenhouse gas abatement in the PAGE2002 model. Energy Policy, 35, 1795-1807. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.05.015
4. Aoki, M. (2003). Towards a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. ADB. (2009). The economics of climate change in Asia and the Pacific. Jakarta, Indonesia: Asian Development Bank.
6. BASIC experts. (2011). Equitable access to sustainable development: Contribution to the body of scientific knowledge. Beijing, Brasilia, Cape Town and Mumbai: BASIC expert group.
7. Birnie, P., Boyle, A., & Redgwell, C. (2009). International law and the environment (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. CISDL/Centre for International Sustainable Development Law. (2002). The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities: Origins and scope (CISDL Legal Brief for World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, 26 August 2002).
9. DARA. (2012). The climate vulnerability monitor: A guide to the cold calculus of a hot planet. Madrid: Fundación DARA Internacional. Retreived from http://daraint.org/climate-vulnerability-monitor/climate-vulnerability-monitor-2012/report/.
10. Dominican Republic. (2010, March). Desarrollo Económico Compatible con el Cambio Climatico. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Consejo Dominicano para el Cambio Climatico y el Mecanismo de Desarrollo Limpio.
11. Gallo, F., Carmel, A., Prichard, S., Rayson, J., Martin, N., Dixon, R., MacDowall, A. (2009). Global Carbon Finance: A quantitative modeling framework to explore scenarios of the Global Deal on Climate Change. Retrieved from http://www.occ.gov.uk/publications/Global%20Carbon%20Finance%20methodology%20paper.pdf.
12. Gamio, A. P. (2009). Documento Político: La estrategia Nacional de Mitigación de Emisiones del Peru (Documento preparado para el Ministerio del Medio Ambiente del Peru). Lima: Keplel Consulting.
13. Garibaldi, J. A. (2009). The economics of boldness. London, Lima: Energeia.
14. Garibaldi, J. A., Araya, M., & Edwards, G. (2012). Shaping the Durban platform: Latin America and the Caribbean in a future high ambition deal. Quito, Ecuador, and London, UK: Energeia, CDKN, y Fundación Futuro Latinoamericano. Retrieved from http://www.intercambioclimatico.com/wp-content/uploads/Shaping-Durban-Platform_Final-April_2012.pdf.
15. Honkonen, T. (2009). The common but differentiated responsibility principle in multilateral environmental agreements: Regulatory and policy aspects. Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
16. 2 from PAGE2002: An integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC's five reasons for concern. The Integrated Assessment Journal, 6, 19-56.
17. 2 emissions over time under uncertainty. Climate Policy, 9, 3-8. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2008.0544
18. Indonesia. (2012). Intervention by Indonesia on behalf of the Cartagena Dialogue for Progressive Action at Plenary of the COP, Doha, 26 November 2012. Retreived from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop18_cmp8_hl_statements/INTERVENTION%20BY%20INDONESIA%20-%20REVISED.pdf.
19. Joyner, C. C.Common but differentiated responsibilities. American Society of International Law, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting2002, March 13-1696, 358.
20. Kesicki, F., & Strachan, N. (2011). Marginal abatement cost curves: Confronting theory and practice. Environmental Science and Policy, 14, 1195-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.004
21. Kirby, A. (2013, April 3). Least developed countries agree to cut greenhouse gas emissions. The Guardian.
22. Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF). (2011). Joint Statement issued at the Conclusion of Sixth BASIC Ministerial meeting on Climate Change, New Delhi. New Delhi: MoEF.
23. Peru. (2009). Propuesta de Estrategia Nacional de Mitigación de Emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero y Criterios para su Plan de Acción. Lima: Ministerio del Ambiente. Retrieved from www.minam.gob.pe/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=1016&Itemid=7.
24. Rajamani, L. (2005). Differential treatment in international environmental law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Rajamani, L.2007The nature, promise and limits of differential treatment in the climate change regime, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 16, 81-118.
26. Roberts, T., & Edwards, G. (2012). A new Latin American negotiating group: The greenest shoots in the Doha desert, December 2012. Retrieved from http://www.intercambioclimatico.com/en/2012/12/13/a-new-latin-american-climate-negotiating-group-the-greenest-shoots-in-the-doha-desert/#more-5684.
27. Sands, P. (2003). Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Stern, N. (2006). The Stern review: The economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury.
29. Stone, C. D. (2004). Common but differentiated responsibilities in international law. American Journal of International Law, 98, 276-281. doi: 10.2307/3176729
30. Tol, R., & Fankhauser, S. (1998). On the representation of impact in integrated assessment models of climate change. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 3, 63-74.
31. UN. (1992). United Nations framework convention on climate change. New York, NY: United Nations.
32. UN ESCAP. (2012). Low carbon green growth roadmap for Asia and the Pacific: Turning resource constraints and the climate crisis into economic growth opportunities. Bangkok: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP).
33. Vergara, W., Rios, A. R., Galindo, L. M., Gutman, P., Isbell, P., Suding, P. H., & Samaniego, J. (2013). The climate and development challenge of Latin America and the Caribbean: Options for climate resilient, low carbon development. Washington, DC: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Inter-American Development Bank and World Wildlife Fund.
34. Weyant, J., Davidson, O., Dowlatabadi, H., Grubb Edmonds, J., & Parson, E. A., Richels, R., Fankhauser, S. (1996). Integrated assessment of climate change: An overview and comparison of approaches and results. In J. P. Bruce, H. Lee, & E. F. Haites (Eds.), Climate Change 1995: Economic and social dimensions of climate change (pp. 367-396). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.