REDD+ finance: policy making in the context of fragmented institutions

Climate Policy

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 687-707

  Well, Mareike ^a   Carrapatoso, Astrid ^b  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

climate regime; financial mechanisms; institutional framework; international cooperation; REDD; UNFCCC

Indexed keywords

DEFORESTATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FINANCE; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; POLICY MAKING; UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 84980409637     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1202096     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Abbott, K. W., (2012). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C:Government and Policy, 30, 571–590. doi:10.1068/c11127
2. ADB (Asian Development Bank). (2012). ADB financial report 2012. Retrieved from http://www10.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2012/07776.pdf
3. AfDB (African Development Bank). (2013). Trust fund management at the African development bank:An independent evaluation. Retrieved from http://independentevaluation.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/opev/Documents/Trust%20Fund%20Management%20at%20the%20African%20Development%20Bank%20-%20EN.pdf
4. AfDB (African Development Bank), ADB (Asian Development Bank), EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development), EIB (European Investment Bank), IDB (Inter-American Development Bank), … WBG (World Bank Group). (2014). Joint report on MDB climate finance 2013. Retrieved from http://www.eib.org/attachments/documents/joint_report_on_mdb_climate_finance_2013.pdf
5. Althelia Ecosphere. (2016). About us. Retrieved from https://althelia.com/about-us/
6. Angelsen, A., (2013). REDD+ as performance-based aid_ General lessons and bilateral agreements of Norway. (Working paper/ 2013/135). Retrieved from http://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/2013/en_GB/wp2013-135/
7. van Asselt, H., Lindgren, M., & Dzebo, A., (2015). Mainstreaming climate change in Norwegian development aid_ Reconciling climate priorities with aid delivery procedures. Retrieved from http://www.sei-international.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Climate/NORD-STAR-PB-2015-Norway-climate-ODA.pdf
8. van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F., (2014). Connect the dots:Managing the fragmentation of global climate governance. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 16, 137–155. doi:10.1007/s10018-013-0060-z
9. Astuti, R., & McGregor, A., (2015). Governing carbon, transforming forest politics:A case study of Indonesia’s REDD+ task force. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 56, 21–36. doi:10.1111/apv.12087
10. Benvenisti, E., & Downs, G. W., (2007). The empire’s new clothes:Political economy and the fragmentation of international law. Stanford Law Review, 60, 595–632.
11. Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F., (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures:A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40. doi:10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14
12. BioCarbon Fund. (2015). What is the initiative for sustainable forest landscapes? Retrieved from http://www.biocarbonfund-isfl.org/about-us
13. Bird, N., Tilley, H., Trujillo, N. C., Tumushabe, G., Welham, B., & Yanda, P., (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of public climate finance delivery at the national level. Retrieved from http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/8303.pdf
14. BMUB (German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety). (2015). Joint statement by Germany, Norway and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland:Unlocking the potential of forests and land use. Retrieved from http://www.bmub.bund.de/fileadmin/Daten_BMU/Download_PDF/Klimaschutz/joint_statement_redd_cop21_en_bf.pdf
15. BMZ (German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2012). REDD early movers (REM):Rewarding pioneers in forest conservation. Retrieved from http://www.bmz.de/en/publications/archiv/type_of_publication/information_flyer/flyer/FlyerREDD_lang.pdf
16. Buchner, B., Stadelmann, M., Wilkinson, J., Mazza, F., Rosenberg, A., & Abramskiehn, D., (2014). Global landscape of climate finance 2014. Retrieved from http://climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/global-landscape-of-climate-finance-2014/
17. Canby, K., Silva-Chávez, G., Breitfeller, J., Lanser, C., Norman, M., & Schaap, B., (2014). Tracking REDD+ finance:2009–2012 Finance flows in seven REDD+ countries. Retrieved from http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/reddx_report_2014.pdf
18. CCBA (Climate, Community and Biodiversity Alliance). (2016). About the climate, community and biodiversity alliance. Retrieved from http://www.climate-standards.org/about-ccba/
19. CIF (Climate Investment Funds). (2014). Linkages between REDD+ readiness and the forest investment program. Retrieved from https://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/cif/sites/climateinvestmentfunds.org/files/Linkages_between_REDD_readiness_and_FIP_Nov2014.pdf
20. Climate Funds Update. (2016). Notes and methodology. Retrieved from http://www.climatefundsupdate.org/about/data-figures-notes
21. Climate Land Use Alliance. (2015). Grants and contracts list. Retrieved from http://www.climateandlandusealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Global-Initiative-Grants-List_2015-Q4.pdf
22. Davies, R., (2015). The Indonesia-Australia forest carbon partnership:A murder mystery. Retrieved from http://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/CGD-Climate-Forest-Paper-Series-21-Davies-Indonesia-Australia-Forest-Carbon.pdf
23. Daviet, F., Larsen, G., Lee, D., Roe, S., O’Sullivan, R., & Streck, C., (2013). Safeguards for REDD+ from a donor perspective. Retrieved from http://www.fcmcglobal.org/documents/Climate_Focus_Safeguards_Report.pdf
24. Drezner, D. W., (2009). The power and peril of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7, 65–70. doi:10.1017/S1537592709090100
25. EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development), ADB, AfDB, EIB (European Investment Bank), IDB (Inter-American Development Bank), IFC (International Finance Corporation), WB & WBG (World Bank Group). (2014). Joint statement by Multilateral Development Banks (MDB) on climate finance. Retrieved from http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/news/mdb-2014.pdf
26. Falconer, A., & Glenday, S., (2016). Taking stock of international contributions to low carbon, climate resilient land use in Indonesia. Retrieved from http://climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/taking-stock-of-international-contributions-to-low-carbon-climate-resilient-land-use-in-indonesia/
27. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). (2016). About the VRD. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/forestry/vrd/about
28. FCPF (Forest Carbon Partnership Facility). (2013). FCPF Carbon Fund methodological framework. Retrieved from https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/sites/fcp/files/2014/MArch/March/FCPF%20Carbon%20Fund%20Methodological%20Framework%20Final%20Dec%2020%202013.pdf
29. Fischer-Lescano, A., & Teubner, G., (2004). Regime-collisions:The vain search for legal unity in the fragmentation of global law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25, 999–1046.
30. Forest Trends. (2016). REDDX tracking forest finance:Indonesia. Retrieved from http://reddx.forest-trends.org/country/indonesia/donors
31. Franklin, N., & Sileuw, A., (2013). Principles, criteria and indicators for a system for providing information on REDD+ safeguards Implementation (SIS-REDD+) in Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.forclime.org/documents/publications/forclime/Book_of_Principles_Criteria_and_Indicators_for_REDD.pdf
32. GCF (Green Climate Fund). (2014a). Decisions of the Board:Seventh Meeting of the Board, 18-21 May 2014. Retrieved from http://www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/24943/GCF_B.07_11_-_Decisions_of_the_Board_-_Seventh_Meeting_of_the_Board__18-21_May_2014.pdf/73c63432-2cb1-4210-9bdd-454b52b2846b?version=1.0
33. GCF (Green Climate Fund). (2014b). Initial logic model and performance measurement framework for ex-post REDD+ results-based payments. Retrieved from http://www.gcfund.org/fileadmin/00_customer/documents/MOB201410-8th/GCF_B.08_08_Initial_Logic_Model_fin_20141005.pdf
34. GCF (Green Climate Fund). (2016). Pledge tracker. Retrieved from http://www.greenclimate.fund/contributions/pledge-tracker
35. GCP (Global Canopy Programme), IPAM (the Amazon Environmental Research Institute), FFI (Fauna & Flora International), & UNEP Finance Initiative. (2014). Stimulating interim demand for REDD+ emissions reductions:The need for a strategic intervention from 2015–2020. Retrieved from http://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/IFF_Report_-_Stimulating_Interim_Demand_for_REDD_Emissions_Reductions.pdf
36. GEF (Global Environment Facility). (2016). GEF agencies. Retrieved from http://www.thegef.org/gef/gef_agencies
37. Gehring, T., & Faude, B., (2014). A theory of emerging order within institutional complexes:How competition among regulatory international institutions leads to institutional adaptation and division of labor. The Review of International Organizations, 9, 471–498. doi:10.1007/s11558-014-9197-1
38. The Gold Standard Foundation. (2016). Our purpose. Retrieved from http://www.goldstandard.org/our-story/who-we-are
39. Goldstein, A., & Gonzalez, G., (2014). Turning over a new leaf:State of the forest carbon markets 2014. Retrieved from www.forest-trends.org/documents/index.php?pubID=4770
40. Gupta, A., Pistorius, T., & Vijge, M. J., (2015). Managing fragmentation in global environmental governance:The REDD+ partnership as bridge organization. International Environmental Agreements:Politics, Law and Economics, 16, 355–374. doi:10.1007/s10784-015-9274-9
41. Harmeling, S., Esch, A., Grießhaber, L., Eckstein, D., Junghans, L., Nakhooda, S., & Fransen, T., (2013). The German fast-start finance contribution. Retrieved from http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/pdf/ocn_ger_fast_start_finance.pdf
42. Harris, N., & Stolle, F., (2016, January 5). Forests are in the Paris Agreement! Now what? WRI Blog. Retrieved from http://www.wri.org/blog/2016/01/forests-are-paris-agreement-now-what
43. IADB (Inter-American Development Bank). (2016). Trust funds. Retrieved from http://www.iadb.org/aboutus/trustfunds/fundsearch.cfm;%20http://www.iadb.org/en/idb-finance/english/funds-under-administration,2122.html
44. IMF (Indonesian Ministry of Finance), & CPI (Climate Policy Initiative). (2014). The landscape of climate finance in Indonesia. Retrieved from http://climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/The-Landscape-of-Public-Finance-in-Indonesia.pdf
45. Irawan, S., Tacconi, L., & Ring, I., (2013). Stakeholders’ incentives for land-use change and REDD+:The case of Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 87, 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.018
46. Jong, H. N., (2015, January 29). BP REDD+ officially disbanded. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/01/29/bp-redd-officially-disbanded.html
47. Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G., (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 7–23. doi:10.1017/S1537592710004068
48. KfW & Climate Focus. (2015). Results-based finance for REDD+:Emerging approaches. Retrieved from http://www.climatefocus.com/sites/default/files/20151130%20RBP%20Paper%201%20Summary%20-%20Expertdialogue%208%20final%5B1%5D.pdf.pdf
49. Korhonen-Kurki, K., Brockhaus, M., Bushley, B., Babon, A., Gebara, M. F., Kengoum, F., … Maharani, C., (2015). Coordination and cross-sectoral integration in REDD+:Experiences from seven countries. Climate and Development. doi:10.1080/17565529.2015.1050979
50. Lash, J., & Dyer, G., (2014). Norway’s international climate and forest initiative:A strategic evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kld/kl/klima-og-skogprosjektet/lash_final_nicfi_evaluationreport.pdf
51. La Viña, T., & Lee, D., (2014). Assessment of the results of the REDD+ partnership. Retrieved from http://www.redd-monitor.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/REDD-Partnership-Assessment-post-Partner-review-17-Nov-2014-Final.pdf
52. Lee, D., & Pistorius, T., (2015). The impact of international REDD+ finance. Retrieved from www.climatefocus.com/sites/default/files/Impacts_of_International_REDD_Finance_Case_Study_Colombia.pdf
53. Linacre, N., O’Sullivan, R., Ross, D., Durschinger, L., FCMC, & Terra Global Capital, L. L. (2014). Report brief:REDD+ supply and demand 2015–25. Retrieved from http://www.fcmcglobal.org/documents/REDD_Market_Brief_2015-2025.pdf
54. Luttrell, C., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Muharrom, E., Brockhaus, M., & Seymour, F., (2014). The political context of REDD+ in Indonesia:Constituencies for change. Environmental Science & Policy, 35, 67–75. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.001
55. Meuser, M., & Nagel, U., (2009). The expert interview and changes in knowledge production. In A., Bogner, B., Littig, & W., Menz (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 17–42). Houndsmills:Palgrave Macmillan.
56. Moeliono, M., Gallemore, C., Santoso, L., Brockhaus, M., & Di Gregorio, M., (2014). Information networks and power:Confronting the “wicked problem” of REDD+ in Indonesia. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 9. doi:10.5751/ES-06300-190209
57. Mulyani, M., & Jepson, P., (2013). REDD+ and forest governance in Indonesia:A multistakeholder study of perceived challenges and opportunities. The Journal of Environment & Development, 22, 261–283. doi:10.1177/1070496513494203
58. Murdiyarso, D., Dewi, S., Lawrence, D., & Seymour, F., (2011). Indonesia’s forest moratorium:A stepping stone to better forest governance? Retrieved from http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/WPapers/WP-76Murdiyarso.pdf
59. Nakhooda, S., & Jha, V., (2014). Getting it together:Institutional arrangements for coordination and stakeholder engagement in climate finance. Retrieved from http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9200.pdf
60. Nakhooda, S., Watson, C., & Schalatek, L., (2014). The global climate finance architecture. Retrieved from http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9312.pdf
61. Nakhooda, S., Watson, C., & Schalatek, L., (2015). The global climate finance rchitecture. Retrieved from http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/10046.pdf
62. Norman, M., Caravani, A., Nakhooda, S., Watson, C., & Schalatek, L., (2015). Climate finance thematic briefing:REDD+ finance. Retrieved from www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/10054.pdf
63. Norman, M., & Nakhooda, S., (2014). The state of REDD+ finance. Retrieved from http://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/CGD-Norman-Nakhooda-Climate-Forests-5-REDD-Finance.pdf
64. Norman, M., & Nakhooda, S., (2015). The state of REDD+ finance. Retrieved from http://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/CGD-Norman-Nakhooda-Climate-Forests-5-REDD-Finance.pdf
65. OECD. (2016a). DAC members. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dac/dacmembers.htm
66. OECD. (2016b). OECD statistics on external development finance targeting environmental objectives including the Rio conventions. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/rioconventions.htm
67. Park, M. S., Choi, E. S., & Youn, Y.-C., (2013). REDD+ as an international cooperation strategy under the global climate change regime. Forest Science and Technology, 9(4), 213–224. doi:10.1080/21580103.2013.846875
68. Pickering, J., (2015). Sharing the global climate finance effort fairly with limited coordination. Global Environmental Politics, 15, 39–62. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00325
69. Pistorius, T., & Kiff, L., (2015). The politics of German finance for REDD+. Retrieved from http://www.cgdev.org/publication/politics-german-finance-redd-working-paper
70. Pistorius, T., & Reinecke, S., (2013). The interim REDD+ partnership:Boost for biodiversity safeguards? Forest Policy and Economics, 36, 80–86. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.007
71. Polycarp, C., Bird, N., & Doukas, A., (2013). Sum of parts:Making the Green Climate Fund’s allocations add up to its ambition. Retrieved from http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/sum_of_parts_making_green_climate_fund_allocations_add_up_0.pdf
72. Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G., (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58, 277–309. doi:10.1017/S0020818304582036
73. REDD+ Partnership. (2010). Work program for the REDD+ Partnership components and timeline 2011–2012. Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20141018102133/http://reddpluspartnership.org/25249-0dba058f432218e505b6c5287aa094884.pdf
74. Reinecke, S., Pistorius, T., & Pregernig, M., (2014). UNFCCC and the REDD+ partnership from a networked governance perspective. Environmental Science & Policy, 35, 30–39. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.015
75. Roe, S., Larsen, G., O’Sullivan, R., Lee, D., Streck, C., & Conway, D., (2014). Safeguards in bilateral REDD+ finance. Retrieved from http://www.climatefocus.com/sites/default/files/20140805%20Safeguards%20and%20Bilateral%20REDD%2B%20Finance%20FINAL.pdf
76. SES Initiative. (2012). REDD+ social & environmental standards:Version 2. Retrieved from http://www.redd-standards.org/standards/redd-social-and-environmental-standards-version-2
77. Seymour, F., Birdsall, N., & Savedoff, W., (2015). The Indonesia-Norway REDD+ agreement:A glass half-full. Retrieved from http://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/CGD-Climate-Forest-Paper-Series-20-Seymour-Savedoff-Birdsall-Indonesia-Norway_1.pdf
78. Silva-Chávez, G., Schaap, B., & Breitfeller, J., (2015). REDD+ finance flows 2009–2014:Trends and lessons learned in REDDX countries. Retrieved from http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_5029.pdf
79. Streck, C., (2012). Financing REDD+:Matching needs and ends. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 628–637. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.001
80. Streck, C., & Parker, C., (2012). Financing REDD +. In A., Angelsen, M., Brockhaus, W. D., Sunderlin, & L., Verchot (Eds.), Analysing REDD+:Challenges and choices (pp. 111–128). Bogor:Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
81. Tänzler, D., & Maulidia, M., (2013). Status of climate finance in Indonesia:Country assessment report. Retrieved from http://cdkn.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/INDONESIA-Country-Report_3Dec2013.pdf
82. UNFCCC. (1996). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its second session, held at Geneva from 8 to 19 July 1996:Part two:Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its second session. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop2/15a01.pdf#page=55
83. UNFCCC. (2010). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf
84. UNFCCC. (2011). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf#page=2
85. UNFCCC. (2012). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdf
86. UNFCCC. (2013a). Submissions on information from developed country parties on the resources provided to fulfil the commitment referred to in decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 95. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2013/cop19/eng/inf01.pdf
87. UNFCCC. (2013b). Warsaw Framework for REDD-plus. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/land_use_and_climate_change/redd/items/8180.php
88. UNFCCC. (2014a). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013:Part two:Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its nineteenth session. Retrieved from unfccc.int/resource/docs/2013/cop19/eng/10a01.pdf
89. UNFCCC. (2014b). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013 (Arrangements between the Conference of the Parties and the Green Climate Fund). Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2013/cop19/eng/10a01.pdf#page=13
90. UNFCCC. (2014c). Submission by Indonesia on methodological guidance for activities relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks (REDD+) in developing countries (issues relating to safeguards). Retrieved from http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/Lists/OSPSubmissionUpload/63_26_130613718354385715-Indonesian%20submission%20on%20REDD+%20safeguards.pdf
91. UNFCCC. (2014d). Summary report on the in-session workshop on long-term climate finance in 2014. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2014/cop20/eng/03.pdf
92. UNFCCC. (2016). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015:Addendum. Part two:Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twenty-first session. Retrieved from unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/10a01.pdf
93. UNFCCC SCF (Standing Committee on Finance). (2014). Revised background paper on coherence and coordination:The issue of financing for forests, taking into account different policy approaches. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/files/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/standing_committee/application/pdf/scf8_background_paper_coherence_and_coordination_financing_for_forest_1655.pdf
94. UN-REDD Programme & FCPF. (2012). FCPF UNREDD R-PP template Annexes V. 6 for use by countries. Retrieved from http://www.unredd.net/index.php?view=download&alias=6970-fcpf-unredd-r-pp-template-annexes-v-6-for-use-by-countries-april-4-2012-final-clean-6970&category_slug=harmonized-un-redd-fcpf-rpp-template-1448&option=com_docman&Itemid=134
95. UN-REDD Programme & FCPF. (2015). Joint FCPF/UN-REDD Programme guidance note for REDD+ countries:Establishing and strengthening grievance redress mechanisms. Retrieved from http://www.unredd.net/~unredd/index.php?view=document&alias=14201-joint-fcpfun-redd-guidance-note-for-redd-countries-establishing-and-strengthening-grievance-redress-mechanisms-1&category_slug=national-grievance-mechanisms-3390&layout=default&option=com_docman&Itemid=134
96. Watson, C., McFarland, W., Nakhooda, S., & Caravani, A., (2014). Fast start finance for forests:The challenge of maintaining momentum. Retrieved from http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/8912.pdf
97. Wibowo, A., & Giessen, L., (2015). Absolute and relative power gains among state agencies in forest-related land use politics:The ministry of forestry and its competitors in the REDD+ programme and the one map policy in Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 49, 131–141. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.018
98. Wong, G., Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Carmenta, R., Duchelle, A. E., Leonard, S., … Wunder, S., (2016). Results-based payments for REDD+:Lessons on finance, performance, and non-carbon benefits. Retrieved from http://www.cifor.org/library/6108/results-based-payments-for-redd-lessons-on-finance-performance-and-non-carbon-benefits
99. Zürn, M., & Faude, B., (2013). Commentary:On fragmentation, differentiation, and coordination. Global Environmental Politics, 13, 119–130. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00186