A fuzzy Bayesian network approach for risk analysis in process industries

Process Safety and Environmental Protection

Volumn 111, Issue , 2017, Pages 507-519

  Yazdi, Mohammad ^a   Kabir, Sohag ^b  

^a EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian networks; Fault tree analysis; Fuzzy set theory; Hazard analysis; Process industry; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 85028607252     PISSN: 09575820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.015     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Abimbola, M., Khan, F., Khakzad, N., Butt, S., Safety and risk analysis of managed pressure drilling operation using Bayesian network. Saf. Sci. 76 (2015), 133–144, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.010.
2. Akkurt, S., Tayfur, G., Can, S., Fuzzy logic model for the prediction of cement compressive strength. Cem. Concr. Res. 34 (2004), 1429–1433, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.020.
3. Altunkaynak, A., Özger, M., Çakmakcı, M., Fuzzy logic modeling of the dissolved oxygen fluctuations in Golden Horn. Ecol. Modell. 189 (2005), 436–446, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.007.
4. Aqlan, F., Mustafa Ali, E., Integrating lean principles and fuzzy bow-tie analysis for risk assessment in chemical industry. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 29 (2014), 39–48, 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.01.006.
5. Atanassov, K.T., On the Concept of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. 2012, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1–16, 10.1007/978-3-642-29127-2_1.
6. Banerjee, S., Industrial Hazards and Plant Safety. 2003, Taylor & Francis.
7. Barua, S., Gao, X., Pasman, H., Mannan, M.S., Bayesian network based dynamic operational risk assessment. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 41 (2016), 399–410, 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.024.
8. Bobbio, A., Portinale, L., Minichino, M., Ciancamerla, E., Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71 (2001), 249–260, 10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00077-6.
9. Bouejla, A., Chaze, X., Guarnieri, F., Napoli, A., A Bayesian network to manage risks of maritime piracy against offshore oil fields. Saf. Sci. 68 (2014), 222–230, 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.010.
10. Buckley, J.J., Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17 (1985), 233–247, 10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9.
11. Celik, M., Lavasani, S.M., Wang, J., A risk-based modelling approach to enhance shipping accident investigation. Saf. Sci. 48 (2010), 18–27, 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.04.007.
12. Chan, H.K., Wang, X., Fuzzy extent analysis for food risk assessment. Fuzzy Hierarchical Model for Risk Assessment, 2013, Springer London, London, 89–114, 10.1007/978-1-4471-5043-5_6.
13. Chang, D.-Y., Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95 (1996), 649–655, 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2.
14. Chen, S.-J., Hwang, C.-L., Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. 1992, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4.
15. De Dianous, V., Fiévez, C., ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. J. Hazard. Mater. 130 (2006), 220–233, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.010.
16. Duan, Y., Zhao, J., Chen, J., Bai, G., A risk matrix analysis method based on potential risk influence: a case study on cryogenic liquid hydrogen filling system. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 102 (2016), 277–287, 10.1016/j.psep.2016.03.022.
17. Dunjó, J., Fthenakis, V., Vílchez, J.A., Arnaldos, J., Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review. J. Hazard. Mater. 173 (2010), 19–32, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.076.
18. Escande, J., Proust, C., Le Coze, J.C., Limitations of current risk assessment methods to foresee emerging risks: towards a new methodology?. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 43 (2016), 730–735, 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.06.008.
19. Ferdous, R., Khan, F., Sadiq, R., Amyotte, P., Veitch, B., Analyzing system safety and risks under uncertainty using a bow-tie diagram: an innovative approach. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 91 (2013), 1–18, 10.1016/j.psep.2011.08.010.
20. Ferdous, R., Khan, F., Veitch, B., Amyotte, P.R., Methodology for computer aided fuzzy fault tree analysis. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 87 (2009), 217–226, 10.1016/j.psep.2009.04.004.
21. Ford, D.N., Sterman, J.D., Expert knowledge elicitation to improve formal and mental models. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 14 (1998), 309–340, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199824)14:4<309:AID-SDR154>3.0.CO;2-5.
22. García-Herrero, S., Mariscal, M.A., Gutiérrez, J.M., Toca-Otero, A., Bayesian network analysis of safety culture and organizational culture in a nuclear power plant. Saf. Sci. 53 (2013), 82–95, 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.09.004.
23. Gul, M., Guneri, A.F., A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: a case study for aluminum industry. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 40 (2016), 89–100, 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.023.
24. Han, Z.Y., Weng, W.G., Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network. J. Hazard. Mater. 189 (2011), 509–518, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.067.
25. Hänninen, M., Valdez Banda, O.A., Kujala, P., Bayesian network model of maritime safety management. Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (2014), 7837–7846, 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.06.029.
26. Huang, H.-Z., Tong, X., Zuo, M.J., Posbist fault tree analysis of coherent systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 84 (2004), 141–148, 10.1016/j.ress.2003.11.002.
27. Huang, H.Z., Zuo, M.J., Sun, Z.Q., Bayesian reliability analysis for fuzzy lifetime data. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157 (2006), 1674–1686, 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.12.004.
28. Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., Mieno, H., The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 55 (1993), 241–253, 10.1016/0165-0114(93)90251-C.
29. Jensen, F.V., Nielsen, T.D., Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. 2007, Springer Science & Business Media http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2.
30. John, A., Yang, Z., Riahi, R., Wang, J., A risk assessment approach to improve the resilience of a seaport system using Bayesian networks. Ocean Eng. 111 (2016), 136–147, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.048.
31. Kabir, S., An overview of fault tree analysis and its application in model based dependability analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 77 (2017), 114–135, 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.058.
32. Kabir, S., Walker, M., Papadopoulos, Y., Rüde, E., Securius, P., Fuzzy temporal fault tree analysis of dynamic systems. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 77 (2016), 20–37, 10.1016/j.ijar.2016.05.006.
33. Kabir, S., Walker, M., Papadopoulos, Y., Reliability analysis of dynamic systems by translating temporal fault trees into Bayesian networks. Ortmeier, F., Rauzy, A., (eds.) Model-Based Safety and Assessment, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 96–109, 10.1007/978-3-319-12214-4.
34. Khakzad, N., Application of dynamic Bayesian network to risk analysis of domino effects in chemical infrastructures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 138 (2015), 263–272, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.02.007.
35. Khakzad, N., Khan, F., Amyotte, P., Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: a Bayesian approach. Saf. Sci. 57 (2013), 108–117, 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.022.
36. Khakzad, N., Khan, F., Amyotte, P., Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 91 (2013), 46–53, 10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.005.
37. Khakzad, N., Khan, F., Amyotte, P., Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (2011), 925–932, 10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.012.
38. Khan, F., Maximum credible accident scenario for realistic and reliable risk assessment. Chem. Eng. Prog. 97 (2001), 55–67.
39. Khan, F., Haddara, M., Krishnasamy, L., A new methodology for risk-based availability analysis. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 57 (2008), 103–112, 10.1109/TR.2007.911248.
40. Khan, F., Abbasi, S.A., MAXCRED—a new software package for rapid risk assessment in chemical process industries. Environ. Model. Software 14 (1999), 11–25.
41. Khan, F., Abbasi, S.A., PROFAT: a user-friendly systemfor probabilistic fault tree analysis. Process Saf. Prog. 18 (1999), 42–49.
42. Khan, F., Abbasi, S.A., Analytical simulation and PROFAT II: a new methodology and a computer automated tool for fault tree analysis in chemical process industries. J. Hazard. Mater. 75 (2000), 1–27, 10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00169-2.
43. Khan, F., Haddara, M.R., Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 16 (2003), 561–573.
44. Khan, F., Haddara, M.R., Risk-based maintenance of ethylene oxide production facilities. J. Hazard. Mater. 108 (2004), 147–159, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.01.011.
45. Khan, F., Husain, T., Abbasi, S.A., Design and evaluation of safety measures using a newly proposed methodology SCAP. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15 (2002), 129–146, 10.1016/S0950-4230(01)00026-2.
46. Lavasani, S.M., Ramzali, N., Sabzalipour, F., Akyuz, E., Utilisation of fuzzy fault tree analysis (FFTA) for quantified risk analysis of leakage in abandoned oil and natural-gas wells. Ocean Eng. 108 (2015), 729–737, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.008.
47. Lavasani, S.M., Zendegani, A., Celik, M., An extension to fuzzy fault tree analysis (FFTA) application in petrochemical process industry. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 93 (2015), 75–88, 10.1016/j.psep.2014.05.001.
48. Leu, S.-S., Chang, C.-M., Bayesian-network-based safety risk assessment for steel construction projects. Accid. Anal. Prev. 54 (2013), 122–133, 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.019.
49. Lewis, E.E., Introduction to Reliability Engineering. 2nd ed., 1996, J. Wiley, New York.
50. Liu, Y., Fan, Z.P., Yuan, Y., Li, H., A FTA-based method for risk decision-making in emergency response. Comput. Oper. Res. 42 (2014), 49–57, 10.1016/j.cor.2012.08.015.
51. Lowen, R., Fuzzy Set Theory: Basic Concepts, Techniques and Bibliography. 1996, Springer, Netherlands.
52. Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications—two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Syst. Appl. 42 (2015), 4126–4148, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003.
53. Markowski, A.S., Mannan, M.S., Fuzzy risk matrix. J. Hazard. Mater. 159 (2008), 152–157, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.055.
54. Marvin, H.J.P., Bouzembrak, Y., Janssen, E.M., van der Zande, M., Murphy, F., Sheehan, B., Mullins, M., Bouwmeester, H., Application of Bayesian networks for hazard ranking of nanomaterials to support human health risk assessment. Nanotoxicology 5390 (2017), 1–34, 10.1080/17435390.2016.1278481.
55. Mesiar, R., Fuzzy set approach to the utility, preference relations, and aggregation operators. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176 (2007), 414–422, 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.016.
56. Miri Lavasani, M.R., Wang, J., Yang, Z., Finlay, J., Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis on oil and gas offshore pipelines. Int. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 1 (2011), 29–42.
57. Modarres, M., Risk Analysis in Engineering: Techniques, Tools, and Trends. 2006, Taylor & Francis.
58. Mohsendokht, M., Risk assessment of uranium hexafluoride release from a uranium conversion facility by using a fuzzy approach. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 45 (2017), 217–228, 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.01.004.
59. Musharraf, M., Smith, J., Khan, F., Veitch, B., MacKinnon, S., Assessing offshore emergency evacuation behavior in a virtual environment using a Bayesian network approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 152 (2016), 28–37, 10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.001.
60. Omidvari, M., Lavasani, S.M.R., Mirza, S., Presenting of failure probability assessment pattern by FTA in fuzzy logic (case study: distillation tower unit of oil refinery process). J. Chem. Health Saf. 21 (2014), 14–22, 10.1016/j.jchas.2014.06.003.
61. Onisawa, T., An application of fuzzy concepts to modelling of reliability analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 37 (1990), 267–286, 10.1016/0165-0114(90)90026-3.
62. OREDA, Offshore Reliability Data Handbook. 4 ed., 2002, Trondheim.
63. Pedrycz, W., Why triangular membership functions?. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 64 (1994), 21–30, 10.1016/0165-0114(94)90003-5.
64. Pereira, J.C., Fragoso, M.D., Todorov, M.G., Risk assessment using Bayesian belief networks and analytic hierarchy process applicable to jet engine high pressure turbine assembly. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (2016), 133–138, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.563.
65. Preyssl, C., Safety risk assessment and management—the ESA approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 49 (1995), 303–309, 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00047-6.
66. Purba, J.H., Lu, J., Zhang, G., Pedrycz, W., A fuzzy reliability assessment of basic events of fault trees through qualitative data processing. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 243 (2014), 50–69, 10.1016/j.fss.2013.06.009.
67. Ramzali, N., Lavasani, M.R.M., Ghodousi, J., Safety barriers analysis of offshore drilling system by employing fuzzy event tree analysis. Saf. Sci. 78 (2015), 49–59, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.004.
68. Rausand, M., Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems. 2014, John Wiley & Sons.
69. Rausand, M., Risk Assessment: Theory, Methods, and Applications. 2011, J. Wiley & Sons.
70. Rausand, M., Hoyland, A., System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications. 2004, John Wiley & Sons, 10.1109/WESCON.1996.554026.
71. Ross, T.J., Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. 2009, John Wiley & Sons, 10.1002/9781119994374.
72. Saaty, T.L., Ozdemir, M.S., Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Math. Comput. Modell. 38 (2003), 233–244, 10.1016/S0895-7177(03)90083-5.
73. Shi, L., Shuai, J., Xu, K., Fuzzy fault tree assessment based on improved AHP for fire and explosion accidents for steel oil storage tanks. J. Hazard. Mater. 278 (2014), 529–538, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.034.
74. Taveau, J., Risk assessment and land-use planning regulations in France following the AZF disaster. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 23 (2010), 813–823, 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.04.003.
75. Trucco, P., Cagno, E., Ruggeri, F., Grande, O., A Bayesian belief network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis: A case study in maritime transportation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 (2008), 823–834, 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.035.
76. Van Der Borst, M., Schoonakker, H., An overview of PSA importance measures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 72 (2001), 241–245, 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00007-2.
77. Vesely, W.E., Stamatelatos, M., Dugan, J., Fragola, J., Minarick, J., Railsback, J., Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications. 2002, NASA Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, Washington DC.
78. Wang, D., Zhang, P., Chen, L., Fuzzy fault tree analysis for fire and explosion of crude oil tanks. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26 (2013), 1390–1398, 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.08.022.
79. Wang, Y., Teague, T., West, H., Mannan, S., A new algorithm for computer-aided fault tree synthesis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 15 (2002), 265–277, 10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00011-6.
80. Wu, W.-S., Yang, C.-F., Chang, J.-C., Château, P.-A., Chang, Y.-C., Risk assessment by integrating interpretive structural modeling and Bayesian network, case of offshore pipeline project. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 142 (2015), 515–524, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.06.013.
81. Yan, F., Xu, K., Yao, X., Li, Y., Fuzzy Bayesian network-bow-tie analysis of gas leakage during biomass gasification. PLoS One, 11, 2016, e0160045, 10.1371/journal.pone.0160045.
82. Yazdi, M., The application of bow-tie method in hydrogen sulfide risk management using layer of protection analysis (LOPA). J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 17 (2017), 291–303, 10.1007/s11668-017-0247-x.
83. Yazdi, M., Daneshvar, S., Setareh, H., An extension to fuzzy developed failure mode and effects analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system. Saf. Sci. 98 (2017), 113–123, 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.009.
84. Yazdi, M., Nikfar, F., Nasrabadi, M., Failure probability analysis by employing fuzzy fault tree analysis. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag., 2017, 1–17, 10.1007/s13198-017-0583-y.
85. Yeo, C.T., Bhandari, J., Abbassi, R., Garaniya, V., Chai, S., Shomali, B., Dynamic risk analysis of offloading process in floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) platform using Bayesian network. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 41 (2016), 259–269, 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.04.002.
86. Yuan, Z., Khakzad, N., Khan, F., Amyotte, P., Risk analysis of dust explosion scenarios using bayesian networks. Risk Anal. 35 (2015), 278–291, 10.1111/risa.12283.
87. Zarei, E., Azadeh, A., Khakzad, N., Aliabadi, M.M., Mohammadfam, I., Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network. J. Hazard. Mater. 321 (2017), 830–840, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.074.
88. Zhang, K., Duan, M., Luo, X., Hou, G., A fuzzy risk matrix method and its application to the installation operation of subsea collet connector. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 45 (2017), 147–159, 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.11.014.