An extension to Fuzzy Developed Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system

Safety Science

Volumn 98, Issue , 2017, Pages 113-123

  Yazdi, Mohammad ^a   Daneshvar, Sahand ^a   Setareh, Hashem ^b  

^a EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b PETROLEUM UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

FMEA; Fuzzy set theory; Group decision making; Landing system; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE INDUSTRY; AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS; AIRCRAFT LANDING; COMPUTATION THEORY; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; FAILURE MODES; FUZZY SET THEORY; LANDING; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS; FMEA; FUZZY ENVIRONMENTS; GROUP DECISION MAKING; LANDING SYSTEM; POTENTIAL FAILURE MODES; RISK PRIORITY NUMBER;

AIRCRAFT LANDING SYSTEMS;

AIRCFRAFT LANDING SYSTEM; AIRCRAFT; AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS; FUZZY LOGIC; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIKERT SCALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 85021053514     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aqlan, F., Mustafa Ali, E., Integrating lean principles and fuzzy bow-tie analysis for risk assessment in chemical industry. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 29 (2014), 39–48, 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.01.006.
2. Ayyub, B.M., 2014. Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics, second ed.
3. Bell, D., Cox, L., Jackson, S., Schaefer, P., n.d. Using causal reasoning for automated failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). In: Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1992 Proceedings. IEEE, pp. 343–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ARMS.1992.187847.
4. Bowles, J.B., Peláez, C.E., Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 50 (1995), 203–213, 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00068-D.
5. Carlson, C. (Carl S.), Effective FMEAs Achieving Safe, Reliable, and Economical Products and Processes Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. 2012, John Wiley & Sons.
6. Chen, S.-J., Hwang, C.-L., Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. 1992, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4.
7. Chen, S.-J., Hwang, C.-L., 1992b. Fuzzy Sets and Their Operations. pp. 42–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_3.
8. Dağsuyu, C., Göçmen, E., Narlı, M., Kokangül, A., Classical and fuzzy FMEA risk analysis in a sterilization unit. Comput. Ind. Eng. 101 (2016), 286–294, 10.1016/j.cie.2016.09.015.
9. Department of Defense of the USA, 1998. Electronic Reliability Design Handbook. Mil. Handb. MIL-HDBK-338B 1046. doi: MIL-HDBK-338B.
10. Ericson, C.A., Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety. 2005, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 10.1002/0471739421.
11. Ford, D.N., Sterman, J.D., Expert knowledge elicitation to improve formal and mental models. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 14 (1998), 309–340, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199824)14:4<309::AID-SDR154>3.0.CO;2-5.
12. Gul, M., Guneri, A.F., A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: a case study for aluminum industry. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 40 (2016), 89–100, 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.023.
13. Hadi-Vencheh, a., Aghajani, M., Failure mode and effects analysis A fuzzy group MCDM approach. J. Soft Comput. Appl. 2013 (2013), 1–14, 10.5899/2013/jsca-00016.
14. Helvacioglu, S., Ozen, E., Fuzzy based failure modes and effect analysis for yacht system design. Ocean Eng. 79 (2014), 131–141, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.12.015.
15. Hong, Y., Pasman, H.J., Sachdeva, S., Markowski, A.S., Mannan, M.S., A fuzzy logic and probabilistic hybrid approach to quantify the uncertainty in layer of protection analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 43 (2016), 10–17, 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.04.006.
16. Hsu, Hsi-Mei, Chen, Chen-Tung, Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 79 (1996), 279–285, 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00185-9.
17. Kahraman, C., Kaya, İ., Şenvar, Ö., Healthcare failure mode and effects analysis under fuzziness. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. An Int. J. 19 (2013), 538–552, 10.1080/10807039.2012.737753.
18. Kara-Zaitri, C., Keller, A.Z., Fleming, P.V., n.d. A smart failure mode and effect analysis package. In: Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1992 Proceedings. IEEE, pp. 414–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ARMS.1992.187857.
19. Kaufmann, A. (Arnold), Gupta, M.M., Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications. 1985, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
20. Kotra, J.P., Lee, M.P., Eisenberg, N.A., DeWispelare, A.R., 1996. Branch Technical Position on the Use of Expert Elicitation in the High-Level Radioactive Waste Program. Nureg-1563.
21. Lee, H.-S.L.H.-S., 2001. Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making⧹nenvironment. In: 10th IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst. (Cat. No.01CH37297) 1, pp. 279–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ.2001.1007275.
22. Liu, H., 2016. FMEA Using Uncertainty Theories and MCDM Methods. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1466-6.
23. Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., Liu, N., Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Exp. Syst. Appl. 40 (2013), 828–838, 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010.
24. Liu, Y., Fan, Z.P., Yuan, Y., Li, H., A FTA-based method for risk decision-making in emergency response. Comput. Oper. Res. 42 (2014), 49–57, 10.1016/j.cor.2012.08.015.
25. Mahan Airline, 2015. Annualy Report. Tehran.
26. Mandal, S., Maiti, J., Risk analysis using FMEA: Fuzzy similarity value and possibility theory based approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (2014), 3527–3537, 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.058.
27. Markowski, A.S., Mannan, M.S., Fuzzy logic for piping risk assessment (pfLOPA). J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 (2009), 921–927, 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.06.011.
28. Miller, G., The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 101 (1956), 343–352, 10.1037/h0043158.
29. Miri Lavasani, M.R., Wang, J., Yang, Z., Finlay, J., Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis on oil and gas offshore pipelines. Int. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 1 (2011), 29–42.
30. Modarres, M., What Every Engineer Should Know About Reliability and Risk Analysis. 1993, M. Dekker.
31. Modarres, M., Kaminskly, M., Krivtsov, V., 1999. Reliability Engineering and Risk Analysis.
32. Naftair Airline, 2015. Risk assessment study. Ahvaz.
33. Nicolis, J.S., Tsuda, I., Chaotic dynamics of information processing: the “magic number seven plus-minus two” revisited. Bull. Math. Biol. 47 (1985), 343–365, 10.1007/BF02459921.
34. Ölçer, A.I., Odabaşi, A.Y., A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 166 (2005), 93–114, 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.02.010.
35. Omidvari, M., Lavasani, S.M.R., Mirza, S., Presenting of failure probability assessment pattern by FTA in Fuzzy logic (case study: Distillation tower unit of oil refinery process). J. Chem. Heal. Saf. 21 (2014), 14–22, 10.1016/j.jchas.2014.06.003.
36. Preyssl, C., Safety risk assessment and management-the ESA approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 49 (1995), 303–309, 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00047-6.
37. Rajakarunakaran, S., Maniram Kumar, A., Arumuga Prabhu, V., Applications of fuzzy faulty tree analysis and expert elicitation for evaluation of risks in LPG refuelling station. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 33 (2015), 109–123, 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.11.016.
38. Ramzali, N., Lavasani, M.R.M., Ghodousi, J., Safety barriers analysis of offshore drilling system by employing Fuzzy event tree analysis. Saf. Sci. 78 (2015), 49–59, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.004.
39. Runkler, T., Glesner, M., 1993. A set of axioms for defuzzification strategies towards a theory of rational defuzzification operators. In: Proc. Second IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Set Syst., pp. 1161–1166.
40. Sugeno, M., Nguyen, H.T., Prasad, N.R., Fuzzy Modeling and Control: Selected Works of M. Sugeno. 1999, CRC Press.
41. US Department of Defence, 1980. Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. MIL-STD-1629, November, AMSC Number N3074 11, 149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2005.06.223.
42. Wang, Y.-M., Chin, K.-S., Poon, G.K.K., Yang, J.-B., Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. J. Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (2009), 1195–1207, 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.028.
43. Wang, J., Ruxton, T., Labrie, C.R., 1996. Design for safety of engineering systems with multiple failure state variables. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 50, 271–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00094-1.
44. Yazdi, M., Nikfar, F., Nasrabadi, M., Failure probability analysis by employing fuzzy fault tree analysis. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage., 2017, 1–17, 10.1007/s13198-017-0583-y.
45. Zadeh, L., Fuzzy Sets. Inf. Control., 1965, 10.1109/2.53.
46. Zhao, R., Govind, R., Defuzzification of fuzzy intervals. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 43 (1991), 45–55, 10.1016/0165-0114(91)90020-Q.