Limitations of current risk assessment methods to foresee emerging risks: Towards a new methodology?

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 43, Issue , 2016, Pages 730-735

  Escande, Jean ^a   Proust, Christophe ^a,b   Le Coze, Jean Christophe ^b  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b INSTITUT NATIONAL DE L ENVIRONNEMENT INDUSTRIEL ET DES RISQUES INERIS   (France)

Author keywords

Decision engineering; Hazards identification; Management and planning; Safety

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ACCIDENTS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK PERCEPTION;

ANALYSIS TOOLS; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; INDUCTIVE METHOD; INDUSTRIAL FIELDS; RISK ASSESSMENT METHODS; WORK IN PROGRESS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84990029567     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alshuller, G.S., Creativity as an Exact Science: the Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems. 1984, Translated by Williams, A. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers Inc.
2. Andel (van), P., Bourcier, D., Serendipity in Science, Technology, Art and Law : Lessons from Unforeseen Facts (Trans.) De la sérendipité dans la science, la technique, l'art et le droit : leçons de l'inattendu, 2013, Hermann (in French).
3. Anders, G., Obsolescence of Manhood 2 (Trans.) Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen 2. Über die Zerstörung des Lebens im Zeitalter der dritten industriellen Revolution”, 1980, C. H. Beck, Munich (in German).
4. Anders, G., The Battle of Cherries : Dialogue with Hannah Arendt (Trans.) Die Kirschenschlacht. Dialoge mit Hannah Arendt, 2012, C. H. Beck, Munich (in German).
5. Aven, T., On the critique of Beck's view on risk and risk analysis. Saf. Sci. 50 (2012), 1043–1048.
6. Catellin, S., Abduction : a Practise in Science and in Literature (Trans.) L'abduction : une pratique de la découverte scientifique et littéraire, 2004, Hermès (in french).
7. Catellin, S., Serendipity : from Tales to Concepts (Trans.) Sérendipité : du conte au concept, 2014, Le Seuil (in French).
8. Chalmers, A., What Is the Thing Called Science ? an Assessment of the Nature and Status of Science and its Methods. 1982, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia.
9. Conner, C.D., A People's History of Science: Miners, Midwives and “low Mechanics”. 2005, Nation Books, New York.
10. Downer, J., 737-Cabriolet: The Limits of Knowledge and the Sociology of Inevitable Failure. Am. J. Sociol. 117 (2011), 725–762.
11. Ginzburg, C., Signs, Traces and Tracks : Roots of a Paradigm of the Clue (Trans.) Signes, traces, pistes. Racines d'un paradigme de l'indice, 1980 Le Débat, no 6, nov (in French).
12. Hopkins, A., Disastrous Decisions: the Human and Organisational Causes of the Gulf of Mexico Blowout. 2012, CCH, Sydney, NSW.
13. Ishimatsu, T., Leveson, N., Thomas, J., Katashira, M., Miyamoto, Y., Nakao, H., Modeling and Hazard Analysis Using Stpa. Proceedings of the 4th IAASS Conference, May 2010, Hunstville, Alabama, USA, 2010.
14. Jacob, F., The Mouse, the Man and the Fly (Trans.) La souris, l'homme et la mouche, 2000, Odile Jacob (in french).
15. Kuhn, T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 1970, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. Lannoy, A., Limits, Shortcomings and Benefits from Present Probabilitic Approaches (Trans.) Limites, insuffisances et apports des approches probabilistes actuelles : quelles leçons tirer?, 2015 IMdR Les entretiens du risques 2015 (in french).
17. Le Coze, J.C., Towards a constructivist program is safety. Saf. Sci. 50 (2012), 1873–1887.
18. Le Coze, J.C., Managing the unexpected. Handbook of Safety Principles, 2016, Forthcoming.
19. Mannan, S., Lees’ Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. fourth ed., 2012, Elsevier ISBN 978-0-12-397210-1.
20. McCoy, S.A., Wakeman, S.J., Larkin, F.D., Jefferson, M.L., Chung, P.W.H., Rushton, A.G., Lees, F.P., Heino, P.M., HAZID, a computer air for hazard identification. Trans. IChemE 77:Part B (1999), 317–327.
21. Paltrinieri, N., Tugnoli, A., Buston, J., Wardmann, M., Cozzani, V., Dynamic procedure for atypical scenarios identification (DyPASI): a new systematic HAZID tool. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind 26 (2013), 683–695.
22. Perrow, C., Normal Accidents: Living with High-risk Technologies. 1984, Basic Books, New York.
23. Pierce, C.S., Deduction, Induction, and Hypothesis. Popular Sci. Mon.(13), 1878, 470–482.
24. Popper, K., The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Trans.) Logik der Forschung, 1936 (in German).
25. Regazzoni, D., Russo, D., TRIZ tools to enhance risk management. Procedia Eng. 9 (2011), 40–51.
26. Rossing, N.L., Lind, M., Jensen, N., Jorgensen, S.B., A functional HAZOP methodology. Comput. Chem. Eng. 34 (2010), 244–253.
27. Russel, B., The Problems of Philosophy. 1912, Oxford Univesity Press, London.
28. Tierney, K., Risk analysis and their social dimensions (Trans.) L'analyse des risques et leurs dimensions sociales Télescope 16:2 (2010), 93–114 (in French).
29. Toulmin, S., Cosmopolis. The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. 1989, The university of Chicago press.
30. Toulmin, S., The Return to Reason. 2003, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
31. Turner, B., Man-made Disasters. The Failure of Foresight, 1978, Butterman-Heiworth.
32. Turner, B., Pidgeon, N., Man-made Disasters. second ed. The Failure of Foresight, 1997.
33. Vinnem, J.E., third ed. Offshore Risk Assessment, vol. 2, 2014, Springer-Verlag ISBN 978-1-4471-5212-5.
34. Voltaire, Zadig. 1747 classical french literature.
35. Walpole H., Letter to Horace Mann, January, 28th, 1754.
36. Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., Managing the Unexpected. Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. second ed., 2007, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA.