The Application of Bow-Tie Method in Hydrogen Sulfide Risk Management Using Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA)

Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 291-303

  Yazdi, Mohammad ^a  

^a EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bow tie model; LOPA; Reliability; Risk assessment; Safety integrity

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; INJECTION (OIL WELLS); OIL WELL FLOODING; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SECURITY SYSTEMS;

BOW TIE; INTELLIGENT SAFETY SYSTEM; LAYER OF PROTECTION ANALYSIS; LOPA; PROBABILITY OF FAILURE ON DEMAND; RELIABILITY BLOCK DIAGRAMS; SAFETY INTEGRITY; SAFETY INTEGRITY LEVELS;

SAFETY ENGINEERING;

EID: 85014106981     PISSN: 15477029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11668-017-0247-x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. V.M. Trbojevic, Optimising hazard management by workforce engagement and supervision (Heal. Saf. Exec. UK Res, Rep, 2008), p. 92
2. A. Shahriar, R. Sadiq, S. Tesfamariam, Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: a sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis. J. Loss Prevent Proc. 25, 505–523 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.007
3. M. Yazdi, F. Nikfar, M. Nasrabadi, Failure probability analysis by employing fuzzy fault tree analysis. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 1–17 (2017). doi:10.1007/s13198-017-0583-y
4. F.R. Chevreau, J.L. Wybo, D. Cauchois, Organizing learning processes on risks by using the bow-tie representation. J. Hazard. Mater. 130, 276–283 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.018
5. A.S. Markowski, A. Kotynia, “Bow-tie” model in layer of protection analysis. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 89, 205–213 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.psep.2011.04.005
6. A. Targoutzidis, Incorporating human factors into a simplified “bow-tie” approach for workplace risk assessment. Saf. Sci. 48, 145–156 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.07.005
7. V. De Dianous, C. Fiévez, ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. J. Hazard. Mater. 130, 220–233 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.010
8. J. Moestedt, E. Nordell, S. Hallin, A. Schnürer, Two-stage anaerobic digestion for reduced hydrogen sulphide production. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 91(4), 1055–1062 (2015). doi:10.1002/jctb.4682
9. D.C. Fuller, A.J. Suruda, Occupationally related hydrogen sulfide deaths in the United States from 1984 to 1994. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 42, 939–942 (2000)
10. T.A. Kletz, Learning from Accidents (Gulf Professional, Amsterdam, 2001)
11. T.A. Kletz, What Went Wrong?: Case Histories of Process Plant Disasters and How They Could Have Been Avoided (Gulf Professional Pub, Amsterdam, 2009)
12. F. Aqlan, E. Mustafa Ali, Integrating lean principles and fuzzy bow-tie analysis for risk assessment in chemical industry. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 29, 39–48 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2014.01.006
13. J. Ahn, D. Chang, Fuzzy-based HAZOP study for process industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 317, 303–311 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.096
14. Y. Duan, J. Zhao, J. Chen, G. Bai, A risk matrix analysis method based on potential risk influence: a case study on cryogenic liquid hydrogen filling system. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 102, 277–287 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.psep.2016.03.022
15. F. Redmill, An introduction to the safety standard IEC 61508. Hazard Prev. 35, 20–25 (1999)
16. A. de Ruijter, F. Guldenmund, The bowtie method: a review. Saf. Sci. 88, 211–218 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.001
17. British Petroleum Company (IP), Area Classification Code For Petroleum Installation: Model Code for Safety Practice, Part 15 (The Energy Institute, London, 1992)
18. TOTAL, C., Dorood project onshore facilities& new plant: safety concept. Kharg Island (2004)
19. E. Munkeby, Effect of safe failures on the reliability of safety instrumented systems. Masters of science thesis,. Dep. Prod. Qual. Eng. Nor. Univ. Sci. Technol. 7491 Trondheim, Norw (2008)
20. BS IEC 61511-1, Functional Safety-Instrument Systems For The Process Industry Sector- Part 1 Frame Work, Difinition, System, Hard Ware And Software Requirments. Br. Stand. Inst. ERC Specs Stand (2003)
21. TOTAL, C., Safety general specification: emergency shut-dow and emergency de-pressurisation (ESD&EPD). France (2005)
22. OREDA, OREDA: offshore Reliability Data Handbook, OREDA Participants, 4th edn. (DET Norske Veritas, Hovik, 2002)
23. ISA-TR84, Safety instrumented function(SIF)- safety integrity level (SIL) evaluation techniques part 2—determining the SIL Of a SIF via simplified equations. North Carolina (2002)
24. ISA-TR84-Part3, Safety instrumented function(SIF)- safety integrity level (SIL) evaluation techniques part 3—determinating the SIL of SIF via fault tree Analysis. North Carolina (2002)
25. F.R. Chevreau, J.L. Wybo, D. Cauchois, Organizing learning processes on risks by using the bow-tie representation. J. Hazard. Mater. 130, 276–283 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.018
26. P.H. Stevens, Reliability, Maintainability and Risk. Practical Methods for Engineers (4th edition), Manufacturing Engineer. (1993). doi:10.1049/me:19930116