Risk Assessment using Bayesian Belief Networks and Analytic Hierarchy Process applicable to Jet Engine High Pressure Turbine Assembly

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Volumn 49, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 133-138

  Pereira, J C ^a   Fragoso, M D ^a   Todorov, M G ^a  

^a LABORATÓRIO NACIONAL DE COMPUTAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process; Bayesian Belief Network; HPT rotor assembly; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; JET ENGINES; MANUFACTURE; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; SOFTWARE RELIABILITY;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); CRITICAL FAILURES; HIGH PRESSURE TURBINE; OPERATION FAILURE; OPERATION RELIABILITY; PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE; QUALITY AND SAFETIES; ROTOR ASSEMBLY;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84992392044     PISSN: None     EISSN: 24058963     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.563     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Calixto, E., Lima, G.B.A., Firmino, P.R.A., Comparing SLIM, SPAR-H and Bayesian Network Methodologies. Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology 3 (2013), 31–41.
2. Droguett, E.L., Groen, F., Mosleh, A., The combined use of data and expert estimates in population variability analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 83 (2004), 311–321.
3. Dong, Q., Saaty, T.L., An analytic hierarchy process model of group consensus. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 23:3 (2014), 362–374.
4. Groth, K.M., Swiler, L.P., Bridging the gap between HRA research and HRA practice: A Bayesian network version of SPAR-H. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 115 (2013), 33–42.
5. Iberraken, F., Medjoudj, R., Aissani, D. (2013). Decision Making on Smart Grids Projects Moving using AHP Method: The case of Algerian Network. IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management, and Control, 543-548.
6. Mls, K., Otcenaskova, T., Analysis of Complex Decisional Situations in Companies with the Support of AHP Extension of Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model. IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management, and Control, 2013, 549–554.
7. Mahadevan, S., Zhang, R., Smith, N., Bayesian networks for system reliability reassessment. Structural Safety 23:3 (2001), 231–251.
8. Mishra, P.K., Shekhar, B.R., Evaluating supply chain risk in Indian dairy industry: a case study. Int. J. Decision Sciences, Risk and Management 4:1/2 (2012), 77–91.
9. Mosleh, A., Apostolakis, G., The assessment of probability distributions from expert opinions with an application to seismic fragility curves. Risk Analysis 6:4 (1986), 447–461.
10. Mosleh, A., Bayesian modeling of expert-to-expert variability and dependence in estimating rare event frequencies. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 38 (1992), 47–57.
11. Pereira, J.C., Lima, G.B.A., Santanna, A.P., Simões, S., Pizzolato, N., Causal model for probabilistic risk analysis of jet engine failure in manufacturing situational operation. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology (IJESIT) 3:3 (2014), 701–717.
12. Pereira, J. C. (2014b). Causal model for probabilistic risk analysis of jet engine failure in manufacturing situational operation (CAPEMO). Doctorate Thesis – UFF-Brazil.
13. Podofillini, L., Dang, V.N., A Bayesian approach to treat expert-elicited probabilities in human reliability analysis model construction. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 117 (2013), 52–64.
14. Rechenthin, D., Project safety as a sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Safety Research 35 (2004), 297–308.
15. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1980, McGraw Hill, New York.
16. Saaty, T.L., Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Manage. Sci. 32:7 (1986), 841–855.
17. Saaty, T.L., How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24:6 (1994), 19–43.