Application of dynamic Bayesian network to risk analysis of domino effects in chemical infrastructures

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 138, Issue , 2015, Pages 263-272

  Khakzad, Nima ^a  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chemical infrastructure; Domino effect; Dynamic Bayesian network; Influence diagram; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; CHAINS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; FUEL STORAGE; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CHEMICAL INFRASTRUCTURE; DOMINO EFFECTS; DYNAMIC BAYESIAN NETWORKS; FIRE AND EXPLOSION; INFLUENCE DIAGRAM; SPATIAL EVOLUTION; TEMPORAL EVOLUTION; TIME-DEPENDENT PROCESS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84924061046     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. G. Reniers, and V. Cozzani Domino effects in the process industries: modeling, prevention and managing 2013 Elsevier
2. The guardian. (©http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/jun/18/buncefield-fire-oil-company-guilty); 2010 (last checked on 10-10-2014).
3. D.F. Bagster, and R.M. Pitblado The estimation of domino incident frequencies - an approach Process Saf Environ Prot 69 1991 195 199
4. Delvosalle C., Domino effects phenomena: definition overview and classification. In: Proceedings of the European seminar on domino effects, Leuven, Belgium; 1996.
5. Gledhill J. Lines I. Development of methods to assess the significance of domino effects from major hazard sites. CR Report 183, Sudbury, UK: Health and Safety Executive; 1998.
6. F. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi Models for domino analysis in chemical process industries Process Saf Prog 17 1998 107 123
7. V. Cozzani, and E. Salzano The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure, Part I. Probit models J Hazard Mater A107 2004 67 80
8. V. Cozzani, G. Gubinelli, G. Antonioni, G. Spadoni, and S. Zanelli The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis J Hazard Mater A127 2005 14 30
9. V. Cozzani, G. Gubinelli, and E. Salzano Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events J Hazard Mater 129 2006 1 21
10. G. Reniers, and W. Dullaert DomPrevPlanning: user-friendly software for planning domino effects prevention Saf Sci 45 2007 1060 1081
11. G. Reniers, and W. Dullaert Knock-on accident prevention in a chemical cluster Expert Syst Appl 34 1 2008 42 49
12. G. Reniers, W. Dullaert, and K. Soudan Domino effects within a chemical cluster: a game-theoretical modeling approach by using Nash-equilibrium J Hazard Mater 167 2009 289 293
13. Q.B. Nguyen, A. Mebarki, R. Ami Saada, and M. Reimeringer Integrated probabilistic framework for domino effect and risk analysis J Adv Eng Software 40 2009 892 901
14. G. Landucci, G. Gubinelli, G. Antonioni, and V. Cozzani The assessment of the damage probability of storage tanks in domino events Accid Anal Prevent 41 2009 1206 1215
15. G. Reniers An external domino effects investment approach to improve cross-plant safety within chemical clusters J Hazard Mater 177 1-3 2010 167 174
16. B. Abdolhamidzadeh, T. Abbasi, D. Rashtchian, and S.A. Abbasi A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry J Hazard Mater 182 2010 416 426
17. R.M. Darbra, A. Palacios, and J. Casal Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences J Hazard Mater 183 2010 565 573
18. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, P. Amyotte, and V. Cozzani Domino effect analysis using Bayesian networks Risk Anal 33 2 2013 292 306
19. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, P. Amyotte, and V. Cozzani Risk management of domino effects considering dynamic consequence analysis Risk Anal 34 6 2014 1128 1138
20. A. López-Molinaa, R. Vázquez-Romána, S. Mannan, and G. Félix-Floresc An approach for domino effect reduction based on optimal layouts J Loss Prevent Process Ind 26 5 2013 887 894
21. E. Bernechea, and J. Arnaldos Optimizing the design of storage facilities through the application of ISD and QRA Process Saf Environ Prot 92 2014 598 615
22. R. Neapolitan Learning Bayesian networks 2003 Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA
23. M.J. Assael, and K.E. Kakosimos Fires, explosions, and toxic gas dispersions: effects calculation and risk analysis 2010 NW: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group
24. CCPS Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis 2nd ed. 2000 AIChE New York, NY
25. C.J.H. Van Den Bosh, and R.A.M.P. Weterings Methods for the calculation of physical effects (yellow book) 1997 Committee for the Prevention of Disasters The Hague, NL
26. J. Pearl Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems 1988 Morgan Kaufmann San Francisco, CA
27. F.V. Jensen, and T.D. Nielsen Bayesian networks and decision graphs 2nd ed. 2007 Springer New York, NY
28. D. Marquez, M. Neil, and N. Fenton Improved reliability modeling using Bayesian networks and dynamic discretization Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95 2010 412 425
29. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches Reliab Eng Syst Saf 196 2011 925 932
30. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network Process Saf Environ Prot 91 1-2 2013 46 53
31. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Risk-based design of process systems using discrete-time Bayesian networks Reliab Eng Syst Saf 109 2013 5 17
32. D.B. Matellini, A.D. Wall, I.D. Jenkinson, J. Wang, and R. Pritchard Modelling dwelling fire development and occupancy escape using Bayesian network Reliab Eng Syst Saf 114 2013 75 91
33. H. Pasman, and W. Rogers Bayesian networks make LOPA more effective, QRA more transparent and flexible, and thus safety more definable! J Loss Prevent Process Ind 26 3 2013 434 442
34. P. Weber, G. Medina-Oliva, C. Simon, and B. Iung Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas Eng Appl Artif Intell 25 4 2012 671 682
35. S. Montani, L. Portinale, A. Bobbio, and D. Codetta-Raiteri RADYBAN: a tool for reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees through conversion into dynamic Bayesian networks Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93 2008 922 932
36. P. Weber, and L. Jouffe Complex system reliability modelling with dynamic object oriented Bayesian networks (DOOBN) Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 2 2006 149 162
37. T. Kohda, and W. Cui Risk-based reconfiguration of safety monitoring system using dynamic Bayesian network Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 12 2007 1716 1723
38. L. Portinale, D. Codetta-Raiteri, and S. Montani Supporting reliability engineers in exploiting the power of dynamic Bayesian networks Int J Approximate Reasoning 51 2 2010 179 195
39. D. Codetta-Raiteri, A. Bobbio, S. Montani, and L. Portinale A dynamic Bayesian network based framework to evaluate cascading effects in a power grid Eng Appl Artif Intell 25 4 2012 683 697
40. C.E. Ebeling An introduction to reliability and maintainability engineering 2nd ed. 1997 McGraw Hill New Delhi
41. US Environmental Protection Agency, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. ALOHA user manual. Available at: ; 2014 (accessed on 21 June 2014).
42. GeNie. Decision Systems Laboratory, University of Pittsburg. Available at: http://www.genie.sis.pitt.edu>.