A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: A case study for aluminum industry

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 40, Issue , 2016, Pages 89-100

  Gul, Muhammet ^a,b   Guneri, Ali Fuat ^a  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b TUNCELI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Aluminum industry; DMRA technique; Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy TOPSIS; OHS risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; ALUMINUM PLANTS; DECISION MAKING; HAZARDS; HEALTH RISKS; INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE;

ALUMINUM INDUSTRY; DMRA TECHNIQUE; FUZZY AHP; FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; FUZZY TOPSIS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY; RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES; TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTIONS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84950244347     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.023     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Amaral T.M., Costa A.P. Improving decision-making and management of hospital resources: an application of the PROMETHEE II method in an emergency department. Oper. Res. Health Care 2014, 3(1):1-6.
2. Barnes M. Risk Assessment Workbook for Mines. Metalliferous, Extractive and Opal Mines, and Quarries, Mine Safety Operations, [IGA-019 (TRIM: OUT09/16488)] 2009.
3. Buckley J.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1985, 17(3):233-247.
4. Celik E., Gul M., Gumus A.T., Guneri A.F. A fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on trapezoidal numbers to material selection problem. J. Inf. Technol. Appl. Manag. 2012, 19(3):19-30.
5. Ceylan H., Başhelvaci V.S. Risk analysis with risk assessment matrix method: an application. Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev. 2011, 3(2):25-33. (In Turkish).
6. Chan H.K., Wang X. Fuzzy extent analysis for food risk assessment. Fuzzy Hierarchical Model for Risk Assessment 2013, 89-114. Springer, London.
7. Chang D.Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1996, 95(3):649-655.
8. Chen C. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2000, 114:1-9.
9. Ebrahimnejad S., Mousavi S.M., Seyrafianpour H. Risk identification and assessment for build-operate-transfer projects: a fuzzy multi attribute decision making model. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37(1):575-586.
10. Grassi A., Gamberini R., Mora C., Rimini B. A fuzzy multi-attribute model for risk evaluation in workplaces. Saf. Sci. 2009, 47(5):707-716.
11. Gül M., Çelik E., Güneri A.F., Gümüş A.T. Simulation with integrated multi criteria decision making: an application of scenario selection for a hospital emergency department. Istanb. Commer. Univ. J. Sci. 2012, 11(22):1-18. (In Turkish).
12. Guneri A.F., Gul M. Prioritization of risk evaluation methods for occupational safety with fuzzy multi criteria decision making. 26th European Conference on Operational Research, 1-4 July, Rome, Italy 2013.
13. Guneri A.F., Gul M., Ozgurler S. A fuzzy AHP methodology for selection of risk assessment methods in occupational safety. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manag. 2015, 18(3-4):319-335.
14. Hu A.H., Hsu C.W., Kuo T.C., Wu W.C. Risk evaluation of green components to hazardous substance using FMEA and FAHP. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36(3):7142-7147.
15. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, A State of the Art Survey 1981, Sprinnger-Verlag, New York, NY.
16. John A., Paraskevadakis D., Bury A., Yang Z., Riahi R., Wang J. An integrated fuzzy risk assessment for seaport operations. Saf. Sci. 2014, 68:180-194.
17. Kang J., Liang W., Zhang L., Lu Z., Liu D., Yin W., Zhang G. A new risk evaluation method for oil storage tank zones based on the theory of two types of hazards. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2014, 29:267-276.
18. Karsak E.E., Dursun M. An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier evaluation and selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2015, 82:82-93.
19. Kutlu A.C., Ekmekçioğlu M. Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39(1):61-67.
20. Liu H.T., Tsai Y.L. A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50(4):1067-1078.
21. Mahdevari S., Shahriar K., Esfahanipour A. Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 488:85-99.
22. Main B.W. Risk assessment: a review of the fundamental principles. Prof. Saf. 2012, 49(12):37-47.
23. Marhavilas P.K., Koulouriotis D.E. A risk-estimation methodological framework using quantitative assessment techniques and real accidents' data: application in an aluminum extrusion industry. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2008, 21(6):596-603.
24. Marhavilas P.K., Koulouriotis D., Gemeni V. Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: on a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000-2009. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2011, 24(5):477-523.
25. Önder S., Suner N., Önder M. Investigation of occupational accident occurred at mining sector by using risk assessment decision matrix. 22nd International Mining Congress and Exhibition of Turkey, 11-13 May 2011, Ankara 2011, 399-406.
26. Pinto A., Nunes I.L., Ribeiro R.A. Occupational risk assessment in construction industry-overview and reflection. Saf. Sci. 2011, 49(5):616-624.
27. Rausand M. Risk Assessment: Theory, Methods, and Applications 2013, vol. 115. John Wiley & Sons.
28. Reniers G.L.L., Dullaert W., Ale B.J.M., Soudan K. Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2005, 18(3):127-138.
29. Tixier J., Dusserre G., Salvi O., Gaston D. Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2002, 15(4):291-303.
30. Tzeng G.H., Huang J.J. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications 2011, CRC Press.
31. Wesdock J.C., Arnold I.M. Occupational and environmental health in the aluminum industry: key points for health practitioners. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2014, 56(5 Suppl.):S5.