Risk assessment and land-use planning regulations in France following the AZF disaster

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 813-823

  Taveau, Jérôme ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE RADIOPROTECTION ET DE SÛRETÉ NUCLÉAIRE IRSN   (France)

Author keywords

AZF; Failure rates; Land use planning; Probabilistic safety assessment; Purple Book; Quantitative risk assessment (QRA); Risk analysis; Risk assessment; Semi quantitative risk assessment

Indexed keywords

AZF; FAILURE RATE; LAND-USE PLANNING; PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT; PURPLE BOOK; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; SEMI-QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; LAND USE; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RISK ANALYSIS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 78649759160     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. AMINAL Handboek kanscijfers voor het opstellen van een veiligheidsrapport 2004, Co-ordinated Version 2.0, AMINAL Dienst gevaarlijke stoffen en risicobeheer, Brussels.
2. ARIA Explosion in a fertilizer plant. September 21st, 2001. Grande Paroisse Toulouse 2007, http://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr.
3. Baltenneck H., Barrachin G., Chambon J.-L., Corenwinder F., Gomane C., Hernandez J.L., et al. Etude Probabiliste de Sûreté relative à une Installation Industrielle, rapport final de la phase 2, tome 1 2005, Rapport DSR/SESPRI n°33, rapport EPS_ININ/PH2/04.
4. Barthélémy F., Hornus H., Roussot J., Hufschmitt J.-P., Raffoux J.-F. Usine de la société Grande Paroisse à Toulouse. Accident du 21 septembre 2001 2001, Rapport de l'Inspection Générale de l'Environnement.
5. Beerens H.I., Post J.G., Uit de Haag P.A.M. The use of generic failure frequencies in QRA: the quality and use of failure frequencies and how to bring them up-to-date. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2006, 130(3):265-270.
6. Blything K.W., Reeves A.B. An initial prediction of the BLEVE frequency of a 100 TE butane storage vessel 1988, UKAEA/SRD/HSE/R488.
7. Center for Chemical Process Safety Guidelines for process equipment reliability data 1989, American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
8. COVO Commission Risk analysis of six potentially hazardous industrial objects in the Rijnmond area, a pilot study. A report to the Rijnmond Public Authority 1981, Central Environmental Control Agency, Schiedam, The Netherlands.
9. Duijm N.J. Safety barriers diagrams as a safety management tool. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2009, 94(2):332-341.
10. Fiévez, C., Delvosalle, C., Cornil, N., Katz, T., Servranckx, L., & Tambour, F. (2009). Influence of new generic frequencies on the QRA calculations for land use planning purposes in Walloon Region (Belgium). In Eighth World Congress of Chemical Engineering, Symposium on the frequency component used in risk assessment of major industrial accidents, 23-27 August 2009, Montreal.
11. French Ministry of the Environment Décret n°2005-1130 du 7 septembre 2005 relatif aux plans de prévention des risques technologiques 2005.
12. French Ministry of the Environment Arrêté du 29 septembre 2005 relatif à l'évaluation et à la prise en compte de la probabilité d'occurrence, de la cinétique, de l'intensité des effets et de la gravité des conséquences des accidents potentiels dans les études de dangers des installations classées soumises à autorisation 2005.
13. French Ministry of the Environment Arrêté du 29 septembre 2005 modifiant l'arrêté du 10 mai 2000 modifié relatif à la prévention des accidents majeurs impliquant des substances ou des préparations dangereuses présentes dans certaines catégories d'installations classées pour la protection de l'environnement soumises à autorisation 2005.
14. French Ministry of the Environment Circulaire du 29 septembre 2005 relative aux critères d'appréciation de la démarche de maîtrise des risques d'accidents susceptibles de survenir dans les établissements dits « SEVESO », visés par l'arrêté du 10 mai 2000 modifié 2005.
15. French Ministry of the Environment Circulaire relative à la mise en œuvre des plans de prévention des risques technologiques 2005.
16. French Ministry of the Environment Guide d'élaboration et de lecture des études de dangers pour les établissements soumis à autorisation avec servitudes et fiches d'application et fiches associées 2006.
17. French Ministry of the Environment Technological risk prevention plan (PPRT) acting together to control risks 2006.
18. French Ministry of the Environment Circulaire du 23 juillet 2007 relative à l'évaluation des risques et des distances d'effets autour des dépôts de liquides inflammables et des dépôts de gaz inflammables liquéfiés 2007.
19. French Parliament Loi n°2003-699 du 30 juillet 2003 relative à la prévention des risques technologiques et naturels et à la réparation des dommages 2003.
20. Fullwood R.R. Probability safety assessment in the chemical and nuclear industries 2000, Butterworth-Heinemann.
21. Gould J. Fault tree analysis of the catastrophic failure of bulk chlorine vessels 1993, AEA Technology, SRD/HSE R603.
22. Gould J., Anderson M. Hose and coupling failure rates and the role of human error - Catastrophic failure rates 2000, Health and Safety Laboratory, HSL/2000/09.
23. Hannaman G.W., Spurgin A.J. Systematic human action reliability procedure (SHARP) 1984, Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI NP-3583.
24. Harding A.B. BLEVE probability of an LPG road tanker during unloading 1995, AEA/CS/HSE R1043.
25. Health and Safety Laboratory. Failure rates and event data. http://www.failurerates.info.
26. IPO Guidelines for the preparation of off-site safety industrial sites 1994, Report IPO Project A-73, The Hague.
27. Keeley D., Wilday J. Hose or coupling failure events during off-loading a chlorine road tanker 2000, Final report, Health and Safety Laboratory, RAS/00/11.
28. Keeley D., Collins A. Hose and coupling: Less than catastrophic failure rates - Milestone 2 2004, Health and Safety Laboratory, RAS/04/03/1.
29. Lees F.P. Loss prevention in the process industries 2005, Butterworth-Heinemann.
30. LNE Handboek faalfrequenties 2009 voor het opstellen van een veiligheidsrapport 2009.
31. Logtenberg M.T. Derivation of failure frequencies for LOC cases 1998, TNO report, TNO-MEP - R98/501.
32. Nussey C. Failure frequencies for major failures of high pressure storage vessels at COMAH sites: A comparison of data used by HSE and the Netherlands 2006, Health and Safety Executive.
33. Pitlabo, R., Bain, B., Falck, A., Litland, K., & Spitzenberger, C. (2009). Frequency data and modification factors used in international QRA studies. In Eighth World Congress of Chemical Engineering, Symposium on the frequency component used in risk assessment of major industrial accidents, 23-27 August 2009, Montreal.
34. Ramsden, N. (1997). The LASTFIRE project. Loss Prevention Bulletin, 138.
35. Rasmussen N. Reactor safety study 1975, WASH 1400, US Atomic Energy Commission.
36. RE-95-1 (1996). Version 2-2-1996, KO-95, KO-96, KO-100 performed by TKO Working Group.
37. 3 butane sphere on a refinery site 1988, UKAEA/SRD/HSE/R492.
38. SINTEF Offshore reliability data Handbook 2002, 4th ed.
39. Smith, T. A., & Warwick, R. G. (1981). A survey of defects in pressure vessels in the UK for the period 1962-1978 and its relevance to nuclear primary circuits. SRD report R203.
40. Spouge J. New generic leak frequencies for process equipment. Process Safety Progress 2005, 24(4):249-257.
41. Swain A.D., Guttmann H.E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant application 1983, US-NRC-NUREG/CR-1278.
42. Taylor J.R. Hazardous materials release and accident frequencies for process plant 2004, Draft version.
43. TNO LPG a study 1983, Report for the Public Ministry of Housing Physical Planning and the Environment, TNO, Apeldoorn.
44. Uijt De Haag P.A.M., Ale B.J.M. Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment (purple book) 1999.
45. Wincek J.C., Haight J. Realistic human error rates for process hazard analyses. Process Safety Progress 2007, 26(2):95-100.