Fuzzy Bayesian network-bow-tie analysis of gas leakage during biomass gasification

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2016, Pages

  Yan, Fang ^a   Xu, Kaili ^a   Yao, Xiwen ^a   Li, Yang ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN NETWORK; BIOMASS; DECISION MAKING; GASIFICATION; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; THEORETICAL STUDY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ALGORITHM; BAYES THEOREM; CHEMICAL ACCIDENT; FUZZY LOGIC; GAS; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; RENEWABLE ENERGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

GAS;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; BIOMASS; CHEMICAL HAZARD RELEASE; FUZZY LOGIC; GASES; RENEWABLE ENERGY;

EID: 85017382303     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160045     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Demirbas A. Biomass gasification for power generation in Turkey. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environment Effects. 2006; 28(5): 433–45. doi: 10.1080/009083190913584
2. Christoforou EA, Fokaides PA. A review of quantification practices for plant-derived biomass potential. International Journal of Green Energy. 2015; 12(4): 368–378. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2014.880147
3. Cherni JA, Kentish J. Renewable energy policy and electricity market reforms in China. Energy Policy. 2007; 35: 3616–3629. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.024
4. Zhang O, Yu SK, Liu PK. Development mode for renewable energy power in China: Electricity pool and distributed generation units. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015; 44: 657–668. doi: 10. 1016/j.rser.2015.01.020
5. Flamos A, Georgallis PG, Doukas H, Psarras J. Using biomass to achieve European Union energy targets-a review of biomass status, potential, and supporting policies. International Journal of Green Energy. 2011; 8(4): 411–428. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2011.576292
6. Sam C, Aira H, Reeli K, Sanna S, Dalia S, Arta D. Progress in renewable electricity in Northern Europe towards EU 2020 targets. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015; 52: 1768–1780. doi: 10. 1016/j.rser.2015.07.165
7. Petinrin JO, Mohamed S. Renewable energy for continuous energy sustainability in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015; 50: 967–981. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.146
8. Sharma S, Sheth PN. Air-steam biomass gasification: Experiments, modeling and simulation. Energy Conversion and Management. 2016; 110: 307–318. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.12.030
9. Ogunkoya D, Fang TG. Engine performance, combustion, and emissions study of biomass to liquid fuel in a compression-ignition engine. Energy Conversion and Management. 2015; 95: 342–351. doi: 10. 1016/j.enconman.2015.02.041
10. Gao XY, Zhang YN, Li BX, Yu XY. Model development for biomass gasification in an entrained flow gasifier using intrinsic reaction rate submodel. Energy Conversion and Management. 2016; 108: 120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.10.070
11. Cao GL, Zhang XY, Wang YQ, Zheng FC. Estimation of emissions from field burning of crop straw in China. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2007; 53 (5): 784–790. doi: 10.1007/s11434-008-0145-4
12. Sreejith CC, Muraleedharan C, Arun P. Thermo-chemical analysis of biomass gasification by Gibbs free energy minimization model-part: II (optimization of biomass feed and steam to biomass ratio). International Journal of Green Energy. 2013; 10(6): 610–639. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2012.709203
13. Cummer KR, Brown RC. Ancillary equipment for biomass gasification. Biomass & Bioenergy. 2002; 23: 113–128. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00038-7
14. Lv XJ, Lu CH, Zhu XJ, Weng YW. Safety analysis of a solid oxide fuel/gas turbine hybrid system fueled with gasified biomass. Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology. 2015; 12(1): 1–6. doi: 10.1115/1. 4029084
15. de Dianous V, Fievez C. ARAMIS project: A more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2006; 130(3): 220–233. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.010 PMID: 16107301
16. Paolo C, Stefano P, Annamaria P. Baseline risk assessment tool: a comprehensive risk management tool for process safety. Process Safety Progress. 2011; 30(3): 251–260. doi: 10.1002/prs.10464
17. Chen QQ, Jia Q, Yuan ZW, Huang L. Environmental risk source management system for the petrochemical industry. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2014; 92: 251–260. doi: 10.1016/j. psep.2013.01.004
18. Mokhtari K, Ren J, Roberts C, Wang J. Application of a generic bow-tie based risk analysis framework on risk management of sea ports and offshore terminals. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2011; 192 (2): 465–475. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.035 PMID: 21705142
19. Lu LL, Liang W, Zhang LB, Zhang H, Lu Z, Shan JZ. A comprehensive risk evaluation method for natural gas pipelines by combining a risk matrix with a bow-tie model. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2015; 25: 124–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.04.029
20. Markowski A, Kotunia A. Bow-tie model in layer of protection analysis. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2011; 89(4): 205–213. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2011.04.005
21. Kaki A, Salo A, Talluri S. Disruptions in supply networks: A probabilistic risk assessment approach. Journal of Business Logistics. 2015; 36(3): 273–287. doi: 10.1111/jbl.12086
22. Badreddine A, Amor NB. A Bayesian approach to construct bow tie diagrams for risk evaluation. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2013; 91: 159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2012.03.005
23. Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2012; 104: 36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.003
24. Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2013; 91(1–2): 46–53. doi: 10.1016/ j.psep.2012.01.005
25. Majeed A, Khan F, Khakzad N. Risk-based safety analysis of well integrity operations. Safety Science. 2016; 84: 149–160. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.009
26. van der Borst M, Schoonakker H. An overview of PSA importance measures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2001; 72(3): 241–245. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00007-2
27. Orissa Renewable Energy Development Agency (OREDA). Offshore Reliability Data Handbook. 4th ed. Trondheim: OREDA; 2002.
28. Lopez RA, Saud Y, Vaez N. Assessment of the likelihood of exceeding the flare capacity of multiple LNG processing trains. Process Safety Progress. 2015; 34: 250–258. doi: 10.1002/prs.11719
29. Chen SM, Chen JH. Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different heights and different spreads. Expert Systems with Applications. 2009; 36(3): 6833–6842. doi: 10. 1016/j.eswa.2008.08.015
30. Chen SM, Sanguansat K. Analyzing fuzzy risk based on a new fuzzy ranking method between generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications. 2011; 38(3): 2163–2171. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa. 2010.08.002
31. Dubois D, Prade H. Ranking fuzzy numbers in the setting of possibility theory. Information Science. 1983; 30(3): 183–224. doi: 10.1016/0020-0255(83)90025-7
32. Chen SJ, Chen SM. Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2003; 11(1): 45–56. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2002.806316
33. Rodger JA. A fuzzy nearest neighbor neural network statistical model for predicting demand for natural gas and energy cost savings in public buildings. Expert Systems with Applications. 2014; 41(4): 1813–1829. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.080
34. Rodger JA. Application of a fuzzy feasibility Bayesian network probabilistic estimation of supply chain backorder aging, unfilled backorders, and customer wait time using stochastic simulation with Markov blankets. Expert Systems with Applications. 2014; 41(16): 7005–7022. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05. 012
35. Rodger JA, Pankaj P, Gonzalez SP. Decision making using a fuzzy induced linguistic ordered weighted averaging approach for evaluating risk in a supply chain. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2014; 70(1–4): 711–723. doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5311-4
36. Yager RR. Ranking fuzzy subsets over the unit interval. In Proceedings of 17th IEEE international conference on decision and control. San Diego, California. 1978; 1435–1437. org/10.1109/ CDC.1978.268154.
37. Onisawa T. An approach to human reliability in man-machine systems using error possibility. Fuzzy sets and system. 1988; 27: 87–103. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(88)90140-6
38. Ferdous R, Khan F, Sadiq R, Amyotte P, Veitch B. Handling and updating uncertain information in bow-tie analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2012; 25(1): 8–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp. 2011.06.018
39. Li PC, Chen GH, Dai LC, Zhang L. A fuzzy Bayesian network approach to improve the quantification of organizational influences in HRA frameworks. Safety Science. 2012; 50(7): 1569–1583. doi: 10.1016/j. ssci.2012.03.017
40. Ramzali N, Lavasani MRM, Ghodousi J. Safety barriers analysis of offshore drilling system by employing Fuzzy Event Tree Analysis. Safety Science. 2015; 78: 49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.004
41. Bardossy A, Duckstein L, Bogardi I. Combination of fuzzy numbers representing expert opinions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1993; 57(2): 173–181. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(93)90157-D
42. Hsu HM, Chen CT. Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1996; 79: 279–285. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00185-9
43. Lavasani SM, Ramzali N, Sabzalipour F, Akyuz E. Utilisation of fuzzy fault tree analysis (FFTA) for quantified risk analysis of leakage in abandoned oil and natural-gas wells. Ocean Engineering. 2015; 108: 729–737. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.008
44. Lin CT, Wang MJ. Hybrid fault tree analysis using fuzzy sets. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 1997; 58(3): 205–213. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00072-0
45. Liang DC, Liu D, Witold P, Hu P. Triangular fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2013; 54(8): 1087–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2013.03.014
46. Mahapatra GS. Intuitionistic fuzzy fault tree analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. International Mathematical Forum. 2010; 5: 1015–1024.