A risk matrix analysis method based on potential risk influence: A case study on cryogenic liquid hydrogen filling system

Process Safety and Environmental Protection

Volumn 102, Issue , 2016, Pages 277-287

  Duan, Yongsheng ^a   Zhao, Jiguang ^a   Chen, Jingpeng ^a   Bai, Guoyu ^a  

^a ACADEMY OF EQUIPMENT COMMAND AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Bayesian belief network; Fuzzy probability; Potential risk influence (PRI); Risk assessment; Risk matrix; Risk prioritization

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CRYOGENIC LIQUIDS; CRYOGENICS; LIQUEFIED GASES; PROBABILITY; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISKS;

BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORK MODELS; FAILURE PROBABILITY; FUZZY PROBABILITY; LIKELIHOOD OF FAILURES; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; POTENTIAL RISKS; RISK MATRIX; RISK PRIORITIZATION;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84963783648     PISSN: 09575820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2016.03.022     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. M.A. Abd Majid, R.K. Wassan, and A.A. Mokhtar Semi-quantitative risk assessment matrix for rotating equipment 1st International Materials, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering Conference, MIMEC 2013 December 4, 2013 to December 6, 2013 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Johor Bahru, Malaysia 647 651
2. H. Abdo, and J.M. Flaus A mixed fuzzy probabilistic approach for risk assessment of dynamic systems IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 2015 960 965
3. L. Anthony Cox Jr. What's wrong with risk matrices? Risk Anal. 28 2008 497 512
4. T. Aven Practical implications of the new risk perspectives Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 115 2013 136 145
5. T. Aven, and O. Renn On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain J. Risk Res. 12 2009 1 11
6. P. Baraldi, L. Podofillini, L. Mkrtchyan, E. Zio, and V.N. Dang Comparing the treatment of uncertainty in Bayesian networks and fuzzy expert systems used for a human reliability analysis application Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 138 2015 176 193
7. Y.S. Chang, J.U. Jeong, Y.J. Kim, S.S. Hwang, and H.P. Kim Enhancement of leak rate estimation model for corroded cracked thin tubes Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 87 2010 52 57
8. J. Chen, Z.-M. Li, S.-C. Tang, and G. Zhao Acquisition risk evaluation for weapon and equipment based on improved risk matrix method Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu Syst. Eng. Electron. 30 2008 1918 1923
9. N.J. Duijm Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices Saf. Sci. 76 2015 21 31
10. R. Ferdous, F. Khan, R. Sadiq, P. Amyotte, and B. Veitch Fault and event tree analyses for process systems risk analysis: uncertainty handling formulations Risk Anal. 31 2011 86 107
11. R. Flage, and W. Røed A reflection on some practices in the use of risk matrices 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 881 891
12. A. Ishikawa, M. Amagasa, T. Shiga, G. Tomizawa, R. Tatsuta, and H. Mieno The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration Fuzzy Sets Syst. 55 1993 241 253
13. J. Jin, S. Zhao, and B. Hu Defining the safety integrity level of public safety monitoring system based on the optimized three-dimension risk matrix Procedia Eng. 43 2012 119 124
14. F. Khan, S. Rathnayaka, and S. Ahmed Methods and models in process safety and risk management: past, present and future Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 98 2015 116 147
15. S.M. Lavasani, N. Ramzali, F. Sabzalipour, and E. Akyuz Utilisation of Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) for quantified risk analysis of leakage in abandoned oil and natural-gas wells Ocean Eng. 108 2015 729 737
16. S.M. Lavasani, A. Zendegani, and M. Celik An extension to Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) application in petrochemical process industry Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 93 2015 75 88
17. L. Lu, W. Liang, L. Zhang, H. Zhang, Z. Lu, and J. Shan A comprehensive risk evaluation method for natural gas pipelines by combining a risk matrix with a bow-tie model J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 25 2015 124 133
18. S. Mandal, and J. Maiti Risk analysis using FMEA: fuzzy similarity value and possibility theory based approach Expert Syst. Appl. 41 2014 3527 3537
19. A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, and E.K. Zavadskas Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications - two decades review from 1994 to 2014 Expert Syst. Appl. 42 2015 4126 4148
20. A.S. Markowski, and M.S. Mannan Fuzzy risk matrix J. Hazard. Mater. 159 2008 152 157
21. R. Mesiar Fuzzy set approach to the utility, preference relations, and aggregation operators Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176 2007 414 422
22. H. Ni, A. Chen, and N. Chen Some extensions on risk matrix approach Saf. Sci. 48 2010 1269 1278
23. T. Onisawa An application of fuzzy concepts to modelling of reliability analysis Fuzzy Sets Syst. 37 1990 267 286
24. J.H. Purba Fuzzy probability on reliability study of nuclear power plant probabilistic safety assessment: a review Prog. Nucl. Energy 76 2014 73 80
25. J.H. Purba, J. Lu, G. Zhang, and W. Pedrycz A fuzzy reliability assessment of basic events of fault trees through qualitative data processing Fuzzy Sets Syst. 243 2014 50 69
26. J.S. Rosenbloom Case Study in Risk Management 1972 Meredith Corp New York, United States 63 67
27. E. Ruijters, and M. Stoelinga Fault tree analysis: a survey of the state-of-the-art in modeling, analysis and tools Comput. Sci. Rev. 15-16 2015 29 62
28. L. Shi, J. Shuai, and K. Xu Fuzzy fault tree assessment based on improved AHP for fire and explosion accidents for steel oil storage tanks J. Hazard. Mater. 278 2014 529 538
29. USA, and D.O.D. MIL-STD-882D 2000 2 3
30. X. Wu, H. Liu, L. Zhang, M.J. Skibniewski, Q. Deng, and J. Teng A dynamic Bayesian network based approach to safety decision support in tunnel construction Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 134 2015 157 168
31. C.J. Yi, C.Y. Zheng, and Q.H. Fu Improvement and application of risk matrix 3rd International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Building Materials, CEABM 2013 May 24, 2013 to May 26, 2013 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Jinan, China 2650 2654