Pan evaporation prediction using a hybrid multilayer perceptron-firefly algorithm (MLP-FFA) model: case study in North Iran

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

Volumn 133, Issue 3-4, 2018, Pages 1119-1131

  Ghorbani, M A ^a,b   Deo, Ravinesh C ^c   Yaseen, Zaher Mundher ^d,e   H Kashani, Mahsa ^f   Mohammadi, Babak ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TABRIZ   (Iran)

^b NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ANBAR   (Iraq)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MOHAGHEGH ARDABILI   (Iran)

Author keywords

Firefly Algorithm; Forecasting; Hybrid model; Multilayer perceptron; Pan evaporation; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE; CLIMATE PREDICTION; INSTRUMENTATION; METEOROLOGY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

IRAN;

EID: 85027831982     PISSN: 0177798X     EISSN: 14344483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-017-2244-0     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abudu S, Cui C, King JP et al (2011) Modeling of daily pan evaporation using partial least squares regression. Sci China Technol Sci 54:163–174. doi:10.1007/s11431-010-4205-z
2. Al-Shammari ET, Mohammadi K, Keivani A et al (2016) Prediction of daily dewpoint temperature using a model combining the support vector machine with firefly algorithm. J Irrig Drain Eng. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001015
3. Bruton JM, McClendon RW, Hoogenboom G (2000) Estimating daily pan evaporation with artificial neural networks. Trans ASAE 43:491–496. doi:10.13031/2013.2730
4. Cekaite A (2016) A comparative study for estimation of wave height using traditional and hybrid soft-computing methods. Int J Comput Collab Learn 4:319–341. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9067-7
5. Ch S, Sohani SK, Kumar D et al (2014) A Support Vector Machine-Firefly Algorithm based forecasting model to determine malaria transmission. Neurocomputing 129:279–288. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2013.09.030
6. Chai T, Draxler RR (2014) Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?—arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci Model Dev 7:1247–1250. doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014
7. Deo RC, Şahin M (2015) Application of the artificial neural network model for prediction of monthly standardized precipitation and evapotranspiration index using hydrometeorological parameters and climate indices in eastern Australia. Atmos Res 161–162:65–81. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.03.018
8. Deo RC, Samui P (2017) Forecasting evaporative loss by least-square support-vector regression and evaluation with genetic programming, Gaussian process, and minimax probability machine regression: case study of Brisbane City. J Hydrol Eng 22:5017003. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001506
9. Deo RC, Samui P, Kim D (2015) Estimation of monthly evaporative loss using relevance vector machine, extreme learning machine and multivariate adaptive regression spline models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-015-1153-y
10. Dogan E, Gumrukcuoglu M, Sandalci M, Opan M (2010) Modelling of evaporation from the reservoir of Yuvacik dam using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23:961–967. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2010.03.007
11. Drucker H, Burges CJ, Kaufman L, Smola AJ, Vapnik V (1997) Support vector regression machines. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 155–161
12. Fahimi F, Yaseen ZM, El-shafie A (2017) Application of soft computing based hybrid models in hydrological variables modeling: a comprehensive review. Theor Appl Climatol 128 (3–4): 875 – 903
13. Ghorbani MA, Khatibi R, Hosseini B, Bilgili M (2013) Relative importance of parameters affecting wind speed prediction using artificial neural networks. Theor Appl Climatol 114:107–114. doi:10.1007/s00704-012-0821-9
14. Ghorbani MA, Zadeh HA, Isazadeh M, Terzi O (2016) A comparative study of artificial neural network (MLP, RBF) and support vector machine models for river flow prediction. Environ Earth Sci 75:1–14. doi:10.1007/s12665-015-5096-x
15. Ghorbani MA, Shamshirband S, Zare Haghi D et al (2017) Application of firefly algorithm-based support vector machines for prediction of field capacity and permanent wilting point. Soil Tillage Res 172:32–38. doi:10.1016/j.still.2017.04.009
16. Gleckler PJ, Taylor KE, Doutriaux C (2008) Performance metrics for climate models. J Geophys Res Atmos. doi:10.1029/2007JD008972
17. Gocić M, Motamedi S, Shamshirband S et al (2015) Soft computing approaches for forecasting reference evapotranspiration. Comput Electron Agric 113:164–173. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2015.02.010
18. Goyal MK, Bharti B, Quilty J et al (2014) Modeling of daily pan evaporation in sub tropical climates using ANN, LS-SVR, Fuzzy Logic, and ANFIS. Expert Syst Appl 41:5267–5276. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.047
19. Günay ME (2016) Forecasting annual gross electricity demand by artificial neural networks using predicted values of socio-economic indicators and climatic conditions: case of Turkey. Energy Policy 90:92–101. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.019
20. Hassanzadeh T, Faez K, Seyfi G (2012) A speech recognition system based on structure equivalent fuzzy neural network trained by firefly algorithm. In Biomedical Engineering (ICoBE), 2012 International Conference on (pp. 63–67). IEEE, Penang. doi:10.1109/ICoBE.2012.6178956
21. Heo K-Y, Ha K-J, Yun K-S et al (2013) Methods for uncertainty assessment of climate models and model predictions over East Asia. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.3692
22. Hong W-C (2009) Hybrid evolutionary algorithms in a SVR-based electric load forecasting model. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 31:409–417. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.03.020
23. Hsu C-W, Chang C-C, Lin C-J (2008) A practical guide to support vector classification. BJU Int 101:1396–1400. doi:10.1177/02632760022050997
24. Inc TM (2015) MATLAB (R2015a). MathWorks Inc
25. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Intergov Panel Clim Chang 446:727–728. doi:10.1038/446727a
26. Kaushik A, Tayal DK, Yadav K, Kaur A (2016) Integrating firefly algorithm in artificial neural network models for accurate software cost predictions. J Softw Evol Process 28:665–688. doi:10.1002/smr.1792
27. Kavousi-Fard A, Samet H, Marzbani F (2014) A new hybrid modified firefly algorithm and support vector regression model for accurate short term load forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 41:6047–6056. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.053
28. Kayarvizhy N, Kanmani S, Uthariaraj RV (2014) ANN models optimized using swarm intelligence algorithms. WSEAS Trans Comput 13:501–519
29. Keshtegar B, Piri J, Kisi O (2016) A nonlinear mathematical modeling of daily pan evaporation based on conjugate gradient method. Comput Electron Agric 127:120–130. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2016.05.018
30. Keskin ME, Terzi Ö, Taylan D (2009) Estimating daily pan evaporation using adaptive neural-based fuzzy inference system. Theor Appl Climatol 98:79–87. doi:10.1007/s00704-008-0092-7
31. Kişi Ö (2006) Daily pan evaporation modelling using a neuro-fuzzy computing technique. J Hydrol 329:636–646. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.03.015
32. Kisi O (2007) Evapotranspiration modelling from climatic data using a neural computing technique. Hydrol Process 21:1925–1934. doi:10.1002/hyp.6403
33. Kisi O, Genc O, Dinc S, Zounemat-Kermani M (2016) Daily pan evaporation modeling using chi-squared automatic interaction detector, neural networks, classification and regression tree. Comput Electron Agric 122:112–117. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2016.01.026
34. Lima AR, Cannon AJ, Hsieh WW (2016) Forecasting daily streamflow using online sequential extreme learning machines. J Hydrol 537:431–443. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.017
35. Lin HT, Lin CJ (2003) A study on sigmoid kernels for SVM and the training of non-PSD kernels by SMO-type methods. Neural Comput 1–32
36. Lukasik S, Zak S (2009) Firefly algorithm for continuous constrained optimization tasks. Firefly Algorithm Contin Constrained Optim Tasks 5796:97–106. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04441-0_8
37. Macfarlane C, Ogden GN (2012) An improved evaporation dome for forest environments. Comput Electron Agric 89:126–129. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2012.09.004
38. Mba L, Meukam P, Kemajou A (2016) Application of artificial neural network for predicting hourly indoor air temperature and relative humidity in modern building in humid region. Energy Build 121:32–42. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.046
39. McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE (1988) Explorations in parallel distributed processing: a handbook of models, programs, and exercises. Explor Parallel Distrib Process Handb Model Programs Exerc 344:ix, 344. doi:10.2307/1423065
40. Misra D, Oommen T, Agarwal A et al (2009) Application and analysis of support vector machine based simulation for runoff and sediment yield. Biosyst Eng 103:527–535. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.04.017
41. Moghaddamnia A, Ghafari Gousheh M, Piri J et al (2009) Evaporation estimation using artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system techniques. Adv Water Resour 32:88–97. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.10.005
42. Mohanty S, Jha MK, Raul SK et al (2015) Using artificial neural network approach for simultaneous forecasting of weekly groundwater levels at multiple sites. Water Resour Manag 29:5521–5532. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-1132-6
43. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
44. Soleymani SA, Goudarzi S, Anisi MH et al (2016) A novel method to water level prediction using RBF and FFA. Water Resour Manag:1–19. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1347-1
45. Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res Atmos 106:7183–7192. doi:10.1029/2000JD900719
46. Trajkovic S (2005) Temperature-based approaches for estimating reference evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng 131:316–323. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:4(316)
47. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York
48. Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (2005) Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim Res 30:79–82. doi:10.3354/cr030079
49. Willmott CJ, Robeson SM, Matsuura K (2012) A refined index of model performance. Int J Climatol 32:2088–2094. doi:10.1002/joc.2419
50. Yang X-S (2010) Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimization. Int J Bio-inspired Comput 2(2):78–84. doi:10.1504/IJBIC.2010.032124
51. Yaseen ZM, El-shafie A, Jaafar O et al (2015) Artificial intelligence based models for stream-flow forecasting: 2000–2015. J Hydrol 530:829–844. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.038
52. Yaseen ZM, Allawi MF, Yousif AA, Jaafar O, Hamzah FM, El-Shafie A (2016a) Non-tuned machine learning approach for hydrological time series forecasting. Neural Comput & Appl 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2763-0
53. Yaseen ZM, Jaafar O, Deo RC et al (2016b) Stream-flow forecasting using extreme learning machines: a case study in a semi-arid region in Iraq. J Hydrol. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.035
54. Yoon H, Jun SC, Hyun Y, Bae GO, & Lee KK (2011) A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer. JHydrol 396(1):128–138